A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Mitt Romney:
A good man.
The right fight.
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Mitt Romney:
A good man.
The right fight.

Washington Post, by Stuart Stevens

Original Article

Posted By:badrad, 11/28/2012 3:35:32 PM

Over the years, one of the more troubling characteristics of the Democratic Party and the left in general has been a shortage of loyalty and an abundance of self-loathing. It would be a shame if we Republicans took a narrow presidential loss as a signal that those are traits we should emulate.
Headline split by staff.

Comments:
Stuart Stevens leading Romney strategist reminding us that the overcoming of his opposition by hook or crook was a narrow obama win. Who do we want to be as a people-our 47% of the constitutional loyalists? Time to think about what we build onIMO.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: thethirdruffian, 11/28/2012 3:40:15 PM     (No. 9038012)

I´m sorry, but Romney was not a "good man."

He lied about and slandered good conservatives during the primaries -- both times, then pretended not to be responsible.

I knew he was a scum bag from the minute he had that fake Fred Thompson website in the first primary.

Was Romney better than Obama? Sure.

But is Romney worth a single tear? Nope.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Paleoconserv43, 11/28/2012 4:02:29 PM     (No. 9038041)

#1 Go take a long walk off a short pier!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: tonyl, 11/28/2012 4:23:29 PM     (No. 9038087)

Wrong 31. I thought mitt was running against ted Kennedy again with Gingrich. he was using all the same bain bashing, capitalist bash kennedy used against Mitt in 94. We are going to pay big time for not electing Mitt. He is a great man. He is a great American. He would have made a great President. Yes I did shed a few tears. God help our nation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: StormCnter, 11/28/2012 4:27:22 PM     (No. 9038095)

#1, do you have a verifiable example of "lied about and slandered"? Or are you simply quoting convenient rumors.

The article is right. Mitt Romney is a good and honorable man of admirable accomplishment. He would have saved this country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Wetlandz, 11/28/2012 4:38:27 PM     (No. 9038114)

I second that #2

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 11/28/2012 4:39:07 PM     (No. 9038115)

If I had been the chief strategist for Romney, I sure as heck wouldn´t admit it! I´d be thinking more about the witness protection program.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: slrobi, 11/28/2012 4:54:40 PM     (No. 9038153)

We will never have a perfect candidate. Romney is a good man and was a very good candidate. Would have made a very good president. He was up against the media and Democrat smear machine and the smears won.

I appreciate Romney´s efforts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Rafter, 11/28/2012 5:05:12 PM     (No. 9038176)

Romney´s a great guy who ran an outstanding race.

Remember that in 1980, Kennedy pummeled Carter in the Demo Primary.
The 1980 DimWit Cornvention was ugly and divided.
Obama, in contrast in 2012, had a free pass.

The electorate has changed.
Romney won the middle class and a bigger margin amongst whites than Reagan in 1980.
It´s just that whites are only 72 percent of voters in 2012.
In 1980 whites were 88 percent of voters.

The media blatantly boosted Obama all year,
and as with the Hurricane Sandy coverage the final week.

Reality is sometimes ugly.
Romney more than deserved to win this one.
Great guy, great family, great long run.
Our nation is screwed with his loss.

And losers like "Ken" from "Livonia" who phoned Rush a few weeks ago complaining
are just defeatist whiners.
The voters picked Romney - not the "Establishment."
That´s what the multiple state primaries are for.
Losers like "Ken" self-righteously wait for perfection in a conservative and refuse to
help Romney.
Thus they give us the Evil Obama and ruin.
And pat themselves on their backs for their purity.

We get a lot of losers like "Ken" from "Livonia" posting here.
Take a look above and find one.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: thethirdruffian, 11/28/2012 5:07:50 PM     (No. 9038184)

#4 This gem from the first Republican primary was when I realized that Myth was a white-washed tomb, eager to bash Republicans, but would not bash his fellow Democrats.

http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/2007/09/attack-website-from-romney-camp-calls.html

(Yes, fellow Democrats.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Pinons, 11/28/2012 5:11:57 PM     (No. 9038190)

#1, nothing will top Obama´s Benghazi lie to 70 million people on live TV in the second debate. Mitt Romeny is a good man and he epitomizes everything that Obama is not and will never be! It is too bad that America lost the opportunity to experience what a really good president Romney would have been.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: veritas, 11/28/2012 5:25:17 PM     (No. 9038211)

1. The Left has found that a sure path to power [their raison d´etre, of course] has been to turn national elections into a TV show: "The American Preezy." And, uhh, that "American" thing, well, hey, if he´s cool, looks kinda black [why isn´t 1/16th enough?], is a doper, who cares? We´re in.

There are answers, there are ways to beat the Left. Sorry that they may not be quick or easy, but they´re usually simple. Odd, but things that are right are often simple, but not easy. Well, unless and until you make them the norm. [Ahh, but that´s simple and not easy, isn´t it? Funny how that works....]

2. GRRRR! "one of... has been a shortage... and an abundance of...." I´m screaming here! "One of" has been "A and B"? Is everyone illiterate? Don´t editors work on Wednesdays at the WaPo? Is the difference between "one" and "two" now found only among the arcana? Known only to The Illuminati?

[Comment on several posts above -- yes, by all means, as Obama, an illegal usurper whose every official act is moot, whose borrowing is crippling us for generations, who is expropriating 1/6 of the economy to the gov´t in the quest for great power that enslaves us all via Obamacare, who eviscerates our military, who is fomenting war against Israel, who is cementing Islamist control of the Middle East, who is crippling our economy, who appoints incompetent America-hating apparatchiks everywhere [including the SCOTUS] -- yes, by all means, let´s have a name-calling food-fight over such flaws as Romney may have, rather than fight Obama.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Malia2012, 11/28/2012 5:31:38 PM     (No. 9038223)

I agree with #2, #3, #8, and everyone else who does NOT agree with #1. There are none so blind as those who will not see. Looks like some still subscribe to that adage. IMO, trash talk belongs to demonrats, not the GOP. BTW, I would like to thank Mitt Romney for being THE candidate who ran an honest campaign with integrity. Those qualities are non-existent in obama. Unfortunately these days, that´s just not enough to win. The election proved that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: lala, 11/28/2012 5:42:19 PM     (No. 9038239)

How many decades has it been since a Dem exhibited anything resembling "self-loathing"? They hide, excuse, celebrate every bad habit, illegality, fraud, lie, cheat, whatever, as long as there is a D behind someone´s name.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Wetlandz, 11/28/2012 5:45:37 PM     (No. 9038246)

dear Lord #9, at least I hope you are happy!

Obama four more years,

Fred Thompson would´ve lost by a wider margin not that you really care

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: congaree53, 11/28/2012 6:46:14 PM     (No. 9038334)

I assume Stu advised Mitt that he could not attract some 47%-- who would vote for Obama no matter what. Turns out that it was Mitt who could garner only 47% of the vote. If I were Stu I would lay low.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Scottish girl, 11/28/2012 7:04:53 PM     (No. 9038368)

I think Mitt is a decent, honorable man. I´m still sad he didn´t win.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: formerlyphelps, 11/28/2012 7:43:51 PM     (No. 9038406)

The interesting thing about the Romney rah-rah crowd is the apparent inability to step back and have some introspection.

According to this cheerleader piece, Romney did nothing wrong – he just came up a little short against the worst president in modern history. Nobody but voters liked him? He didn’t get support from “politicians in Washington”? He wasn’t the inevitable candidate? What nonsense. He barely scraped out a win in a protracted 3-way primary against two other candidates - one a supposedly fringe wacko religious fundamentalist fool and the other apparently an irreparably media-damaged ego-maniac Wilsonite moonbat who cheated on his wife. Voters “loved” him? The media propped him up in the primary and helped him destroy everyone else, and it was barely enough.

Yes, Romney performed good in “debate” (singular as per the article). His last two were lackluster. But he did NOT present a compelling case for free markets and government restraint. Warning of the catastrophic consequences of NOT doing those things is not the same as laying out the case for why it’s better to do them in the first place. He offered voters half, where -0-bama offered all. He did not explain WHY personal responsibility and having a job is better than living the life of Julia.

We can no longer assume Americans understand freedom and capitalism or desire either.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Cleanhousein2012, 11/28/2012 8:13:59 PM     (No. 9038439)

The problem 11, is that we can´t fight Obama, since the representatives we elected to do just that kow-tow and cave to Obama as soon as they can. This same leadership, btw, is the that which made sure that the candidate was Romney, and not one of the other supposed unelectables.

Romney may be a good guy, and may have proven to be a good or even great President, but we´ll never know. Mr. Electable phoned it in after the first debate and blew it, if he actually ever could have won it. I for one will work as hard as I can to see the birth of a third party. The GOP actually managed to grasp defeat from the worst President in history, and alienate a large proportion of their support in the process. They don´t deserve to continue.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 11/28/2012 9:37:17 PM     (No. 9038552)

The scale of the negative campaign Romney ran against fellow Republicans during the primary was truly appalling. He relied on well-funded personal attacks, and they drove Romney´s national favorability numbers through the floor before anyone had the money to respond in kind. Romney didn´t run a campaign for conservative ideas; he ran a smear campaign against his rivals as people. It takes a special kind of naivete to believe that the synchronization between a rival topping Romney in a poll and the appearance of damaging stories in the press was just a lucky coincidence for Mitt. I suppose believing that Mitt Romney was a "severe conservative" requires a similar act of willful blindness. Romney was what he was--indisputably better than Obama but nowhere near the political candidate his followers continue to misrepresent on this site.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: TakeBackAmerica, 11/28/2012 9:48:24 PM     (No. 9038568)

#17: Your last line sums it all up:

We can no longer assume Americans understand freedom and capitalism or desire either.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Hobbiest, 8/8/2013 11:55:59 AM     (No. 9464369)

Romney couldn´t beat an incumbent who had been underwater in several polls a year before the election and whose major policy initiative has always been unpopular. He was claimed to be an excellent judge of talent but his paid advisers fought a 21st century campaign with a 1990s media strategy while Obama had the Internet sites frequented by low info voters all to himself. Romney´s chief selling point was his skill as a manager yet on election day the GOTV software his campaign had spent a fortune to develop fizzled badly.

The sad thing is that it was all fairly predictable. As a candidate Romney has always looked better on paper than in performance. He has a record of starting strong, fighting hard in the primaries and then getting tentative towards the end of the general election cycle.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 713630




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "badrad"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "badrad"



Mitt Romney:
A good man.
The right fight.
Washington Post, by Stuart Stevens    Original Article
Posted By: badrad- 11/28/2012 3:35:32 PM     Post Reply
Over the years, one of the more troubling characteristics of the Democratic Party and the left in general has been a shortage of loyalty and an abundance of self-loathing. It would be a shame if we Republicans took a narrow presidential loss as a signal that those are traits we should emulate.
Headline split by staff.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

53 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

44 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

43 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it

Atlanta Braves flooded with Hank
Aaron hate mail: He’s a ‘s*****g’

30 replie(s)
Washington Times (D.C.), by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/15/2014 3:23:19 PM     Post Reply
Hank Aaron’s recent comments about the need for America to realize that racism is still very much alive and thriving — only now due to those who wear “neckties and starched shirts” rather than KKK hoods — has sparked an angry backlash and many fans are turning the tables, calling the baseball legend himself a racist. “Hank Aaron is a s*****g piece of [expletive] [racial slur],” one man said in an email to the Atlanta Braves’ front office, one of the teams Mr. Aaron used to play for, CBS News reported. “My old man instilled in my mind from a


Post Reply   Close thread 713630





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~