A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Supreme Court decides this week
whether to rule on gay marriage
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Supreme Court decides this week
whether to rule on gay marriage

Los Angeles Times, by David Savage

Original Article

Posted By:earlybird, 11/25/2012 6:03:05 PM

WASHINGTON — After two decades in which gay rights moved from the margin to capture the support of most Americans, the Supreme Court justices will go behind closed doors this week to decide whether now is the time to rule on whether gays and lesbians have a constitutional right to marry. For justices, the issue is not just what to decide, but when to decide it. (Snip) Now, the justices must decide whether to hear an appeal from the defenders of California´s Proposition 8, the 2008 voter initiative that limited marriage to a man and a woman. At the same session Friday, the court will sift through several

Comments:
Will they drag feet, waiting for some more Obama justices?

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 11/25/2012 6:14:34 PM     (No. 9033523)

They´ll take the case. Existing marriage laws in all states will be changed. When have liberals ever hesitated forcing their views onto the whole country?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Judith, 11/25/2012 6:15:59 PM     (No. 9033526)

Really, why bother. Just let their emperor, obama, say it is so. That seems to be the new "law" of the land. Then roberts won´t have to contort himself to support gay marriage.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: nina584, 11/25/2012 6:24:18 PM     (No. 9033538)

They have idiot roberts(thanks to Bush) whi will agree.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: vwlarry, 11/25/2012 6:26:57 PM     (No. 9033542)

Just another day in Crazyland, formerly known as "America".

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Namma, 11/25/2012 6:37:01 PM     (No. 9033555)

#2 got it...just let the dictator decree...who needs a constitution and a supreme court...certainly not hugo obama

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: calgrammy, 11/25/2012 6:46:28 PM     (No. 9033563)

I wager they will make same sex marriage the law of the land. Friends keep telling me GOD has a plan, I say what if the plan is the further ruination of the USA.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: vesicant, 11/25/2012 6:49:39 PM     (No. 9033566)

"...will go behind closed doors..."

Or closet.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 11/25/2012 7:12:11 PM     (No. 9033576)

My opinion: they´ll rule it constitutional. But that won´t be the end of it. Next will come polygamy, threesomes of the same sex, etc.

The worm bucket is about to spill over.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: killerbee, 11/25/2012 7:12:22 PM     (No. 9033579)

The social conservatives blew this one. It will become law in all states eventually, mark my words.

The thing is, the government shouldn´t be dispensing marriage in the first place. I recall hearing a sermon where the reverend explained that he objected to officiating weddings. Why? Because every time he did so he had to sign a government form, effectively making him -- specifically as a member of the clergy -- an agent of the government. Is there separation of church and state or not?

In any case, it should be civil partnership across the board for all the "business transaction" elements of a union. The sharing of benefits, next of kin status, etc ... Marriage, the sacred rite, should be between the church and the couple who wish to be married. If a church doesn´t want to marry a couple because they´re same sex, or like Obama´s old church, because one of their flock wants to marry a white Jew, that´s their prerogative regardless of whether the rest of the world agrees with their stance or not.

But So-conservatives blew it by demanding, via governmental intervention, to keep the status quo which is based on religious doctrine. And now, not only will it eventually be legal no matter what happens with the Supreme Court, all churches will be forced to perform gay marriages whether their doctrine permits it or not. Because we allowed it to stay in the hands of the government. Short-sighted and shameful.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: veritas, 11/25/2012 7:25:14 PM     (No. 9033591)

Everyone already has the same rights and prohibitions regarding marriage.

The simple matter of joint ownership should be able to address the untaxed-inheritance issue.

"Hey, lookit me!" gets tiresome once the person in question is 4 or 5 years old.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: msjena, 11/25/2012 7:36:40 PM     (No. 9033601)

If they don´t take the case, gay marriage will be a constitutional right all of the western states in the 9th Circuit. I hope they take the case and uphold the right of the people to decide.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Coy860, 11/25/2012 7:38:21 PM     (No. 9033603)

When I see the words RULE and Supreme Court in the same sentence, I feel real fear.
This is not the country I grew up in.
Thanks John Roberts, you signed my death warrant.
Now the liberals on the court will desecrate the sacrament of marriage, churches will be forced to marry gays. Christian religion is to be stamped out.
May God and the Founding Fathers forgive us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: tren9, 11/25/2012 7:41:15 PM     (No. 9033607)

History:

Government became involved in marriage because it was necessary to deal with inheritance and because the basic building block of human tribes, clans, and any other type of society is the family [parents and children]. Society decided that children were better off within the structure of family. If you are going to call it ´marriage´ you need to define the word so we know what the word means in the law. That is what government did.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 11/25/2012 7:57:06 PM     (No. 9033619)

Ahhh - - another opportunity for Roberts to earn his chops with the leftist elite.

Only question is - - will Kennedy join him this time?

Yup - - it´s gonna be a 3-6 Supremo from here on.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: craige, 11/25/2012 8:12:35 PM     (No. 9033633)

It is a STATE issue. Not a federal issue.

I have noticed, that lately the US Supreme Court is not concerned with the Constitution.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Penney, 11/25/2012 8:16:09 PM     (No. 9033637)

Spare us from the, ´lawyers!´ ...Look at the Congress!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: athina, 11/25/2012 8:47:51 PM     (No. 9033664)

They don´t need to wait for more liberal justices - whatever they´ve got on Roberts, they´ve still got, and he will do the job for them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: dcomd, 11/25/2012 8:48:27 PM     (No. 9033665)

Might be getting close to fire on Ft. Sumter again!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: RedWhiteBlue, 11/25/2012 8:49:58 PM     (No. 9033667)

GAAAAWD, 709 days till the next election.....GAAAAWD!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: msjena, 11/25/2012 8:58:24 PM     (No. 9033671)

Since Roberts wanted the voters, not the courts, to overturn Obamacare, will he rule likewise on gay marriage? The people of California voted to ban gay marriage and it was overturned by the courts. Shouldn´t the same reasoning apply here?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: jeffblair, 11/25/2012 9:07:36 PM     (No. 9033678)

What´s there for the SCOTUS to rule on? Obama and Holder ruled on this a long time ago, when they proclaimed that DOMA is unconstitutional, and nobody had the courage to challenge their proclamation in court.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 11/25/2012 9:27:47 PM     (No. 9033691)

Rot is progressive. Given enough time the maggots take over .

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: lingillen, 11/25/2012 11:57:25 PM     (No. 9033780)

"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever." -Thomas Jefferson



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: NotaBene, 11/26/2012 12:02:37 AM     (No. 9033782)

Supreme Justice Stupid Roberts: please wait until Hussein appoints a couple more Communists to the court. Let them work for their perversions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 713276




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"



Bryan Singer’s Accuser Names
Three More Alleged Sex Abusers
Variety, by David McNary    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 4/22/2014 9:56:26 AM     Post Reply
Hollywood executives Garth Ancier, David Neuman and Gary Goddard have been accused of sexually abusing teenage boys in lawsuits filed Monday in Hawaii federal court. “I would not wish on my worst enemies what I went through,” declared plaintiff Michael Egan(Snip) Ancier is the former president of BBC Worldwide America and also served as head of programming for Fox, NBC and the WB. He’s also the head of year-old Quad Media Partners, formed to launch four fully curated linear TV networks, “each built around a modern decade in broadcast and cable network television.”

It´s Final -- Corn
Ethanol Is Of No Use
Forbes, by James Conca    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 4/21/2014 7:01:43 AM     Post Reply
OK, can we please stop pretending biofuel made from corn is helping the planet and the environment? With huge subsidies for ethanol in gasoline, with all States now selling gasoline having some ethanol blend, and a general misconception that these biofuels are green, corn ethanol has taken on a $30 billion/yr life of its own. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released two of its Working Group reports at the end of last month (WGI and WGIII), and their short discussion of biofuels has ignited a fierce debate as to whether they’re of any environmental benefit at all.

Prince George meets his bilby
namesake at Sydney zoo
USA Today, by Maria Puente    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 4/20/2014 12:25:21 PM     Post Reply
It´s all happening at the zoo today, Easter Sunday in Sydney, where Prince George met a cute little critter named for him and the world got to see the royal baby for a second official appearance. After Easter services at the Anglican cathedral in Sydney in the morning, Prince William and Duchess Kate changed clothes, collected George and headed for the Taronga Zoo, Sydney´s harbor-side menagerie of Australia´s wonderfully quirky wildlife. It was another beautiful sunny day and thousands had been waiting to see them for hours before the zoo opened. Eventually there were so many people, the zoo closed to further

Kansas City Highway Shooting
Suspect Charged With 18 Felonies
ABC News, by Colleen Curry    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 4/20/2014 10:01:17 AM     Post Reply
The man suspected of shooting at cars as they traveled on Kansas City, Mo., highways in recent weeks has been identified and charged with 18 felonies, authorities announced today. Mohammad Whitaker, 27, is accused of shooting into at least nine cars, injuring two of the drivers, in incidents dating to the beginning of March. (Snip)On April 9, a witness who was aware of the reports of the highway shooter saw a green vehicle driven by a man in a mask and hoodie acting suspiciously while driving very slowly. She reported the vehicle´s license plate number to police. Police were able to

Your Internet security
relies on a few volunteers
CNN Money, by Jose Pagliery    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 4/19/2014 6:10:16 PM     Post Reply
NEW YORK - Last week´s Heartbleed Internet bug revealed a startling fact. The software protecting banks, email, social media and government is maintained by only a few people. They´re all volunteers. And only one does it as a full-time job. Their labor of love is OpenSSL, a free program that secures a lot of online communication. And it was a tiny coding slip-up two years ago that caused the Heartbleed bug, a hole that allows attackers to peer into computers. The bug forced emergency changes last week at major websites like Facebook (FB, Fortune 500), Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) and Yahoo (YHOO,

Vulnerable To ´Heartbleed´ Bug,
Obamacare Subscribers Told
To Change Password
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 4/19/2014 5:04:37 PM     Post Reply
People who have accounts on the enrollment website for President Barack Obama´s signature health care law are being told to change their passwords following an administration-wide review of the government´s vulnerability to the confounding Heartbleed Internet security flaw. Senior administration officials said there is no indication that the HealthCare.gov site has been compromised and the action is being taken out of an abundance of caution. The government´s Heartbleed review is ongoing, the officials said, and users of other websites may also be told to change their passwords in the coming days, including those with accounts on the popular

Ohio couple who held hands at
breakfast even after 70 years
of marriage die 15 hours apart
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 4/19/2014 4:58:54 PM     Post Reply
NASHPORT, Ohio – A couple who held hands at breakfast every morning even after 70 years of marriage have died 15 hours apart. Helen Felumlee, of Nashport, died at 92 on April 12. Her husband, 91-year-old Kenneth Felumlee, died the next morning. The couple´s eight children say the two had been inseparable since meeting as teenagers, once sharing the bottom of a bunk bed on a ferry rather than sleeping one night apart(Snip)They remained deeply in love until the very end, even eating breakfast together while holding hands, said their daughter, Linda Cody.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Obama to free hundreds of drug
felons under clemency rules
designed to un-do mandatory
sentences from ´War on Drugs´ era

54 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/21/2014 11:37:51 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is poised to entertain a flood of new clemency applications from thousands of federal prisoners who were given harsh sentences under mandatory-minimum laws following drug convictions, Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday. Holder said in a short videotaped statement that he wants to shrink the federal prison population by a modest amount while ensuring ´that those who have paid their debts have a chance to become productive citizens.´ At the center of the move is a set of old sentencing rules that punished crack-cocaine offenders with more time behind bars than users or traffickers of powder cocaine.

Dole: Cruz, Paul & Rubio
lack experience for 2016

44 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Mario Trujillo    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 11:18:06 AM     Post Reply
Former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) said a number of junior GOP senators considering a presidential run in 2016 do not yet have the experience — specifically naming Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Texas). The former 1996 GOP presidential candidate sounded particularly skeptical of Cruz in an interview this week with The Wichita Eagle. "A number of the younger members, first-termers like Rand Paul, Rubio and that extreme-right-wing guy, Ted Cruz — all running for president now. I don´t think they´ve got enough experience yet," Dole said. The 90-year-old former senator said, however, his main concern about 2016 is living

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if
US hadn´t ´switched sides in the War on Terror´
and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach
al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

44 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 7:02:40 PM     Post Reply
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn´t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier. ´The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,´ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline. She blamed the Obama administration

Jeb Bush is your only chance
against Hillary, Republicans

42 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Bob Schrum    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/22/2014 6:32:54 AM     Post Reply
If Jeb reaches for the nomination, there will be a titanic battle between the party establishment and the Tea Party. Steve Schmidt, McCain’s strategist in 2008, insists that in the end Republicans usually settle on the most electable candidate. To get by, this Bush may be forced to trim his positions, although the cautionary tale of Romney suggests that he would have to tack artfully and carefully for the sake of the general election. Certainly he will have the resources to outlast, discredit, and disqualify his rivals.

Michelle Obama:
´splurging is the key to life´

40 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/21/2014 9:31:25 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Michelle Obama said "splurging is the key to life" if you regularly eat right and stay active. Her biggest guilty pleasure: French fries. "How would you appreciate vegetables if you never had chocolate?" she asked. "You couldn´t live without a little chocolate, a little French fries." The first lady took questions from children reporters Monday after appearing at the White House Easter Egg Roll. She told the children that if they eat right the majority of the time, then a splurge or snack is not going to hurt them. "I still splurge when I can, but that's why I try to exercise almost every day," she said.

Why Does Nation Tolerate A
Habitual Liar As President?

39 replie(s)
Investors Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/22/2014 2:10:54 PM     Post Reply
Public Trust: Sixty-one percent polled say President Obama lies "some of the time" or "most of the time" on matters of national importance. Americans have to ask: Why do we let him get away with it? It´s no surprise that a Fox News poll of 1,012 registered voters last week found immense distrust of a president whose main domestic initiative was based on a lie. The shock is that the same poll found his disapproval level down to its lowest since last fall. Asked, "How often do you think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters?" 37% replied "most of

Fraud runs rampant in Census Bureau
37 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:03:20 AM     Post Reply
There’s a pattern of falsifying statistics throughout the entire Census Bureau. And anyone who attempts to blow the whistle on the fraud is either retaliated against or ignored, according to two new sources who have experienced the process firsthand. As I’ve been writing for more than six months, the Census Bureau office in Philadelphia uncovered a case of fraud in 2010, did nothing about it and allowed the practice to continue. In that instance, a data collector named Julius Buckmon was faking reports that went into the nation’s all-important jobless tally and consumer-inflation survey. Because the Census Bureau’s surveys are scientific — meaning


Post Reply   Close thread 713276





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~