|
|
| |
Topic: Homeless Man Shoeless Again In NYC Despite Boots |
Homeless Man Shoeless Again In NYC Despite Boots
Associated Press, by Staff
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:PageTurner, 12/3/2012 8:29:54 AM
|
| NEW YORK -- The New York City homeless man - whose gift of boots from an NYPD police officer became an online sensation - is back on the streets with no shoes. The New York Times found him Sunday night wandering barefoot in Manhattan. The paper identified him as Jeffrey Hillman, formerly of South Plainfield, N.J. Asked about the $100 all-weather boots Officer Larry DePrimo gave him on Nov. 14, Hillman says he´s hidden them because "they are worth a lot of money." He says he´s grateful for the gift, but he wants "a piece of the pie"
|
Comments: Surprised? I knew it would turn out like this, after all the drooly gooey sentimental stories of the cop helping the bum. Well, he´s still a bum, he sees his profit opportunities and some people can´t be helped.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Keekng, 12/3/2012 8:35:21 AM (No. 9045526)
Go figure.....
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
CEP, 12/3/2012 8:36:09 AM (No. 9045528)
"He says he´s grateful for the gift, but he wants "a piece of the pie" because the photo was posted online "without permission.""
How long will it be before he has a lawyer representing him?
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Evocatus, 12/3/2012 8:39:33 AM (No. 9045535)
The photo was snapped in public, where there is no expectation of privacy. Therefore, he does not have rights to the photo. If we´re going to be clinical about it.
Boots hidden? How about sold for alcohol or drugs? More likely.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
rustycfc, 12/3/2012 8:42:59 AM (No. 9045541)
barry to the rescue,after all he is king of the give away.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
PageTurner, 12/3/2012 8:43:14 AM (No. 9045543)
I don´t think he has the law on his side regarding rights to the pic - the event was conducted in public.
This calls to mind my early newspaper days in San Francisco, when I told my editor we ought to run photos of the drunken bums of 16th Street. He said we couldn´t do it quite that way. "If there was one thing that´s worse than a drunk it´s a drunk´s lawyer," he said.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 12/3/2012 8:43:47 AM (No. 9045545)
Didn´t see that one coming... /s
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
skedaddle, 12/3/2012 8:45:55 AM (No. 9045550)
The tender-hearted cop just learned a lesson about the homeless that I bet he doesn´t forget. I´m sure the boots were sold for the bums drug of choice.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
JAN, 12/3/2012 8:49:40 AM (No. 9045558)
Anyone remember Billie Boggs.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
ebgodard, 12/3/2012 8:51:51 AM (No. 9045561)
If he is homeless how the heck does he know the video went viral? Likely has a giveaway IPhone with free minutes. Even our homeless are well connected. No good deed goes unpunished. The Pollyanna in me hopes that some day there will be just ONE heartwarming story that doesn´t go south and leave me depressed at the reality that apparently everyone is looking for an angle.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
mominNoCA, 12/3/2012 8:52:59 AM (No. 9045565)
The cop gave this man an opportunity to take care of himself. He´s probably had these opportunities many times courtesy of many people, including his family. He chose to throw them away to feed his addictions.
This doesn´t minimize what the officer did for him at all. Neither does it mean the other people in his life are suckers for helping him.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
mickturn, 12/3/2012 8:58:03 AM (No. 9045576)
Hey man how can I get sympathy and a full cup´O´cash every day if I look like I´ve got lots´O´cash?
After work I gets into my Cadillac and drives home to the burbs.
Thanks for the boots officer but you´re ruining my gig!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
RosietheObserver, 12/3/2012 8:58:39 AM (No. 9045579)
I have to agree with #10. There is no clause in the bible that says "help the poor but only if they deserve and appreciate it." The act speaks for itself. So do the bum´s actions.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
cinwasp, 12/3/2012 9:05:28 AM (No. 9045596)
This is what happens when you treat the symptom and not the "disease"...All for a moment to feel good about maybe making a difference.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
dr.lakerman, 12/3/2012 9:08:06 AM (No. 9045599)
Up until the 1970s, people who were unable to take care of themselves were institutionalized. Then along came the courts, Nelson Rockefeller, and Geraldo Rivera, and our society decided that it was unfair, and expensive, to institutionalize those people. So in a it of liberalism, society allowed those kinds of people to live and die in the streets.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Conservativegirl, 12/3/2012 9:11:11 AM (No. 9045607)
Most homeless are schizophrenic, it´s why they are on the street in the first place. They typically refuse assistance from family and friends who offer to take them in. They also tend to shun shelters as well, and all for the same reason. Their mental disorder makes them fiercely independent and they fear being trapped or controlled by those who offer them food and a safe clean place to sleep. They cannot be helped because they don´t want it. They should either be institutionalized or ignored.
Girl´s Hubby
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
zzzghy, 12/3/2012 9:14:21 AM (No. 9045616)
If you give a man a fish, he´ll eat for a day.
If you give a bum your shoes, he´ll trade them for MadDog 20/20.
Or something like that. I forget how it goes, exactly...
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Leshno, 12/3/2012 9:24:06 AM (No. 9045635)
Just when I think that I have become much too cynical something like this happens. Disappointing.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Sunhan65, 12/3/2012 9:27:02 AM (No. 9045645)
That´s the whole story in a nutcase.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
jerseyden, 12/3/2012 9:27:16 AM (No. 9045647)
Reading an article about this he said he´s hiding the boots. He knows he could get killed by someone who knows the value of them. He may be homeless but he knows the environment where he lives.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
ColoWapiti, 12/3/2012 9:34:48 AM (No. 9045665)
Fits the profile of an Obama socialist voter perfectly.
Give me something I did not earn. I will squander it immediately, then demand another slice of the pie.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl, 12/3/2012 9:35:43 AM (No. 9045669)
Sad. What a waste of $100.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 12/3/2012 9:38:21 AM (No. 9045674)
I´m proud to be posting this morning, as always, barefoot...from the local library, sipping my MD-20/20 from a paper cup, feeling the rush of the Thorazine as it kicks in.
You call it what you like.
I call it liberty.
I´m catchin´ the bus to the Keys tomorrow.
They have a much better attitude toward barefootedness down there.
(OK....just kidding)
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
CharlyG, 12/3/2012 9:40:46 AM (No. 9045682)
How about making a bigger pie? A fact lost on libs.....
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
bob913, 12/3/2012 9:41:12 AM (No. 9045683)
That cop learned a lesson and lost $100
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
William1, 12/3/2012 9:46:58 AM (No. 9045700)
Look on the bright side. He´s keeping the boots all nice and spiffy, so he can be presentable when he attends Zero´s inauguration.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Gretchen, 12/3/2012 9:52:47 AM (No. 9045714)
This is why the poor will always be with us. It isn´t just about feeding and clothing...it´s a spiritual condition, too. God bless them both and assist them in the ways that will do the most good.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Grace Veritas, 12/3/2012 9:53:24 AM (No. 9045716)
Gloria Alred cannot be far behind.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Eheu Fugaces, 12/3/2012 9:55:17 AM (No. 9045719)
Another Obama voter heard from! Why doesn´t Homeless Man Hillman just shack up with "Julia" -- she can show him how to live well off the dole.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
NorthernDog, 12/3/2012 10:13:42 AM (No. 9045757)
A good lesson - Don´t squander what is given to you. And be careful giving things to others who will only squander it.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
lasvegaslou, 12/3/2012 10:18:03 AM (No. 9045770)
This is so sad. I can´t believe the way some of you react to this unfortunate soul. The poor man is obviously not capable of caring for himself yet some of you judge him by standards you use to judge yourselves. That is not right and is anything but Christian.
In the more enlightened era of time gone by, we had both Federal and State Institutions to care for people like this. What happened is another example of liberal good intentions gone wrong. In 1963, at JFK´s urging and as part of his New Frontier, the Community Mental Health Act was passed by Congress and it closed down all Federal and State asylums. They were supposed to be replaced by local "community" centers to care for those unable to care for themselves.
JFK was killed and it never happened and multitudes were left to die on the streets and for 50 years that has happened. I´m ashamed of myself and my fellow citizens for letting it happen.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
MsMontana, 12/3/2012 10:26:29 AM (No. 9045787)
In my area, there is a homeless man who you see on the street frequently. He is often carrying a large number of personal items that gets to be larger and larger as time goes by and then one day you see him with nothing but a small suitcase again.
He comes from a well to do family who wants to get him treated, but they cannot force him into medical care...and so he continues the way he has for many many years.
I am a true believer in the preservation of liberty, however, this man is not using his liberty to his benefit and his family should be allowed to handle his affairs.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
kanphil, 12/3/2012 10:36:04 AM (No. 9045817)
If you examine the statements the homeless man made, you get a strong clue as to why he is homeless and living on the street. He clearly doesn´t realize what it takes to earn his "share of the pie".
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
TrueBlueWfan, 12/3/2012 11:02:45 AM (No. 9045875)
Sorry #30, but I reserve my sympathy for people that cannot help themselves, and this guy was given something to help his situation and he CHOSE to pawn it or trade it for (most likely) drugs or alcohol. I will never give to homeless beggars.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Kingbubo, 12/3/2012 11:19:03 AM (No. 9045916)
Yes, $100 pair of boots is ideal for a homeless guy. Nice, but impractical officer and I see why the guy got rid of them.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
woofwoofwoof, 12/3/2012 11:19:11 AM (No. 9045917)
The boots may even be in a safe place, he just "likes" to be barefoot. Doesn´t want to get the boots dirty.
Cop could have saved $90 by getting boots at Goodwill, might not have been quite as nice. Excuse my cynicism, but I kept waiting to find out the whole thing was a setup of some kind.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
B&B, 12/3/2012 1:15:06 PM (No. 9046186)
Thank you, #35, I doubt anyone would get killed for a $5 pair of boots from Goodwill...
2 examples of why I don´t think twice about passing by these people -- in Denver a few years ago, a local story about a woman who had a ´daycare´ in her home and was caught, by one of the parents, on a street corner, with their child, and a ´I´m homeless´ sign. A couple years ago, here in northern Washington, I saw a 2 guys I recognized from their familiar street corner, in the laundromat, they were discussing what corner to move to that afternoon, when one pulls out a cell phone and says ´let me call home and see if the wife´s back yet´. Then I watched them leave in a decent late model truck. Yeah, right, homeless...
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 12/3/2012 1:17:12 PM (No. 9046190)
Mr. HIllman is mentally ill and should not be on the streets. Leaving him there is not "compassion".
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
navybrat, 12/3/2012 3:49:06 PM (No. 9046537)
Just try and put someone in a mental institution when they do not want to go and the ACLU will be on your backside faster than an Obama voter with a welfare check.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
bob913, 12/3/2012 4:30:26 PM (No. 9046607)
I bet he was bussed in to vote for obama.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
lazlototh, 12/5/2012 10:54:56 AM (No. 9049816)
As the nun once told my wife in school, "don´t give them money. Give them a ham sandwich." The police officer knew the risks here and in my mind that probably makes him even more praiseworthy, even if the risks probably came to pass and the guy no longer has the boots because he traded them for something worth $15 at most.
But it is sad that the guy did what I suspected he would do.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "PageTurner"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "PageTurner"
|
Pope Should Recognize That Free Markets Are Best Way To End Poverty
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: PageTurner- 5/19/2013 11:44:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Statism: Pope Francis seemed to have an economic blind spot, to say the least, when he urged more "state control" to cut global poverty Thursday. On the contrary — the biggest poverty-killer in history is free enterprise.Before we go further, let us say that we know that the pope does seem to have the best intentions and his devotion to the poor is indisputable. But it appears he has been infected by the local economic pathologies of his homeland, Argentina, and its liberation theology among the Jesuits, at least when he warned ambassadors about "the tyranny of money"
|
IRS Attack Against Tea Party Assaulted Civility
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: PageTurner- 5/17/2013 3:10:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Democracy: The IRS targeting of Tea Party groups is mind-boggling not only for its abuse of government power. It´s also disturbing for what it intended to do: destroy civil society, opening a door for tyranny. The formation in 2009 of hundreds of Tea Party groups at the rallying cry of CNBC news editor Rick Santelli, from places as diverse as Lowell, Mass., Pleasanton, Calif., Asheville, N.C., Yuma, Ariz., and Lincoln, Neb., among hundreds of others, was a spontaneous reaction by ordinary American citizens to an overspending, oversized government whose overreach called into question its constitutionality.
|
Don´t Cry For Me, America: Comparing Argentina And The United States
|
|
Forbes, by Alejandro Chafuen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: PageTurner- 5/17/2013 2:30:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Many observers have pondered if the United States is following the same troubled path as Argentina. In the 1940s, Argentina’s Juan Domingo Perón used government agencies for political gain and created a popular form of fascism called Perónism. In the United States, the recent revelation of the Internal Revenue Service targeting political enemies is a bad omen. Are we on an Argentinean course? The road to decay in my native country, Argentina, began with the implementation of one of the most powerful collectivist doctrines of the 20th century: fascism.
|
Now Venezuela is running out of toilet paper
|
|
Associated Press, by Fabiola Sanchez and Karl Ritter
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: PageTurner- 5/16/2013 1:22:12 PM
Post Reply
|
|
CARACAS, Venezuela — First milk, butter, coffee and cornmeal ran short. Now Venezuela is running out of the most basic of necessities — toilet paper. Blaming political opponents for the shortfall, as it does for other shortages, the embattled socialist government says it will import 50 million rolls to boost supplies. That was little comfort to consumers struggling to find toilet paper on Wednesday. "This is the last straw," said Manuel Fagundes, a shopper hunting for tissue in downtown Caracas. "I´m 71 years old and this is the first time I´ve seen this." One supermarket visited by The Associated Press
|
Big Labor Was Bigtime Wrong On Colombia
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: PageTurner- 5/15/2013 1:40:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Commerce: Big Labor worked hard to halt the U.S.-Colombia free trade agreement, claiming it threatened our economy and our workers. But a year since its passage, the pact has surpassed all expectations. Where´s the mea culpa? If there was ever a reason to declare Big Labor´s credibility at zero on matters economic, the best example would be in its long, pathetic tocsins over free trade with Colombia. Today, exactly a year since the pact went into effect, U.S. exports to Colombia have risen 13% while Colombia´s to the U.S. are up 3.4%
|
Venezuela Food Maker Denies Blame for Shortages
|
|
Associated Press, by Karl Ritter and Fabiola Sanchez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: PageTurner- 5/14/2013 9:28:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
CARACAS, Venezuela Venezuela´s biggest food company on Monday hit back at President Nicolas Maduro´s claims that it´s to blame for the country´s persistent food shortages. The chief executive of Empresas Polar, Lorenzo Mendoza, rejected accusations by the president that the company has reduced production and is hoarding products to create scarcity. "The accusations that we are producing less than last year are false," Mendoza told reporters. "I presume that President Nicolas Maduro is not well informed about the situation and about what´s happening."
|
Venezuela net importer of gasoline in 2012 because of Amuay refinery fire
|
|
MercoPress [Montevideo, Uruguay], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: PageTurner- 5/14/2013 9:05:50 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Venezuela in 2012 became a net importer of gasoline as a result of escalating problems at its refineries and increasing demand for fuel in its internal market, joining a growing list of countries that struggle with fuel supplies despite ample oil reserves. Venezuela exported 30,000 barrels per day (bpd) of gasoline and naphtha last year, according to state oil company PDVSA annual report. But it imported an average of 66,300bpd of the same fuels from the US alone, according to US energy department data.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|