|
|
| |
Topic: George W. Bush calls for ‘benevolent’ immigration debate |
George W. Bush calls for ‘benevolent’ immigration debate
Washington Post, by Rachel Weiner
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 12/4/2012 7:19:45 PM
|
| Former president George W. Bush is wading into the debate over immigration reform, using a speech in Dallas to praise immigrants and ask that the issue be approached with a “benevolent spirit.” Bush, who tried and failed to pass comprehensive reform as president, opened a day-long conference on immigration and economic growth organized by the George W. Bush Institute, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Economists, CEOs and policy experts are speaking at the invitation-only event. Immigrants come with new skills and new ideas. They fill a critical gap in our labor market.
|
Comments: You have to wonder about the timing of this. The blanket statement that immigrants come with new skills and new ideas doesn´t include those with no skills and who are living off the government. The illegals here now have contributed heavily to the destruction of our economy. Meanwhile, the border remains open so terrorists from all over the world easily enter this country. It´s just disgraceful.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
RUReadyY3K, 12/4/2012 7:23:02 PM (No. 9048741)
Yes to immigration. Hell No, to illegal immigration!
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Italiano, 12/4/2012 7:24:37 PM (No. 9048742)
What should we call it, "Compassionate Capitulation" or "Altruistic Amnesty?"
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
tisHimself, 12/4/2012 7:25:35 PM (No. 9048745)
This is the son of the Bush who ignored the second half of Simpson Mazzoli in the post Reagan years? This is not the family to lead the discussion on this topic.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 12/4/2012 7:28:52 PM (No. 9048749)
If these illegals were white, they would be shown no compassion nor benevolence. White people are expected to follow the law; if not, there are consequences. Conversely, white guilt allows non-whites to essentially be scofflaws. In fact, we have a scofflaw in chief who clearly trades in white guilt for most of his power.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
IdahoJoe, 12/4/2012 7:28:55 PM (No. 9048750)
It´s like the problem with stray cats - you want to help and be compassionate, but we now have reached the point where we have a few hundred. They are fighting, crapping on the carpet and costing us thousands of dollars in cat food. At some point we have to say no to more stray cats. No one will ever learn if we just let the ones that came through illegally get away with it. We will just keep accumulating more.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Urgent Fury, 12/4/2012 7:34:31 PM (No. 9048755)
OK, bring in the Irish.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 12/4/2012 7:50:30 PM (No. 9048771)
Enforce the immigration laws. Send officials who refuse to enforce the law to jail.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
yuban, 12/4/2012 7:56:12 PM (No. 9048775)
Shut up!
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
KTWO, 12/4/2012 8:02:22 PM (No. 9048785)
Good intentions. Train wreck results.
We have not enforced the laws on the books for decades because the funding has always been too low. And executive orders now make the laws meaningless anyway.
Selective enforcement rots a society.
So talk of a new law doesn´t impress me. Calling it Reform doesn´t impress me. The trouble is in Washington and it must be fixed there or not at all. It isn´t from Mexican villages or with the guy cutting your lawn.
Without enforcement there is no way of amending laws to improve anything. Kids figure that out quickly and drive parents and teachers crazy. But the US can´t grasp the point?
Bush is saying be nice. Good advice in most activities. But being nice isn´t the problem.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
FunnyGirl, 12/4/2012 8:06:56 PM (No. 9048791)
He´s right. There is not a chance in hell that we will ever be rounding up illegals and shipping them home. Logistically it´s not possible and it won´t even be attempted. What we need to do is secure the borders, create a social security card that can´t be made on a street corner, and round up criminals including gang members and send them home. Then we need a permanent green card deal for people who came here illegally but are good citizens - not citizenship, but permanent residency.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Coy860, 12/4/2012 8:12:02 PM (No. 9048799)
Thanks to his 8 years of doing nothing, millions of Mexicans entered illegaly. How about we show compassion to Lithuanians, Ukrainians, Polish Irish and Chechs ? How about 20 million of them being allowed in while we turn our heads? There isn´t a damn day that I don´t hear the word "hispanic"..they have their own special radio and tv programs, press one for spanish..ENOUGH!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Gretchen, 12/4/2012 8:12:38 PM (No. 9048800)
Lordy, Lordy. Here is Mr. Bush advocating for his brother´s 2016 run and more of the compassionate conservative pablum that so many of us fell for the last time. What is this, a New World Order?
If so, one should just go visit southern California or the Arizona and Texas borders to see what kind of World Order is being implemented. And it ain´t a new world order, it´s a Third World Order.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
nina584, 12/4/2012 8:14:06 PM (No. 9048804)
He has done enough damage. We have lost 2 elections because of him. Time to shut up and take your little brother with you.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Sherlock, 12/4/2012 8:28:48 PM (No. 9048814)
Yep! Jeb Bush will be shoved down our throats, just like John McCain and Mitt Romney. Well I will not vote for another Bush...ever.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
MickTurn, 12/4/2012 8:41:18 PM (No. 9048825)
GW, you had an opportunity to speak out when it would have meant something, now you come up with this lame crapola.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
fayebeck, 12/4/2012 9:06:19 PM (No. 9048858)
Those Bush´s sure do have CLASS.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Patchy Groundfog, 12/4/2012 9:40:04 PM (No. 9048916)
Sure thing. But we can´t have a debate while the side door is open. Close it, bolt it and then we´ll talk.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
St. Pitbull, 12/4/2012 11:34:49 PM (No. 9049094)
W - you were a good man, but naive at best. You screwed up on voter fraud, immigration and rampant spending.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 12/5/2012 12:01:07 AM (No. 9049130)
Benevolent immigration?
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
bighambone, 12/5/2012 12:10:50 AM (No. 9049140)
They are already allowing about one million immigrants to immigrate to the USA every year legally. That is in addition to the massive, probably 20 million person illegal alien population that keeps growing each year.
The problem is instead of highly skilled immigrants who really have new ideas, the vast majority of the immigrants they are allowing to become permanent resident aliens are very low skilled people from socialist oriented countries who earn very low wages if they can even find a job, and who need to be subsidized by American taxpayer provided social welfare programs from the get-go.
Those are not people who are going to vote for "benevolent" but stupid Republicans in any numbers.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 12/5/2012 12:35:23 AM (No. 9049162)
Let´s not forget GW allowed 8 milion immigrants, many of whom were illegal to come here to work.
We need an immigration freeze until Americans are employed.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
paleoconserv43, 12/5/2012 12:54:17 AM (No. 9049174)
George Bush doesn´t have to live among these Mexican invaders. He lives on his ranch surrounded by secret service agents. The gang violence, the over run hopital ER´s and over crowded schools with anchor babies doesn´t affect him in the least.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Optimist123, 12/5/2012 12:10:03 PM (No. 9050020)
We need to start by enforcing the current laws, and the problem is solved.
My company was recently purchased and as part of the integration process I had to show my US Passport to prove I was a citizen. No proof, no job (though I will have 35 years of service with the new company on day 1).
Make people prove they are citizens for jobs (or have other appropriate documentation), and most importantly for government assistence and to vote.
Really, how hard is this to do, or to understand? (Unless there is something in it for you.)
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Mediaite Exclusive: Internal Memo Proves That CBS’ Sharyl Attkisson Did Not Get Benghazi Emails Story Wrong
|
|
Mediaite, by Noah Rothman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/19/2013 10:17:21 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The revelation that the government’s talking points in the wake of the Benghazi attacks were edited to reflect the concerns of a variety of federal agencies has sparked a firestorm of controversy in recent weeks. Some early reports on that email exchange created the erroneous impression that the White House was more deferential to the concerns of State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, who sought to remove from those talking points a variety of references suggesting the Benghazi attack was the result of a coordinated act of terror. The actual interagency email exchange, released by the Obama administration on Wednesday,
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|