A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: War Is the Answer
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
War Is the Answer
Front Page, by Daniel Greenfield

Original Article

Posted By:Judy W., 11/25/2012 6:57:36 AM

For the last hundred years the best and brightest of the civilized world have been engaged in the business of peace. In the days before the Nobel Peace Prize became a joke, it was expected that scientific progress would lead to moral progress. (Snip) Since the League of Nations folded, the warring peoples of the world have added the atom bomb, the suicide bomber, the jet plane, the remotely guided missile, the rape squad, the IED, the child soldier and the stealth fighter to their arsenals.

Comments:
This is brilliant.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 11/25/2012 7:50:39 AM     (No. 9032786)

Great piece.

More proof that the left gets it as wrong as it can be gotten on every issue every time.

They are truly an Oracle.

When in doubt...consult the left and do the opposite.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: gewgaw, 11/25/2012 7:53:17 AM     (No. 9032790)

Peace can only be achieved by victory....what an eye/mind opening article for a Sunday morning.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: bkt23, 11/25/2012 7:56:46 AM     (No. 9032791)

Very good article. Bottom line: when you encounter evil, crush it. Don´t let it grow. Don´t let it be defended by those who proclaimed themselves morally superior.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 11/25/2012 8:26:50 AM     (No. 9032808)

The fallacies of modern liberalism are based upon a willful misunderstanding of human beings, beginning with themselves. Their basic assumptions are false and obstinately unexamined. Leftist schemes can never succeed because people do not think and act the way they would have to in order for such fantasies to become real. Leftism represents a rejection of reality and a refusal to learn from experience.

It is not always a matter of simple ignorance. Most Americans, as we know from studies, are almost unbelievably ignorant of history. That might seem to explain their lack of understanding of present events, but it is not that simple. For many who are thus ignorant of history are wise to the ways of human beings; while many, perhaps most with graduate and post-graduate training in history still manage to delude themselves about the documented behavior and nature of human beings, even though there are thousands of years of data to make plain what is plain to most people from introspection and daily experience.

War is not an unfortunate, unnecessary, always undesirable and avoidable misunderstanding and misfortune. War is what we, i.e. human beings, do. It is an essential part of who and what we are. Pretending otherwise puts us at the greatest possible peril from enemies who do not, like us, indulge in the luxury of wishful thinking.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: jglas, 11/25/2012 8:46:45 AM     (No. 9032830)

Liberals don´t think beyond the obvious, you want peace, forbid war, too much poverty, everyone must share. They cannot comprehend the sense of ´if you want peace practice for war´ or ´if you want less poverty in society individuals have to first help themselves.´ That those ways work to bring peace and prosperity is just history and yet liberals never learn them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: sunsong, 11/25/2012 8:47:52 AM     (No. 9032831)

This is sick and this guy is, himself, immoral. How sad that he has a following.

Peace *is* better than war. And those who cannot see that live in darkness. The utter lack of imagination, the lack of wisdom, the lack of understanding is stunning. War is hell and those who celebrate it and advocate for it and desire it have lost touch with their humanity. It is better to reach for an impossible goal - an ideal like peace - than it is to sink to the level of evil itself.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 7 - Posted by: bamapreacher, 11/25/2012 8:51:38 AM     (No. 9032836)

Since the doves forced the U.S. to lose the Vietnam War it seems nations including the U.S. merely "play war." There are rules, civilians have to be protected, captives have to be treated humanely and sent back home, you don´t bomb haphazardly, etc. War used to be war, you fought until one side surrendered and you brought that surrender about as fast as possible. Sometimes war was for conquest, conversely sometimes to prevent the conquest of your own country, sometimes to save people from dictatorships, sometimes like the American Civil War to free a group of people from slavery (but give the freed people something to do next time, Lincoln). Hamas isn´t going to give up, the Taliban aren´t going to give up, Al Quaeda isn´t going to give up, China won´t give up nor will Russia. It´s either kill or be killed, no holds barred and to the victor belongs the spoils. The U.S. won´t be the victor in the next real war, Israel will be.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Grambo, 11/25/2012 9:26:13 AM     (No. 9032878)

If peace is the absence of war, it must also be the absence of evil, and that will never be. So, if evil will always be, then peace must be the containment of evil. Unless technology reveals a way to contain evil without violence, we’re resigned to living with war.

Sorry, Libs and Peaceniks, get used to it. As George Will put it, paraphrased, perhaps, “For us to enjoy peace, there must be hard men on the wall, ready to visit violence upon those who would harm us.”


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: tren9, 11/25/2012 9:34:36 AM     (No. 9032889)

There is, historically, one method that brings periods of peace. This method has worked over and over again. No other method has been even one tenth as successful.

Kick the stuffing out of your enemy and impose peace on him.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: curious1, 11/25/2012 9:44:38 AM     (No. 9032900)

Amen, #3.
Our ancestors allowed libtards to exist and expand in our society instead of crushing their evil. Now look at what we are facing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 11/25/2012 9:47:55 AM     (No. 9032902)

#6

It is by no means obvious that peace is always better than war. Subtract the great wars of history and the world would at the very least look very different. Suppose, for example, the Persians and not the Greeks had won the Persian War(s)? Suppose Hitler and the Axis had won World War II?

If peace is always and without exception better than war, then it follows that slavery is at least some of the time better than freedom. Other things follow, too, e.g. genocide.

It is a Straw Man fallacy to argue that peace is better than war. It also contains the elements of petitio principii, or begging the question, which presumes that war is always avoidable and that the avoidance of war is always good.

But the questions, the answers to which are obvious to most but not all, are these: Is war always avoidable? Is the avoidance of war always good?

There is a third question, the most important of all: what is the best way to minimize the risk of war? About this, wise men and those who have studied the matter are in near universal agreement: the best way to minimize the risk of war is to be prepared to fight and win. Strength deters, while weakness invites aggression.

And aggression is a permanent and inextricable element of human nature. Even those who profess to be in favor of peace manifest their own aggression to those who remind others of the persistence and ubiquity of war!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: bpl40, 11/25/2012 10:04:03 AM     (No. 9032924)

The left, I submit, knows the essence of this article extremely well. They are not simply naive to push their ´peace at any cost´ ideology. It is a deliberate attempt to force unilateral dis-armament by the Democratic West. Just watch Zippy´s ´defense´ policy for these eight years.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: devnull, 11/25/2012 10:34:36 AM     (No. 9032965)

Orcs only understand war.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: thenightowl, 11/25/2012 11:32:36 AM     (No. 9033042)

It´s unfortunate that those who advocate the loudest for peace seldom create it. Instead they brutally crush the realists in their midst in the name of a utopian idea, and seldom, if ever, recognize the irony or evil of their methodology. Peaceniks lie to themselves and others and then proceed to make war on reality. What a mess!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: sunsong, 11/25/2012 12:31:42 PM     (No. 9033130)

The GOP isn´t known as the stupid party for nothing. They are against women, against gays, against Latinos, against the poor and the needy, against anything other than what they believe

but hey! they are *for* war - lol
absolutely - go out and sell that - lol

At some point you have to realize that you must stand for something that is true - peace *is* better tha war - something that is beautiful and war *is* ugly - and something that is good. Peace is filled with goodness.

Because something is hard is a stupid reason to give up on it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Sinatra5, 11/25/2012 6:21:43 PM     (No. 9033534)

Methinks # 6 is still self medicating with the rest of the left over losers of the ´60´s generation.....


"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
John Stewart Mills

Si vis pacem, para bellum

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: kanphil, 11/25/2012 9:58:54 PM     (No. 9033718)

Si vis pacem, para bellum. If you seek peace, prepare for war. This is a principle which has kept our nation safe for over two hundred years. Those times we have been least prepared for war, we have come closest to destruction.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: pigop, 11/25/2012 10:11:43 PM     (No. 9033729)

FTA ~ "The business of peace is the industry of death. Behind the peace sign is a field of flowers with a grave for every one. Behind the peace agreement and the ceasefire is another war that will be worse than the last."

What a paradox! Brilliant piece, bravo!



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 713240




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."



The war on standards
comes to college debate
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/19/2014 8:55:55 AM     Post Reply
Paul has been writing about the war on standards in various aspects of our society, generally as a means of advancing the interests of minorities (or purporting to advance them, anyway). Now it appears that the decline of standards–indeed, the abolition of any standards at all–has come to the world of college debate. The Atlantic reports: These days, an increasingly diverse group of participants has transformed debate competitions, mounting challenges to traditional form and content by incorporating personal experience, performance, and radical politics. These “alternative-style” debaters have achieved success, too, taking top honors at national

What Really Happened at the Bay of Pigs
Townhall, by Humberto Fontova    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/19/2014 8:41:20 AM     Post Reply
(You always hear and read of a “fiasco,” a “defeat” a “disaster” at the Bay of Pigs, 53 years ago this week. But you rarely hear about the cause. Here it is.) "They fought like tigers," writes the CIA officer who helped train the Cubans who splashed ashore at the Bay of Pigs 53 years ago this week. "But their fight was doomed before the first man hit the beach." That CIA man, Grayston Lynch, knew something about fighting – and about long odds. He carried scars from Omaha Beach, The Battle of the Bulge and Korea´s Heartbreak Ridge. But

Federal Land as a Percentage
of Total State Land Area
Townhall, by Nick Sorrentino    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/19/2014 7:53:22 AM     Post Reply
The government has no business owning (or administering) all of this land. I am willing to concede federal courthouses and even the national parks to the feds, (even though some of the parks were created as a result of brutal land grabs. Shenandoah National Park which I look out at as I write this is an example.) but why is practically all of the far West run by the Federal Government? Here’s another thing I’ll concede. The feds get a few hundred God forsaken square miles in the northern Nevada desert to do nuclear testing and to dump nuclear fuel. Beyond that? People should own this land.

   

 



 
Can You Spot The Racist,
Homophobic Anti-Semites In
This Special 10 Item Quiz?
Townhall, by John Hawkins    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/19/2014 7:20:28 AM     Post Reply
As we all know, racism, homophobia and anti-Semitism are very bad and should be condemned. Not only do I condemn all of those things, I´d encourage you to share this quiz to all of your liberal friends so they can wag their fingers right in the faces of the awful people who said all of these terrible things. 1) Who said, "We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it." A) Rush Limbaugh B) Mark Levin C) Laura Ingraham D) Al Sharpton 2) Who said, "That’s just how white folks will do you.

Capitalism and the Dalai Lama
New York Times, by Arthur Brooks    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/19/2014 7:01:10 AM     Post Reply
What can Washington, D.C., learn from a Buddhist monk? In early 2013, I traveled with two colleagues to Dharamsala, India, to meet with the Dalai Lama. (Snip) That same duality was on display in February when the Dalai Lama joined atwo-day summit at my institution, the American Enterprise Institute. At first, his visit caused confusion. Some people couldn’t imagine why he would visit us; as Vanity Fair asked in a headline, “Why Was the Dalai Lama Hanging Out with the Right-Wing American Enterprise Institute?” There was no dissonance, though, because the Dalai Lama’s teaching defies freighted ideological labels.

Here´s How Long That Teen Would Have
to Pee in the Portland Reservoir
to Make It Unsafe to Drink
Slate Magazine, by Laura Helmuth    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/18/2014 5:53:10 PM     Post Reply
Oh, Portland. A teenager urinated into one of the city’s drinking water reservoirs the other day. That’s gross, sure, and aggravating—what a brat! But in one of the most spectacularly stupid decisions in years, the city is going to drain the reservoir. (Snip) But is it possible to calculate precisely how illogical Portland’s decision is? Let’s try to put some numbers on it. Several smart people on Twitter quickly did the math and figured that a typical urination of about 1/8 gallon in a reservoir of 38 million gallons amounts to a concentration of 3 parts per billion.

My dinner with the
family of Justina Pelletier
Fox News, by Dr. Keith Ablow    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/18/2014 11:32:57 AM     Post Reply
In case you’ve ever wondered, when you take a psychiatrist to dinner (especially a forensic psychiatrist, like me), he doesn’t leave the office 100 percent. No well-trained psychiatrist can. The “third ear” we develop during training – the one that catches meaningful turns of phrase or attempts to be evasive – can’t be left at the office door entirely. When I had dinner with Lou and Linda Pelletier and three of their four daughters, Jennifer, Jessica and Julia, a few nights ago in Massachusetts, I wasn’t trying to evaluate them. They aren’t my patients. But I was listening for discordant psychological



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Kim Novak responds to post-
Oscars ridicule: ‘I was bullied.’

53 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Soroya Nadia McDonald    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:02:40 AM     Post Reply
After presenting at the Academy Awards this year, Kim Novak didn’t want to leave her house. The Hitchcock screen siren, 81, was too humiliated to venture from her home near the Rogue River in Oregon. She read the cruel posts and Internet snark about her appearance, and it was just too much. “It got to me like it gets kids and teenagers,” she told the Associated Press. The “Vertigo” actress, considered one of the great beauties in her day, posted a note on her Facebook wall Thursday, acknowledging that she’d gotten fat injections in her face and addressing her halted

Analysis: Obama Celebrates
Eight Million ´Enrollments,´
Again Declares Debate ´Over´

45 replie(s)
Townhall, by Guy Benson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:56:28 PM     Post Reply
President Obama addressed the White House press corps today, announcing that with the final numbers in, Obamacare´s exchanges have attracted eight million sign-ups -- 35 percent of whom are "under the age of 35," he said. Several elements of his comments were misleading: (1) At first blush, the 35 percent stat is both significant and impressive. As recently as last month, the share of "young invincibles" signing up for plans was struggling in the 25 percent range, far short of the actuarial target of nearly 40 percent. A leap into the mid-30´s, while still shy of the goal, would constitute a major step, and would bode well for the risk pools'

The Folly Of The Bundy Ranch Rebellion
44 replie(s)
The Federalist, by Grace Olmstead    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 4:21:46 AM     Post Reply
It’s the stuff of Westerns: a showdown on the desert plains, the big bad government against an underdog farmer. Though the story has only grabbed national headlines in the past several days, rancher Cliven Bundy has illegally grazed cattle on the Nevada land surrounding his farm for over 20 years. He hasn’t paid grazing fees since 1993, and refuses to renew the necessary grazing permit.(Snip)Rather than using the avenues and pathways presented to him, Bundy has staunchly declared his own law and allegiances. Unfortunately, reality doesn’t work this way. If only it did—we could rebel for paying stupid taxes, refuse to

Students Demand Acknowledgement of
Robert E. Lee´s ´Racist and Dishonorable Conduct´

42 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by AWR Hawkins    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/18/2014 12:35:28 PM     Post Reply
A group of seven multiracial Washington and Lee University (W&L) students are demanding the school remove all Confederate flags from campus and "acknowledge" General Robert E. Lee´s "dishonorable side." According to the Roanoke Times, "seven multiracial students, calling themselves ´The Committee,´" have also demanded the school "acknowledge and apologize for participating in chattel slavery." They want recognition of "Martin Luther King Jr. Day on the undergraduate campus" and an end to "neo-Confederates" marching across campus "to the Lee Chapel on Lee-Jackson Day." The students say they will "engage in civil disobedience" if their demands are not met by September 1st. They added: "The

White House blames fox for
destroying Michelle’s garden

40 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Vince Coglianese    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 3:59:04 PM     Post Reply
The White House is going to war with another fox — and this time, it’s personal. The Wall Street Journal reports that a red fox has been causing chaos around the White House, tripping security alarms, digging up Michelle’s garden and distracting the president from his duties. The Secret Service won’t give any details about how often the fox trips the White House’s obviously sophisticated security alarms, but rest assured, officials say, they’re watching. President Obama was apparently “stunned” to see the fox roaming freely down the oft-photographed White House colonnade, home to the world’s shortest, but most dramatic, outdoor strolls. The bushy-tailed visitor

Pelosi assists in Holy Week
foot-washing ritual

28 replie(s)
San Francisco Chronicle, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 4/18/2014 11:46:54 AM     Post Reply
To "honor the dignity and work of immigrants," Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi helps Bishop Marc Andrus wash the feet of two children Thursday at Saint John the Evangelist Episcopal Church in San Francisco. Pelosi also used the occasion to talk about passing HR15 - bipartisan immigration legislation that her office says would "reduce the deficit by nearly $1 trillion, secure our borders, unite our families, protect our workers and provide an earned pathway to citizenship." The Democratic leader´s ceremony coincides with Pope Francis´ similar ceremony in Rome to mark Holy Week.

In a Hole, Golf Considers
Digging a Wider One

28 replie(s)
New York Times, by Bill Pennington    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/19/2014 10:48:33 AM     Post Reply
GREENSBORO, Ga. — Golf holes the size of pizzas. Soccer balls on the back nine. A mulligan on every hole. These are some of the measures — some would say gimmicks — that golf courses across the country have experimented with to stop people from quitting the game. Golf has always reveled in its standards and rich tradition. But increasingly a victim of its own image and hidebound ways, golf has lost five million players in the last decade, according to the National Golf Foundation, with 20 percent of the existing 25 million golfers apt to quit in the next few years. People under 35 have especially spurned the game, saying it takes too

   

Post Reply   Close thread 713240





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~