A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Obama threatens Assad
but misses the point
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Obama threatens Assad
but misses the point

Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/4/2012 6:03:59 AM

The faltering regime of Bashar Assad reportedly is preparing to use chemical weapons against insurgents. President Obama responded by saying that such action would be “totally unacceptable” and that Assad would be held accountable for it. Secretary of State Clinton added that any use of chemical weapons by Assad would constitute “a red line for the United States” and that the U.S. would “take action” in response. It’s not clear to me what Obama means when he calls an action contemplated by a foreign government “unacceptable.” He has often used this word

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/4/2012 6:18:00 AM     (No. 9047302)

They´re talking about sending 75,000 troops in there to find the chemical weapons and bring them out. That´s pure craziness.You can´t very well take them out with airstrikes either.

The media keeps saying Bashar wants to use these weapons on his own people but I have a hard time believing that. Nobody knows who these rebels are and he may be justified attacking them.It´s looks more to me like radical Islamists want to take over this whole reigon,not some foolish attempt at democracy.


Reply 2 - Posted by: chumley, 12/4/2012 6:23:04 AM     (No. 9047305)

Tyrants are not impressed with vague threats from little pipsqueaks. Obama might as well have screamed "I´m telling!"
We have not followed through and won a war since 1945. All we do is smack them and run away. They know this, and they know they can survive the smack because most do. Our words carry no truth and instill no fear.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Crosscut, 12/4/2012 6:30:17 AM     (No. 9047311)

Assad must be shaking in his boots. Not. Assad knows that Obama and Clinton are ineffectual and incompetent.


Reply 4 - Posted by: jdh, 12/4/2012 6:30:18 AM     (No. 9047312)

And if Assad does use chemical weapons, Obama will stamp his feet a say he will be really, really mad if he uses them again....


Reply 5 - Posted by: provide, 12/4/2012 6:32:27 AM     (No. 9047316)

Send our Islamist Quisling zombie mouthpiece, Carter. He´ll make ´em shake.


Reply 6 - Posted by: jglas, 12/4/2012 7:03:28 AM     (No. 9047347)

Obama has to hurry, he only has four more years to complete the Islamification of the Mediterranean. Then they can restore the caliphate and work on the rest of the world.


Reply 7 - Posted by: mickeymat, 12/4/2012 7:05:03 AM     (No. 9047349)

Actually wasn´t it Hillary herself who called Assad a reformer? Is this stock of chemical weapons by chance the same that was carried out of Iraq by truck caravan that we saw in satellite images before the Iraq War? You know the one that all the leftist say never existed?


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: LZK, 12/4/2012 7:13:15 AM     (No. 9047357)

Sooooooo -- did WE finally find the Weapons of Mass Destruction that traveled to Syria via the truck convoy during the President George W. Bush´s administration....?

Looks like Sadam Hussein´s Weapons have surfaced....hmmmmmmm?

AND the MSM covered Sadam´s posterior -- just to make President Bush look like a liar. BUT -- God forbide the MSM call the REAL liar obama----- a liar........

LZK


Reply 9 - Posted by: Judith, 12/4/2012 7:19:33 AM     (No. 9047365)

Wait, I thought barry didn´t approve of war? Or has he named it something else and, thus, it is just hunkey dorey? Or, instead of having to fire our military ´cause we can´t afford it, he sends it into a chemical attack and gets rid of it? After all, the american voters don´t seem to care if, due to his incompetence of malfeasance, our people are slaughtered.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 12/4/2012 7:23:01 AM     (No. 9047371)

Will Obama do as he did when NATO became involved in Libya? (Lead from behind and let other NATO countries carry the load.)


Reply 11 - Posted by: planetgeo, 12/4/2012 7:33:31 AM     (No. 9047392)

In diplomatese, the warning that something is "unacceptable" is well known to mean it´s acceptable. It´s the debating society equivalent of the schoolyard taunt, "I dare you." And "totally unacceptable" ramps it up to "I double dare you." All with the same lack of fists flying.

In Obama´s case, the key determinant of whether he´ll follow through on the threat isn´t dependent on whether Assad will use the chemical weapons, but on whether there is a credible Islamist group ready to assume power from Assad. Take a look at almost every instance of action that Obama has taken in that region, such as Libya and Egypt, or not taken, as in Iran, and the common determinant is the presence of an Islamic power group. Conclusion: Obama is facilitating the overthrow of regimes by Islamic groups and protecting those already controlled by Islamic regimes. He´s building the caliphate.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Maybeth, 12/4/2012 7:58:38 AM     (No. 9047427)

Why do I think Obama´s threats are just his latest stage performance scripted to convince American citizens that he is againbst terrorism?
.... Why do I doubt him? Could it be that almost everything he says is a lie? Absolutely!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: steveW, 12/4/2012 8:00:09 AM     (No. 9047429)

Warmonger
Reckless cowboy.
Obama lied, people died.
No blood for oil.
A chill wind.

And besides, we learned from the Democrats and the MSM that no Arab dictator who funds terrorism could possibly have WMDs, at least not when there´s a Republican in the White House.


Reply 14 - Posted by: john c, 12/4/2012 8:05:58 AM     (No. 9047442)

Threat one-Syria: we will stop you:
threat two-America, January we are going to end the US military´s ability to do war.
Meanwhile the _ _ _ _ continues to plan his 3 week vacation.


Reply 15 - Posted by: OperaBuff, 12/4/2012 8:10:15 AM     (No. 9047453)

Oooohh, such manly talk. And B.O. is talking tough, too. For a valley girl.

Rally round, ye electorate, rally round!


Reply 16 - Posted by: MattMusson, 12/4/2012 8:33:33 AM     (No. 9047503)

Prepare for the scolding of your life, Assad!


Reply 17 - Posted by: udanja99, 12/4/2012 8:35:46 AM     (No. 9047511)

#11 just said it all.

But I´ll add... where is Code Pink?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 12/4/2012 8:39:26 AM     (No. 9047517)

Quit the criticisms of the squatter in OUR HOURS! Doncha´all know he´s a "piece" maker..., er Nobel Peace Laureate! Everything he touches he leaves in pieces!


Reply 19 - Posted by: Rinktum, 12/4/2012 8:40:08 AM     (No. 9047520)

You know, I read the comments here and am convinced that any one of you has more ability to run this country than the joker sitting in the White House. It is evident that his agenda is not in the best interests of this country. He is absolutely aiding the reformation of the caliphate. It is hard to wrap my brain around the fact that the American people voted in this Muslim appeaser so quickly after the tragedy of September 11th. Everything he has done has been to weaken this nation. Is half this country willfully ignorant? Nothing good will come of this. Obama is determined to break the United States of America.


Reply 20 - Posted by: geoguy, 12/4/2012 8:53:16 AM     (No. 9047547)

Poster #8 has asked a good question. Last night on the Kudlow Report guest John Bachelor said the WMD were Sadam´s and transported there just prior to the Iraq war with the direction and assistance of the Russians. It has always been rumored that the weapons are in caves in the Bekaa Valley.

Why "W" never defended himself about the WMD is a mystery to me. The government had all the evidence necessary to make a strong argument that Iraq had move the WMD to Syria. But instead rolled over and said they were wrong because of bad intelligence.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 12/4/2012 9:01:56 AM     (No. 9047574)

To answer one of #19´s points, I believe that to be willfull, you have to know the truth and ignore it anyway. In the case of the Obama base, I believe it is just ignorance brought about by the deliberate intentions of the public school system and the media for the past 50 years. We are seeing the results of all that brainwashing now.


Reply 22 - Posted by: saurkrut, 12/4/2012 9:12:34 AM     (No. 9047597)

So, am I to understand that had the attackers at Benghazi been using chemical weapons, the affirmative action president would have provided assistance? Offering to provide help to rebels but not your own people fighting for their lives? What a sorry state this country has come to!


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 12/4/2012 9:24:26 AM     (No. 9047625)

Who aappointed us policemen of the world? This administration has already supported the overthrow of two governments - Ghadaffi´s and Mubarak´s - which were no threat to us, and we will pay the butcher´s bill for years.


Reply 24 - Posted by: joeyinempirestate, 12/4/2012 9:40:08 AM     (No. 9047665)

We know from the Bible that Damascus will soon be vaporized. I´m betting that Israel will be attacked by Syria and retaliate massively. I can´t see the Pink Prince having the stones to do it.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Clinger, 12/4/2012 9:59:35 AM     (No. 9047715)

What, are we going to tell his mom on him?


Reply 26 - Posted by: Barbarian Heretic, 12/4/2012 10:09:52 AM     (No. 9047749)

If Assad is willing to use Chem Weapons on his own people, I´m sure he´d be happy to use them on US troops. Nothing to lose at that point...

I´m still foggy on why Libya deserved US intervention and support of it´s insurgency and regime change, but not Syria and not Iran in 09. It would have been easier, considering GWB had managed to park the World´s Most Powerful Military literally between the two in Iraq. Seems we failed to execute on an obvious strategy.


Reply 27 - Posted by: sandianne, 12/4/2012 10:14:09 AM     (No. 9047758)

Here is my Universal Comment for all stories on Lucianne and every single other site:

So what! Nothing will happen. Nothing will change. Benghazi did not matter. Fast & Furious did not matter. Rice´s lies did not matter. That the country does not like Obamacase does not matter. Barry is back and is finishing his destruction of the country. Bye!


Reply 28 - Posted by: ebuilder, 12/4/2012 10:28:16 AM     (No. 9047779)

IMO polite republicans and democrat "demogogues" have heard all the rumors connected with Obama, Ezekial 38, Isaiah 17:1, Matt. 24, etc, dismissed them as vague warnings or offensive Jewish calculation, are still OK with a NWO by any means possible, and are merely disappointed that the "amateurish" Obama styled plan is devolving into some feared international rebellion that is not going to end well. As nominal Christians -- meaning nothing like the Founders -- they will never risk calling America´s attention to this adavancing Biblical truth: in some prophetic age of trouble, after the rebirth of Israel, a man will distinguish himself as more than an enemy of what´s left of Christendom, more than a traitor deserving trial and punishment, and probably in a time when internationalist, politically corrected words have no useful meaning. This unstoppable man, or number of a man, or "abomination of desolation" who will make everything desolate, is "unveiled". And it is not explained how exactly such a number of a man can be officially "revealed." Is it by a proclamation, discussed by the Fox News All Stars? Is it with a Russian ukase, confirming all evil is now walking among us? Maybe the revealing is not meant for everyone. The Rapture, if there is one, is spectacularly revealed. We are told that some will not miss it, and it spans from the East to the West. Others, working at the mill, working in the fields will miss it. How exactly do you miss something like a Rapture? Suicide of the Soul. Counterfeit thinking, searing the conscience, empty of truth, chosen through free will, just as the "mark" will be chosen through free will, because some will have ceased to be a protected, separated, soul. Has Benghazi ceased to outrage you?


Reply 29 - Posted by: nevernaught, 12/4/2012 11:24:28 AM     (No. 9047888)

But who sits behind Assad guarding his rear... the Russians of course. Doesn´t sound like a fair fight to me, because the Russians aren´t afraid of Spanky and our military is wasting away in places like Afghanistan. Terrorists are alive and well and operating all over the world at this moment while Zero is out shanking 9 irons.


Reply 30 - Posted by: chuck koala, 12/4/2012 11:55:28 AM     (No. 9047983)

Don´t y´all be worryin´ about it...Prof. Irwin Corey ( AKA - John Effin Kerry) will take over at state and solve the problems.


Reply 31 - Posted by: horacer, 12/4/2012 12:02:42 PM     (No. 9048007)

It´s not just the Russians who are all in behind Assad. It´s also the Iranians and Khamanei. The Revolutionary Guard are fighting in Syria. Hezbollah is fighting in Syria and very likely guarding the chemical weapons. al qaeda is utilizing suicide bombers in Homs. Turkey is itching to invade and if they do it will mean war with the Kurds. Syria´s the biggest hornet´s nest on the planet. By all means intervene Hillary, you go first.


Reply 32 - Posted by: OdinsAcolyte, 12/4/2012 12:25:04 PM     (No. 9048063)

I have been saying this for years. It is too late to do it right. Our nation is run by idiots.


Reply 33 - Posted by: gwmcclintok, 12/4/2012 12:50:52 PM     (No. 9048109)

I am lucky to have visited Damascus Syria in 1981. Great food and nice folk. But, be careful.
Does this moron in chief know that Russia has 100,000 armed forces on the ground in Syria?
Does he know that Tartus is a deep water port for the Russian Navy?
With the shape of our county now, Russia would kick our ass in a war. Period.
This fool in our Out House is trying to start WWIII!


Reply 34 - Posted by: larryp, 12/4/2012 12:55:26 PM     (No. 9048113)

The chemical weapons will be used on Israel. Baby will say :"oops". Israel will defend by launching against the EU in Brussels. No holocaust II for them...
Obama is becoming a menace to the world. He better stop acting goofy and get some better advice. People and their families are endangered. Obama and the USA must be careful not to weakly antagonize and cornerize, if that is a word, these folks.


Reply 35 - Posted by: TCloud, 12/4/2012 3:05:13 PM     (No. 9048342)

For the *Anti-Christ*, FUBAR is total victory!


Reply 36 - Posted by: CivilServant, 12/4/2012 4:58:28 PM     (No. 9048552)

#20, operational security. A MAN does not put at risk the soldiers under his command for mere recognition. Sadly, most of the Country does not understand that.


Reply 37 - Posted by: rplat, 12/4/2012 5:39:09 PM     (No. 9048616)

As long as he can afford to build his little drones he´ll fight anybody that´s an ocean away and 10,000 feet below.


Reply 38 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 12/4/2012 5:51:27 PM     (No. 9048630)

Zero should know about chemicals. He sucked them in for hours in the Choom Wagon!


Reply 39 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 12/4/2012 8:08:27 PM     (No. 9048793)

Obie´s Chicago-style politics won´t cut it in the middle east. After Assad calls Obie a joke, now we got something to go with.


Reply 40 - Posted by: janylou, 12/4/2012 9:26:23 PM     (No. 9048887)

Are these WMDs from Iraq?


Reply 41 - Posted by: Davids918, 12/4/2012 11:25:31 PM     (No. 9049073)

So, did the worldwide intelligence community know of this WMD program?

No, did they fail to realize this massive stockpile?


Reply 42 - Posted by: billa, 12/5/2012 12:48:53 AM     (No. 9049172)

Jimmy Carter must totally be smiling now as he no longer holds the mantle as the worst president in our history.

What absolutely baffles me is how so many people do not see how totally incompetent he is. If his utter cluelessness with Fast and Furious and his massive failure with Benghazi does not convince 50% of the coun
try that he is a bumbling fool, nothing can.

Ask any one of the morons who voted for this bafoon name one, just one accomplishment(and Bin Lades does not count because others forced his hand on that). No one can identify one accomplishement. Not one.



Post Reply   Close thread 714314




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Holding AWOL Obama Accountable
American Spectator, by Betsy McCaughey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 6:20:22 AM     Post Reply
President Obama offers only weasel words to explain deaths in Libya and IRS abuses. He’s the master of verbal evasion. House Republicans need to replace debate with action to hold the president accountable on these issues. To get to the bottom of why four Americans died in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, House Republicans should issue a formal resolution demanding to know where the president was on the night September 11 and what role he played. Obama needs to be put on the hot seat. Benghazi- For eight months, the White House has maneuvered

What the White House Really Thinks
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:59:25 AM     Post Reply
Much has been written and said about the astoundingly tone deaf performance of White House spokesman Jay Carney during this past month of scandals. The former journalist has lost the confidence of the people who were once his colleagues due to his unwillingness to tell the truth about his own deceptive statements (never mind those he represents in front of the press) about the Benghazi talking points or even to acknowledge that he has changed his story. The same applies to the shifting story he has told about the Internal Revenue Service scandal

All in the Family
Washington Free Beacon, by C.J. Ciaramella    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:44:55 AM     Post Reply
A nonprofit connected to Rep. Corrine Brown (D., Fla.) and run by a local political power player overbilled Medicaid by nearly $1.4 million, the Florida Times-Union reported. According to an audit by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, the Community Rehabilitation Center in Jacksonville overbilled Medicaid by nearly $1.4 million. Reggie Gaffney, a former Jacksonville Port Authority board member, runs the nonprofit, which provides medical services for mental illness, substance abuse, and HIV/AIDS for low-income residents. Brown’s daughter, Shantrel, is a lobbyist for Arlington-based Alcade and Fay, whose clients include the nonprofit. C

Slain Russian ‘intimidated’ neighbors
Boston Herald, by Laurel J. Sweet*    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:40:57 AM     Post Reply
Former Cambridge neighbors of a Russian mixed martial arts brawler shot dead by an FBI agent early yesterday in Florida — after ?being questioned about his ties to the marathon bombing and a Waltham triple murder — said he was nasty. Ibragim Todashev, 27, also hung around with slain marathon bombing mastermind Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26 — swilling beer and eating chicken on a stoop on Harding Street, they said. “I was the happiest person when they moved. ... It’s a little more peaceful since they left,” a neighbor told the Herald yesterday of the Russian buddies.

The Real Voter Suppression of 2012
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:29:41 AM     Post Reply
The 2012 election season was filled with angry cries of “voter suppression,” almost all of them regarding attempts by states to require voter ID and otherwise improve ballot integrity. Bill Clinton warned that “there has never been — in my lifetime, since we got rid of the poll tax and all the other Jim Crow burdens on voting — the determined effort to limit the franchise that we see today.” Democratic-party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said “photo-ID laws, we think, are very similar to a poll tax.” All of this proved to be twaddle.

The ‘Criminal’ press
New York Post, by Michael A. Walsh    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:24:39 AM     Post Reply
The Justice Department’s secret seizure of phone records from The Associated Press and its monitoring of Fox News reporter James Rosen are nothing less than thuggish attempts to criminalize the practice of journalism — the only profession specifically protected by the US Constitution. Free and open inquiry is also the cornerstone of our democracy, a legacy of the Enlightenment that found its clearest expression in the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” By which the Founders specifically meant political speech. They understood that, even with the checks and balances

London Attack: The New Face of Terror
Daily Beast, by Clive Irving    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:11:41 AM     Post Reply
A blood-splattered jihadist with a meat cleaver in one hand declaring to a bystander’s smartphone camera “Allahu Akbar” and “we will always beat you” in a pronounced south London accent? While waiting twenty minutes for the police to arrive after he’s taken part in what seemed like a ritual assassination of a British soldier? Exactly what terrorist profile does this conform to? None. And that’s what concerns British terrorism officials. Is this bizarre episode the beginning of a new, unpredictable pattern of loners operating without any organized backing behind them, or a one-off?



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
75 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
55 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

51 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”

Criminality Appears To Lie at the
Heart of the IRS Scandal

42 replie(s)
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM     Post Reply
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.

Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’

41 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM     Post Reply
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.


Post Reply   Close thread 714314





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~