|
|
| |
Topic: Who elected Obama? |
Who elected Obama?
American Thinker, by Paul Murphy
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 12/6/2012 8:20:52 AM
|
| Many Republicans seem ready to agree to Obama´s demands for tax increases -- after all, elections have consequences, and he won, right? Maybe, but before agreeing to anything, the GOP should probably look a little more carefully at just who elected Obama. Dr. Robert Vanderbei, a professor of Operations Research at Princeton, developed the visualization shown above by combining Democrat blue with GOP red according to popular vote proportions taken at the county level and printing the result as a 3D map in which apparent vertical height is a stand-in for the number of voters counted.
|
Comments: When you look at the map in the article it makes the win of 0bama even more depressing. The small pockets of blue in the huge sea of read determined the fate of this huge country.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Newtsche, 12/6/2012 8:23:41 AM (No. 9051193)
True poster, almost as depressing as one man on the Supreme Court determining the fate of this huge country.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Sfacheem, 12/6/2012 8:25:28 AM (No. 9051199)
Like it or not they´re Americans.
Americans elected Obama.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
gagolfer, 12/6/2012 8:36:29 AM (No. 9051214)
Yes, but the small pockets of blue are where the majority of people live. Obama won not only the electoral vote but the popular vote too- more people voted for him. You can excuse Obama´s victory however you wish, but where people live made no difference; he got more votes period (even though the winner is determined by electoral votes).
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Periwinkel, 12/6/2012 8:39:08 AM (No. 9051218)
I love American Thinker!!! It is just as we thought. A few counties with huge margins. Romney, and Republicans by extension, did not have a chance...it wasn´t an election; it was a Chicago mugging plain and simple.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
John c, 12/6/2012 8:39:34 AM (No. 9051219)
We laughed at the toothless, uneducated woman over the obama phone but it was enough to win the election.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Galtoid, 12/6/2012 8:49:19 AM (No. 9051230)
#2: Americans elected a NON-American.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
hotrod, 12/6/2012 8:51:45 AM (No. 9051234)
It is sad that some Americans will sell their soul for some free handouts from the government. If they were more interested in the welfare of their country, they would pay attention to the consequences of selling out. All they have to do is look to the European countries to see their future.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Clinger, 12/6/2012 8:54:03 AM (No. 9051239)
The article nails it. I hope the Republican leadership is as curious and Mr. Murphy. The Republicans continue to reach across the aisle to the hand that slides further left with every attempt. Both parties have abandoned the mass of red.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
CEP, 12/6/2012 9:07:16 AM (No. 9051270)
It´s people like that Detroit council woman expecting their payday, expecting a bailout, expecting quid pro quo. In fact now demanding that he give them a piece of the pie. THose that have no concept of a free country only free they know is someone giving them something for free.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Cat Ballou, 12/6/2012 9:11:52 AM (No. 9051275)
I doubt that "they" relied on their voters to re-elect him.........voter fraud is the real reason he won.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
GoDeacs79, 12/6/2012 9:18:34 AM (No. 9051293)
Two points: 1)Every election has become a contest about who can appeal the most to the least-productive members of society. The job creators are demonized and the average working joes are ignored. 2) The electoral college and the 2-senators-per-state rule were designed to prevent highly populated areas from amassing too much control. This worked as long as the high concentrations were due to working people living where the jobs were. Now the dependency class, which always supports the Dems, has taken control by the shear magnitude of its numbers. Thank you, LBJ, for giving away our nation with your war on poverty.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
BarryNo, 12/6/2012 9:34:01 AM (No. 9051321)
If we ever get the country back include these two rules:
1. No one who depends on a government paycheck for their livelihood (excepting military) should be voting. Only those who make their own way and contribute more than they take to the nation have skin in the game.
2. Special term limits. No one can run for any public office more than twice and no one can be in any branch of government more 10 years consecutively. In areas where there are fewer than a single candidate applying for a public office (since the main advantage of accumulating power is removed) a voter will be randomly selected to ´run´.
We need to limit not the rich, but the powerful.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
civilservant, 12/6/2012 9:47:44 AM (No. 9051360)
#2, America is not a GPS coordinate or a spot on the map. America is an idea; an idea that Man has God given rights that NO-ONE can take away, a place that venerates the Individual and holds the Rule of Law dear. The ´people´ who voted for Uhhhbama are NOT Americans, regardles of where they ´live´.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Mr. Know-It-All, 12/6/2012 9:48:15 AM (No. 9051362)
Who elected Him? The gimme-something-free crowd, coupled with the Honey-boo-boo know-nothing types who are deliberately uninformed/misinformed by our "unbiased" national "news" organiztions. That´s who elected Him.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
UtahLurker, 12/6/2012 9:52:23 AM (No. 9051368)
The Administration has access to the welfare rolls in every precinct, county and state. All they have to do is task the ´community organizers´ to keep track of the takers and get them to the polls. That´s why you see the poll ´assisters´ checking everyone off on their I-pads at the polling stations. Welfare recipients are bused to the polls or whatever it takes to get them to vote in their own selfish interest.
The taker´s self-interest is an ever larger portion ´redistributed´ from our personal paychecks and savings accounts.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
jimmiet, 12/6/2012 9:54:09 AM (No. 9051373)
Here´s the question. How much longer are the working productive Americans who in fact pay for free phones, free healthcare, housing subsidies, food stamps and all the rest going to tolerate being called racist and greedy before they turn off the spigots. There´s approx. 160 million Americans who provide for not only another 160 million Americans but for most of the rest of the world including all the pukes in Washington.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Old Army Vet, 12/6/2012 9:59:56 AM (No. 9051387)
"Who elected Obama"? Idiots.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
ebuilder, 12/6/2012 10:01:17 AM (No. 9051389)
When you realize that David Petraeus, who might have been conservative enough to check on the suspect eligibility of his criminal C.O.C. to be President, or follow up leads on the electoral fraud he had going, but was seduced with the idea of running for President himself [the Ailes story], only to misunderstand the enemy, end up as the mark for Benghazi himself, and play out his string doublespeaking and living off the low information sympathy of those who are smitten with him as their American hero -- you understand almost everyone voted for Obama.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
caddyjak, 12/6/2012 10:10:00 AM (No. 9051417)
The RNC is a collection of "idiots". They failed the conservative electorate completely by not vetting the criminality of Obama and his 35 czars. The RNC could atone by invoking the 12th Amendment and convincing 17 states to boycott the Electoral College on December 17th. Let´s see if they have more guts than they demonstrated during the campaign.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Mass Minority, 12/6/2012 10:11:21 AM (No. 9051421)
This map shows why any non leftist candidate for nationalk office has such a huge hurdle. California, illinois and New york control 104 electoral college votes. Those states elections are mor and more being determined by the votes of LA/SF, Chicago and NYC. Add in MA and Boston and you have a permanent lock on 40% of the electors required to win the Presidency.
Combined population of those 5 cities 13.5 million or 4% of the US population.
So 4% of the population can reliably deliver 40% of the required electors. Thats a huge hill to climb. The left only really has to win 166 electoral votes while the Republican must win 270. Talk about stacking the deck. And its actually worse, in those dense inner cities it takes very little effort to round up hundreds of ignorant morons, hand them pre filled out registrationa dn absentee ballot forms and then collect said properly (ie Dem voted) absentee ballots and mail them in. Try doing that in rural Illinois, or PA or the Great valley.
Republicans focus now needs to shift to state races, our only real hope is strong Republican/conservative state governors and state legislatures. The cities cannot vote in the rural districts, those elections cannot be stolen by busloads of inner city ignoramusses.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 12/6/2012 10:18:51 AM (No. 9051431)
Assuming taxes are eventually raised, why not put an expiration date on them as was done to the Bush tax rates? Have them expire on Election Day 2014 so the GOP can use them to show the country they didn`t do a-n-y-t-h-i-n-g positive!!
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Sfacheem, 12/6/2012 10:33:35 AM (No. 9051480)
#14: Tell yourself whatever you need to.
Obama is president, the people elected him. It makes me sick to my stomach but that´s the reality.
And by the way, while there is truth to what you say about America being "an idea", that is the very problem. It´s been too much of an idea and not enough of a real country lately. The problem is, when a country is nothing more than an idea, it tends to become somebody else´s idea of what it should be. And that´s our problem.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
goodguyrick, 12/6/2012 10:35:55 AM (No. 9051491)
What needs to be done is breaking all the electoral votes into individual vote and no more "Winner takes all." That would stop the politicians from targeting welfare monies and programs to specific communities, collect their debt in the form of votes. Yep, what we need to do is target the electoral college and crush their strangle hold on our country.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
mathman, 12/6/2012 11:10:18 AM (No. 9051597)
Who, indeed? 1) Democratic precincts, in which Republicans are not allowed to interfere in any way. 2) Labor unions: they polled individuals, selected those who would not vote, and brought in ringers by bus to vote for them. 3) Inept and corrupt voter lists. Too many dead people voted for Obama. 4) Precincts in which 100% of registered voters voted 100% for Obama. Statistically impossible. 5) Mentally incompetent persons in nursing homes, who had votes cast for them by staff.
This election, like many before, was stolen, pure and simple.
Purple thumbs would fix the problem, but that can´t happen here. Union power is dependent on stolen fixed elections.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
disasterman, 12/6/2012 11:12:08 AM (No. 9051604)
Yes, more people voted for 0bama. More dead people, more illegal immigrants, more felons, more multiple voters, more non existent voters, more pets and more cartoon characters. Now that the libs have established this as the norm the only way it will ever be fixed is the hard way.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
OhMy, 12/6/2012 11:17:17 AM (No. 9051620)
Small wonder Obama and his ilk want to hurd us all into huge cities with a 200 sq ft living space for each family, no car, using public transport. The "Rich" means anyone who is not totally dependent on the government. The "Rich" are the few people left who could pay off their share of the national debt until Obama takes it and squanders it ! They are the enemy to this administration. This is insane.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Linus_Charlotte, 12/6/2012 11:26:34 AM (No. 9051651)
"Democrat tendency toward self-ghettoization" How true...
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Grambo, 12/6/2012 11:40:08 AM (No. 9051713)
Dogs, cats and dead Americans did their part too.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
pgvoisin, 12/6/2012 12:28:42 PM (No. 9051889)
of the 100% of eligible voters...
28% voted for Big Government, more taxes, and more spending. 26% voted for smaller government, less taxes, and less spending. 46% refrained from voting because they did not want any responsibility for their future.
In 4 years, all of us will ask "Are we better off now than we were 8 years ago"?
If we are, more of the same.
If we are not, we will need to be the "Change" we´ve been wating for.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
TakeBackAmerica, 12/6/2012 12:33:36 PM (No. 9051904)
He was elected dictator by...
Creating an oratory of lies, using his race and faux-amiable demeanor to appeal to the most uneducated segment of society who rely on government handouts—Free Stuff--to function.
Appealing to venal progressives who hate and fear Republicans more than they value the future of their own country and who don´t know--or care--that Obama’s campaign slogan "Forward" is a traditional Marxist term.
Buying union votes with the $447 billion American jobs act that adds a half-trillion dollars in new debt for American taxpayers while reducing our Gross Domestic Product output and pushing our unemployment rate even higher.
Concealing the terrorist murder of four Americans at our diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya—and leveraging the Petraeus Affair--as a political expedience.
And by stealing the election with traitorous levels of corruption that may be never fully known.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
civilservant, 12/6/2012 3:09:51 PM (No. 9052194)
#2/23, now you know how I felt when being forced to listen to how conservative Christie was.
When people tell me what their concept pf the American Idea is, I tell them in no uncertain terms that they are WRONG. And then try to educate them on what it really is.
I will not give up. I have a child and I will see her live in a free society.
I will water that tree with my own fluids if I have to.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
idahospanky, 12/6/2012 4:19:33 PM (No. 9052299)
If the election results can be trusted, then Obummer bought the Presidency with taxpayer money giving away free cell phones, gift cards, and bussing in votes. I agree with the author. Additionally, the dumbocrats want compromise because every compromise draws us closer to their stu-topia. I cannot understand how a duly elected congress can allow such flagrant disregard for the Constitution by an incompetent, inelligible, and unqualified, narcissist.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
idahospanky, 12/6/2012 4:38:05 PM (No. 9052320)
...Narcissit to continue to violate his oath to protect the Republic and the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC for he is the enemy to our liberties. He is the manifestation of the Manchurian Candidate or, if you prefer, the Anti-Christ. The Bible foretells of false Prophets. He is all of. The above. For the preservation of our liberties and way of life we cannot compromise with the enemy. We cannot allow ourselves to be drawn one inch further into the abyss.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Sherlock, 12/6/2012 4:51:48 PM (No. 9052336)
#24 laid out the answer to our problem...will that happen? probably not.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
oldsfc, 12/6/2012 6:12:33 PM (No. 9052443)
Welfare slugs, dead people,women who think with their girl parts, racists, low or non tax payers with high taxpayer costs, see item #1. May be a run on sentence, but it works for me.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|