A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Will the GOP Let the MSM Back
for the Primary Debates of 2016?
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Will the GOP Let the MSM Back
for the Primary Debates of 2016?

PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/3/2012 11:39:21 AM

We all know the old saw, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.” But how about “Fool me two dozen times and you’re the Stupid Party!” (aka, the GOP)? The Republicans certainly did their best to prove the latter in election 2012. And how were they fooled? The last election was arguably over and done before the real battle started when the mainstream media overtly and covertly made mincemeat of the Republican candidates during the primary debates, effectively neutering them for the main event.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Msctex1, 12/3/2012 11:41:37 AM     (No. 9045964)

Our last two candidates were not chosen by our Party, they were chosen by the Media, through a process of character assassination towards more preferable possibilities. And we wonder how what could happen, happened.


Reply 2 - Posted by: happy conservative, 12/3/2012 11:44:25 AM     (No. 9045970)

There will be no debates in 2016. I am betting there will not be an election.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: OdinsAcolyte, 12/3/2012 11:49:56 AM     (No. 9045985)

Who cares? The debates are meaningless and answers given by all candidates are rarely meaningful in any sense.


Reply 4 - Posted by: horacer, 12/3/2012 12:12:58 PM     (No. 9046047)

If the debates were structured properly you wouldn´t need a moderator or the msm. If you do have a moderator it shouldn´t be a network twit, find an ex party official. And no debates until primary season.


Reply 5 - Posted by: mickturn, 12/3/2012 12:42:21 PM     (No. 9046118)

We don´t need no stinkin´ election, just appoint your friends...Obie


Reply 6 - Posted by: dr.lakerman, 12/3/2012 12:43:57 PM     (No. 9046122)

Gingich and Santorum did great damage to Romney during those primary debates, perhaps wounding him enough to lose the election.


Reply 7 - Posted by: nina584, 12/3/2012 12:51:56 PM     (No. 9046137)

#6 Romney could have gone after BO the same way he went after Gingrish and Santorum. He had in the ropes and let him go.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: grampstosix, 12/3/2012 1:08:05 PM     (No. 9046171)

Debate moderators ought to be selected from the ranks of those who coach debate teams in high schols and colleges. they know how to run debates and they´d do a good job because they´d have to face teir students the next dsay.


Reply 9 - Posted by: RightShoe, 12/3/2012 1:12:11 PM     (No. 9046182)

None of the major networks need be involved in the debates. None of the navel gazing talking heads should be allowed near any of the candidates!

Video the debates and put them one the web. They will get more attention and be much more thorough than what we had this time around.

And skip the stupid questions from the audience papp. Let the candidates ask questions of each other.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Mike PHX, 12/3/2012 1:18:34 PM     (No. 9046194)

Of course they will. They´re stupid.


Reply 11 - Posted by: absalom, 12/3/2012 1:18:56 PM     (No. 9046196)

Romney´s wounds were self inflicted starting w/the reality that he was a banal, feckless and inept candidate who stood for nothing.


Reply 12 - Posted by: bighambone, 12/3/2012 1:27:52 PM     (No. 9046214)

George Snuffeupagus a liberal Democrat political hack at ABC signaled one facet of the coming liberal Democrat attack on Romney when he asked Romney that out of the blue question concerning female contraceptives in the first debate.

That signals to me that George Snuffeupagus was in cahoots with the Obama campaign from the get-go. That´s proof enough that the RNC should never again allow liberal Democrat political hacks who are employed in the media to moderate any sort of debate involving Republican candidates.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: john56, 12/3/2012 1:28:47 PM     (No. 9046218)

As my high school civics/government teacher taught us back in 1972, never underestimate the stupidity of the national Republican party.

A wise man, that Mr. Shriver. God rest him soul.


Reply 14 - Posted by: dman, 12/3/2012 1:33:47 PM     (No. 9046227)

Who cares? If we continue to pin our hopes on the GOP, then we´re the stupid ones.

They will float names like Rubio and Martinez as the hopes of the future. However, if they don´t toe the WS/CC line, their fate will be the same as this year´s crop of conservative candidates.

Time for a new party. The GOP will never, ever get it. They´re stupid.


Reply 15 - Posted by: submariner, 12/3/2012 2:23:43 PM     (No. 9046331)

´Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, I´m the Republican Party.´


Reply 16 - Posted by: abiner, 12/3/2012 2:30:34 PM     (No. 9046358)

I agree with #2. Along about 2015, The Anointed One will work with Congress (by then 96 dem senators to 4, and 417 dem reps to 18) to have himself declared Emperor for Life.

Once that happens, the hundred or so republicans left in the country would be given a choice between swearing undying fealty to their new Lord or being torn apart by wild dogs in the Obama Colosseum (formerly Yankee Stadium.)

Lenin would be so proud.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 12/3/2012 2:35:21 PM     (No. 9046370)

Debates are meaningless and immaterial; candidates are chosen in back-room deals like they have been for 200 years.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Rafter, 12/3/2012 2:52:19 PM     (No. 9046409)

Ah, the hilarity never stops.
So many punchlines to read... so little time.

On this thread, prize goes to #12...
for most accurate, worthwhile post.

Others must be joking.


Reply 19 - Posted by: killerbee, 12/3/2012 3:11:26 PM     (No. 9046464)

Of course they will, Roger. They needed no more proof of the media´s perfidy and yet they allowed them to take control of the primary debates this time.

The Republican establishment is useless. And now that we know they´re barred by law from even accusing the Democrats of their blatant election fraud, the party is clearly dead. They have absolutely nothing to offer. They´re actually in the way of any real, viable new party forming.

Disband.


Reply 20 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 12/3/2012 3:15:50 PM     (No. 9046474)

1st debate moderator: Larry Kudlow
Second: Jim Lehrer
Third: Bret Bair
Fourth: Megan Kelly/ Greta Van Sustern
Fifth: no more debates, period!


Reply 21 - Posted by: Penney, 12/3/2012 3:25:40 PM     (No. 9046496)

Only the RINOS might fall yot again for the dems´ MSM tools to moderated future Presidential debates.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Liberal like Jefferson, 12/3/2012 3:29:56 PM     (No. 9046504)

The GOP are Charlie Brown´s kicker to the MSM Lucy the holder.

When the GOP goes to kick the ball and the MSM whisks it away, they lay on the ground looking surprised, yet knowing it´s happened every time before.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: harper, 12/3/2012 5:15:56 PM     (No. 9046681)

The Pubbies could wise up and treat the media like the enemies they are...but expecting that seems about as likely that American Jews will stand up for Israel and vote Republican. Possible, logical and unlikely.

Even with the deck stacked against him in the debates, it´s possible Romney could have pulled it off on election day if he had prevailed in the second and third debates. Instead he did a McCain. Any possibility of picking up the Oprah-loving-women´s vote was negated by the loss of core support by McCaining it.


Reply 24 - Posted by: LanieLou, 12/3/2012 9:13:30 PM     (No. 9047002)

Unless we vote via purple thumbs... it no longer matters. Election reform should be the primary focus of the GOP right now.

Now we know why Obozo showed up for the 1st debate unprepared... why bother, when it´s in the bag?



Post Reply   Close thread 714204




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



It’s.The.Law
American Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 6:17:17 AM     Post Reply
Last Thursday, Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) started a Twitter prairie fire with his call for people to describe #ObamacareInThreeWords. (My contribution was “Sorry, Doctor retired.”) (Snip) The White House, never shy to jump into social media, responded with a flurry of tweets, including “It’s. The. Law.” which smacked, more than anything, of typical Obama chest-thumping. Is the administration sure they want to aggressively take credit for a law which, for almost the entire three years since its passage, has had more Americans supporting its repeal than supporting the law itself and which, according to Rasmussen Reports

Tooth and Nail: Fluoride
Fight Cracks Portland´s Left
Wall Street Journal, by Joel Millman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:57:35 AM     Post Reply
PORTLAND, Ore.—In the 1950s, after health authorities began fluoridating U.S. water supplies, they faced opposition from groups like the John Birch Society, which called it "an unconstitutional mass medication of the public." Sixty years later, the fight over fluoridation has erupted in Portland, where the battle has drawn in the city´s craft-beer brewers, organic-food purveyors and environmentalists. Even some of the city´s famed indie-rock musicians are taking sides. The debate has prompted something of an existential crisis in this self-consciously liberal city, which votes Tuesday on whether to overturn the city council´s 2012 decision to fluoridate.

What Angelina Jolie
forgot to mention
CNN, by H. Gilbert Welch    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:54:23 AM     Post Reply
I first saw the headline early Tuesday on Real Clear Politics, a political news site where I generally start my morning. It´s not where I expect to see a story on breast cancer. Then I checked my e-mail messages -- they all seemed to be about Angelina Jolie´s op-ed. Students in my undergraduate class wanted to discuss it in our next session. Colleagues expressed concern and wondered what the right response was. People I don´t even know sent e-mails. One, from a research fellow at the International Agency for Research on Cancer, nicely summed up the general concern:

Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:46:03 AM     Post Reply
The late columnist William Safire once said that a good clue that someone in Washington was engaged in “an artful dodge,” i.e., a cover-up, was that they used the phrase “mistakes were made.” Safire defined it as a “passive-evasive way of acknowledging error while distancing the speaker from responsibility for it.” The phrase became infamous when both Richard Nixon and Ron Ziegler, his press secretary, deployed it to explain away Watergate without explaining who did what and when or whether any ill motive was involved. Astonishingly, the Internal Revenue Service resurrected the Nixonian expression within hours

Deval as Holder’s fill-in?
That just wouldn’t be just
Boston Herald, by Holly Robichaud    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:27:24 AM     Post Reply
Just when you think the news surrounding Obamagate cannot get any worse, it does. Some say U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s days on the job are numbered and that it’s just a matter of when he’ll be forced to resign. While I’ll not shed a tear over Holder’s departure, one of the replacement names being floated has me reaching for tissues: Gov. Deval Patrick. Patrick has denied he’s interested — but the job isn’t on offer yet. If it is, President Obama should not select him nor should he be confirmed by the Senate for a plethora of reasons.

How the white hat got stained
New York Daily News, by Jim Geraghty    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:20:32 AM     Post Reply
Don’t let anyone fool you: Everyone in politics is tempted to believe that their noble ends could justify unethical and illegal means. Those who had hoped that President Obama would usher in a new era of higher standards in Washington must be shell-shocked by last week’s revelations: -The Internal Revenue Service admitted to delaying conservative organizations’ tax-exempt status while quickly approving groups that had liberal or progressive orientations. The IRS asked these groups all sorts of invasive questions, including what kind of books they read, and leaked some information to the media. -The Department of Justice secretly obtained

The Arab collapse
New York Post, by Ralph Peters    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:15:02 AM     Post Reply
The Arab Spring has unleashed the Arab Collapse. Everybody still standing in the region is picking the flesh of the helpless. The Islamist cancer proved more virulent than Arabs themselves expected, while dying regimes behave with unrestrained ruthlessness. And our diplomats still think everyone can be cajoled into harmony. We’re witnessing a titanic event, the crack-up of a long-tottering civilization. Arab societies grew so corrupt and stagnant that violent upheaval became inevitable. That’s what we’re seeing in Syria and Iraq — two names, one struggle — and will find elsewhere tomorrow.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

59 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

59 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

43 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week


Post Reply   Close thread 714204





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~