|
|
| |
Topic: Boehner, House GOP leaders offer ‘fiscal cliff’ counterproposal |
Boehner, House GOP leaders offer ‘fiscal cliff’ counterproposal
Washington Post, by Lori Montgomery
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 12/3/2012 3:35:00 PM
|
| House Republican leaders endorsed a far-reaching plan Monday to rein in the national debt that would raise $800 billion in new tax revenue, slice $600 billion from federal health programs and apply a stingier measure of inflation to Social Security benefits. In a letter to President Obama, House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and other senior Republicans suggested that the framework, first laid out by Democrat Erskine Bowles during last year’s budget battles, should serve as a starting point for budget talks aimed at averting the year-end “fiscal cliff.” “With the fiscal cliff nearing,
|
Comments: It makes no mention of the debt limit. You would have thought that would be included since 0bama wants to behave like a King.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
JediJerry, 12/3/2012 3:42:21 PM (No. 9046529)
Attaboi Johnny! Raise taxes and cut Medicare and Social Security. I am sure McCain and Graham will be there in a photo-op backing you up as doing the rignt thing.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
jdh, 12/3/2012 3:45:56 PM (No. 9046531)
A partial solution to the Obama tax extensions (Bush tax cuts) is actually no solution. We are in the current situation because we delayed decisions in order to not have to make hasty decisions. Congress has been unable or unwilling to develop a solution to this ongoing problem. We are in a financial mess that we can´t spend ourselves out of. I cannot support a solution that "kicks the can down the road" for another few months knowing that we will be in this same situation 4 weeks before the next extension expires. The current House, Senate, and President are responsible for this situation. President Bush and the 110th Congress have been gone for a long time. The worst thing congress can do is to cobble some legislation together that they have to pass quickly in order to find out what is in it
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
rc1776, 12/3/2012 3:49:00 PM (No. 9046536)
Current Social Security sufferers do not receive a cost of living increase on the things they spend the most on - food, gas, medical and clothing.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
sunsong, 12/3/2012 3:50:17 PM (No. 9046538)
Good! It´s good enough as a counter. Now the ball is right back in Obama´s court.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Coy860, 12/3/2012 4:04:50 PM (No. 9046561)
How about a 50% cut in your salaries, a freeze on raises for yourselves and inclusion in Obamacare for starters, followed by 10% cuts in every department except DoD.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
jlmaca, 12/3/2012 4:05:18 PM (No. 9046564)
This is so bad, cutting retirees benefits who really need them. Do means testing on these benefits, cut 25% from the EPA, Education Department, get rid of the No Energy Department.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
gesundheit, 12/3/2012 4:07:39 PM (No. 9046574)
Time is growing short, so John Boehner should immediately invite Erskine Bowles to appear with him at a joint press conference endorsing Mr. Bowles´s budget framework as as a bi-partisan basis for getting the fiscal-cliff talks going again.
If Erskine Bowles refuses to show up to publicly affirm his own proposal, then John Boehner should speak alone with an empty chair by his side labeled ´´Reserved for Erskine Bowles.´´
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
mitzi, 12/3/2012 4:12:09 PM (No. 9046580)
B. O. wants to raise everyone´s taxes w/o taking the blame for it. That´s why his "counter" offers are what they are.
He has no intention of negotiating anything.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 12/3/2012 4:32:43 PM (No. 9046610)
Raise rates on the "Rich" in the face of overwhelming evidence that MORE revenue would result from lower rates ?
This is , clearly, a punitive measure.
As it damages the productive sector as well as the GDP as a whole it is a twofer for Barky.
As sure as groceries come from the store, Barky knows that money comes from the printing press.
Shoooow Nuff !
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
JediJerry, 12/3/2012 4:38:15 PM (No. 9046627)
The United States of America will soon become the Slave States of Obama.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 12/3/2012 4:56:08 PM (No. 9046657)
I don´t think cutting social security and health benefits to retirees is going to play well as opposed to raising taxes on rich people. Has the GOP lost its mind?
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
gagolfer, 12/3/2012 4:59:55 PM (No. 9046664)
Right now they are just doing a dance for the benefit of each party´s base. Real negotiations will start next week in private when they will stop making public pronouncements everyday and go on till the very end of Dec. when a deal will be approved.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
pearlyjo, 12/3/2012 5:02:03 PM (No. 9046666)
All negotiations should be televised on CSpan.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
franq, 12/3/2012 5:08:45 PM (No. 9046675)
We´re on our own, folks. Levin said this several years ago. Anyone who believes the government is going to look out for their interests is deluded.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
No Arm, 12/3/2012 5:10:50 PM (No. 9046676)
Remindful of that pitiful scene in Deliverence. Substitute Boehner for Ned Beatty and Obama for the hillbilly behind him, twisting his ears and saying "squeal like a pig". Boehner squealing away for his life...oh and the toothless guy laughing while looking on would be Harry Reid.
C´mon everyone, WEEEEE WEEEE!
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
octrojan, 12/3/2012 5:15:39 PM (No. 9046679)
#3, I´m not sure why a social security recipient would ever expect a cost of living increase. Are most annuities indexed? Aren´t most pensions a fixed amount?
Actually, I´m being a bit sarcastic (not toward #3 but economic illiterates who think a person "paid into" SS and think it´s an insurance plan, rather than a welfare program).
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
sinic, 12/3/2012 5:28:37 PM (No. 9046699)
Pretty soon they´ll raise the SS "retirement" age to 85. Meanwhile, the lavish spending, fraud, waste, and outright foolishness will continue unabated. We´ve lost the fight, folks. Even the ones, like Boner, who are supposedly on our side are now cowering in closet, permanently folded up in the fetal position, crying their eyes out, and whimpering "Stop, stop, whatever you want...please STOP". And when it´s over, they´ll all go to nice parties every night, play golf every day, and continue to receive the lavish percs that they´ve voted for themselves. Meanwhile, we´ll be riding bicycles, eating pasta sans sauce 3 times a day, and waiting for that final decision from the Death Panel. They all should be locked in stocks, tarred, feathered, and pi$$ed on.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Socio, 12/3/2012 5:29:02 PM (No. 9046700)
Sounds like neither side is serious about doing anything, "reduce borrowing by more than $4 trillion over the next decade" is a meaningless freaking joke.
Just means they will only borrow 20 trillion over the next decade instead of 24 trillion!
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
MDConservative, 12/3/2012 5:34:54 PM (No. 9046708)
I´ve often heard the only way to get your best deal is to walk away at least three times. Try it once, Johnny...your House passed a budget. Let Harry do some lifting.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
JHHolliday, 12/3/2012 5:40:36 PM (No. 9046717)
The GOP needs to propose that SS be means-tested in the future. It is indeed a welfare program that, like all of these schemes, has gotten out of control. Also propose that the full benefit age be raised to 68-70.
Buy television time to say that people making millions in retirement should give up their benefit. That SS is bankrupt and it must be saved. They will have to buy the time because the regular media will distort what they propose. It´s only a couple of thousand a month max benefit anyway. If you have an income of over $250,000 a year in retirement you can do without the extra two grand.
I know that this is a huge stealth tax increase but we have no options left. Our politicians have financially ruined this country. They have also encouraged a huge percent of our less intelligent population that SS will take care of their retirement years. This myth has to be busted to encourage them to be more responsible.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
strike3, 12/3/2012 5:55:25 PM (No. 9046742)
The only proper counterproposal to what the marxist dreamer demanded would be, "Get real, Barry!"
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 12/3/2012 6:35:23 PM (No. 9046793)
#5 is right. The fact that we allow these pols to have no skin in the game shows me that indeed, there is no hope. Boehner will continue to kick the can down the road. Congress´ personal bank accounts will continue to be nice and secure.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 12/3/2012 8:40:15 PM (No. 9046953)
What an unmitigated disaster! I can already hear Obozo... Republicans want to starve seniors so rich folks keep low taxes! I also thought impacted existing seniors was off the table for both parties!
Stupid! The GOP has lost. Unless someone with credibility goes on the morning talk shows, comedy central & the late shows... no truth will get out.
Rubio, Christie, Ryan... someone.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
AWAKE, 12/4/2012 9:02:46 AM (No. 9047576)
#16 Soc Sec is NOT a welfare program. And we could seriously lower it´s costs if we got all those phoney disability deadbeats off it.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, ´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Obama 47 minutes late for his press conference; leaves reporters in the rain
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/16/2013 1:20:06 PM
Post Reply
|
|
“I look forward to taking some questions at tomorrow’s press conference,” President Obama said last night, after announcing the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. The president scheduled a noon press conference today with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in honor of his visit. Reporters, however, found themselves waiting outside in the rain for Obama, who was 47 minutes late. Only New York Times reporter Mark Landler had an umbrella.
|
Fox’s Brit Hume: ‘Stupid’ For GOP To Think Of Impeaching Obama Over Recent Scandals
|
|
Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 5:05:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Appearing on Laura Ingraham‘s radio show this afternoon, Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume suggested some Republicans were “stupid” to consider impeachment of President Obama a viable response to the ongoing scandals regarding the Benghazi attacks, the IRS targeting of conservative groups, and the Justice Department secret seizure of AP phone records. Likely referring to some GOP lawmakers, including Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) who has put impeachment on the table as an option for handling the Benghazi fallout, Ingraham asked Hume to comment on how some Republican leaders have “ran to the microphone” to suggest removal
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|