A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Sununu: Democrats won election by turning
out voters who are dependent on government
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Sununu: Democrats won election by turning
out voters who are dependent on government

Concord Monitor [NH], by Ben Leubsdorf

Original Article

Posted By:Pluperfect, 12/6/2012 4:53:26 AM

President Obama and the Democrats won last month’s election because they were able to turn out voters who are dependent on the government, former New Hampshire governor and Mitt Romney adviser John H. Sununu said last night. “They aggressively got out the base of their base, the base of their base that’s dependent, to a great extent economically, on government policy and government programs,” Sununu said during a forum with two other Republican former governors, Steve Merrill and Craig Benson, at Concord’s Grappone Conference Center. For example, Sununu said, Democrats ran up big majorities in some parts of Cleveland

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: 66Strat, 12/6/2012 5:23:38 AM     (No. 9050964)

Sununu speaks absolute truth. But he forgot that part of the turnout model also included massive fraud - just to make sure votes were counted for all those who intended to vote Democrat, but just could not get to the polls for various reasons such as being dead.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: pineledger, 12/6/2012 5:27:39 AM     (No. 9050969)

Several times.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: mabeldog, 12/6/2012 5:30:41 AM     (No. 9050973)

Massive fraud also included transporting bus loads of people from states that didn´t matter to the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections to vote early where they "lived" for 12 hours. No ID required!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: paleoconserv43, 12/6/2012 6:02:25 AM     (No. 9050994)

OK but how do we explain Obama winning in places like Iowa and New Hampshire. Those states aren´t known to have large enclaves of government dependent minorities. This past election baffles me to no end.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Fiesta del sol, 12/6/2012 6:09:59 AM     (No. 9051004)

#4, how many Iowa farmers are dependent on government subsidizing corn/ethanol? The government turns even the most typical hard working Americans into welfare voters.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 12/6/2012 6:14:23 AM     (No. 9051008)

I find it strange that none of the key figures in the Romney Campaign claim that electoral fraud was a consequential factor in his loss. So when Romney supporters on this site make these claims, they are saying that Mitt Romney and his team are deliberately conspiring to conceal a massive illegal usurpation of political power by fraudulent means. Or they are saying that Team Romney was too stupid or weak to know that the election was stolen and do anything about it. I suspect Romney, Sununu, and the rest actually do understand the truth about what happened--we lost--and are now more interested in understanding why.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 12/6/2012 6:35:23 AM     (No. 9051028)

Sununu has said something which, while true, Ryan is running away from as fast as he can.

I have previously asked posters who advocate that Romney dispute the election results to tell me what the first step would be to do so, as well as how evidence could be found. So far, no bright ideas.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Kitty Myers, 12/6/2012 6:38:18 AM     (No. 9051030)

#6 The Republican Party made an agreement 30 years ago with the Democrat Party NOT to ensure voting integrity and NOT to pursue suspected vote fraud.

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Mazeman, 12/6/2012 6:41:31 AM     (No. 9051033)

Sununu is correct, and many of the liberals I´ve argued with understand this.

But the REAL problem is that they don´t see it as a problem. It´s hard to argue with someone who WANTS government as their nanny. The much harder thing now is to educate people on why this is a bad thing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: gam, 12/6/2012 6:45:11 AM     (No. 9051034)

Our election fraud would cause even Hugo Chavez to blush.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 12/6/2012 7:16:06 AM     (No. 9051074)

Re the case of the RNC having been found guilty of voter fraud, it´s a laughing matter that the REPUBLICANS were found guilty when it´s been the other side doing it since old man Kennedy bought the election for his son, John. And I wondered why nothing had been done about getting that decision overturned. Here´s the rest of the story from fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com: Since 1982, that Consent Decree has been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, now 88 years old. Long retired, Debevoise comes back yearly for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year. (cont.)



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 12/6/2012 7:17:06 AM     (No. 9051076)

(cont.) In 2010, the RNC unsuccessfully appealed “to vacate or modify” the Consent Decree in “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012).

This is a summary of the appeals judge’s ruling, filed on March 8, 2012:

In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The RNC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying, in part, the RNC’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Consent Decree. Although the District Court declined to vacate the Decree, it did make modifications to the Decree. The RNC argues that the District Court abused its discretion by modifying the Decree as it did and by declining to vacate the Decree. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.

Surprise! The judge who denied the RNC’s appeal to “vacate” the 1982 Consent Decree is an Obama appointee, Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Would you believe Judge Greenaway, Jr. is an AF-AM!


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: cobieone, 12/6/2012 7:22:46 AM     (No. 9051078)

Big fan of Sununu, but I think this is terribly misguided. He is correct, the dem base is a bunch of dependent on nanny state radicals. But... the reason we lost this election is CONSERVATIVES STAYED HOME. Romney should have received millions more votes than McCain in ´08, but that didn´t happen. Worry about the dependent class all you want, and that is a legitimate concern, but I am way more concerned about conservatives staying home in protest because they didn´t get the perfect candidate, whatever that means. Sorry guys, but this disaster is on them!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: bpl40, 12/6/2012 7:27:05 AM     (No. 9051088)

White males had a calamitous fifteen point drop from´08. Who are these people and why did they stay away inspite of the criticality of the election? Why wasn´t Romney able to persuade them? Thats where the answer and the guideline for the future lies.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 12/6/2012 7:30:54 AM     (No. 9051095)

Cuyahoga county:

16 Precincts: Romney 0 votes
125 Precincts: Romney less than 4 votes
Many surrounding and in close proximity precincts Romney won.
Allen West´s district: 7 registered voters 900 ballots in one precinct. He picked up 132 votes in a 36 hour early voting block, then the Supervisor of Elections slammed the hatch and confirmed the vote, realizing West would win.

Even Mubarak was upset when he learned that his fraudsters who registered too many votes in his favor made the fraud too obvious.

Someone needs to ply the streets asking questions. (probably too dangerous) Maybe a radio host could ask for anonymous verification of Romney votes. Same in 59 Philly precincts; Romney 0 votes.

And there´s a question about whether there was fraud?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: JAN, 12/6/2012 7:42:16 AM     (No. 9051121)

Despite the massive unemployment and the massive government give aways, O received less votes this time than in 2008.

It´s no secret by now that the election was stolen.

Add to that the millions and millions of dollars spent making sure that Voter I.D. was deemed ´racist´.

Dem bought judges went along with this despicable lie and overturned it´s use in the battleground states.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: OhMy, 12/6/2012 7:42:57 AM     (No. 9051122)

If the GOP won´t challenge the vote fraud and they are too timid to make the case for conservatism then it is time for a new party! Why should patriots support loosers and keep on loosing to a traitor like Obama?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 12/6/2012 7:48:25 AM     (No. 9051130)

Pardon me: Not Mubarak, but Mursi was concerned about too many votes by his fraudsters.

And there are huge questions about the millions who stayed home. There are indications that millions of Romney votes may have been flipped or spiked, a simple script introduced into the machines that count the ballots. Many of those machines are maintained by unions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: cobieone, 12/6/2012 7:52:25 AM     (No. 9051136)

#16, exactly why Romney should have won this thing big. Zero received millions less votes than in ´08. All we had to do was unite and vote, but we didn´t. Romney barely bested McCain´s totals. Romney´s a RINO, the GOP shoving another moderate down our throats, Mormon religion, many other excuses.

Conservatives failed and are to blame.

I believe there was massive voter fraud in OH, PA, and FL, but this election shouldn´t have been close. If conservatives united behind Romney, we would have won and saved this nation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 12/6/2012 8:00:13 AM     (No. 9051146)

I think we knew all along that our side needed to have a massive turnout in order to overcome what we know about the fraud that is the democrat machine. This year was an exceptional case of that due to early voting, high tech and hijinks.
We didn´t do that but I still contend that had a recount been ordered in places like Ohio, Florida, etc , a different result may have obtained. If the ´victory´ had been overturned we would be seeing the total devastation of every blue or light blue city in this country as the Takers sought , as Obama stated, ´revenge´. I just don´t think the Romney team would risk that tactic- in the same way that Nixon didn´t want to ´ tear apart the country´ in 1960.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Arby, 12/6/2012 8:02:37 AM     (No. 9051150)

It´s the one day when they get off their butts and do something--voting for someone who will enable them to get back on their butts until the next election.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 12/6/2012 8:04:08 AM     (No. 9051152)

“Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!” – Sir Walter Scott, having in mind the election held exactly one month ago today, November 6, 2012, when he uttered those astonishingly prophetic words.

Who knew?

Wouldn’t it be interesting and instructive, that is to say enlightening, what a full-blown investigation would reveal?





  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: LZK, 12/6/2012 8:06:53 AM     (No. 9051156)

This election was "strange"....

Yes -- fraud contributed to the win -- but -- something else happened....

I´m not sure -- yet -- what it was.....

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Kate318, 12/6/2012 8:08:38 AM     (No. 9051158)

Until the vote fraud issue is seriously addressed, Republicans will not be winning elections. And, all this talk about voter turn out and messaging is as pointless as not being able to discuss the real reasons racism and poverty still exist.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: BarryNo, 12/6/2012 8:16:25 AM     (No. 9051171)

And I will state again that without the massive fraud, Obama would have lost. There was more fraud this election than ever before. I remember when the media made much of a single small town in a very red area where Bush got nearly all the vote. They muttered darkly of voter suppression and fraud, and did it reflect on the election at large.

But when dozens of high population precincts in multiple swing states show up this election cycle with 100 percent of the votes going for Obama, or more people voting than are registered, the Press sees nothing.

Not that I´m surprised. But I am surprised that so little is made of this in the alternative media and Conservative Talk Radio.

This is not a time to hunker down, unless you are preparing to be utterly trampled.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Donna M, 12/6/2012 8:17:55 AM     (No. 9051175)

Like any plane crash, this election crash was a concatenation of events, not just one. The Top Ten are right here:

1) Blatant vote fraud not ruled against by bought-and-paid for Dem judges.
2) Overall better turnout by Dems, even to the graveyard vote.
3) Religious stupidity. Evangelicals stayed home because of prejudice against Mormons. We fail to acknowledge that in the West, a lot of people don´t like Mormons because they are very successful and a little insular. Catholics went left.
4) The Romney campaign never effectively went after the Hispanic vote. They never got their key people (Rubio etc) on the road and high profile.
5) Romney needed to visit factories, farms, mines and Sandy disaster sites with private charities, and less huge rallies.
6) White males stayed home in droves
7) Never pounded on Benghazi and the coverup
8) This made a huge difference--singles either stayed home or voted for Obama because the Republican campaign, in overemphasizing families and marriage--and not appealing to our natural independence, hard work and frustration at this economy--made singles like me sometimes feel like second class citizens. (I´m older and don´t vote my feelings, but most people do.)
8) Romney campaign never roadblocked the media with purchased time to get his message out straight to the public around the media=soft left. Tons of money but lack of smart media strategy!
9) We never successfully painted Obama as a LOSER
10) ORCA was probably sabotaged by Indian or Russian programmers



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Crosscut, 12/6/2012 8:23:13 AM     (No. 9051192)

Remove the parasite vote and Romney won. Romney should have been president. Rabble should not be electing presidents ever. Obama is an aberration. The working taxpaying citizens of America are enraged and very ticked off. Democrats will pay dearly for what they have done. They will be butchered at the 2014 elections.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Grampy, 12/6/2012 8:37:03 AM     (No. 9051215)

Some say there is "no evidence" of fraud. Without a million voters proving their vote was changed or deleted, exactly how do you prove fraud with empirical evidence? Sometimes circumstantial and/or anecdotal evidence is compelling enough, like the precincts mentioned before in Philly and Cleveland.
Exactly right #17, if the GOP isn´t going to challenge it, we need a party that will. Voter ID is only a good start.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: mindyourbubble, 12/6/2012 8:50:10 AM     (No. 9051233)

#27 I agree with you...but. The Dems will repeat their methods in 2014 because of it´s success in 2012. The thing that frightens me the most is, BHO is going to pack the Supreme court, and if their methods of getting votes at the poles works, they will regain the House as well as increase their members in the senate.
For then Dems it will be like shooting fish in a barrel. Sununu just talks and whines as do other RNC honchos.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: dolphin, 12/6/2012 9:00:52 AM     (No. 9051251)

We lost because we were the target of a government sponsored cultural revolution. And I don´t think Chairman O is finished with us yet.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Swo, 12/6/2012 9:04:24 AM     (No. 9051263)

The Obama campaign machine played MoneyPol.

Assuming y´all have seen the movie Moneyball (a good flick), The Oakland A´s went all geek, and targeted only those things that would get players on base or across the plate.

The Obama campaign targeted only those people in selected states who would get them the elections. They discovered what really matters, and tended to buck the conventional wisdom about elections.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Avogadra, 12/6/2012 9:41:58 AM     (No. 9051345)

Remember how the administration threatened Gallup when its poll numbers started showing Obama would lose? Why would it do that? Because it owns stock in Gallup? Or because a huge theft of votes would become obvious if the most accurate polling agencies predicted a result far different from the actual result?

Electronic vote theft can´t be traced. All evidence of it can be self-erased shortly after the deed is done. It will happen again in 2014 unless We-the-People come up with some sort of strategy to stop it. (It´s quite obvious that elite Republicans like John Boehner are quite content with their role as pretend opponents of the Democrats. They have no motivation to fix vote fixing.) Can we go back to paper ballots, filled out by hand? Do our computer wizards know of any way that common folk can expose the complicity of Spanish companies in stealing elections with electronic voting machines?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: joeyinempirestate, 12/6/2012 9:52:18 AM     (No. 9051367)

Ryan was off-putting to many swing voters, too edgy, too high strung. The water gulping and obsessive throat-clearing in the debate made him seem weird.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: OhMy, 12/6/2012 9:57:03 AM     (No. 9051377)

Electronic vote fraud can easily be countered by having the voting machines print a paper record which the voter must check on the spot and which must be retained by law in case of a recount or if verification is needed such as one candidate getting every vote! The beauty of this approach is that the Rats were howling about voter fraud and calling for it the every time the GOP won at least since Bush vs Gore. How can they object if we all approve of this measure?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Sully, 12/6/2012 10:00:29 AM     (No. 9051388)

Sununu: I predict a solid win for Romney.

I´ve had it with Sununu. The man who gave us Souter and then gave us false information on election 2012.

Jumped the Shark:

Sununu
Limbaugh
Dick Grimer Wormtongue Morris
Hannity
Basically anyone who told us to disbelieve the polls (all of which were right) and to believe them instead (all of whom were wrong)

When the Republicans give over to sophistry and the denial of reality, well, what are they good for?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: nolibgal, 12/6/2012 10:02:40 AM     (No. 9051393)

I don´t know any voters that stayed home this time. I do know voters that stayed home in 08. Totally anecdotal-yes. But there was NO voter apathy with the people I talked to. It just doesn´t add up! literally! It also makes me feel like the whole integrity of our voting system is pirated and useless. I no longer believe that my vote counts anymore.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Aria, 12/6/2012 10:12:22 AM     (No. 9051422)

I didn´t know about the consent decree until this election and can´t imagine why the GOP hasn´t figured a way around this including disbanding the entity subject to the decree and starting an alternate party that passes the test of not being liable for the GOP´s legal entanglements.

The other thing I wonder is - why were they so stupid to ever agree to this? It guaranteed their sideshow status and the transformation of this country. Obviously someone cared more about their own butt than the much bigger picture.

And lastly - the GOP is in trouble for voter fraud? When the rats do it right in front of us and no one can do a damned thing about it????? I don´t believe nothing can be done - it´s just that no one has bothered and now we´ve got a full blown crisis.

I´m looking for another country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: gpau, 12/6/2012 10:16:58 AM     (No. 9051428)

Here is what happened: "Master Plan to Steal an Election" at www.brushfires-of-freedom.com/steal-an-election.html

So simple and timeless: just like Stalin said, it doesn´t matter who votes, it matters who counts the votes.

You want ideas of what to do? Demand release of the source code in the vote tabulating computers in every swing state. Go to Governor Kasich, or Florida´s Governor and pressure them to investigate.

They won´t do anything, unless the demand reaches a certain mass. But there IS a critical mass of Americans that KNOWS this election was a fraud; they just don´t know how it was pulled off. The building blocks are as plain as day in "Master Plan to Steal an Election". Axelrod´s use of Holder and the DOJ to threaten Gallup is the step that gave away the game.

Spread the word. Let´s see what happens--

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 12/6/2012 10:19:42 AM     (No. 9051434)

I understand the sentiments of #36, but don´t blame those listed for the outcome of the election. What was happening "on the ground", with the huge crowds Romney garnered, did NOT jive with the outcome of the election. In fact, I don´t think that even 0bama thought he was going to win. This is a red country. Don´t think I´m right? Take a look at the article at American Thinker today entitled "Who elected Obama?"

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: congaree53, 12/6/2012 10:19:57 AM     (No. 9051436)

I´m with #36. The only good thing about the election result is that it put an end to the ´skewed polls´ nonsense.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: OhMy, 12/6/2012 10:20:37 AM     (No. 9051438)

How could the GOP agree to this one sided consent degree in the first place and how could it be still in effect 30 years later? The GOP is engaging in a charade to pretend we have elections. Why didn´t Obama get 98% of the vote just like Saddam Hussein used to in Iraq. The only reason for that is to keep up appearances!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: msjena, 12/6/2012 10:28:37 AM     (No. 9051460)

The polls were wrong--only not in the way people thought. The polls showed Romney winning Florida, Virginia and Colorado, and too close to call races in Ohio and Iowa. They even showed Wisconsin in play. So the commentators were not wrong to think that Romney would win, since the undecided vote typically goes to the challenger. The pollsters need to rethink what they are doing, because the old methods just don´t work in the age of cell phones and early voting.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: M2, 12/6/2012 10:43:10 AM     (No. 9051511)

So, doesn´t that make Romney right about the "47%"? Where´s the apology?

Also, no one can convince me that voting-machine tampering and other fraudulent methods were not used to steal this election. That is really the serious part of the Obama win.

We must get a handle on disallowing certain people from voting; specifically those who are not qualified, not registered, have no photo ID, are not domiciled, or are utterly ignorant about America´s founding and her Constitution.

We have been far too lax with both our immigration laws and our voting laws. Time to tighten them up so that never again will another election be stolen by fraud.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: dragonlearner, 12/6/2012 10:45:05 AM     (No. 9051518)

It´s time to learn from mistakes and look towards the next election. If Republicans cannot convince Obama voters that their plans are better than Democrat plans, then we´re finished. Take a look at Detroit and Philadelphia. If those examples of Democrat rule are not convincing enough, then it´s time to throw in the towel and move out of the country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 45 - Posted by: RancherJack, 12/6/2012 11:07:41 AM     (No. 9051583)

Sununu lies through his teeth

The election was stolen. Period.

If you believe otherwise you´re running around with your skirt over your head refusing to stare the truth in the face

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 46 - Posted by: smcchk, 12/6/2012 11:08:59 AM     (No. 9051591)

Everyone that I know knew the stakes of this election and were desperate for Romney to win. The GOP has to start claiming voter fraud! We will never win any elections until we know how inner city precincts come in 100% for the Democrat. As for states such as New Hampshire, baffling.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 47 - Posted by: OdinsAcolyte, 12/6/2012 11:30:11 AM     (No. 9051666)

I knew this. Socialism waxes in America. I want to escape to Belize.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 48 - Posted by: bighambone, 12/6/2012 12:03:56 PM     (No. 9051801)

However they did it, the liberal Democrats have come up with a winning election strategy. Everything points to a lot more people becoming dependent on government welfare based benefits and services before the next election.

There is no doubt that motor voter registration, instant voter registration, liberal absentee ballot and early voting, procedures, all contrary to common sense, that the liberal Democrats have been pushing for seemingly forever are only benefiting the liberal Democrats and have no impact on most Republican voter numbers, making it much easier for registration and voter fraud to be perpetrated, especially since voters do not have to present any sort of ID in a lot of places.

When you look back on how a lot of those liberalized voter procedures got passed into law, you will see that the wimpy Republicans went along with the liberal Democrats to get along when a lot of those liberal procedures were passed.

The liberal Democrats have a particularly effective tactic when dealing with the Stupid Party anytime that decide to further liberalize voting procedures that they know will get them more votes, they simply threaten to use the race card and call out any opposing wimpy Republicans as being racists. That always gets enough Republicans in line so that the liberal Democrats can get what they want done.

Then on top of all that in the last election there were so many narrow minded conservatives who refused to vote for a Mormon that Romney never had a chance. Those are the people who are going to find out that they shot themselves in the foot.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 49 - Posted by: rc1776, 12/6/2012 12:04:09 PM     (No. 9051802)

Sir,
You forgot the dead, illegal aliens, missing, invented, and computer fraud.
The only way the dimfecals can win is through criminal theft and intimidation.
Sure the lobbyist, imprisioned and otherwise felons, welfare class, the "stuff" idiots, and the wealthy foodstamp busniess types( Solandra~ GM ~ Chrysler) and corporate farmers enthuisaticaally grovel to the dimfecals, but they are a small number compared to the illegal aliens who criminally

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 50 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 12/6/2012 1:43:16 PM     (No. 9052028)

Amen #37. Every conservative I know was aware of the importance of this election and I don´t think wild horses or NBP´s w/sticks could have stopped them from voting for Romney. Not our particular favorite choice, but certainly better than Chairman O.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 51 - Posted by: NotaBene, 12/6/2012 2:00:42 PM     (No. 9052067)

Democrats turned young Americans into beggars for gifts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 52 - Posted by: ScrIbelus, 12/6/2012 2:10:55 PM     (No. 9052085)

Mencken had it right:
"some people work for a living;
More people vote for a living."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 53 - Posted by: rocco49, 12/6/2012 2:11:48 PM     (No. 9052087)

We wuz robbed...not by much, just enough for the Alinsky-taught Soros-loving thug union crooks on the left to "fix" the fraudulent election in "My Muslim Faith" Hussein the Won´s favor. And I want something DONE about it! Like the fiscal cliff negogiations, like Benghazi, Libya, like....oh never mind!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 54 - Posted by: nevernaught, 12/6/2012 2:30:34 PM     (No. 9052113)

Hey I found a newspaper article about Obama voters:

http://www.mandatory.com/2012/06/05/the-funniest-newspaper-fails/#photo=44

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 55 - Posted by: starboard, 12/6/2012 4:54:45 PM     (No. 9052340)

Obama has the voter fraud blue print patented and ready to pass on to the next Democrat candidate. I read somewhere Bill Clinton was helping Obama in Ohio in order to get some of this information.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 56 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 12/6/2012 6:14:25 PM     (No. 9052445)

47 percent! 47 percent! 47 percent! So, there Nancy Pelousy!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 57 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 12/6/2012 7:54:01 PM     (No. 9052614)

I´ll be dipped...a revelation from Sununu. The dims helped the gummint-dependent sheep get off their behinds to vote for Obie. There´s something wrong here that not enough of the rest of us bothered to vote Obie out of a job (by the way, I did).

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 58 - Posted by: Kate3513, 12/6/2012 9:19:14 PM     (No. 9052745)

This afternoon one of my staff intercepted a recorded message stating in so many words, " we are calling you to enlist your help. There are millions of Republicans who are trying to take your medical care from you. We need you to donate $200.00 toward the cause so that we can help you hold on to your healthcare". She tried to get a human on the phone so that she could enlighten that person that they had called into a medical office full of Republicans! Of course no human came on the line. My first thought was that it was a scam using the Dems to get money out of people by scaring them but after some thought I think it is coming from the same thugs that brought fraud into every nook and cranny of the voting process in this country on Nov 6. They have figured out how to use the phone and the Internet to scare people, 47 % who receive some form of entitlement from Washington. Until Republicans and Conservatives are ready to man the phones and the Internet and do likewise we will never beat these thighs. Time to play hardball!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 59 - Posted by: Kate3513, 12/6/2012 9:21:11 PM     (No. 9052750)

Thugs!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 60 - Posted by: ChicagoWilson, 12/6/2012 9:35:04 PM     (No. 9052774)

Sunnunu speaks the obvious. The obverse is that Romney failed to turn out his base.

Another point to consider is that the state party won the Wisconsin recall vote but the national party lost there. I say, clean house and find the sharks who know how to win door to door.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 61 - Posted by: Mmdemimonde, 12/7/2012 6:18:04 PM     (No. 9054334)

I witnesses what appeared to be fraud when I was poll watching and had hoped someone would contact me after I tried to call the campaign office.
Sununu is correct, this election was won because people did not want to give up or have reduced any benefits from the gov´t. People would ask me questions about romney´s policies on federal programs and how they would impact on their needs......I tried to be truthful and told them to do research. They did, and they voted their interests....Obama.
I´m still reeling from this election. I don´t think I´ll ever get involved in an election again.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 714600




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"



The Tea Party Wins a Congressional Primary;
Jeb Bush, Sarah Palin Lose It
Slate, by David Weigel    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/23/2014 6:22:40 AM     Post Reply
Just three months after Rep. Trey Radel resigned his safe Republican seat in southwest Florida, Republican voters have chosen his likely successor: Curt Clawson. He won the election the old-fashioned way, by making a ton of money in the private sector and then splattering the airwaves with TV ads. In the process, Clawson rolled up endorsements from local Tea Party leaders and from the Tea Party Express. It wasn´t that he was particularly conservative -- he had no prior political record, and had even donated to Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow. It was enough, according to the Tea Party Express, that he

Bundy´s ´ancestral rights´
come under scrutiny
KLAS-TV [Las Vegas, NV], by Nathan Baca    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/23/2014 5:09:43 AM     Post Reply
LAS VEGAS -- Federal authorities remain silent about their next plans to confront Cliven Bundy at his Bunkerville ranch. Both sides are fighting over history, with federal courts denying Bundy´s claims of "ancestral rights" on the Virgin River valley. The I-Team dug into century-old records to examine Bundy´s claims. At the Bunkerville camp next to Cliven Bundy´s ranch, there are constant reminders of history. Revolutionary War flags, ancient Greek mottos and native American symbols, all mixing together to create a growing identity and narrative for protestors. This land is unusually fertile and green for southern Nevada. Cliven Bundy grows melons there. They are said

A Lack of Affirmative Action Isn’t
Why Minority Students Are Suffering
Daily Beast, by Ron Christie    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/23/2014 5:03:51 AM     Post Reply
The Supreme Court let states ban race as a factor in college admissions. That’s a good first step toward race-blind education that can focus on root problems. Shortly before his assassination President Kennedy addressed the nation on June 11, 1963 to explain his decision to federalize the Alabama National Guard to integrate the University of Alabama. In part, Kennedy offered: It ought to be possible in short for every American to enjoy the privileges of being an American, without regard to his race or his color. In short, every American ought to have the right to be treated, as he or she

The Scalia – Sotomayor Thunderdome
Hot Air, by Jazz Shaw    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/23/2014 4:44:28 AM     Post Reply
Ed already brought you up to date on the SCOTUS decision regarding the Michigan referendum that ended affirmative action in college admissions, so if you happened to miss the story, read that first. It was one of the more raucous decisions in a while, with plenty of twists and turns in terms of who went with the majority or the dissent and what they said. But the Washington Examiner dug a bit deeper later in the day, finding what amounted to a bit of a slug-fest in the footnotes between Sonia Sotomayor and Antonin Scalia. The scuffle erupted over Sotomayor’s not

The sad power of an
atheist’s temper tantrum
Fox News, by Jay Sekulow    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/23/2014 4:41:10 AM     Post Reply
Angry atheists are at it again. This week, they’re taking on Dabo Swinney, head coach of the Clemson Tigers. His alleged unlawful conduct? Expressing his Christian faith and allegedly making a number of voluntary religious activities available to his players -- the adult student-athletes at Clemson. The Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation sent Clemson University a “letter of complaint” detailing Swinney’s alleged constitutional violations, including such atrocities as the team’s volunteer chaplain writing Bible verses on a whiteboard and the team making available bus transportation to players who wish to attend church. In a reasonable constitutional world, this complaint would be ignored by

N.C. prosecutor was real
target of elaborate kidnap plot
CBS News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/23/2014 4:36:17 AM     Post Reply
CHARLOTTE, N.C. - A North Carolina prosecutor was the original target of an elaborate kidnapping plot, but the kidnappers looked up the wrong address on the Internet and abducted the prosecutor´s father by mistake, an indictment released Tuesday said. Nine people were charged in the kidnapping of 63-year-old Frank Janssen, the father of Wake Forest Assistant District Attorney Colleen Janssen. Frank Janssen was abducted April 5 from his Wake Forest home and held captive for five days in Atlanta before being rescued by the FBI. Authorities have said the kidnapping was retaliation for Colleen Janssen´s prosecution of Kelvin Melton, a

Sherpas Leave Everest:
Some Expeditions Nix Climbs
Associated Press, by Binaj Gurubacharya    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/23/2014 4:31:10 AM     Post Reply
KATMANDU, Nepal -- Dozens of Sherpa guides packed up their tents and left Mount Everest´s base camp Wednesday, after the avalanche deaths of 16 of their colleagues exposed an undercurrent of resentment by Sherpas over their pay, treatment and benefits. With the entire climbing season increasingly thrown into doubt, the government quickly announced that top tourism officials would fly to base camp Thursday to negotiate with the Sherpas and encourage them to return to work. But while Nepal´s government has been heavily criticized for not doing enough for the Sherpas in the wake of last week´s disaster, the deadliest ever on the



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Obama to free hundreds of drug
felons under clemency rules
designed to un-do mandatory
sentences from ´War on Drugs´ era

54 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/21/2014 11:37:51 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is poised to entertain a flood of new clemency applications from thousands of federal prisoners who were given harsh sentences under mandatory-minimum laws following drug convictions, Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday. Holder said in a short videotaped statement that he wants to shrink the federal prison population by a modest amount while ensuring ´that those who have paid their debts have a chance to become productive citizens.´ At the center of the move is a set of old sentencing rules that punished crack-cocaine offenders with more time behind bars than users or traffickers of powder cocaine.

Dole: Cruz, Paul & Rubio
lack experience for 2016

44 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Mario Trujillo    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 11:18:06 AM     Post Reply
Former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) said a number of junior GOP senators considering a presidential run in 2016 do not yet have the experience — specifically naming Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Texas). The former 1996 GOP presidential candidate sounded particularly skeptical of Cruz in an interview this week with The Wichita Eagle. "A number of the younger members, first-termers like Rand Paul, Rubio and that extreme-right-wing guy, Ted Cruz — all running for president now. I don´t think they´ve got enough experience yet," Dole said. The 90-year-old former senator said, however, his main concern about 2016 is living

Jeb Bush is your only chance
against Hillary, Republicans

42 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Bob Schrum    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/22/2014 6:32:54 AM     Post Reply
If Jeb reaches for the nomination, there will be a titanic battle between the party establishment and the Tea Party. Steve Schmidt, McCain’s strategist in 2008, insists that in the end Republicans usually settle on the most electable candidate. To get by, this Bush may be forced to trim his positions, although the cautionary tale of Romney suggests that he would have to tack artfully and carefully for the sake of the general election. Certainly he will have the resources to outlast, discredit, and disqualify his rivals.

Michelle Obama:
´splurging is the key to life´

40 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/21/2014 9:31:25 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Michelle Obama said "splurging is the key to life" if you regularly eat right and stay active. Her biggest guilty pleasure: French fries. "How would you appreciate vegetables if you never had chocolate?" she asked. "You couldn´t live without a little chocolate, a little French fries." The first lady took questions from children reporters Monday after appearing at the White House Easter Egg Roll. She told the children that if they eat right the majority of the time, then a splurge or snack is not going to hurt them. "I still splurge when I can, but that's why I try to exercise almost every day," she said.

Fraud runs rampant in Census Bureau
37 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:03:20 AM     Post Reply
There’s a pattern of falsifying statistics throughout the entire Census Bureau. And anyone who attempts to blow the whistle on the fraud is either retaliated against or ignored, according to two new sources who have experienced the process firsthand. As I’ve been writing for more than six months, the Census Bureau office in Philadelphia uncovered a case of fraud in 2010, did nothing about it and allowed the practice to continue. In that instance, a data collector named Julius Buckmon was faking reports that went into the nation’s all-important jobless tally and consumer-inflation survey. Because the Census Bureau’s surveys are scientific — meaning

Professor: ‘Colleges Will Start Closing Up’ if
‘Racist, Misogynist, Money-Grubbing’ GOP Wins

36 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/22/2014 4:42:50 PM     Post Reply
New audio reveals an Eastern Connecticut State University professor warning that Republicans will “want things to go back — not to to 1955, but to 1855? if they win control of Congress in November. Republican victories could also put him out of a job, he cautioned. “We will live in a very, very, very different kind of country if that happens,” Professor Brent Terry told students in his Introduction to Creative Writing course, according to audio obtained by Campus Reform. “I mean, colleges will start closing up if these people have their way.” Over the course of his rant, Terry characterized conservatives

But Seriously, Just How
Slow-Witted is John Boehner?

35 replie(s)
American Thinker, by C. Edmund Wright    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/21/2014 7:22:21 AM     Post Reply
As he moves from lobbyists to the golf course, from press conferences to the tanning bed, he remains oblivious to all that is around him. He has power, incredible power, and yet to this day he has no understanding of the election that made it so. Moreover, all around him are astonishing opportunities for him to be an historic figure -- one who could and should be the man who did more than any other single person in turning back the red tide of Obama. It’s all there for Speaker of the House, and yet John Boehner manages to miss


Post Reply   Close thread 714600





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~