|
|
| |
Topic: State to Eliminate “Bride” &
“Groom” on Marriage Certificates |
State to Eliminate “Bride” &
“Groom” on Marriage Certificates
Fox News, by Todd Starnes
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/29/2012 9:02:11 AM
|
| The words “bride” and “groom” – along with “husband” and “wife” are about to become archaic language in Washington state as officials prepare to remove the terms from marriage and divorce certificates. (Snip) Tim Church, a spokesman for the Wash. state Health Department, told Fox News they will likely be removing those words in favor of more gender neutral terms. He said the changes are necessary in response to the same-sex marriage law that takes effect Dec. 6. “We’ve been quickly moving ahead to change our marriage certificate to make sure it fits for everyone who is going to be
|
Comments:
I feel like I´m living in a horrible nightmare and I can´t wake up. I truly didn´t think it was possible to have so many twisted and perverse individuals in this nation who do nothing but think of malevolent and heinous acts to further destroy the country and our culture. It makes me weep tears of anger and frustration.
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
jackson, 11/29/2012 9:10:41 AM (No. 9039077)
You can´t make this stuff up! "Tim Church ...spokesman for the Wash. state Health Department..."
Way to do your job, Tim. What could be "healthier" than the filthy devotion to the germ and bacteria rich human rectum. Oh, am I not supposed to use simple accurate language?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
AGGW, 11/29/2012 9:13:44 AM (No. 9039085)
Well said, OP
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
tsquare, 11/29/2012 9:21:47 AM (No. 9039096)
They might as well add a number of lines for multiple partners on the legal certifications
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
aasilver, 11/29/2012 9:23:09 AM (No. 9039098)
I am amazed at how Americans put up with ´hoop jumping´ for 3% of the population.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 11/29/2012 9:42:58 AM (No. 9039143)
Dearly beloved, does this animal take this mineral to be your vegetable for life....
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
dwillyc, 11/29/2012 9:43:32 AM (No. 9039144)
To be replaced with what? Catcher and Pitcher?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
coyote, 11/29/2012 9:50:04 AM (No. 9039154)
Does not the Washington State Legislature make the laws of the state? Did the Health department do this on their own? Washington Citizens want to know how their representative or senator voted (if there was a vote).
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
preciosodrogas, 11/29/2012 10:23:03 AM (No. 9039211)
This is appropriate if the government controls marriage. Government should not control marriage, at least not the federal government. I oppose same sex marriage on faith, moral, and personal beliefs. Those are personal beliefs they can only govern me. But it is none of the government´s business. For one thing it´s unconstitutional for the feds to be sticking their nose in it. It is not enumerated in the Constitution and therefor is left to us or the states. For the We The People, the public, it is now secular matter, that is if we are to have full freedom of worship or religion. As for my opinion this war was lost long ago. If We The People believed we were a country of the one and only true living God then we should have tightly controlled who was allowed to immigrate into this country. Since we opened the borders long ago to anyone and everyone our country is now divided into secular and private and the government needs to be tightly controlled or else we have government where it does not belong. That of course means people get to do what they want in private matters.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
lynngirl122, 11/29/2012 10:33:36 AM (No. 9039248)
In the movie Woman of the Year there is a lovely home wedding with the words God, sacred, obey, man, woman -- a stunning, gentle scene of traditional marriage. I burst into tears every time I see it.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ccprops, 11/29/2012 10:39:30 AM (No. 9039265)
Massachusetts did this several years ago. Instead of ´man and wife´, the current terminology is ´party A´ and ´party B´.
My wife and I once had a mock-serious discussion and wondered, if we were to renew our vows, who would be party ´A´ and who would be party ´B´. Is ´A´ the more butch? Does ´B´ swish more?
We decided that each of us wanted to be party ´A´. But alas, even in the people´s republic, you´ve got to be one or the other.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Bobn.T, 11/29/2012 11:01:10 AM (No. 9039320)
Why not just totally eliminate the institution of marriage. After all, it is a religious ceremony and religion must be removed from our society.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
tehtriggerman, 11/29/2012 11:47:00 AM (No. 9039405)
This is discrimination pure and simple.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Wetlandz, 11/29/2012 12:11:55 PM (No. 9039474)
Well #11 that is the end game of the left.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
kono, 11/29/2012 12:44:36 PM (No. 9039559)
If you want terms to be universally applicable, just change ´bride´ and ´groom´ to ´things´ and leave room for a list of any length. Multi-couple ´marriage´ will be coming soon on this slippery slope.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
zoidberg, 11/29/2012 1:05:57 PM (No. 9039603)
They´ll be referred to as tops and bottoms.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 11/29/2012 7:26:41 PM (No. 9040233)
How long before they erase "Washington" from the state name?
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to
block new gun restrictions,
file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea
Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti-
Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro-
life group about ´the content
of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S.
Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
| |
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t
Employees More Time for ´Planning
and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS
scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP
Investigates Obama Scandals,
´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
| | |
|
|
