A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Fox Interview Ends After Guest Accuses
Network Of Operating As ‘Wing
Of The Republican Party’
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Fox Interview Ends After Guest Accuses
Network Of Operating As ‘Wing
Of The Republican Party’

Mediaite, by Andrew Kirell

Original Article

Posted By:Oblio, 11/27/2012 6:59:15 AM

Fox News interview about the Benghazi attacks ended Monday morning after the guest openly accused the network of “hyping” the story — doing so with political motivations by acting as “a wing of the Republican Party.” Author Tom Ricks was brought on Happening Now to discuss how several GOP lawmakers are backing off their criticism of U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice‘s handling of the September terror attacks that left four Americans dead in Libya.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: right-turn, 11/27/2012 7:07:38 AM     (No. 9035461)

Another left wing kook unable to see the truth or even speak the truth.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Mai Bad, 11/27/2012 7:09:18 AM     (No. 9035465)

Yo..yo..OBummer and crew hate any criticism!!,How dare anyone question "Jesus"!!,


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: marcus tullius, 11/27/2012 7:19:04 AM     (No. 9035482)

#2... the correct pronunciation is B´roke Insane Odumma.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 11/27/2012 7:21:46 AM     (No. 9035484)

I dare this guy to go on with Megyn Kelly. Not that Jon Scott isn´t tough, but Megyn would chew him into paste before dumping his @ss.

Amd yet, he wants to sell his book, to Fox viewers.

As we all know, this is the kind of story that would be thrust upon us 24/7 (´´HYPED´´) by the FKA/MSM if it had happened during the Bush years. When I compare this and the media reaction to it, to the ValPlame NOTHINGBURGER, or Abu Ghraib, and what happened with those stories, I just fume. And then shake my head since this is such a common experience for us.

I wish, I really really wish, this guy had had the cajones to hawk his stupid book with Megyn.....


Reply 5 - Posted by: SourKraut, 11/27/2012 7:28:01 AM     (No. 9035491)

Scott missed a huge opening:

´As opposed to the rest of the media, who are nothing but water-boys and cheerleaders for Obama ?´


Reply 6 - Posted by: pineledger, 11/27/2012 7:30:17 AM     (No. 9035496)

What does the number of security contractors killed in Iraq have to do with the attack by AQ on an American consulate and the murder of an American ambassador?

Obviously Mr.Ricks has not heard of the third-term logical fallacy.


Reply 7 - Posted by: jinx, 11/27/2012 7:32:57 AM     (No. 9035502)

Hype the story! #4 is right. The MSM hyped the Valerie Plame story until Scooter Libby was sent to jail for lying to the FBI. Abu G. was hyped until members of our military were kicked out. Bush was hyped because he dared to wear a bomber jacket and stand under a banner that said Mission Accomplished. The MSM did not hype Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton. I need to stop. Ricks is a political hack for the left operating as a "wing of the Socialist Party aka Democrat Party."


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Catherine, 11/27/2012 8:08:55 AM     (No. 9035548)

Anyone who says Fox is filled with nothing but right wing conservatives immediately lets us know they don´t watch. Friend of mine is exactly like that when she spouts the manic left wing drivel. When someone says that, tho, I tune them out. They´re just repeating what they´ve been told on left wing sites.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Maybeth, 11/27/2012 8:13:26 AM     (No. 9035561)

If he accused FOX News of being a right wing of the Republican Party, what does he call CNN - NBC - MSNBC - ABC - CBS - PBS - NYT - WaPo - USAToday .... all the ´newsies´ which blatantly promote Socialism, Obama and the Democrat Party?

This is Marxism at its best, accusing others of the activities your party practices.


Reply 10 - Posted by: mominNoCA, 11/27/2012 8:17:50 AM     (No. 9035571)

A dead ambassador is just "hype"? He wasn´t even appointed by a Republican. I guess lefties don´t mind sacrificing their own.


Reply 11 - Posted by: krause, 11/27/2012 8:19:10 AM     (No. 9035572)

I thought Scott handled it properly. He realized Ricks did not want to have a serious discussion. Don´t waste the time. It would be like trying to have an intelligent discussion with Bill Press, Sgt. Shultz, or Jeanne Garofolo. Impossible.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Newtsche, 11/27/2012 8:19:38 AM     (No. 9035574)

´As opposed to the rest of the media, who are nothing but water-boys and cheerleaders for Obama ?´

You´d think the best defense would be a good offense here but instead fighting from our heels is SOP. Scott should have laughed in his face, cited ubiquitous lefty projection and gotten back on topic.

Ricks´ visit to Fox could be an early foray into enemy territory. The left has been quietly targeting Fox, talk radio and the internet, percolating for four years, about to bubble over.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: cake crumb, 11/27/2012 8:20:59 AM     (No. 9035578)

It wasn´t a firefight, it was a siege. Scott should never have backed off on that pompous derriere. He let him win a fallacious argument. Stupid.


Reply 14 - Posted by: earlybird, 11/27/2012 8:23:41 AM     (No. 9035585)

Jon Scott is NOT the one to take on a guy like this. Not the sharpest knife in the door, he gets lost when things go off script.

Formerly lite Bill Hemmer seems to be coming on stronger these days. Formerly sort of a fluffy early morning type, he did some terrific work during the election. I was surprised.


Reply 15 - Posted by: earlybird, 11/27/2012 8:24:52 AM     (No. 9035586)

Oops.

#14 should have said "not the sharpest knife in the drawer".

Coffee time.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 11/27/2012 8:32:10 AM     (No. 9035595)

For openers, the fact that this article appears in MEDIAite should be a dead giveaway about the leftward direction in which it’s going to lean.

Fox News Channel sometimes goes much too far out of its way to be “fair and balanced.” FNC is so heavily laden with liberal democrats that I sometimes wonder if I’ve wandered inadvertently over to CNN or, heaven forefend, MSNBC.

Fox News regulars such as Juan Williams, Bob Beckel and Alan Colmes along with the increasingly growing cadre of Fox News irregulars – “contributors” - who inhabit the channel often cause a goodly number of viewers to complain, frequently on threads such as this one.

The road to um, uh, somewhere or other, is paved with good intentions; probably by members of the pavers union.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Speedypetey, 11/27/2012 8:34:20 AM     (No. 9035600)

Mr. Ricks is cunning in his approach. The best defense is a good offense. Four men were murdered and two men´s careers were trashed (or fired) same thing, Rear Admiral Gaouette and General Ham for launching a rescue attempt that would have saved these brave men but was thwarted by the highest office in the land. That is the coverup and Mr. Ricks has proven he is not a journalist, investigative or otherwise.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: rplat, 11/27/2012 8:34:45 AM     (No. 9035603)

Why did they even want to talk to this scum. Enough of this "Fair and Balanced" crap.


Reply 19 - Posted by: SoCalGal, 11/27/2012 8:40:33 AM     (No. 9035615)

What #16 said.


Reply 20 - Posted by: EnsignO´Toole, 11/27/2012 8:44:13 AM     (No. 9035623)

And I´ve been complaining that Fox News is going "wobbley" on us. I can´t take Whoraldo Rivers and I can barely stomach Shep Smith. Also there are Bob Beckel and Juan Williams who appear daily at Fox News and who grow more tiresome by the day. Juan, in particular, should be forever grateful that Rupert Murdoch rescued him after he lost his job at NPR (or was it PBS? - same difference).


Reply 21 - Posted by: suedotsue, 11/27/2012 8:54:39 AM     (No. 9035637)

If Fox News is a wing of anything it´s a wing of the Bush crowd. The term GOP correctly defined in 2012 is the Bush crowd. They hold court on Fox News.


Reply 22 - Posted by: maryc, 11/27/2012 9:06:31 AM     (No. 9035663)

We live in a press world akin to 1960´s USSR. Only one voice and it isn´t true, objective or even remotely objective. They have made talk raido their next target . And sadly that is our radio free America. Sites like this are now outposts of freedom. Don´t give guys like this a voice. He really is nothing but a tool with an ego and nno original thought.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: WAN2, 11/27/2012 9:40:07 AM     (No. 9035735)

It is called projecting.


Reply 24 - Posted by: chicodon, 11/27/2012 10:05:45 AM     (No. 9035795)

Predictions: 1. MSNBC will run the segment in a loop. 2. He will never appear on Fox News again.


Reply 25 - Posted by: killerbee, 11/27/2012 10:09:07 AM     (No. 9035801)

The guy clearly came on the show to push an agenda that had nothing to do with what he agreed to go on the show for.

However, these moments can turn into gifts. The pig chose the right news talker to ambush as Jon Scott didn´t hive him the heck he deserved.


Reply 26 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 11/27/2012 10:11:51 AM     (No. 9035809)

To bad Jon Scott didn`t challenge this jerk. You can tell the show producer whispered in Scott`s earpiece to cut off the interview.


Reply 27 - Posted by: owl, 11/27/2012 10:12:36 AM     (No. 9035811)

The socialists won´t rest until we´re all dead . They control government unions , the education and media systems and their propaganda is rampant . Indoctrination has our kids voting for Pol Pot and they whine about a little sliver of sanity left - Hannity . Greta is a moderate conservative , and that´s it ! . Reilly anyone ? . Listen to Fox news radio and tell me Fox is ´ a wing of Republicans ´ . Go soak your head , idiot .


Reply 28 - Posted by: RancherJack, 11/27/2012 10:23:04 AM     (No. 9035830)

Well, Fox is on a meme that serves somebody other than me.

I quit watching Fox several years ago. They´re as bad as the Usual Suspects.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Arby, 11/27/2012 10:40:48 AM     (No. 9035867)

If the press isn´t slobbering all over you, it´s the enemy. The left just doesn´t get it and the ´press´ as a profession tanked long ago.


Reply 30 - Posted by: snowoutlaw, 11/27/2012 10:56:32 AM     (No. 9035897)

Fox has to learn that the truth is not wanted by most people. Most people want to be lied to because it makes them feel so much better. Lying is the way to get ahead in this Obama world.


Reply 31 - Posted by: CEP, 11/27/2012 11:02:32 AM     (No. 9035909)

Who is Tom Ricks?


Reply 32 - Posted by: NYbob, 11/27/2012 11:09:04 AM     (No. 9035929)

Incompetent interview of a zealot. Answers question with a question. No one ever asks these apologists why there was no anticipation of violence at this hot spot?

Mediaite makes me physically ill when I read the comments of the new leftists that post there. When I realize these people are now running my country, I am overwhelmed with pessimism for our collective future.


Reply 33 - Posted by: bubbabgone, 11/27/2012 11:18:17 AM     (No. 9035945)

This Ricks guy belongs to a Lefty "Think Tank" populated by a bunch of Obama appointees. He made sure his appearance on FOX was going to earn him some chits with the far left crowd he feels most comfortable.


Reply 34 - Posted by: oh-heck, 11/27/2012 11:54:13 AM     (No. 9036021)

Someone please tell me when the last time a coordinated military style assault was made on a US embassy and allowed to continue for 7 hours without a full military response to save our men.

Someone also please tell me when we knew we had been hit by terrorists and refused to even acknowledge they had taken credit. They remained widely seen on the street while the FBI stayed away for a month because the risk of confrontation was too high.


Reply 35 - Posted by: John21, 11/27/2012 11:54:22 AM     (No. 9036022)

Just another Obamabot sucking up for his lord and savior. No intelligence required.

If you have read any of Mr. Ricks books you can easily understand the "No Intelligence Required" comment.

You just can´t fix stupid


Reply 36 - Posted by: No Arm, 11/27/2012 11:56:34 AM     (No. 9036030)

Everyone-

Stop watching all cable and network news...including FOX. Get information from the internet. Significant drop in viewership will send shockwaves through media.

Stop buying books from news personalities- conservative or liberal including OReilly Hannity etc.


Reply 37 - Posted by: JoniTx, 11/27/2012 12:01:00 PM     (No. 9036043)

Rarely watch Fox News any more. Each time I do go to it, some dem appears to be blaming some Republican for something, or idolizing obama. Very discouraging....at times they are much worse than CNN ever was. At least we knew where CNN was coming from.


Reply 38 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 11/27/2012 12:04:50 PM     (No. 9036051)

The fact that the libs are whining about Fox is the reason that Fox remains fair and balanced. Gives us a chance to hear what lunatic things they say. juan and alan c. are funny - bob is having a good time and half of the time I think he doesn´t believe the words that come out of his mouth. All part of the program.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Freeloader, 11/27/2012 12:09:38 PM     (No. 9036058)

Can´t help but note how Mr. Ricks, the Audie Murphy wannabe and widely celebrated "military expert," has never logged a day of military service.


Reply 40 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 11/27/2012 12:27:39 PM     (No. 9036085)

What Ricks did is commonly known as biting the foot that stomps your grape.


Reply 41 - Posted by: mickturn, 11/27/2012 12:48:46 PM     (No. 9036135)

No, Bevis´ brother, it´s all about accountability but you wouldn´t get that.


Reply 42 - Posted by: Penney, 11/27/2012 12:54:13 PM     (No. 9036148)

The dem politicos have drifted so far left that they no longer even recognize the authentic facts when confronted with them? ...Parse, ´´zombies.´´


Reply 43 - Posted by: belwhatter, 11/27/2012 3:12:05 PM     (No. 9036397)

If Fox displeases you so, there is a new station called ´The Blaze´ - it is available on ROKU and Dish - it is privately owned and does not have to abide by any agenda other than the truth. So quit moaning and do yourselves a favor.For a miniscule monthly outlay you can have access to what is really going on.


Reply 44 - Posted by: osprey21, 11/27/2012 5:13:26 PM     (No. 9036552)

Hey Tommy, shove it.


Reply 45 - Posted by: RightShoe, 11/27/2012 9:15:52 PM     (No. 9036772)

Not sure why Fox bothered with this twit. Conservatives need to start becoming more aggressive in telling our story instead of capitulating to dingbats like this one. Liberals are only growing more and more shameless.

The idea that this guy should be interviewed about what John McCain was doing was foolish to begin with.

Let´s face it, the President lied about Benghazi, and CBS proved it.


Reply 46 - Posted by: mikeman, 11/27/2012 9:35:48 PM     (No. 9036799)

Ricks wrote "the gamble", which is guaranteed to put you to sleep.

He´s probably not as lazy as jayson blair who wrote his Iraq articles while sitting in a Manhattan park. But he is one boring and predictable lefty.



Post Reply   Close thread 713437




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"



The Secrets of Princeton
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Piercing the secrecy of
offshore tax havens
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM     Post Reply
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.

Former News Corp President
Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM     Post Reply
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.

After Pentagon investigations, three
Army generals censured for misconduct
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM     Post Reply
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.

Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration
minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM     Post Reply
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

55 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

42 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

39 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.


Post Reply   Close thread 713437





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~