A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Should the GOP cave on taxes?
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Should the GOP cave on taxes?
Human Events, by Mark LaRochelle

Original Article

Posted By:javaboy, 11/26/2012 6:06:41 AM

Republicans in Congress are under tremendous pressure to cave in to President Obama’s demand for tax hikes by December 31. These tax hikes are projected to generate $823 billion in additional revenues, and save another $127 billion in interest payments, for a cumulative reduction of $950 billion in the national debt over 10 years, according to the left-wing Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. Ten-year budget projections are notoriously unreliable, but the White House estimates budgets for five years. By 2017, the administration projects that the national debt will be more than $21 trillion

Comments:
The problem with "baseline budgeting" (what the govt does to hide the true spending increases) and the Orwellian re-defining of words is that it usually works, keeping the average person completely deceived and in generally the dark.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: AisA, 11/26/2012 6:08:14 AM     (No. 9033889)

Let the GOP- Third Party Time as the GOP will become a by-gone.


Reply 2 - Posted by: LAW428, 11/26/2012 6:12:34 AM     (No. 9033895)

Our goobermint needs to get over the spending addiction. That´s the real problem.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Spidey, 11/26/2012 6:21:58 AM     (No. 9033899)

It´s insane to think these tax increases will be used on deficit reduction. Obama will have the new money spent on foolishness before the ink is dried on the deal.

The left know their own voters the best and they have to have a manufactured boogeyman to activate their base. Bush is fading as a villain,so they need to move on to the rich.
The GOP wants it both ways by stopping tax rate increases but raising revenues from other sources.They know they´re going to face a flood of pressure from the media and left wing nag groups.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Topic Thunder, 11/26/2012 6:43:59 AM     (No. 9033908)

Not only will the GOP cave on taxes, they´ll put a new tax on caves!


Reply 5 - Posted by: sanchin, 11/26/2012 6:50:15 AM     (No. 9033910)

Should?!! They will without question. It will give them an issue to run on in 2014 and 2016 by saying that they will promise to cut taxes. It is how the game is played.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Judith, 11/26/2012 7:18:26 AM     (No. 9033931)

Is the Pope Catholic? Should is not the word, when is the word.


Reply 7 - Posted by: artman1746, 11/26/2012 7:21:19 AM     (No. 9033935)

There is only one way to reduce the deficit at this point.... And the politicians know it. INFLATION. It´s the only way to prevent the coming increase in interest rates from bankrupting the country while allowing the politicians some sort of distance from culpability.

Inflation ( hyperinflation?) will diminish the debt and allow politicians to point to someone else for the blame. The suffering many of us will endur will cause even more dependency upon government and serve the political purposes of the liberal agenda.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: god of irony, 11/26/2012 7:29:13 AM     (No. 9033944)

Maybe they should ask President Hoover how that worked out for the country.


Reply 9 - Posted by: bpl40, 11/26/2012 7:57:34 AM     (No. 9033976)

#3 absolutely nails the issue. Every penny the GOP puts on the table, either rate increase or elimination of deductions will be spent to feather nests of special interests and create more dependence for future ´Rat candidates to use.
Not a penny more to feed the entitlement monster under any circumstances. Come hell or high water.


Reply 10 - Posted by: erv, 11/26/2012 8:06:20 AM     (No. 9033987)

I have the same concers as others that spending will not be cut; maybe projected spending five or more years out will be projected to be cut, but that will never materialize.

The issue is spending, not revenue. The government´s revenue from 2011 is enough to cover the government´s outlays in 2005. I think that we could easily survive if the government cut their spending back to the 2005 level.


Reply 11 - Posted by: nonsense, 11/26/2012 8:12:10 AM     (No. 9033993)

We´ve already fallen (over the fiscal cliff) and can´t get up.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 11/26/2012 8:37:57 AM     (No. 9034024)

Tax inreases would be perfectly rational and called for if they were matched wuth reliable reductions and controls on future government spending. Immigration reform, including generous amnesty for current illegal aliens, would be equally rational and appropriate if serious border control and enforcement were guaranteed.

We know, of course, that no such control of spending or the nation´s borders is part of the radical Democrat agenda. Regardless of what they might say -and as far as I know they have yet to make any serious proposals on these matters- their record suggests they cannot be trusted to keep any promises they might make.

The writing is on the wall. We are going to get higher taxes and more, not less government spending. And any immigration reform will certainly fail to include serious border control while proposing amnesty for current and future illegal aliens.

I am not among those who believe the Democrats are deliberately trying to ruin the country, thought I can appreciate why it seems that way to others. It actually makes no difference WHY they are pursuing the policies they are, since the consequences will be the same whatver the motives.

Nor do I subscribe to the racist, sexist, ageist, bigoted theory that the fundamental problem is demographics. The fundamental problem is ignorance, a great part of it resulting from systematic indoctrination of children in school and university. Unless education is reformed, America, the goose that laid the golden egg, the republic that provided so much for so many for so long, is cooked.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: johnnygeneric, 11/26/2012 9:25:10 AM     (No. 9034084)

Do I care what the GOP does? We were told over and over that voting for other than GOP is throwing away your vote. I voted GOP and guess what? I threw away my vote.

From now on, I vote who I want to vote for. I´m voting Libertarian. That way when the country implodes I can tell you all I told you so.


Reply 14 - Posted by: coldoc, 11/26/2012 9:38:40 AM     (No. 9034105)

The point is not where or how the money will be spent. We already know that. The point is a few bucks out of very wealthy peoples pockets is being used as a club to pound the republicans into the ground. It is used as the quintessential proof of the argument the pubbies are the party of the rich fat cats. They should have gotten elected first, then dealt with this issue properly. Now they will just continue to be scapegoats.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Eheu Fugaces, 11/26/2012 9:42:53 AM     (No. 9034109)

It doesn´t matter what the House Republicans do. They will get the blame for everything that is going to go wrong, anyhow. As for the Senate Republicans, they will get even more of the blame, since the Senate is controlled by Democrats, and it will be necessary to cover for them.


Reply 16 - Posted by: twinkle93, 11/26/2012 9:53:00 AM     (No. 9034125)

The question is why will the dems not cave on spending cuts?


Reply 17 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 11/26/2012 9:55:09 AM     (No. 9034130)

What they should do is NOT sign pledges. And, they should marginalize islamophilic moles named Grover Norquist.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: wakeupcall, 11/26/2012 9:56:05 AM     (No. 9034133)

No!

First cut spending.

I mean really cut spending.

Close down whole agencies.

Cut government remaining bureaucrats payroll by 50%.

Put Marxist democrats calling themselves progressives, liberals, out of government permanently.

It´s the only way to save free America.


Reply 19 - Posted by: unklebeau, 11/26/2012 10:04:14 AM     (No. 9034147)

#14, I think that is the correct way. The GOP has become spineless, limp-wristed wannabes. They wannabe in power, they wanna tell others how to live their lives, but the do not have the cajones to stand up to the steamroller Democrats with øbama at the controls. I will not vote GOP in the future.


Reply 20 - Posted by: F16 guy, 11/26/2012 10:45:46 AM     (No. 9034206)

Apparently, at least 50% of the voting population wants a party in power who will give them "free stuff".

If the R´s oppose that (and therefore increased spending) they will never win a presidential campaign again.

There is a new paradigm. The day of conservative politics is over, IMHO.


Reply 21 - Posted by: OdinsAcolyte, 11/26/2012 11:00:52 AM     (No. 9034241)

Not if they want to prevent the rise of a third party.


Reply 22 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 11/26/2012 11:33:14 AM     (No. 9034309)

The Republican Party, along with our republic, died on 11-6-2012.

I say we go out with a bang, shove this thing over the cliff, and let the dictator and his politburo deal with it.

We are reamed one way or the other. Let´s just hope NØbamacare provides free Vaseline for all the times we will be told to ´´just bend over and take it for the good of the country´´ over the next few years...


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: slrobi, 11/26/2012 11:38:04 AM     (No. 9034317)

I say let the Dems have their way. Let all the Bush tax rates expire for everyone, not just the wealthy.



Post Reply   Close thread 713318




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "javaboy"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "javaboy"



Grayson: Paul Ryan wants
sick poor people to die
HumanEvents.com, by David Harsanyi    Original Article
Posted By: javaboy- 3/14/2013 7:07:27 AM     Post Reply
Yesterday we watched Senator Claire McCaskill’s fantastical view of the world. Today, I offer you the perpetually unhinged Alan Grayson, who gives us his take on Paul Ryan’s budget: “In one case after another, you look at his principles, you look at his vision, and they’re a nightmare for America. He wants Americans to work until they die, he wants poor people who get sick not be able to see a doctor, not to get the care they need, not to get better, he wants them to die,

Trouble in the Nanny State
HumanEvents.com, by Ann Coulter    Original Article
Posted By: javaboy- 3/14/2013 6:58:36 AM     Post Reply
Like the proverbial monkey typing for infinity and getting Shakespeare, Mayor Bloomberg’s obsession with reforming New Yorkers’ health has finally produced a brilliant ad campaign. Posters are popping up in subway stations and bus stops giving statistics about teen pregnancy that show cute little kids saying things like, “Honestly, Mom … chances are he won’t stay with you. What happens to me?” and “I’m twice as likely not to graduate high school because you had me as a teen.”

The Sequestered Life of Julia
AmericanThinker.com, by Randy Fardal    Original Article
Posted By: javaboy- 3/11/2013 6:55:07 AM     Post Reply
A meticulous new analysis examines the benefits of government-administered socialism among a representative cross section of individuals. It is an insightful departure from the usual studies of socialism that analyze only collective benefits to society using statistics about such things as income quartiles and poverty levels. The new study is 27 pages and can be accessed as a PDF file via this link. As its author, I´ll summarize the results here. Julia, the president´s comic book heroine, is used as the baseline.

Advice on the Second Amendment
AmericanThinker, by James V. Delong    Original Article
Posted By: javaboy- 1/14/2013 6:58:07 AM     Post Reply
Pravda, Guns & America (AT, Jan. 11) quoted a Russian who advises: Americans: Never Give Up Your Guns, citing the bloody and tragic result of the Communists´ confiscation of arms after they came to power in 1917. The quotation has been echoing around the Internet, so here are more ringing defenses of the importance of the right to bear arms to the cause of liberty. Another Russian, the great writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn, wrote about the Soviet Union in The Gulag Archipelago (p.13, note 5): And how we burned in the camps later,

The Socialist Mind Game:
A Brief Manual
AmericanThinker.com, by Oleg Atbashian    Original Article
Posted By: javaboy- 1/1/2013 7:11:23 AM     Post Reply
We are being played; it´s time we learned the game. Conservatives have their Constitution. Progressives have their Narrative. The current battle for America is between these two concepts, and each side uses different rules to fight it. One set of rules is consistent with an unchanging objective: limited government and individual freedoms. The other side´s rules are as fickle as their goals, which are never fully disclosed beyond the equivocal references to fairness and hyphenated forms of justice.

Global Governance Begins on December 14
AmericanThinker.com, by Daren Jonescu    Original Article
Posted By: javaboy- 12/3/2012 5:41:18 AM     Post Reply
The International Telecommunications Union (ITU), an imprint of the UN, is holding its World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) from December 3-14, 2012. The stated purpose of the WCIT is to update the UN´s "global treaty" on telecommunications to deal more directly and comprehensively with the internet. Knowing who controls the UN, it is not hard to see that a primary aim of the updated "treaty" will be to give credence to the regulation and monitoring of online activity in ways that are desirable to the (authoritarian) majority of member states.

The Governing Class and the Decline of America
AmericanThinker.com, by Steve McCann    Original Article
Posted By: javaboy- 11/29/2012 6:40:38 AM     Post Reply
The United States will not reverse its descent into the abyss of financial and societal bankruptcy until the current political and governing establishment is replaced. That will not happen until the American people, who have been deliberately ill-educated and deceived, experience first-hand the early stages of the turmoil and suffering extant in Europe and elsewhere. While professing to care for the interests of the average person, the underlying motivation for the vast majority of the governing class or Establishment is first and foremost self-aggrandizement and the acquisition of wealth.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Lois Lerner´s Brief And
Awful Day On Capitol Hill

55 replie(s)
NPR, by Frank James    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 10:21:38 PM     Post Reply
The public got its first look Thursday at Lois Lerner, who has gone from faceless IRS bureaucrat to the face that launched what feels like 1,000 congressional hearings and conspiracy theories. But it was only a brief sighting since she didn´t stay long at a House hearing to further probe her role in how some IRS workers came to target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status. (Snip)She did make a short statement to declare her innocence, however. Lerner´s motivation was more transparent than much of what the IRS has done in connection with this controversy. She was determined to

Criminality Appears To Lie at the
Heart of the IRS Scandal

54 replie(s)
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM     Post Reply
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.

Eva Longoria graduates with
master´s degree in Chicano studies

51 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/23/2013 3:03:53 PM     Post Reply
Eva Longoria is backing up her beauty with a whole lot of brain. The actress graduated with a master´s degree Wednesday. Longoria, 38, took home a real degree (not an honorary one) in Chicano studies from Cal State Northridge, where she physically attended classes for three years, according to TMZ. "Big day today!!! Very excited to graduate for my master´s degree in Chicano studies! You´re never too old or too busy to continue your education!" the actress wrote on her Who Say site Wednesday, sharing loads of pics of her big day, posing with her family, cohorts and diploma.

Why was the Department
of Homeland Security monitoring
Tea Party IRS demonstrations?

50 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM     Post Reply
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state

The Mystery Night
43 replie(s)
Politico, by Rich Lowry    Original Article
Posted By: RappVol- 5/23/2013 7:36:59 AM     Post Reply
On “Fox News Sunday” last weekend, White House aide Dan Pfeiffer was asked about President Barack Obama’s whereabouts the night of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi. This was the night when we lost our first ambassador in 30 years, and when three other Americans were killed in an attack that lasted all night long at multiple locations within the eastern Libyan city. Since the president is commander in chief, one would think where he was and what he did during such an event would be of obvious public concern.

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”

Obama nominates Nuland for
assistant secretary of state

41 replie(s)
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 10:08:52 PM     Post Reply
President Obama on Thursday nominated Victoria Nuland, a State Department official involved in the editing of the administration´s talking points on Benghazi, to be the next assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. Nuland, a career foreign service officer who was until recently State´s top spokesperson, had long been expected to be nominated the post to replace Philip Gordon, who Obama picked to serve as Middle East coordinator for the National Security Council. Nuland´s nomination -- which requires Senate confirmation -- could come under scrutiny from Republicans who see her as playing a central role in shaping


Post Reply   Close thread 713318





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~