A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Harry Reid: Fiscal Cliff Deal
Must Include Raising Debt Ceiling
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Harry Reid: Fiscal Cliff Deal
Must Include Raising Debt Ceiling

Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/28/2012 2:39:07 PM

In addition to raising taxes on those making over $250,000, Harry Reid and President Barack Obama want to raise the debt ceiling as part of the fiscal cliff negotiations. Reid on Tuesday said raising the debt ceiling must also be included in any fiscal cliff deal because he did not want to negotiate separately with Republicans over the debt ceiling six weeks later. “We would be somewhat foolish to work out something on stopping us from going over the cliff and then a month or six weeks later Republicans pull the same game they did before and say,

Comments:
It sickens and enrages me what the Democrats are doing to this country and the Republicans act like spineless fools. The fact that spending is never, ever mentioned in these discussions is outrageous. It´s so very depressing.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: FunOne, 11/28/2012 2:41:53 PM     (No. 9037883)

How about the GOP insisting that the Senate PASS A BUDGET as a condition on any fiscal cliff negotiations?


Reply 2 - Posted by: SteelTurman, 11/28/2012 2:45:25 PM     (No. 9037887)

How about the Republicans do anything but cave every time?

Just once - try it just to see if it might work.

Never know unless you try.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Gallo3, 11/28/2012 2:45:42 PM     (No. 9037889)

Not just no, but heck no!


Reply 4 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 11/28/2012 2:48:46 PM     (No. 9037898)

Fine. Make them actually propose and pass a budget. I can´t believe that we´re on our way to a fourth year without a budget.


Reply 5 - Posted by: rpool, 11/28/2012 2:48:58 PM     (No. 9037899)

Uh, just in case you didn´t read #3´s post, NO!


Reply 6 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 11/28/2012 2:49:07 PM     (No. 9037900)

Dear Harry Reid, please see:

Greece
The EU
Spain
The Roman Empire

Dear Repubs, please see the above.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Periwinkel, 11/28/2012 2:52:13 PM     (No. 9037908)

Does anyone else notice that the Democrats are telling us what we should include, but we never hear what they will put on the table? Rush was just talking about that...I guess because they won the election and we didn´t.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: hotcorner, 11/28/2012 2:54:42 PM     (No. 9037916)

Yes, how about a budget, a standard of no more than 19% GDP for spending, the penny mac bill for cutting spending, entitlement reform. No, negotiating with these weenies who are in a campaign mode 100% of the time won´t work. Buchanan said pass 2 bills: retain the payroll tax cut and retain the Bush tax cuts for another year and wait. Let the Rats sign it or leave it on the table and own the cliff. There are few good options with these folks.


Reply 9 - Posted by: noproblems, 11/28/2012 3:00:28 PM     (No. 9037924)

ther Dims know they have no leverage once the Repugs agree to raise taxes on the rich.

I an not sure of the depths of Repug stupidity. I would recommend they only pass the Bush "tax cuts" but without including the "rich" (let the Dimms define rich).

If the Dimms want to go over the cliff, let them. Kinda hard for them to blame Repugs at that point. Once the rich are taxed everything is fine, right?

Also, we will find out what kind of man Romney is tomorrow.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Garry Owen, 11/28/2012 3:02:12 PM     (No. 9037930)

I recommend we take the dive off the fiscal cliff. This is the only way to get the mandatory domestic spending cuts. Once off the cliff the House (because that is where all budget matters must originate) pass a permanent tax relief bill reinstating the Bush Tax rates. Let Obama and the Democrats vote against middle class tax relief, good for 2014. Then, pass a second bill to relieve the military of 1/2 the mandatory budget cuts. Let Obama and the Democrats vote against supporting our military during a time of war. Another winning issue for 2014. I sure hope someone in the GOP Leadership reads Lucianne. This is a no brainer...the only way we the people will get the domestic spending cuts.


Reply 11 - Posted by: ZurichMike, 11/28/2012 3:03:02 PM     (No. 9037931)

Where is the GOP response? Where is the pushback? The anger? The facts? Where is the spine of the GOP?

I am seriously depressed that John Blubber-Boy Boehner will just roll over for the Demowhores.

It´s about the deficit and spending. Fight back, you weasels.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 11/28/2012 3:03:16 PM     (No. 9037932)

What makes dirty Harry think there will be a "Deal"? At this point, I am all for diving off the Fiscal Cliff! It is time to take the punishment for allowing this disaster to happen. Let the chips fall where they may!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Davids918, 11/28/2012 3:09:32 PM     (No. 9037944)

Make them propose and vote on a budget in the Senate first.

Then we´ll talk, Harry.

McConnell and others should be demanding the Senate Democrats pass a budget - put their names on the line.

Do NOT allow the debt ceiling to be increased as it will only allow them to push this off just like they have for the last 4 years.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Pearson365, 11/28/2012 3:15:49 PM     (No. 9037963)

Obama & Reid are far craftier than smart, for they know how to have the media blame the GOP for everything they and the Dems do wrong. Don´t increase the debt ceiling, then seniors won ´t get SS checks. Don´t agree upon raising taxes on the "rich", then retailers have a bleak Christmas. Ask for entitlement reform, then the poor and elderly won´t get to see a doctor. Act to reduce growth of spending, then AIDs sufferers go naked. The old, white GOP not only is soulless, it is heartless. No matter how false, this is the narrative that national media will run with, especially with Christmas approaching.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Rafter, 11/28/2012 3:17:46 PM     (No. 9037967)

Refuse to raise the debt ceiling any further.

Take a stand.

What could anyone do?
The GOP controls the House.
Time for GOP to stick it to ´em.
Constitution gives House the power to tax and spend.

I´d like to see the predictions on the results of this.
"Default."
"Bankruptcy."
"Over the cliff without a chute."

Time for The Day of Reckoning.
And Wreckining.
Bring it on.
The Obama Train Wreck.
It´s a No-Broehner.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Black Knight, 11/28/2012 3:27:15 PM     (No. 9037986)

Go over the Fiscal Cliff to be sure we´re all in this together.
(We can reverse the Tax Increases when we have cut enough wasted spending to do so.)

Leave the Debt Ceiling frozen to require the Federal Reserve to cover all overspending by expanding the money supply. (They already do so by buying up our expiring debt.)

Put Obama on Quarterly Probationary Budgeting. (The federal workforce must have maximum skin in the game, and Obama must face the music every quarter.)
- Freeze every Department´s Budget in inflated dollars, with zero growth trajectory and zero inflation offset, until the Budget is balanced.
- Freeze compensation of the non-Defense federal workforce until the Budget
is balanced.
- Replace Continuing Budget Resolutions with Quarterly Probationary Budgets that make real quarterly cuts across the board for every department.
- Reduce each non-Defense Department´s Quarterly Budget by 1% from the prior
Quarter as a cut in Waste, Fraud and Abuse, and define its unique performance metric for return on spending.
- Institute quarterly House Reviews of every Department´s performance before passing the next Quarterly Budget.
- Support the Reviews with a House Budget Oversight Department (BOD) to (1) verify spending control, (2) report return on spending, and (3) investigate Waste, Fraud and Abuse by Department. Fund the BOD with an allocation of 1% from every Department´s Budget. [Let Romney run it.]


Reply 17 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 11/28/2012 3:40:57 PM     (No. 9038013)

I´ve heard nothing but what the socialists want - higher tax rates, debt ceiling increase, no spending cuts. Why should there be any kind of deal? What are they willing to give up to get all this? To hell with them.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 11/28/2012 4:18:36 PM     (No. 9038077)

Every day the dems make a new demand. It never stops.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Wetlandz, 11/28/2012 4:59:31 PM     (No. 9038162)

Forget Greece, this country will look like the inner city slums of Detroit when the Dems win this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: neenbean, 11/28/2012 5:12:40 PM     (No. 9038193)

Better yet...do nothing and lets go over! Be done with it...Why worry about a debt ceiling when you don´t have budgets and send billions to Hamas


Reply 21 - Posted by: oh-heck, 11/28/2012 5:15:39 PM     (No. 9038203)

Let them keep demanding and don´t say a word. The extensions will expire on unemployment benefits, the Bush tax rates, and the Obama Payroll Tax Holiday. The Sequester they proposed will take effect. Reality has to set in sometime.

Have House Democrats put a bill on the floor?

Have Senate Democrats put a bill on the floor?

Who is doing the obstructing?


Reply 22 - Posted by: formerlyphelps, 11/28/2012 5:42:11 PM     (No. 9038237)

Democrats don’t want to fix the problems. They don’t know how to fix the problems. Democrats aren’t even trying to fix the problems!

They want to buy votes, pass the buck, assign blame, obfuscate and evade. They only want to win. The results are 100% irrelevant.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: octrojan, 11/28/2012 5:45:47 PM     (No. 9038248)

Not sure why the opposition to Reid´s comment. Makes sense, doesn´t it? Why play games. Either make a deal or dive off the cliff. Why pretend to deal today and do it all over again in 6 weeks. What´s going to change between now and then?


Reply 24 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 11/28/2012 5:52:40 PM     (No. 9038264)

The Dems are essentially stealing money from the next generation and spending it all now. But they think ahead no further than the next 24 hours (just like their supporters).
It won´t be a pretty day when it suddenly has to stop.


Reply 25 - Posted by: rocket scientist, 11/28/2012 6:50:20 PM     (No. 9038343)

At this point I don´t believe anything either party says. All we get is endless Kabuki theater from this bunch. We know Boehner does secret deals with the DemocRATS behind closed doors. All we can be certain of is nothing will change, spending will go up and taxes will go up. We do not have a representative government any more. We have government by Crime Family.


Reply 26 - Posted by: TXknitter, 11/28/2012 6:54:32 PM     (No. 9038353)

Dr. K is right. Republicans have one card, one card only to play. If they do not do this, there won´t be disagreement any longer that all is lost for the GOP. Allow us to go over the fiscal cliff. So WHAT if Pubbies get "blamed?" When is it time for Boehner and company to stop making decisions because they will get "blamed" for something?? Ths move would ruin Obama´s second term! Do it. If you love this country at all anymore, Mr. Speaker, just do it.



Post Reply   Close thread 713622




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says
Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM     Post Reply
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.

Rep. Nadler: Post-Five Month
Abortion Ban ‘Morally Outrageous’
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 7:58:34 PM     Post Reply
Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday it is “morally outrageous” to ban abortions after five months of pregnancy. “It is morally outrageous, frankly,” Nadler said about the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 1797), a bill that would ban abortions 20 weeks post-fertilization, or five months into pregnancy. “Here we go again,” he said. “Every single year we have to go through the same nonsense with the same morally presumptuous, morally arrogant attitude that we know better. ‘We know better than women and their doctors. We know better about their health care.

Bill Ayers: Obama Presidency Gets
‘Failing Grade,’ He Should Be
Tried For ‘War Crimes’
Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 2:20:06 PM     Post Reply
Bill Ayers believes President Obama gets a “failing grade” for his presidency, and should be tried for “war crimes,” along with all living presidents who have engaged in acts of “terrorism” abroad. Sitting down for an episode of RealClearPolitics’ “Morning Commute,” Ayers told host Charlie Stone that, on policy, Obama receives a “failing grade” along with the “F-minuses” he’s given previous presidents like George W. Bush and Richard Nixon. “I don’t think he’s let anybody down,” Ayers added, pointing to how during the 2008 presidential campaign then-Senator Obama consistently declared himself to be a “middle-of-the-road, pragmatic politician.”

NSA Chief: Intel Leak Caused
‘Irreversible and Significant Damage’
Cybercast News Service, by Melanie Hunter    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 2:05:10 PM     Post Reply
National Security Agency Director Gen. Keith Alexander told the House Intelligence Committee on Tuesday that the NSA whistleblower that leaked classified information on the agency’s surveillance program caused “irreversible and significant damage” to the nation and helped America’s enemies. “I think it was irreversible and significant damage to this nation,” Alexander said Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) asked how damaging it was “to the national security of the American people that this trust was violated.” “Has this helped America’s enemies?” Bachmann asked Alexander. “I believe it has, and I believe it will hurt us and our allies,”

Will Boehner Lose His Speakership Over
Immigration Reform? ‘Maybe,’ He Says
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 1:57:02 PM     Post Reply
John Boehner (R-Ohio) said he might lose his job as House speaker over immigration reform, but he insisted he will not bring a bill to the House floor that does not have majority support of both Republicans and Democrats. Following the Republican conference meeting on Tuesday, Boehner was asked: “Rep. Rohrabacher said that if you bring immigration reform to the floor without the support of the GOP conference you will lose your job (as speaker). Do you think that’s accurate?” “Maybe,” Boehner said after a long pause, to laughter from reporters.

Al Sharpton: GOP ‘Built
on Fear and Obstruction’
Cybercast News Service, by Melanie Hunter    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 1:51:48 PM     Post Reply
Rev. Al Sharpton, host of MSNBC’s “PoliticsNation,” said Friday that Republicans are “scared,” because the party is “built on fear and obstruction.” “This is who they are. They are scared, because the party is built on fear and obstruction, and no matter how hard they try, it’s not working,” said Sharpton after reading a tweet from Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) that bragged about being “Obamaphobic.” “If supporting real immigration reform, not path to citizenship is ‘Obamaphobia,’ guilty as charged. RT is you’re a fellow ‘Obamaphobic!’” Cruz tweeted in response to Sen. Robert Menendez’s (D-N.J.) accusation that Cruz has

Navy Will Inspect Its Bathrooms
for ‘Degrading’ Images of Women
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 1:46:56 PM     Post Reply
In line with Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel’s order for troops to have their workplaces searched for “degrading or offensive” materials -- part of an attempt to curb sexual assault in the military -- the Navy will inspect even its bathrooms. While what’s degrading or offensive is open to interpretation, the material can include song lyrics and “inappropriate cartoons.” In a memo sent on June 13, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus ordered that all sailors, Marines, cadets and civilian employees have their workplaces searched by June 28.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Edward Snowden Is In The
Process Of Destroying Any Support
And Sympathy He Has Built Up

47 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM     Post Reply
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information

Barbara Walters Defends Maher
Calling Trig Palin Retarded:
‘I Don´t Think He Intended
it to be Mean-Spirited’

45 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by John Nolte    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM     Post Reply
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?

Who is he? Obama keeps allies,
enemies guessing in second term

44 replie(s)
The Hill, by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: ketchuplover- 6/17/2013 6:31:12 AM     Post Reply
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is. Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric? Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations. His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue.

Jeb Bush labels conservative
critics ‘the chirpers’

44 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM     Post Reply
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative

Rubio Aide: ‘There Are American
Workers Who, For Lack of a
Better Term, Can’t Cut It’

42 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Rich Lowry    Original Article
Posted By: trapper- 6/16/2013 11:18:45 PM     Post Reply
Politico’s Playbook has an excerpt from a new Ryan Lizza piece from the New Yorker that is not yet online. It contains a passage on the back-and-forth between labor and the Chamber that has a quote from a Rubio staffer that is going to raise eyebrows, to say the least: “There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.” Here is the entire context:

Iran to send 4,000 troops to
support President Assad in
Syria as British Armed Forces
play war games on border

38 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Suzannah Hills    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/16/2013 11:08:12 PM     Post Reply
Iran is preparing to send 4,000 troops in to Syria to support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in the wake of America´s announcement it will be providing ´military aid´ to the country´s Muslim rebels. President Barack Obama made the pledge earlier this week after the U.S. claimed it found ´conclusive evidence´ Assad´s regime has used chemical weapons against the rebel forces--which includes the most extreme Sunni Islamists--and has called for Britain and France to back the move. While Britain hasn´t made a guarantee either way as yet, more than 350 Royal Marines are being sent to Jordan

Marco Rubio doesn´t
know if ´he´s getting
played´ by Democrats

37 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/17/2013 6:42:44 AM     Post Reply
Is Marco Rubio, R-Fla., getting played by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.? During his interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl this morning, Rubio didn’t even seem to understand what that meant. “Are you being played by the Democrats?” asked Karl. “Is Chuck Schumer playing you?” “I don’t — I quite frankly, I don’t even know what that means,” Rubio replied. “Is he using you?” Karl continued. “Is he using you to try to accomplish something that the Democrats want and is not — not a conservative bill?” Rubio responded that immigration reform was a bi-partisan issue that “all Americans


Post Reply   Close thread 713622





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~