A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: ‘Poverty’ like we’ve never seen it
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
‘Poverty’ like we’ve never seen it
New York Post, by Robert Rector

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 11/27/2012 5:22:10 AM

The federal government now considers a family of four in New York City to be poor if its pre-tax income is below $37,900.Even with full medical coverage. The calculation helps explain why newly revised Census Bureau figures hike the number of poor Americans to 49 million as of last year, further widening an already yawning gap between ordinary perceptions of poverty and how the government sees it. This breathtaking number begs the question: What does it mean to be “poor” in the United States? To the average American, the word “poverty” means significant material hardship and need.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: rabbit, 11/27/2012 5:27:02 AM     (No. 9035375)

Sad. Because there are people who are truly poor, who don´t have enough to eat or a roof over their heads. And this ´dumbing down´ of the definition of poverty makes it more difficult for social services agencies to differentiate and get help to those who truly are in need.


Reply 2 - Posted by: tehtriggerman, 11/27/2012 5:31:28 AM     (No. 9035377)

Thats about what I bring in annually on my own.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 11/27/2012 5:44:07 AM     (No. 9035387)

My definition of real poverty comes close to the conditions in which Obama´s half-brother (or whatever relation he is) lives in Kenya. It´s also close to the way most people in Britain lived in WWII and for some years afterwards. Add to that the Appalachian poor, poor American Indians on the rez, and so on. We don´t have to raise the line below which poverty lies. We already have plenty of it.

A few years ago the common definition was if you don´t have a microwave, you´re poor. These days it´s if you didn´t grab a 60" TV on Black Friday, you´re poor.

I guess we´re poor.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Quisp, 11/27/2012 5:44:33 AM     (No. 9035388)

The key fact in this article is the change in how poverty is assessed. It is no longer about how well you can provide for your family´s needs. It is now about what your family has *relative to other people*.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Spidey, 11/27/2012 5:56:19 AM     (No. 9035394)

The more people in the collective bowl of poverty,the more it empowers socialism.I´m a very low income person myself but I don´t consider myself living in poverty because I have the simplistic blessings of God.I don´t want the government stealing money from someone else and giving it to me.I wouldn´t know what to do if I hit the powerball,probably use the money for a worthy cause,like giving out school vouchers for bullied kids.

A TV show isn´t any better because you´re watching it on a big screen as opposed to a smaller one. It costs me 20 bucks a month for a phone that I´m very happy with.

The point is if people found spirituality,they´d be a lot more content with what they have,instead of lusting after other worldly goods,especially if it´s being bought with government theft.

Just living int his country puts you way ahead of the majority of people in the world,many of whom have never seen indoor plumbing,electricity or talked on a phone.

I dont think God minds people having nice things,it when you put those nice things ahead of Him is when you run into a problem.


Reply 6 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 11/27/2012 6:03:32 AM     (No. 9035401)

Anyone of modest means who tries to live in New York City is making himself poor. Another place to move the heck out of.

When I first came to Miami everything was cheap. Because I started here long ago I have been able to help my children get established. I wouldn´t come here now.

Prices of homes are very reasonable in West Virginia. Georgia is still reasonable in many sections. Some of the middle northwest states are sparsely populated. I know. It´s cold there.


Reply 7 - Posted by: balogreene, 11/27/2012 6:41:20 AM     (No. 9035433)

$38,000/yr in NYC, comes really close to the 50% tax rate in NY with federal, state and city income taxes. An inexpensive one bedroom apartment might be as little as $1,000/mo. $7,000/yr to live on is pretty close to poverty in my mind.
I´d get out if I could, in fact, I did. But, the inexpensive places to live have fewer jobs, you have to go where you can work. Here in NOVA, I know people who live where housing is cheaper, but they have commutes of over an hour each way. That´s not cheap either.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Country Boy, 11/27/2012 6:44:10 AM     (No. 9035434)

I heat my house with wood and coal, like they used to do 100 years ago. Does that make me poor?


Reply 9 - Posted by: realrep, 11/27/2012 6:46:26 AM     (No. 9035442)

I live abundantly on a lot less than that. I´m fine as long as I don´t have taxes to pay for a bloated government or socialist programs.


Reply 10 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 11/27/2012 7:00:10 AM     (No. 9035456)

My sister died almost 2 years ago because she was white and poor. She fell and injured her wrist, lost her job because she couldn´t work after the surgery on her wrist. Didn´t qualify for Medicaid for some reason. Lived in subsidized housing. Couldnt get the medication she needed for her diabetes from the neighborhood clinic she was forced to use. One day went into a coma and two days later she died. I doubt she ever even saw a 60" TV.


Reply 11 - Posted by: FLCracker, 11/27/2012 10:30:30 AM     (No. 9035853)

As a high school student in 1960s Miami, I was amazed to find that my family was living "below the poverty line."

My parents were buying a 3-bedroom "waterfront" home (on a canal); a color console TV, a boat, but only one car. We had new clothes for the start of school and for Easter, and were never hungry.

We did, however, take advantage of cheaper food, such as "pick your own" fruit and vegetables, and free food - bass, bream and blue-gill in the canal and mackerel, dolphin (don´t get excited - it´s mahi-mahi) and lobster, once my brothers convinced dad to take the boat out in salt water.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Optimist123, 11/27/2012 12:18:08 PM     (No. 9036074)

So the difference between living in poverty and being rich is less than a factor of 10 now.

Nothing like a little redistribution to equalize everyone.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: drive, 11/27/2012 12:22:09 PM     (No. 9036078)

Wow. I´m poor and didn´t know it. Bring on the Guvmint goodies


Reply 14 - Posted by: shepsmum, 11/27/2012 1:43:33 PM     (No. 9036238)

#7 -- I don´t think a one bedroom in NYC for $1K exists.

I also live in Northern VA and one bedrooms in middle class/mediocre neighborhoods in Arlington, Alexandria and closer-in suburbs start around $1,300/month, if you´re lucky.
And commutes even from close in (under 10 miles) are at least 45 minutes. Wish I could leave...



Post Reply   Close thread 713417




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Despite the WaPost, Benghazi
Is a Major Scandal
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM     Post Reply
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.

Role of Health-Law
´Navigators´ Under Fire
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM     Post Reply
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"

   

 

  


 
Labor unions break ranks with
White House on ObamaCare
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM     Post Reply
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal

Issa Warns Hillary
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM     Post Reply
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee

Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM     Post Reply
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...

How Hope and Change Gave
Way To Spying on the Press
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM     Post Reply
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,

Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi
Whistleblowers with Info
Devastating to Clinton and Obama
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM     Post Reply
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

   

 



 


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

47 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

44 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care

   

Post Reply   Close thread 713417





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~