A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The New York Times´ latest cutbacks:
Proof its digital strategy is failing?
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The New York Times´ latest cutbacks:
Proof its digital strategy is failing?

The Week [Palm Coast, FL], by Ryu Spaeth

Original Article

Posted By:jackson, 12/3/2012 3:55:14 PM

The New York Times on Monday announced that it would offer buyout packages to 30 newsroom employees, and that layoffs would ensue if the 30 spots were not voluntarily filled. Citing a difficult "economic environment" that has led in recent years to a 60 percent staff reduction on the paper´s business side, Executive Editor Jill Abramson said, "There is no getting around the hard news that the size of the newsroom staff must be reduced." While the loss of 30 jobs pales in comparison to the ousting of roughly 100 newsroom staffers in 2008, it is the latest evidence that the Times continues to struggle

Comments:
Deleted by Taste Police. Scatological references are never welcome here and are routinely deleted when they appear.

If you are going to post from an obscure source, please list it properly [as shown] for our search function. LCom Staff.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: schnapps, 12/3/2012 4:10:46 PM     (No. 9046578)

NYT discovers that its readers don´t mind being brainwashed as long as it´s for free.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Calvinesq, 12/3/2012 4:12:32 PM     (No. 9046582)

mene mene tekel upharsin

You have been found wanting, NYTimes.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: mickturn, 12/3/2012 4:27:24 PM     (No. 9046602)

Citing a difficult "economic environment"...Really, reality hits no home with these registered agents of the Socialist/Marxist parties...the DNC to be exact.

Serves them right, truth knows no limits, lies are tied down the first day.


Reply 4 - Posted by: jgalt, 12/3/2012 4:31:39 PM     (No. 9046609)

At least we can all enjoy a heaping helping of shadenfreude...

Ha ha ha ha ha

The slow sinking of this stinking organization of corrupt non-profesionals and general trouble makers is a very satisfying thing to witness


Reply 5 - Posted by: charliecoconut, 12/3/2012 4:33:13 PM     (No. 9046612)

After I gave up Sunday crossword puzzles in 1983, I never bought another copy.

To actually expend the energy to push a couple keys down on the computer was just too much effort to read it online.

Besides you can just post AP articles and nobody would know the difference.


Reply 6 - Posted by: JHHolliday, 12/3/2012 4:45:46 PM     (No. 9046635)

I suspect a good part of their remaining circulation consists of people who like the Sunday crossword.

Them and a handful of left-wing fools and red-diaper babies grown old.


Reply 7 - Posted by: john56, 12/3/2012 4:45:57 PM     (No. 9046637)

what is also probably in the press release:

"No liberal´s job will be affected. We´ll fire any conservative we can find first."


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: gollyneds, 12/3/2012 4:48:44 PM     (No. 9046645)

30 people! that will seriously cut back the times´ readership. maureen dowd´s gasbaggery unread! oh, the humanity!


Reply 9 - Posted by: Garage Logician, 12/3/2012 4:48:58 PM     (No. 9046647)

When you get to the online story limit you can delete your cookies.


Reply 10 - Posted by: stablemoney, 12/3/2012 4:52:59 PM     (No. 9046654)

Paul Krugman should be one to go. The rest of the propagandists should be let go. Fiction writers are cheap.


Reply 11 - Posted by: andyboy, 12/3/2012 4:55:00 PM     (No. 9046655)

Maybe the NYT can save itself by deploying the very same Democrat policies the NYT champions:

1. Increase revenue by charging people more for its newspapers and online access; and

2. Stimulate more business activity by increasing its expenses.


Reply 12 - Posted by: UNO, 12/3/2012 5:21:48 PM     (No. 9046691)

Jill Abramsom: leftist house muppet...


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Pearson365, 12/3/2012 5:46:34 PM     (No. 9046724)

There is certain to be an editorial blaming the economic policies of Mitt Romney for the NYT´s problems. Will be followed by correction that it was Bush´s policies that led to this rag´s decline.

The Times hates conservatives so much that it would never have the two best writers in America, Victor Davis Hanson & Mark Steyn, on its Op Ed page. Better the mental slop of Charles Blow, Krugman, Friedman and Dowd, to name just 4 ink wasters.


Reply 14 - Posted by: miceal, 12/3/2012 5:48:08 PM     (No. 9046728)

It will not be missed...


Reply 15 - Posted by: strike3, 12/3/2012 5:52:42 PM     (No. 9046738)

As bird ownership becomes less popular, their remaining circulation will slowly disappear.


Reply 16 - Posted by: dr.lakerman, 12/3/2012 6:15:51 PM     (No. 9046770)

In a race to identify the most annoying woman in America, Jill, Hillary Clinton, and susan rice would be tied.


Reply 17 - Posted by: KansasWind, 12/3/2012 7:24:52 PM     (No. 9046843)

Over the past several years the Times has been liquidating assets, leaving yet another alternative, not mentioned in the artilce:

Go away - die - dissolve - vanish - evaporate


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: curious1, 12/3/2012 7:50:10 PM     (No. 9046879)

Yay!!!!!


Reply 19 - Posted by: TunnelRat, 12/3/2012 8:00:44 PM     (No. 9046901)


"Proof its digital strategy is failing?"

I tend to reserve just one digit for the Times...


Reply 20 - Posted by: lazlototh, 12/3/2012 8:08:32 PM     (No. 9046913)

If only Bain Capital thought the paper was a worthwhile investment...but even on that level, the Times hypocritically has two classes of stock and the voting shares can´t really be bought on the open market, because when it comes to walking the walk the Times is just as authoritarian in its ownership and leadership structure as it is in its slavish worship of dictatorial regimes (as long as they are on the left or Islamist).

I would prefer that the news business was thriving so much that conservative and moderate publications were thriving and the Times was doing okay but its influence slowly waning. Barring that, I´ll celebrate this as good news.


Reply 21 - Posted by: jkcinsalem, 12/3/2012 10:42:02 PM     (No. 9047069)

I´m wiping a tear from the corner of my eye.



Post Reply   Close thread 714228




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "jackson"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "jackson"



Hard of hearings
New York Times, by Gail Collins    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/18/2013 8:09:16 AM     Post Reply
Before Congress is finished with the Internal Revenue Service, there’s a serious danger some of us are going to wind up feeling sorry for the auditors.And, honestly, that is not the way we were planning on spending the spring. Especially since it appears that there are people making decisions at the I.R.S. who have the intelligence of a wet Frisbee. But, so far, the Congressional hearings of outrage have been even less sympathetic. Perhaps you didn’t have time to spend much of your Friday watching the House Ways and Means Committee grill Steven Miller

On the Plus Side ...
New York Times, by Gail Collins    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/16/2013 8:34:41 AM     Post Reply
Let’s try to come up with some positive thoughts about the recent political fortunes of the Obama White House: • Economy’s getting a little better. Deficit’s dropping. • Bill Clinton had a really terrible second term and look how well things turned out for him. • Nobody in the administration has been caught driving to Canada with Bo the dog strapped to the car roof. It’s been quite a week, what with the I.R.S. scandal, the Benghazi controversy and revelations about the Justice Department’s sweep of The Associated Press’s phone records.

The Heretic at Heritage
Human Events, by Patrick J. Buchanan    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/15/2013 7:44:42 AM     Post Reply
Jason Richwine, the young conservative scholar who co-authored the Heritage Foundation report on the long-term costs of the amnesty bill backed by the “Gang of Eight,” is gone from Heritage. He was purged after The Washington Post unearthed his doctoral dissertation at the JFK School of Government. Richwine’s thesis: IQ tests fairly measure mental ability. The average IQ of immigrants is well below that of white Americans. This difference in IQ is likely to persist through several generations. And the potential consequences of this? “A lack of socioeconomic assimilation among low IQ immigrant groups

New Orleans Mother´s Day parade
shooting suspect possibly caught
on video
USA Today, by Doug Stanglin    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/13/2013 10:51:51 AM     Post Reply
New Orleans police have released a video that shows a possible suspect in the shooting that wounded 19 people at a Mother´s Day parade. The surveillance video shows the crowd dispersing and some falling to the ground before one person in a white T-shirt and dark pants flees. The image of the man isn´t clear but police say they hope someone will recognize him. The wounded included 10 adult men and seven women as well as a boy and a girl, both 10. Remi Braden, director of public affairs for the New Orleans Police

Leave Hillary Alone! Bill Kristol Says
Republicans Should Stop Running
‘Ridiculous’ Ads On Benghazi
Mediaite, by Tommy Christopher    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/13/2013 9:49:01 AM     Post Reply
On Fox News Sunday this morning, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol defended former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from partisan political attacks over the tragedy in Benghazi, while also urging non-partisan investigations into that incident and the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups during the 2012 election. Kristol denounced American Crossroads’ anti-Hillary ads, asking “What is the point of that?” and calling them “ridiculous.” “There’s no campaign going on,”Kristol continued, adding “Let’s pull the partisanship back. It’s genuine outrage. There should be bipartisan committees investigating both from Congress. So I wish the Republicans would just be quiet,

Daniel Snyder says Redskins
will never change name
USA Today, by Erik Brady    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/10/2013 9:15:48 AM     Post Reply
Daniel Snyder is owner of the Washington pro football team he grew up adoring. Would he ever consider changing the team name that many American Indians and others believe is a racial slur? "We will never change the name of the team," Snyder told USA TODAY Sports this week. "As a lifelong Redskins fan, and I think that the Redskins fans understand the great tradition and what it´s all about and what it means, so we feel pretty fortunate to be just working on next season." What if his football team loses an ongoing federal trademark lawsuit?

The Benghazi beat
New York Post, by Editors    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/9/2013 8:24:43 AM     Post Reply
In the run-up to yesterday’s House hearings on Benghazi, we were struck by a column by The New York Times’ public editor. It was written in response to readers angry that the paper was not giving the Benghazi hearings the coverage they merited. After suggesting that such criticism was politically motivated and “fomented by Fox News,” the editor offered an interesting conclusion. “The Times,” she wrote, “has had a tendency to both play down the subject, which has significant news value, and to pursue it most aggressively as a story about political divisiveness rather than one about national security



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
73 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

56 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part


Post Reply   Close thread 714228





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~