|
|
| |
Topic: Local Planned Parenthood to break from national organization |
Local Planned Parenthood to break from national organization
Star Gazette, by Jennifer Micale
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Gretchen, 11/30/2012 3:32:53 PM
|
Planned Parenthood of South Central New York is breaking away from the national organization, changing its name and going solo. In early 2013, the group — which has locations in Binghamton, Norwich, Oneonta, Sidney and Walton — will become Family Planning of South Central New York, an independent nonprofit. Headline split by staff.
|
Comments: Note in the body of the article the affiliates are breaking off because Planned Parenthood is mandating that all affiliates provide abortions by 2013.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Emmajustin, 11/30/2012 3:47:02 PM (No. 9041838)
Changing their name to Baby Killers South?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
4Justice, 11/30/2012 3:55:11 PM (No. 9041848)
#1, it looks like they don´t want to provide abortions...that is why they´re breaking away.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
killerbee, 11/30/2012 4:19:30 PM (No. 9041875)
I am all for this type of organization as long as it doesn´t provide abortions. Helping women to get regular gyno exams and birth control is not noxious to me. The abortion industry and the way they´ve characterized it as a transcendent, sacred rite is.
Good luck to them. I might even send them some money if this is truly what they´re doing. I support this kind of endeavor and it´s annoyed me that the Right to Life movement hasn´t provided much competition for PP in that area.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Persecutor2, 11/30/2012 5:24:56 PM (No. 9041941)
Not sure how praiseworthy this action is. Looks like they are still going to refer women to the neighborhood abortion mills, they just don´t want to do it (abortions) themselves. I´m thinking it´s more a case of not having the courage of their convictions than of having any better convictions than PP at large.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Persecutor2, 11/30/2012 5:32:54 PM (No. 9041954)
Profse apoplogies for the double post, but something occurred to me just after I hit the "submit" button. The PP office here doesn´t provide abortions either, but it´s not due to any particularly pure motives. In this town, an abortion clinic--and anybody associated with it--would be VERRRRY unpopular with the majority of the citizenry. PP gets the usual preferential treatment from local authorities, but it is based on their insistence that they do not and will not actually do abortions here. The PP director is a stone baby-killer at heart, she just can´t get away with it here and retain her social prominence. I expect they might try a similar ploy so they can stay in the one-step-removed baby-killing biz.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
HPmatt, 11/30/2012 5:44:06 PM (No. 9041968)
I think it is similar to the strategy Acorn is using - ´break apart´ - for tactical purposes - so Conservatives can´t destroy the entire corrupt organization, but obtain funding the same way and keep coordinated on advancing the democrat mission of eugenics.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
pearlyjo, 11/30/2012 5:59:17 PM (No. 9041995)
Follow the money. There must be a monetary reason (that is, tax dollars) why they are doing this.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 11/30/2012 6:13:30 PM (No. 9042008)
Family Planning and parenthood. This organization has nothing to do with that concept. Perhaps the new stats showing the worms may be turning has scared a few. These new stats indicate now that women have achieved their total control over choices and free services they are more willing to get married. But wait the same percentage of men are now saying I will never marry one of you. You have the sole right to make all becoming parents choices and abort my child so why would I trust you enough to hope you would even let one live after birth. Agendas can turn on you too Flukes.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
grampstosix, 11/30/2012 6:31:51 PM (No. 9042027)
It´s mind boggling how the abortion business got to be called an industry but that´s simply because it has grown so big.Thanks largely to government funding whether we want it or not.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 11/30/2012 8:34:17 PM (No. 9042171)
Bullhockey. For the past 3 years, Sebillius has doled out over $3B to convert PP locations into Family Health Care Centers.. aka future ObamaCare Centers. This is just the 1st to launch.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Gretchen"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Gretchen"
|
Conservative groups rebel against Boehner
|
|
Politico, by Jake Sherman and John Bresnahan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Gretchen- 12/4/2012 8:29:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Several prominent conservative organizations lashed out against a pair of decisions by Speaker John Boehner’s leadership team as House Republicans saw their tightly held grip on the right loosen a bit on Monday. Heritage Action, long a thorn in the side of the House Republican leadership, told its members in an email that Boehner was asking his “members to go back on their promise not to raise taxes on the American people” by putting $800 billion in new revenue into the mix of the negotiations to avert the fiscal cliff.
|
| |
|
Local Planned Parenthood to break from national organization
|
|
Star Gazette, by Jennifer Micale
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Gretchen- 11/30/2012 3:32:53 PM
Post Reply
|
Planned Parenthood of South Central New York is breaking away from the national organization, changing its name and going solo. In early 2013, the group — which has locations in Binghamton, Norwich, Oneonta, Sidney and Walton — will become Family Planning of South Central New York, an independent nonprofit. Headline split by staff.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
| |
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
| | |
|
|