A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Why Should Israel´s Response
To Hamas Be Proportional?
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Why Should Israel´s Response
To Hamas Be Proportional?

Investor´s Business Daily, by Victor Davis Hanson

Original Article

Posted By:SoCalGal, 11/29/2012 8:58:01 PM

Classical explanations of conventional wars run something like this: An aggressor state seeks political advantage through military force. It has a hunch that the threatened target will likely either make concessions to avoid losing a war, or, if war breaks out, the resulting political gains will be worth the military costs to achieve victory. Wars then are prevented only by a balance of power and military deterrence: aggressors have to be warned that it would be stupid to start a war they will likely lose. If there are miscalculations or if emotions run high and logic is ignored,

Comments:
VDH in his oeuvre. Military historian.

Trying to shoehorn this into 100 words is hopeless. You´ll just have to read it so that you´ll know why he calls it a T-ball war. For now.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 11/29/2012 9:18:53 PM     (No. 9040388)

When a punk punches the biggest kid on the block....a clock gets cleaned.

It´s the way of the world, it used to be.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Calvinesq, 11/29/2012 10:23:21 PM     (No. 9040450)

Uh, no. Proportional means equal in effect. This doesn´t work, as the more patient, less worried about losses, faction merely ups the ante next time, knowing that it will only get back the same in kind.

What nonsense. The response has to be swift, immediate and overwhelming. If not, the ratcheting up will never end. War by attrition is neither humane nor right.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: oh-heck, 11/29/2012 11:29:51 PM     (No. 9040490)

For every rocket fired into Israel, fire a smart bomb back. The Israelis probably are entitled to another 200 smart bombs. After the first 100, the people will stop allowing the few militants left from firing from schools and hospitals.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Cortillaen, 11/29/2012 11:49:17 PM     (No. 9040505)

Hm, proportional response, eh? I like the sound of that. Israel responds in kind to each attack, launching, as their opponents do, their best munitions at random civilian population centers with no warning.

What do you mean "That´s not the ´proportional´ they want"?


Reply 5 - Posted by: Spidey, 11/30/2012 4:35:33 AM     (No. 9040633)

Actually Gaza has one of the most densely populated areas of the world. If Israel got 60,000 Gaza style rockets and fired them back they would be pretty effectual.


Reply 6 - Posted by: zoidberg, 11/30/2012 8:40:19 AM     (No. 9040872)

I favor a proportional response, with a proportion of 100 to 1.


Reply 7 - Posted by: saguni, 11/30/2012 8:56:19 AM     (No. 9040913)

Poster #2: The response has to be swift, immediate and overwhelming.

Yesterday I was talking with some friends, and said, "There should be no reduced sentencing or probation for the first offense, come down hard and harsh to get their attention. The first and only time my then young teenage son broke curfew, he was five minutes late. I grounded him for five weeks...one a minute. After that, even if he thought he might not make it home on time he called ahead with a begging/excuse so he wouldn´t be punished again."

And yes, I was one of those mothers who drug the five year old back to the store to apologize to the clerk for taking a piece of candy without paying.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: hamrman, 11/30/2012 8:36:08 PM     (No. 9042177)

No give them the whole experience!



Post Reply   Close thread 713817




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "SoCalGal"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "SoCalGal"



Faulty wheel jeopardizes
Kepler space telescope´s
quest for alien life
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/16/2013 12:39:40 PM     Post Reply
A faulty steering apparatus may bring an early end to NASA’s Kepler space telescope, a $600 million tool in the space agency’s quest for life elsewhere in the universe. Kepler is the first NASA mission capable of finding Earth-size planets in or near the habitable zone, the range of distance from a star where the surface temperature of an orbiting planet might be suitable for liquid water. Launched in 2009, it has discovered thousands of such planets, including a pair just 1,200 light years away.(Snip) But yesterday, Kepler’s mission ran into trouble.

The IRS´s Nonprofit Helper
Wall Street Journal, by James Taranto    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/14/2013 4:10:56 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service last year supplied a left-leaning nonprofit charity with confidential information about conservative organizations, which the charity disseminated to the public, ProPublica reported yesterday. The charity in question was ProPublica itself. We should acknowledge that "left-leaning" is our characterization; ProPublica describes itself in its own tax filings as "entirely non-partisan and non-ideological." ProPublica is legally obliged to be nonpartisan, for it enjoys tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which means that contributions to it are tax-deductible.

A Tainted Campaign?
National Review Online, by Victor Davis Hanson    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/14/2013 1:44:02 PM     Post Reply
If it is proven that the IRS thwarted some groups from obtaining tax-exempt status in fear that their traditional or conservative messages might hurt the 2012 Obama campaign (especially if it did so under pressure from White House-affiliated operatives), and if it is proven that the Obama administration deliberately ignored warnings about lax security at the Benghazi consulate, missed real opportunities to send help, or deliberately massaged intelligence reports in order to mislead the pre-election public about the true nature of Benghazi in order to further a false campaign narrative of a near dormant al-Qaeda

   

 



 
Stealing Style From Granny
Wall Street Journal, by Alexa Brazilian    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/13/2013 7:45:00 PM     Post Reply
IS CONSERVATIVE THE new radical? The fashion world certainly seems to think so. This season, designers filled their runways with restrained silhouettes that echo the graceful, showing-less-is-more aesthetic of generations past. Designers are reimagining soignée staples for spring and summer—skirt suits, twin sets, below-the-knee dresses, kitten heels and frame bags—that appear anything but moth-eaten. In fact, fashion´s neoconservative coup d´état feels deliciously defiant, given the excessively revealing styles pop culture celebrates. A quick flip through any supermarket tabloid yields an

Sanford victory shows adultery,
lies can´t trump party loyalty
Los Angeles Times, by Robin Abcarian    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/13/2013 12:01:45 AM     Post Reply
It would be too easy to make fun of the good Christian voters of South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District who saw fit to return their disgraced former Gov. Mark Sanford to the office he once held. I won’t do it. Well, maybe just a little. Sanford, whose political rise was fueled by his conservative principles and focus on family values, did not stay true to his wife. But in the end, the voters in South Carolina’s 1st stayed true to him.(Snip)“Obviously, there´s a vulnerability to me now that people respond to," Sanford told

Jay Carney attempts to
throw CIA under the bus
on Benghazi talking points
Legal Insurrection, by William A. Jacobson    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/10/2013 5:07:56 PM     Post Reply
I’ll post the video when available. (Wow, GOP Rapid Response got this video out really quickly)(Snip for Video)Here are some tweets as it took place: Throwing CIA under bus never works, ask every prior President–> payback leaks — Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) May 10, 2013 Carney: Should we have overruled the intelligence community?We relied on what they thought.Fighting words. — Guy Benson (@guypbenson) May 10, 2013 “These were intelligence community talking points” -Jay Carney — Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) May 10, 2013

W.H. on Obama golfing
with GOP senators: ´He´s
willing to try anything´
Politico, by Donovan Slack    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/6/2013 6:07:43 PM     Post Reply
White House press secretary Jay Carney says there is no specific agenda for President Obama´s golf game with GOP senators Monday, hinting that the president is simply continuing his gambit to find members of the "common sense" caucus who are willing to work with him on any part of his agenda. "He’s willing to try anything," Carney said Monday while Obama was hitting the links with GOP Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Bob Corker. "And whether it’s a conversation on the phone or a meeting in the Oval Office or dinner in a restaurant or dinner in the residence,



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

50 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

   

 

  


 
Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

41 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
37 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

   

 



 
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

36 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 713817





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~