|
|
| |
Topic: Thanks, Mitt Romney, for Campaigning on Big Ideas |
Thanks, Mitt Romney, for Campaigning on Big Ideas
Forbes, by Avik Roy
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 11/25/2012 2:08:00 PM
|
| Mitt Romney isn’t going to be the next President of the United States. But the familiar spectacle of the post-election circular firing squad shouldn’t blind us to the many good things that Mitt Romney brought to the 2012 election. First and foremost, he had the courage to campaign on the most pressing domestic policy problem we face: the explosion of deficit spending caused by our health-care entitlements. No modern Republican presidential nominee—not even Ronald Reagan—has ever attempted anything like it.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
tonyl, 11/25/2012 2:13:43 PM (No. 9033271)
The one hazard of living in a democracy is that stupid, uninformed, uninterested, self centered people can vote. The dems got them out.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
MDMuskrat, 11/25/2012 2:17:04 PM (No. 9033280)
One of the saddest things about this year´s election rout was to see this honorable, exemplary man lose the chance to save us.
We shall never see the likes of this man again in a presidential race.
More´s the pity.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Wetlandz, 11/25/2012 2:53:05 PM (No. 9033317)
A campaign of lies, deception and fear is what we got and the next four years we will see the single payer health care program become reality.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
GreatPlains, 11/25/2012 3:02:39 PM (No. 9033325)
Nice article that makes excellent points. As a former Perry supporter ,the more I learned about Romney´s actual positions and personal history , the more I liked the guy. He was unfairly tarnished and demonized by the media and truth be told, by many supposedly on our side. Like Limbaugh did for for months and months. Limbaugh would often allow callers to say the most heinous and untrue things about Romney as if they were facts. FTA -" Romney could have shrunk from the Medicare debate, as even Ronald Reagan had, but instead Romney rose to it. For this honorable effort, Mitt Romney deserves our gratitude." Sadly ,what # 1 said is a reality and it´s only going to get worse.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 11/25/2012 3:25:02 PM (No. 9033351)
#4 is right. Limbaugh enjoys his ability to manipulate, no matter the damage.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
ruready?, 11/25/2012 3:34:52 PM (No. 9033363)
Rush represents my feelings more than any politician. Maybe I am in the minority.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Coy860, 11/25/2012 3:36:26 PM (No. 9033368)
Romney had the resources and ability to POUND his message out..instead, he played it safe instead. He was up against pure evil and needed to push back forcefully.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
AnnG, 11/25/2012 3:39:09 PM (No. 9033370)
All the dumping on Romney reminds me of a T shirt I saw that read "Never kick me when I´m down, because when I get back up......you´re screwed!!"
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 11/25/2012 3:43:58 PM (No. 9033378)
Thank you, Governor Romney. You would have made an effective President of the United States.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
snowcloud, 11/25/2012 3:46:55 PM (No. 9033387)
#4 and 5, how did Rush do damage to Romney? I listen to Rush every day and didn´t hear anything he said against Romney.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
LWGII, 11/25/2012 3:59:20 PM (No. 9033403)
For some time I have thought that the man who took the oath of office in January 2013 would turn out to be the most despised in American history. If anyone had the chance to keep us from the abyss, it was Mitt. But not even he could beat back the entrenched DemocRats in the Senate, and the Prog-unists throughout the judiciary. So, maybe it´s better this way. The DemocRats will well and truly own the crash.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
f64, 11/25/2012 4:13:27 PM (No. 9033412)
Agree with #10. I also never heard Rush bad-mouth Romney and I also listen every day.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Former lurker, 11/25/2012 4:42:18 PM (No. 9033437)
Thank you #2 for saying what I think. We had a chance to put the two people capable of saving us and we blew it. I will always honor them for their valiant effort to defeat the corrupt democrat party and the treasonous propaganda of the media.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
belwhatter, 11/25/2012 4:44:38 PM (No. 9033439)
Romney was beaten by politics.The pity of itis that the politics were dirty. The republican establishment can thank itself for yet another failure - not so much for pushing Romney who has the financial cred. for the job, but they failed to do the suport work needed to defeat Democrats and their dirty tricks. When will the Rs ever learn that you must fight fire with fire. An upright man such as Romney made a good target because he simply didn´t have it in him to take Obama to the cleaners when opportunities to do so arose. The republican party needs to be taken behind the woodshed and kept there till they learn a few home truths.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
wilko, 11/25/2012 5:06:31 PM (No. 9033458)
Before he was the GOP candidate, Rush would snort in derision at Romney´s name. It was blatant and daily. He never said a bad word about him, but you knew where Rush stood - Against Mitt.
Mitt never articulated the oppressive regulations that were strangling small businesses, he just said he´d get rid of them. Not specific enough about alot of things he would fix was a problem.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 11/25/2012 5:39:42 PM (No. 9033483)
Rush never hurt or attacked Mitt Romney personally. He stood up for conservatism. What a hypocrite he would have been called if he had lied and called Mitt a Reagan conservative when he wasn´t. Once Romney was our candidate, he made every effort to help beat Obama. Stupid, ignorant voters? Yes, so... isn´t it about time GOP figured out how to talk to them instead of using the same tired play book every four years? He was neither as bad a candidate as some are unfairly saying but neither was Romney anything like Ronald Reagan.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Malia2012, 11/25/2012 5:57:36 PM (No. 9033498)
What #4 said. Also agree with #15. Anyone who didn´t understand what Rush Limbaugh thought about Mitt Romney wasn´t listening to him. I began to listen to Rush in 1988 and never heard such disdain toward a Republican candidate. Not even President George H.W. Bush, whom Rush didn´t like either. The same goes for for Levin, Ingraham and even Hannity during the most important primaries in the history of this Country. By the time they "came around" it was too late for them to pretend to respect, OR support him. BTW, President Ronald Reagan is gone, he can´t come back. If someone can name a better candidate out here than Mitt Romney was, I´d really be interested in getting on the band-wagon early......Thought so.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Kayworthy, 11/25/2012 6:09:45 PM (No. 9033520)
The bottom line is that Romney and Ryan had all the tools to right the ship. Obama has zippity-zip.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Wendybird, 11/25/2012 7:23:24 PM (No. 9033589)
Neither Limbaugh nor Levin damaged Romney. Both had some early reservations but were more than complimentary for the last several months of the campaign. I can’t for the life of me see how Romney lost, and also believe we have missed out on a potentially great leader. Instead, look at what we got, and weep.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
yorkiemom, 11/25/2012 7:41:05 PM (No. 9033606)
I see Rush is still fooling people. If he didn´t actually badmouth Romney, he sure let callers do it. Thinking back these many years of listening to Rush, I have discovered he doesn´t really pick many winners. I am not fooled by him anymore, nor am I fooled by Laura Ingraham and the other "purists." Don´t listen to any of them any more. Another big reason is the thousands of commercials on their shows. Does Rush still sell his tea? I sure got tired of hearing about it when I did listen to him.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
smcchk, 11/25/2012 7:46:00 PM (No. 9033616)
Agree, #2.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Poliskeptic, 11/25/2012 9:06:28 PM (No. 9033676)
Romney was our last best hope to turn the country around. He was uniquely qualified to handle the economy. I´m still depressed.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
previouslyon24, 11/25/2012 9:53:39 PM (No. 9033713)
George Romney would have been proud of his son´s effort. I certainly was and am also depressed that a man of his integrity and experience isn´t our president. I believe fraud played too big a part in this election, either in registration before the vote or in unfound or lost Romney precinct ballots in targeted states.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
JoElla Bee, 11/25/2012 10:17:20 PM (No. 9033733)
I thought this was going to be a thread giving thanks to Mitt Romney for campaigning on big ideas, as it should be. I´m sad to see that it is a Rush Limbaugh bashing thread for some, and done in a way that leaves a false impression.
Just my observation: Rush Limbaugh is going to have to go some to match some of the truly hateful personal attacks on Sarah Palin, and a number of other prominent conservatives including Rush, by posters here in this salon.
Some here still do not have a kind word to say about Palin or Rush, and other conservatives, under any circumstances.
Guess y´all must have missed the callers tearing into Rush because they thought he supported Mitt Romney over their chosen candidate before the nomination, and some who criticized him for supporting him after the nomination. That wasn´t because they thought Rush was badmouthing Mitt Romney.
Rush has said that he never endorses a candidate before the nomination. A number of callers criticized him for what they thought was harsh treatment of their favorite candidate.
Also, there are some pretty good "manipulators" among the moderates, and they have no equal when it comes to attacking Republicans with whom they disagree. I´d venture to say that Rush has been kinder to Mitt Romney than some of his "friends" who turned on him after the loss.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 11/25/2012 11:08:59 PM (No. 9033755)
#17, how about Romney 2016.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Lalo, 11/25/2012 11:16:58 PM (No. 9033761)
Thank you, Roy, for thanking Romney. I thank him too, and as for his mistakes - everyone makes them.
I stopped listening to Rush a long time ago, plus wrong time slot for me. I listen to Hannity regularly & don´t remember his ever saying a word against Romney, or being less than supportive. Rush is obviously a great conservative intellect, but too polarizing for me. The left easily uses him to pound us with.
That was the beauty of Romney - he was someone even many Dems had been able to sort of admire, at least before he became such a threat.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Lalo, 11/25/2012 11:21:41 PM (No. 9033765)
#25 - Sounds good to me. It would be better if we had someone who could go for 8 years, and he would be too old, I think. But I´m not seeing anyone else who is a good bet for even the first four.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 11/26/2012 3:19:47 AM (No. 9033846)
I was pretty mad at Rush because he was very anti Romney. I almost cancelled my subscription to his newsletter. He did come around after Romney was nominated. But he had already done a lot of damage.
Rush is not always right, although he thinks he is and apparently so do some others. They listen "all the time" and never heard what they were listening to.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Despite the WaPost, Benghazi Is a Major Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.
|
Role of Health-Law ´Navigators´ Under Fire
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"
|
Labor unions break ranks with White House on ObamaCare
|
|
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal
|
|
Issa Warns Hillary
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee
|
|
Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM
Post Reply
|
|
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...
|
How Hope and Change Gave Way To Spying on the Press
|
|
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,
|
Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama
|
|
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla. tornado for anti-GOP rant over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|