A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Against the Tide,
Part III
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Against the Tide,
Part III

National Review Online, by Jay Nordlinger

Original Article

Posted By:duhem, 12/5/2012 6:32:16 AM

For the last couple of days, I’ve been writing about American culture and American politics. The two are basically inseparable, I find. Anyway, for the first part of the series, go here; and for the second, go here. I will now wrap up. There is a defeatist strain among conservatives. Some say, “You know, we’ve done our best. We’ve tried our best in politics. Let’s just give up, and tend to private life, such as it is. Let’s look after our families, our places of worship, our friends.

Comments:
The first heartening and sensible words I´ve heard after the November 6th disaster.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: thelmalou, 12/5/2012 7:09:18 AM     (No. 9049346)

Well, I adore Jay. I just can´t find it in me to agree with him this time. :bleaksigh: Perhaps after more time has passed...


Reply 2 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 12/5/2012 7:39:22 AM     (No. 9049392)

All true enough, yet while necessary, not sufficient. The education of the American electorate remains possible, in fact probable - but it will come only through the pedagogy of pain. They are going to have to experience for themselves what they have wrought by entrusting the nation´s interests to the Democrats. Nature and reality will have to be the teachers in this class, which permits no social promotions or fudging of test scores. Nothing but the perceived undeniable consequences of bad decisions can possibly alter the thinking of the kinds of people who supported Obama. They are going to have to see and feel the effects for themselves. Conservatives can do little at this point but wait. Of course it behooves us to be good citizens, to improve ourselves, to work for the good in such ways as we are able to work for the good. But we cannot alter the widespread fantasy mindset promoted by Leftist ideologues. Only reality can do that. We need not fear that this will be long in coming, nor that it will destroy the Republic. The Republic is stronger than that. The American people are more educable than that. Things may and probably will be shaken to the foundations - but the foundations will not fail. And after America has survived the ordeal that is coming upon her, it will be a long time before Leftist fantasy ideology reigns supreme again.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: voxpop, 12/5/2012 7:48:53 AM     (No. 9049405)

Wow, #2. You nailed it. Perfectly.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Elvira, 12/5/2012 7:52:40 AM     (No. 9049409)

Excellent #2! Bravo!


Reply 5 - Posted by: chillijilli, 12/5/2012 7:52:55 AM     (No. 9049410)

On a national scale, we have to actively boycott the MSM and Hollywood. People are being intentionally misinformed and they don´t know it. How can you expect rational thinking when the public is being fed propaganda on a 24/7 basis?
Actually, (for legal purposes) the media is fairly careful about what they *do* report; it´s what they *don´t* report---what they *withhold*--- that gives citizens a distorted view of the news.
No matter how perfect the next conservative candidate may be, he or she will not be able to overcome the evil media machine. We *must* take them down and it *must* be our #1 priority.
No viewers, no ratings, no sponsors, no shows. Write and tell them *why* you will no longer watch until they become objective and report both sides of a story. Just do it.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 12/5/2012 8:07:23 AM     (No. 9049435)

Sadness aside, it´s difficult to build forms, pour concrete and begin framing when the political and economic tsunami is still gaining strength and momentum.

With almost every public institution and media outlet pulling for the retributionist / Marxist POV, I would suggest that we WAIT patiently until this era crashes and burns of it´s own artificiality before building anything.

I recommend concentrating on gardening and hunting and personal sufficiency / safety issues.

How can we debate the issues when there is no debate allowed in the major institutions ?


Reply 7 - Posted by: TXknitter, 12/5/2012 8:12:14 AM     (No. 9049442)

Kay´s article was good - as far as it went. Then #2, your perfect logic wrapped it up beautifully. There will be no quick fixes now. America is in for many many years of reaping what was ignorantly and arrogantly sown.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: JAN, 12/5/2012 8:12:34 AM     (No. 9049443)

#6 speaks for me.

We have no voice and therefore no way to educate others to the value of our principles.

We are the ones charged with making sure our children are not polluted by the leftists.

For a short while we had FNC. That has gone to the other side and we are on our own.


Reply 9 - Posted by: chillijilli, 12/5/2012 8:50:43 AM     (No. 9049501)

Sorry for the double post here, but c´mon you guys, snap out of it. You sound seriously depressed and defeatist.
Do you think we got Obama because the Demos threw in the towel and gave up after 8 yrs of Bush? Think about it. We need to energize and reorganize, not drop out! Who do we have if not each other?


Reply 10 - Posted by: clayusmcret, 12/5/2012 8:51:03 AM     (No. 9049503)

Those of us sounding defeatist understand that until we hit rock bottom, we´re simply wasting frustration. Too many "conservatives" are reaching for as many sets of rose colored glasses as they can to pretend the inevitable hasn´t been decided. Ken Hamblin pointed out in the 90´s that no major world power, e.g. Roman, British, etc, once it peaked and started down the other side had ever regained its footing. In fact, once they crossed the point of growing and started down the other side, their demise was normally swift and absolute. So, like the idiots preaching global warming, we can similarly try to hold off a planet´s routine changes, wasting huge sums of money trying to stall natural occurrences, or we can instead focus on what happens after we´ve hit the inevitable bottom. This past election locked in the future. Santa now reigns supreme. Dearbonastan IS going to spread. The nannystate (by both open libs and RINO´s) IS going to take over our entire lives. So, we can either prepare for what´s going to happen.... or we can waste our time arguing with the left on NPR. Any conservative who goes onto NPR, CNN, MSNBC, etc, isn´t clear enough of the actual situation to be taken serious.


Reply 11 - Posted by: stencil, 12/5/2012 9:22:22 AM     (No. 9049554)

The headline had me thinking of the upcoming game between Notre Dame vs. Alabama. Good anyway. Roll Tide.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Former lurker, 12/5/2012 9:43:49 AM     (No. 9049603)

Nordlinger is right of course, but it still hurts too much to contemplate jumping back into the fray. I do wish that people like Adelson (great article in WSJ today) who are committed to the fight would do one simple thing........run ads, post billboard, etc in Spanish language outlets pointing out that they didn´t leave leave their home country with the idea of re-creating it in America. So become Americans, learn English, stay in school, don´t have babies until you can support them, start a business, keep a job, pay your taxes and vote to preserve the land of opportunity.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 12/5/2012 11:55:05 AM     (No. 9049998)

Speaking of against the tide, the whole Republican Convention that nominated Romney was against the tide.

I thought it was a great convention and I thought the sight of so many young successful over achievers would inspire the 47%. They would see black achievers, Asian achievers, Latino achievers all enthusiastically explaining how they did it and all Republicans.

I now realize it was a horror show for the 47%. The speakers all told how hard they worked to get where they are, the long hours, the taking of responsibility
and the family money put at risk to start businesses. It all sounded so hard!


Reply 14 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 12/5/2012 11:59:38 AM     (No. 9050005)

Speaking of against the tide, the whole Republican Convention that nominated Romney was against the tide.

I thought it was a great convention and I thought the sight of so many young successful over achievers would inspire the 47%. They would see black achievers, Asian achievers, Latino achievers all enthusiastically explaining how they did it and all Republicans.

I now realize it was a horror show for the 47%. The speakers all told how hard they worked to get where they are, the long hours, the taking of responsibility
and the family money put at risk to start businesses. It all sounded so hard!

After the election the media reported that the people at the convention looked like America used to look. No matter how young they were, they represented the "Old Americda". It seemed to be a criticism-something old fashioned, passe, of which no one should wish to be a part.


Reply 15 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 12/5/2012 12:02:05 PM     (No. 9050006)

Sorry, folks, it was not good enough to read twice. I must be guilty of impatience.



Post Reply   Close thread 714479




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "duhem"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "duhem"



The Politics of Reality
National Review Online, by William Bennett    Original Article
Posted By: duhem- 2/4/2013 10:00:10 AM     Post Reply
EDITOR’S NOTE: The following text is adapted from Secretary Bennett’s speech delivered at National Review Institute’s summit on the future of conservatism on January 27, 2013. Good evening. It was National Review’s eminence, Bill Buckley, who described conservatism as the politics of reality. Let’s look reality square in the eye. Let me tell you some things that I think are true. 1. First, two honest looks back and a word of encouragement.

   

 

  


 
Against the Tide,
Part III
National Review Online, by Jay Nordlinger    Original Article
Posted By: duhem- 12/5/2012 6:32:16 AM     Post Reply
For the last couple of days, I’ve been writing about American culture and American politics. The two are basically inseparable, I find. Anyway, for the first part of the series, go here; and for the second, go here. I will now wrap up. There is a defeatist strain among conservatives. Some say, “You know, we’ve done our best. We’ve tried our best in politics. Let’s just give up, and tend to private life, such as it is. Let’s look after our families, our places of worship, our friends.

Was the 2012
Election Stolen?
American Thinker, by Selwyn Duke    Original Article
Posted By: duhem- 11/13/2012 8:06:44 AM     Post Reply
As the 2012 election approached, conservative enthusiasm grew. Mitt Romney was drawing huge crowds while Barack Obama spoke in half-filled stadiums. All the passion lay on the right, while the left was discouraged with a promised messiah who proved merely a politician. And the prediction was that, in contrast to 2008, Republican turnout would dwarf the tuned-out and carry the day. Hence the shock November 6 eve. How could Romney lose, especially by such a wide electoral margin? Maybe he didn´t

Me, Myself & I
National Review Online, by Peter Kirsanow    Original Article
Posted By: duhem- 10/23/2012 6:09:05 PM     Post Reply
He killed Osama bin Laden. He ended the war in Iraq. He can lower oceans and heal the planet. He has a better command of policy than his policy advisers and can craft better speeches than his speech writers; indeed, he told Harry Reid, “I have a gift.” Such self-regard is no surprise from a man able to coax two autobiographies out of life experiences equivalent to about 45 minutes in SEAL Team Six.

BREAKING: October Surprise —
Iran Agrees To Nuke Deal with U.S.
National Review Online, by Peter Kirsanow    Original Article
Posted By: duhem- 10/22/2012 12:27:39 PM     Post Reply
Tehran — Iran has agreed to abandon its nuclear-weapons program in a historic diplomatic achievement certain to dominate tonight’s foreign-policy presidential debate, and dramatically reshape the electoral landscape. “This is an extraordinary breakthrough,” said Deputy Undersecretary of State Jonathan Ebert Jr., lead negotiator for the U.S. “It’s a tribute to the hard work of our diplomatic team and President Obama’s visionary leadership.” According to Ebert, the momentous deal was struck late Sunday night after President Obama called Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and personally apologized for a Madonna video the Iranian leader found offensive.

What's Not Optimal
National Review Online, by Peter Kirsanow    Original Article
Posted By: duhem- 10/20/2012 10:54:49 AM     Post Reply
Having a president who perpetuates a falsehood to the American people about the cause of a terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that resulted in the deaths of four Americans. Having a president who uses $70,000 of taxpayers’ money to promote that falsehood on Pakistani television. Having a president who broadcasts that falsehood to the world using the megaphone of a speech before the U.N. General Assembly. Having a president who repeats the falsehood in front of the caskets of the four Americans killed in Benghazi. Having a president who will casually wreak havoc on the life

   

 



 
Capital Crime
National Review Online, by Mark Steyn    Original Article
Posted By: duhem- 10/15/2012 8:42:38 AM     Post Reply
Following my weekend column on the Administration’s disgraceful behavior over Benghazi, a commenter called Pilipo Underwood pops up: "Mawk Steyn’s sophistry is simply astounding! Willard Romney started the politics before we even knew the basics of the attack in Benghzi. And his essays just drip with vituperation. Such a chip on his shoulder, one thinks he would have learned after his Conviction for Hate Speech." If only Capitalization could Make It So. I’ve never been Convicted of Hate Speech.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Edward Snowden Is In The
Process Of Destroying Any Support
And Sympathy He Has Built Up

48 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM     Post Reply
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information

Barbara Walters Defends Maher
Calling Trig Palin Retarded:
‘I Don´t Think He Intended
it to be Mean-Spirited’

45 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by John Nolte    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM     Post Reply
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?

Jeb Bush labels conservative
critics ‘the chirpers’

44 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM     Post Reply
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative

Obama: You Can´t Fathom
´Complexities´ of Syria
Policy ´If You Haven´t Been
in Situation Room´

36 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM     Post Reply
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal
35 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jeffrey Lord    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 10:37:24 AM     Post Reply
Marco Rubio. Paul Ryan. The IRS. Illegal immigration. And fraud to the tune of billions.. Now there’s a combustible mix. Let’s start with the IRS, illegal immigration and fraud. We’ll come back in a minute to Senator Rubio and Congressman Ryan. For those who came in late, a year before the IRS scandals burst onto the scene in early May of 2013, an alert investigative reporter for WTHR-Indianapolis (Channel 13), Bob Segall by name, produced a stunning piece of journalism. Segall’s video report is found here and we will quote from his story for the basics.

TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence
in new documentary, claim original
conclusion about cause of crash is wrong

35 replie(s)
FOX News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM     Post Reply
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded

Obama assassination bid fears -
aircraft carriers on standby off
Irish coast during G8 summit

34 replie(s)
Belfast Telegraph [Ireland], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 6/17/2013 11:39:01 PM     Post Reply
It is understood that a contingency plan is in place for the unlikely event that an attempt would be made on the President’s life. The Secret Service also have diplomatic immunity which will allow them to shoot to kill a would-be assassin without fear of prosecution. As part of the “evacuation route” plan, they would be able to spirit the President by chopper to one of the carriers where a jet is on standby to take him back to the United States.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 714479





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~