A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Obama threatens Assad
but misses the point
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Obama threatens Assad
but misses the point

Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/4/2012 6:03:59 AM

The faltering regime of Bashar Assad reportedly is preparing to use chemical weapons against insurgents. President Obama responded by saying that such action would be “totally unacceptable” and that Assad would be held accountable for it. Secretary of State Clinton added that any use of chemical weapons by Assad would constitute “a red line for the United States” and that the U.S. would “take action” in response. It’s not clear to me what Obama means when he calls an action contemplated by a foreign government “unacceptable.” He has often used this word

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/4/2012 6:18:00 AM     (No. 9047302)

They´re talking about sending 75,000 troops in there to find the chemical weapons and bring them out. That´s pure craziness.You can´t very well take them out with airstrikes either.

The media keeps saying Bashar wants to use these weapons on his own people but I have a hard time believing that. Nobody knows who these rebels are and he may be justified attacking them.It´s looks more to me like radical Islamists want to take over this whole reigon,not some foolish attempt at democracy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: chumley, 12/4/2012 6:23:04 AM     (No. 9047305)

Tyrants are not impressed with vague threats from little pipsqueaks. Obama might as well have screamed "I´m telling!"
We have not followed through and won a war since 1945. All we do is smack them and run away. They know this, and they know they can survive the smack because most do. Our words carry no truth and instill no fear.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Crosscut, 12/4/2012 6:30:17 AM     (No. 9047311)

Assad must be shaking in his boots. Not. Assad knows that Obama and Clinton are ineffectual and incompetent.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: jdh, 12/4/2012 6:30:18 AM     (No. 9047312)

And if Assad does use chemical weapons, Obama will stamp his feet a say he will be really, really mad if he uses them again....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: provide, 12/4/2012 6:32:27 AM     (No. 9047316)

Send our Islamist Quisling zombie mouthpiece, Carter. He´ll make ´em shake.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: jglas, 12/4/2012 7:03:28 AM     (No. 9047347)

Obama has to hurry, he only has four more years to complete the Islamification of the Mediterranean. Then they can restore the caliphate and work on the rest of the world.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: mickeymat, 12/4/2012 7:05:03 AM     (No. 9047349)

Actually wasn´t it Hillary herself who called Assad a reformer? Is this stock of chemical weapons by chance the same that was carried out of Iraq by truck caravan that we saw in satellite images before the Iraq War? You know the one that all the leftist say never existed?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: LZK, 12/4/2012 7:13:15 AM     (No. 9047357)

Sooooooo -- did WE finally find the Weapons of Mass Destruction that traveled to Syria via the truck convoy during the President George W. Bush´s administration....?

Looks like Sadam Hussein´s Weapons have surfaced....hmmmmmmm?

AND the MSM covered Sadam´s posterior -- just to make President Bush look like a liar. BUT -- God forbide the MSM call the REAL liar obama----- a liar........

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Judith, 12/4/2012 7:19:33 AM     (No. 9047365)

Wait, I thought barry didn´t approve of war? Or has he named it something else and, thus, it is just hunkey dorey? Or, instead of having to fire our military ´cause we can´t afford it, he sends it into a chemical attack and gets rid of it? After all, the american voters don´t seem to care if, due to his incompetence of malfeasance, our people are slaughtered.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 12/4/2012 7:23:01 AM     (No. 9047371)

Will Obama do as he did when NATO became involved in Libya? (Lead from behind and let other NATO countries carry the load.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: planetgeo, 12/4/2012 7:33:31 AM     (No. 9047392)

In diplomatese, the warning that something is "unacceptable" is well known to mean it´s acceptable. It´s the debating society equivalent of the schoolyard taunt, "I dare you." And "totally unacceptable" ramps it up to "I double dare you." All with the same lack of fists flying.

In Obama´s case, the key determinant of whether he´ll follow through on the threat isn´t dependent on whether Assad will use the chemical weapons, but on whether there is a credible Islamist group ready to assume power from Assad. Take a look at almost every instance of action that Obama has taken in that region, such as Libya and Egypt, or not taken, as in Iran, and the common determinant is the presence of an Islamic power group. Conclusion: Obama is facilitating the overthrow of regimes by Islamic groups and protecting those already controlled by Islamic regimes. He´s building the caliphate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Maybeth, 12/4/2012 7:58:38 AM     (No. 9047427)

Why do I think Obama´s threats are just his latest stage performance scripted to convince American citizens that he is againbst terrorism?
.... Why do I doubt him? Could it be that almost everything he says is a lie? Absolutely!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: steveW, 12/4/2012 8:00:09 AM     (No. 9047429)

Warmonger
Reckless cowboy.
Obama lied, people died.
No blood for oil.
A chill wind.

And besides, we learned from the Democrats and the MSM that no Arab dictator who funds terrorism could possibly have WMDs, at least not when there´s a Republican in the White House.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: john c, 12/4/2012 8:05:58 AM     (No. 9047442)

Threat one-Syria: we will stop you:
threat two-America, January we are going to end the US military´s ability to do war.
Meanwhile the _ _ _ _ continues to plan his 3 week vacation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: OperaBuff, 12/4/2012 8:10:15 AM     (No. 9047453)

Oooohh, such manly talk. And B.O. is talking tough, too. For a valley girl.

Rally round, ye electorate, rally round!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: MattMusson, 12/4/2012 8:33:33 AM     (No. 9047503)

Prepare for the scolding of your life, Assad!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: udanja99, 12/4/2012 8:35:46 AM     (No. 9047511)

#11 just said it all.

But I´ll add... where is Code Pink?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 12/4/2012 8:39:26 AM     (No. 9047517)

Quit the criticisms of the squatter in OUR HOURS! Doncha´all know he´s a "piece" maker..., er Nobel Peace Laureate! Everything he touches he leaves in pieces!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Rinktum, 12/4/2012 8:40:08 AM     (No. 9047520)

You know, I read the comments here and am convinced that any one of you has more ability to run this country than the joker sitting in the White House. It is evident that his agenda is not in the best interests of this country. He is absolutely aiding the reformation of the caliphate. It is hard to wrap my brain around the fact that the American people voted in this Muslim appeaser so quickly after the tragedy of September 11th. Everything he has done has been to weaken this nation. Is half this country willfully ignorant? Nothing good will come of this. Obama is determined to break the United States of America.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: geoguy, 12/4/2012 8:53:16 AM     (No. 9047547)

Poster #8 has asked a good question. Last night on the Kudlow Report guest John Bachelor said the WMD were Sadam´s and transported there just prior to the Iraq war with the direction and assistance of the Russians. It has always been rumored that the weapons are in caves in the Bekaa Valley.

Why "W" never defended himself about the WMD is a mystery to me. The government had all the evidence necessary to make a strong argument that Iraq had move the WMD to Syria. But instead rolled over and said they were wrong because of bad intelligence.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 12/4/2012 9:01:56 AM     (No. 9047574)

To answer one of #19´s points, I believe that to be willfull, you have to know the truth and ignore it anyway. In the case of the Obama base, I believe it is just ignorance brought about by the deliberate intentions of the public school system and the media for the past 50 years. We are seeing the results of all that brainwashing now.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: saurkrut, 12/4/2012 9:12:34 AM     (No. 9047597)

So, am I to understand that had the attackers at Benghazi been using chemical weapons, the affirmative action president would have provided assistance? Offering to provide help to rebels but not your own people fighting for their lives? What a sorry state this country has come to!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 12/4/2012 9:24:26 AM     (No. 9047625)

Who aappointed us policemen of the world? This administration has already supported the overthrow of two governments - Ghadaffi´s and Mubarak´s - which were no threat to us, and we will pay the butcher´s bill for years.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: joeyinempirestate, 12/4/2012 9:40:08 AM     (No. 9047665)

We know from the Bible that Damascus will soon be vaporized. I´m betting that Israel will be attacked by Syria and retaliate massively. I can´t see the Pink Prince having the stones to do it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Clinger, 12/4/2012 9:59:35 AM     (No. 9047715)

What, are we going to tell his mom on him?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Barbarian Heretic, 12/4/2012 10:09:52 AM     (No. 9047749)

If Assad is willing to use Chem Weapons on his own people, I´m sure he´d be happy to use them on US troops. Nothing to lose at that point...

I´m still foggy on why Libya deserved US intervention and support of it´s insurgency and regime change, but not Syria and not Iran in 09. It would have been easier, considering GWB had managed to park the World´s Most Powerful Military literally between the two in Iraq. Seems we failed to execute on an obvious strategy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: sandianne, 12/4/2012 10:14:09 AM     (No. 9047758)

Here is my Universal Comment for all stories on Lucianne and every single other site:

So what! Nothing will happen. Nothing will change. Benghazi did not matter. Fast & Furious did not matter. Rice´s lies did not matter. That the country does not like Obamacase does not matter. Barry is back and is finishing his destruction of the country. Bye!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: ebuilder, 12/4/2012 10:28:16 AM     (No. 9047779)

IMO polite republicans and democrat "demogogues" have heard all the rumors connected with Obama, Ezekial 38, Isaiah 17:1, Matt. 24, etc, dismissed them as vague warnings or offensive Jewish calculation, are still OK with a NWO by any means possible, and are merely disappointed that the "amateurish" Obama styled plan is devolving into some feared international rebellion that is not going to end well. As nominal Christians -- meaning nothing like the Founders -- they will never risk calling America´s attention to this adavancing Biblical truth: in some prophetic age of trouble, after the rebirth of Israel, a man will distinguish himself as more than an enemy of what´s left of Christendom, more than a traitor deserving trial and punishment, and probably in a time when internationalist, politically corrected words have no useful meaning. This unstoppable man, or number of a man, or "abomination of desolation" who will make everything desolate, is "unveiled". And it is not explained how exactly such a number of a man can be officially "revealed." Is it by a proclamation, discussed by the Fox News All Stars? Is it with a Russian ukase, confirming all evil is now walking among us? Maybe the revealing is not meant for everyone. The Rapture, if there is one, is spectacularly revealed. We are told that some will not miss it, and it spans from the East to the West. Others, working at the mill, working in the fields will miss it. How exactly do you miss something like a Rapture? Suicide of the Soul. Counterfeit thinking, searing the conscience, empty of truth, chosen through free will, just as the "mark" will be chosen through free will, because some will have ceased to be a protected, separated, soul. Has Benghazi ceased to outrage you?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: nevernaught, 12/4/2012 11:24:28 AM     (No. 9047888)

But who sits behind Assad guarding his rear... the Russians of course. Doesn´t sound like a fair fight to me, because the Russians aren´t afraid of Spanky and our military is wasting away in places like Afghanistan. Terrorists are alive and well and operating all over the world at this moment while Zero is out shanking 9 irons.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: chuck koala, 12/4/2012 11:55:28 AM     (No. 9047983)

Don´t y´all be worryin´ about it...Prof. Irwin Corey ( AKA - John Effin Kerry) will take over at state and solve the problems.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: horacer, 12/4/2012 12:02:42 PM     (No. 9048007)

It´s not just the Russians who are all in behind Assad. It´s also the Iranians and Khamanei. The Revolutionary Guard are fighting in Syria. Hezbollah is fighting in Syria and very likely guarding the chemical weapons. al qaeda is utilizing suicide bombers in Homs. Turkey is itching to invade and if they do it will mean war with the Kurds. Syria´s the biggest hornet´s nest on the planet. By all means intervene Hillary, you go first.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: OdinsAcolyte, 12/4/2012 12:25:04 PM     (No. 9048063)

I have been saying this for years. It is too late to do it right. Our nation is run by idiots.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: gwmcclintok, 12/4/2012 12:50:52 PM     (No. 9048109)

I am lucky to have visited Damascus Syria in 1981. Great food and nice folk. But, be careful.
Does this moron in chief know that Russia has 100,000 armed forces on the ground in Syria?
Does he know that Tartus is a deep water port for the Russian Navy?
With the shape of our county now, Russia would kick our ass in a war. Period.
This fool in our Out House is trying to start WWIII!


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: larryp, 12/4/2012 12:55:26 PM     (No. 9048113)

The chemical weapons will be used on Israel. Baby will say :"oops". Israel will defend by launching against the EU in Brussels. No holocaust II for them...
Obama is becoming a menace to the world. He better stop acting goofy and get some better advice. People and their families are endangered. Obama and the USA must be careful not to weakly antagonize and cornerize, if that is a word, these folks.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: TCloud, 12/4/2012 3:05:13 PM     (No. 9048342)

For the *Anti-Christ*, FUBAR is total victory!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    6 persons like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: CivilServant, 12/4/2012 4:58:28 PM     (No. 9048552)

#20, operational security. A MAN does not put at risk the soldiers under his command for mere recognition. Sadly, most of the Country does not understand that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: rplat, 12/4/2012 5:39:09 PM     (No. 9048616)

As long as he can afford to build his little drones he´ll fight anybody that´s an ocean away and 10,000 feet below.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 12/4/2012 5:51:27 PM     (No. 9048630)

Zero should know about chemicals. He sucked them in for hours in the Choom Wagon!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 12/4/2012 8:08:27 PM     (No. 9048793)

Obie´s Chicago-style politics won´t cut it in the middle east. After Assad calls Obie a joke, now we got something to go with.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: janylou, 12/4/2012 9:26:23 PM     (No. 9048887)

Are these WMDs from Iraq?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Davids918, 12/4/2012 11:25:31 PM     (No. 9049073)

So, did the worldwide intelligence community know of this WMD program?

No, did they fail to realize this massive stockpile?



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: billa, 12/5/2012 12:48:53 AM     (No. 9049172)

Jimmy Carter must totally be smiling now as he no longer holds the mantle as the worst president in our history.

What absolutely baffles me is how so many people do not see how totally incompetent he is. If his utter cluelessness with Fast and Furious and his massive failure with Benghazi does not convince 50% of the coun
try that he is a bumbling fool, nothing can.

Ask any one of the morons who voted for this bafoon name one, just one accomplishment(and Bin Lades does not count because others forced his hand on that). No one can identify one accomplishement. Not one.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 714314




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



New grand jury expected to be seated
in Gov. Rick Perry´s ethics case
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 1:18:20 PM     Post Reply
AUSTIN — A Texas judge was expected to seat a grand jury Monday in an investigation into whether Gov. Rick Perry abused his power by vetoing funding for public corruption prosecutors last year. Special State District Judge Bert Richardson was to oversee the impaneling in Austin. The governor’s office didn’t return messages seeking comment, but The Austin-American Statesman and KVUE-TV reported that Perry took the unusual step of hiring a criminal defense attorney to represent him. The attorney, David Botsford, did not return calls from The Associated Press seeking comment. In June, the governor threatened to veto funding approved by the Texas Legislature

A Pitiful Pulitzer Pick
Commentary Magazine, by Max Boot    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 12:34:31 PM     Post Reply
The Pulitzer Prize board has just managed to do the impossible. It has awarded a prize that deserves to be spoken of in the same conversation with its risible 1932 award to the New York Times correspondent Walter Duranty for articles whitewashing the evils of Stalinist Russia. The award of the Public Service prize to the Washington Post and the Guardian for serving as a mouthpiece for Edward Snowden is an attempt by the journalistic establishment to put its stamp of approval on the actions of one of the most destructive traitors in U.S. history—a former NSA contractor who has done

Texan, 23, Headed To State Prison
For Urinating On The Alamo
Smoking Gun, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 12:27:47 PM     Post Reply
A Texas man was sentenced yesterday to 18 months in state prison for urinating on the Alamo. Daniel Athens, a 23-year-old El Paso resident, pleaded guilty earlier this year to a criminal mischief charge in connection with the April 2012 incident at the Texas shrine. While Athens could have faced a maximum of two years in custody, a plea deal saved him up to six months in custody. Athens was also ordered to pay $4000 in restitution by District Judge Ray Olivarri. Since Athens is not eligible for parole, he will have to serve the entirety of his 18-month sentence. As detailed

Rand Paul for President
Wall Street Journal, by Bret Stephens    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 9:25:40 AM     Post Reply
Republicans, let´s get it over with. Fast forward to the finish line. Avoid the long and winding primary road. It can only weaken the nominee. And we know who he—yes, he—has to be. Not Jeb Bush, who plainly is unsuited to be president. He is insufficiently hostile to Mexicans. He holds heretical views on the Common Core, which, as we well know, is the defining issue of our time. And he´s a Bush. Another installment of a political dynasty just isn´t going to fly with the American people, who want some fresh blood in their politics. Unless the dynasty is

Progressive Puritans
Reason Magazine, by Matt Welch    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:42:20 AM     Post Reply
When I first started hearing people on the political left describe themselves with some frequency as progressive back in the 1990s, the term did not seem tethered to the epoch-defining, early-20th-century spasm of moral crusading and government centralization that helped give us everything from trust busting to Prohibition to the Federal Reserve. As articulated by champions like Ralph Nader and Molly Ivins, the progressive label was both a way to get out from under the generation-old baggage of liberal-a term Ronald Reagan and others had turned into an epithet-and to differentiate lefties from seemingly apologetic triangulators like Bill Clinton and

Eleven Days to November
Politico Magazine, by Larry Sabato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:39:40 AM     Post Reply
For political junkies desperate for clues to the hottest House, Senate and governors’ races around the country, April is the cruelest month. While Illinois and Texas primaries were held last month, the 48 remaining state contests don’t start up again for three weeks. Here’s the good news for those of us hoping to determine whether Democrats or Republicans will be celebrating in the fall: From early May to early September, we’ll have a steady stream of conventions, primaries and runoffs to keep us busy. We’ve already learned a little from the first two contests. On March 4, Texas told us two contradictory

Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

53 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

44 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it

Atlanta Braves flooded with Hank
Aaron hate mail: He’s a ‘s*****g’

30 replie(s)
Washington Times (D.C.), by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/15/2014 3:23:19 PM     Post Reply
Hank Aaron’s recent comments about the need for America to realize that racism is still very much alive and thriving — only now due to those who wear “neckties and starched shirts” rather than KKK hoods — has sparked an angry backlash and many fans are turning the tables, calling the baseball legend himself a racist. “Hank Aaron is a s*****g piece of [expletive] [racial slur],” one man said in an email to the Atlanta Braves’ front office, one of the teams Mr. Aaron used to play for, CBS News reported. “My old man instilled in my mind from a


Post Reply   Close thread 714314





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~