|
|
| |
Topic: How the Implementation of Obamacare Will Make the GOP a Majority Party |
How the Implementation of Obamacare Will Make the GOP a Majority Party
PJ Media, by Rick Moran
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 11/24/2012 3:04:59 PM
|
| As we get closer to the day when Obamacare moves from threat to reality, it seems probable that the resulting catastrophe for tens of thousands of businesses, as well as the massive increase in premiums for many families, will propel Republicans to majority status in 2014. How many businesses will be forced to close shop? How many will cut back on the number of employees to stay in business? How many will refuse to expand, unable to handle the increased costs? How many jobs will Obamacare cost? Michael Tanner, senior fellow at the Cato Institute,
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 11/24/2012 3:09:52 PM (No. 9032131)
`Will Make the GOP a Majority Party`. Not sure if that is supposed to be a good thing....
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
youngtexan, 11/24/2012 3:13:55 PM (No. 9032133)
The problem is that the GOP caves in with the Dems all the time. Since they can´t stand their grounds, they won´t be a Majority Party anytime soon or ever.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
enuf8, 11/24/2012 3:19:15 PM (No. 9032139)
Some of those shrilling for universal heath care with a substantial income from either one of two contributing were actually believing they would get FREE heath care and be able to eliminate health care from their personal budget. Some of these bragged about their college degrees. Like Gen. Honoree said, "Stuck on Stupid".
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 11/24/2012 3:24:39 PM (No. 9032143)
Let the Dims loose on the American public. They voted for it and they deserve it.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Ranger Applejack Dawson, 11/24/2012 3:26:30 PM (No. 9032146)
YUP #1
The only difference between the Republican Party and the Democrats is that when the Republicans run the country the decline is a steep downward slope.
When Democrats are in control the country is in free fall.
Under Bush, the NATIONAL DEBT increased by $5Trillion in 8 years. Under Obama, the NATIONAL DEBT increased $6Trilion in 4 years.
They are both just politicians.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 11/24/2012 3:46:45 PM (No. 9032163)
Some of you don´t believe that the loss of 800,000 jobs will convince voters that there is a difference between Democrats and Republicans? Want to bet? I think that will convince even you.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 11/24/2012 3:59:24 PM (No. 9032183)
Let ´em own it !
Let´s get out of the way and just let ´em do it.
Let´s not get blamed for the whole failure for holding out on the last 2%.
They must have NO CHANCE to blame the coming crash on us.
Make ´em smoke the whole damn pack.
Vote "Present".
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Cat Ballou, 11/24/2012 3:59:50 PM (No. 9032184)
If you are already feeding at the trough why would you care if 800,000 jobs are lost? One of the stupid women picketing Hostess said she was glad they were going out of business, you can´t talk to someone that ignorant & get anything accomplished.
Until the hyperinflation hits & a trailer load of Obama money won´t buy a nail wrap or pack of cigarettes, you´re not going to get the masses to pay attention. And the masses are at "tipping" point of 50%....!! Scary.... & very very sad!!
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DJ51, 11/24/2012 4:03:31 PM (No. 9032190)
#6 I Do not think so. A dumbed down electorate that easily responded to slick liberal campaign marketing, during a disastorous presidency, will still not notice the devastation. Even if they did, the Dems will successfully blame republicans.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
harleynyc, 11/24/2012 4:05:13 PM (No. 9032193)
Won´t happen. The GOP hasn´t got the spine to stop democrat voter fraud. Civil war is the only option, and it´s up to us.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
dr.lakerman, 11/24/2012 4:06:04 PM (No. 9032197)
#5, I respect president george w. bush alot, and believe the historians, a few decades out, will rate him highly. But he did spend too much money, with no child left behind, and with rx coverage in medicare. both of those were passed with the best of intentions. Neither should have been passed in the form each took. But 9/11/01 put incredible burdens on the president, who had to put protecting Americans at the top of his ´to do´ list. And in the process of protecting us, spending went kind of crazy. But he protected us.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Pearson365, 11/24/2012 4:16:28 PM (No. 9032214)
The more ObamaCare fails, the more Obama and Dems will blame the health care insurers, physicians and employers who provide coverage for their employees. Assuming that Obama does not ignore Constitution, he will have Michelle run in order to complete his illusionary plan to provide every American coverage, "We can´t let the wealthy get the good care. We gotta make sure that the poor black kid in Harlem gets the same care as those fat cats on Wall Street." He & she will call for nationalizing health insurers and putting all doctors in federal civil service. The two grifters will advocate making things worse in order to presumably make it better.
In 2015-16, Michelle and Hillary will be locked in a vicious Democratic primary battle centered on who can best provide nationalized health, dental and long-term care. The GOP will hopefully have a candidate who can counter this madness, but at the moment, I do not know who.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Daisymay, 11/24/2012 4:17:45 PM (No. 9032215)
The "Takers" won´t even notice if 800,000 workers get laid off. The "Takers" will still get all their Freebies. It won´t affect their lifestyle at all. Until the Free Phones, Food Stamps, Rent Subsidies, Free heat, and whatever else the government is giving out these days, stops...and we all know that won´t happen because Democrats do not want to upset their BASE...UNTIL it stops...nothing will upset the "Takers". They are growing by the day and by 2016, they will once again grow in numbers and they WILL VOTE to protect their FREEBIES! I don´t see how Republicans will EVER be able to fight their way back to being the Majority unless they come up with Bus loads of Illegals from some foreign country who would agree to vote Republican on election day because we provided them each with a $100 Bill after they vote!
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Spidey, 11/24/2012 4:37:10 PM (No. 9032232)
The reason liberalism has continued so long in this country is they more or less left the golden goose alone while they found ways to nickle and dime it while thriving themselves. Then along comes Obama intent on destroying the golden goose,blowing $800 billion in stimulus and passing health that will cost $500 billion a year in totality with no way to pay for it.
People have conditioned themselves to survive without a job the past 4 years which is incredible in itself. I can´t think of a way to survive without a job,what´s the secret?
Obamacare is a disincentive to work if you can get free healthcare while doing nothing.If you file taxes,you´ll be paying a fine or premium you can´t afford. This means people will stop filing tax returns.If you have a $600 refund coming and the fine is $1200,then why file and fork out an additional $600?
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
chumley, 11/24/2012 4:40:30 PM (No. 9032238)
They may get their majority. What will they do with it? If the past is any indication (and it always is), they will do nothing useful with it. They will appease their good friends across the aisle, they will shudder in fear at threatened but never carried out filibusters, and they will continue our decline. Fool me once.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Cat Ballou, 11/24/2012 4:41:01 PM (No. 9032240)
"We can´t let the wealthy get the good care. We gotta make sure that the poor black kid in Harlem gets the same care as those fat cats on Wall Street." He & she will call for nationalizing health insurers and putting all doctors in federal civil service.
If this happens, how does this part of Obamacare pertain? Are we to assume those poor Congressman are not wealthy? If they weren´t when they got to Washington I would imagine most of them are by the time they leave, that is if they ever do leave. Then they can become a lobbyist.......!!!
> "Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members > of Congress."
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Pinchem, 11/24/2012 4:47:05 PM (No. 9032247)
Sometimes, when I´m sittin round doin nuthin, just doin nuthin while sittin round, I sometimes ponder....we killed communist in Korea. We killed communist in Vietnam. We killed communist in Bosnia.
Why do those same Rules of Engagement not apply here? Just wonderin.
Maybe we should make THEM wonder about that.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
gesundheit, 11/24/2012 5:15:01 PM (No. 9032282)
If Obama and the Democrats thought ObamaCare would benefit the economy and make everyone happy, they wouldn´t have postponed its implementation until after the 2012 election.
And if they had thought raising taxes on the rich would also help the economy, they could have done so when the Democrats had a majority in Congress during Obama´s first two years in office.
So it isn´t only Republicans who believe ObamaCare and the repeal of the Bush tax cuts will hurt the economy, the Democrats have shown that they believe it, too.
In order to win the presidency and then re-election, Obama had to energize the Democrats´ liberal base with promises of free universal health care, etc., while stirring up class-warfare anger with promises of taxing the rich.
That´s why ObamaCare and the repeal of the Bush tax cuts will soon be upon us -- NOT because Obama and the Democrats thought they would be good for the country.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
rabbit, 11/24/2012 5:18:02 PM (No. 9032285)
The GOP fools itself if it believes people will turn back to them just because of problems with Obamacare. Those who voted for Obama want to see some sort of coverage for those who can´t afford any type of insurance and those who have pre-existing conditions and have thus been forced out of the insurance market.
Medical pricing is horribly distorted by the current medical insurance system in the US. Those with good insurance get discount pricing because the insurance companies have negotiated large-scale discounts. The most expensive medical care is reserved for those who have no choice but to pay 100% out-of-pocket without access to those discounts. That causes people to avoid medical services until the situation is dire, at which time ER´s and hospitals are forced to care for much sicker individuals.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
jalo1951, 11/24/2012 5:19:11 PM (No. 9032287)
Thanks to obamacare I will be losing my health insurance on Jan, 1. My premiums were to double which would have been a third of my salary. One third going to taxes and another third going to taxes doesn´t leave much when you really don´t have a big paycheck to begin with. No raises for the past two years and probably none in the future.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
LadyHen, 11/24/2012 5:19:26 PM (No. 9032288)
The people that voted for Obama DON´T WANT JOBS. They want free stuff from the government because the world owes them.
No amount of job loss will do any good. I repeat, they don´t want jobs. They want to live in the projects having baby after baby and getting Obamaphones and groceries and healthcare from Uncle Sam OR living in their boomer parent´s basement forever playing games and watching TV and having mommy and daddy buy them everything from underwear to iPhones. They have no motivation, no incentive, no need to improve, no nothing. They are a generation of perpetual adolescent nothings hell bent on staying nothing and they see nothing wrong with being nothing. THESE nothings are the empty suit´s constituency and he is more than happy to drain us all dry to support these nothings for their votes until they and we die.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Coy860, 11/24/2012 5:20:59 PM (No. 9032289)
Why is there no court challenge to the Obamacare "waivers"? What happened to Equal Protection Under the Law?
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
bpl40, 11/24/2012 5:31:39 PM (No. 9032301)
Unless the current GOP cleans up or is forced to do so, I am not interested in it becoming the majority party anymore. the #1 clean up issue is to get leadership that is totally loyal to the Constitution and is in resonance with the conservative grassroots and their ideology. Currently I don´t see anyone but Sarah.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
bighambone, 11/24/2012 5:32:03 PM (No. 9032302)
The majority of the people out there who re-elected Obama believe that he is going to provide them with "free" health care and a lot of other taxpayer provided benefits and services.
As long as Obama tells them that he is doing "the best that he can" in the face of Republican intransigence, those people will come out again and vote for an Obama clone, or whoever Obama directs them to vote for in 2014-2016.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 11/24/2012 5:38:14 PM (No. 9032306)
If these masses wanted more and more babies we wouldn´t be facing free abortions for all and more for the 47.5%. They want to revisit the free love for all era and no responsibility as taught them by the originals of the 60´s generation. perhaps when that group has passed on sanity may be back in style.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
snakeoil, 11/24/2012 5:39:17 PM (No. 9032307)
Just another 800,000 on Food Stamps and playing with their ØDumbø phones. We aren´t going to get back to majority party until only taxpayers are allowed to vote. And that could only happen with a revolution.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
pickle1, 11/24/2012 6:07:25 PM (No. 9032328)
Is this a joke?
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Straitpath, 11/24/2012 6:36:31 PM (No. 9032364)
The comments under the original post are very interesting and educational.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
killerbee, 11/24/2012 6:49:00 PM (No. 9032373)
Yeah, right. And the leftist media has no power. We´ll get ´em next time.
I´m sick of it. We saw blatant fraud this time along with outrageous bias in the media and in the debate system. Has anyone in the GOP done a thing to combat it? Nope.
So, yeah, this is the thing that´s going to wake the Obama electorate up. Are you kidding? They´re stupid. They´re thralls to the Democrat party. They believe the Republicans brought up contraception and abortion and such in the election.
Until we get serious about exposing and combating/shaming fraud, we will never win another election they don´t want us to win.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
suedotsue, 11/24/2012 7:10:35 PM (No. 9032396)
Mr. Moran is disingenuous at best. When we gave the GOP the people to defund ObamaCare Moran was describing us as dirty fingernailed hicks who would never be accepted by GOP establishment. Moran is just filler between so-called elections.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Quigley, 11/24/2012 8:41:57 PM (No. 9032457)
Back during hillarycare, Phil Graham said if it got implemented people would be hunting dimocrats with dogs.
It may still be the case. While it seems nothing matters to the electorate, if it turns out teleprompter care inconveniences them then they will hate it.
Death of an ambassador, no big deal. Inconvenienced or charged $2.00 for an ATM transaction, moral outrage!!
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
KTWO, 11/24/2012 8:50:14 PM (No. 9032461)
I expect ObamaCare will be as effective as gun control and drug control and border control. And the thousand entitlement programs at every level, city, county, state, and federal.
And like the millions of shovel ready jobs the stimulus has produced.
And the tremendous benefits we have enjoyed from wind power and solar and electric cars because our government subsidized them with billions of dollars, trillions over the years.
And our public schools, the most expensive on Earth, whose graduates amaze us all.
Government does not run things well. Being government means they don´t have too.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
montanabound, 11/24/2012 9:15:24 PM (No. 9032481)
#21 is right. My son sees that attitude in his middle school students. No ambition.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
KimoSaavy, 11/24/2012 10:40:50 PM (No. 9032558)
Obamacare was a perjorative against the law. Now BO and the dems have stolen the term which is clearly out of context from what it was intended to mean. Does he care? It is obamaNOcare.
Besides, I want to read more on the portion of the law that includes RFID. No RFID, no care. See the kid in Texas going at it alone. But the sheep will allow RFID for a free bandaid.
Scientist no doubt will design and program chips to permanently turn off the expensive eaters and looters. Either that or tax all at 90% to cover costs.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 11/25/2012 4:31:06 AM (No. 9032691)
The Death Bill will cost 800,000 jobs and $2+ trillion. These things are always, always underestimated. The numbers should be doubled or quadrupled.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Adam, 11/25/2012 8:08:30 AM (No. 9032797)
implementation of Obamacare will hurt the Democrats, I agree but that isn´t the exact same thing as helping the Republicans. First, the Republicans will have to denounce Obamacare but with it becoming an entitlement, they won´t. And that leads me to Second, you can´t beat something with nothing. If the Republicans are not for Obamacare, what are they for?
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Cooling Saucer, 11/25/2012 8:32:41 AM (No. 9032816)
I´m just so sick in my heart of reading and wanting to believe predictions that voters are capable of smartening up and changing the political direction of this country.
If Toby Harden´s piece in correct and GOP luminaries are stabbing Romney in the back, then the GOP is as rotten a political party as anything coming from the left. Gingrich and Santorium did an enormous amount of damage to Romney during the GOP primaries. There comes a point where a contender needs to put country before self and step aside. Too many GOP candidates don´t have the sense to do that. Todd Atkins was another one ...
Anyway, the point is that Obamacare was never meant to be a permanent system -- it is a segue to single-payer. The plan was always for a huge part of the population to pay nothing for "free" health care. For the remainder who pay taxes, a sizable percentage are poised to be dropped from their employers´ coverage. That will throw more people into the exchange system, thereby overwhelming it. Its pure Cloward-Pliven. With less employer-participation, independent employer health insurance systems will not be able to survive. As more people get thrown into the exchanges, the exchange system cannot provide the necessary volume of care. Before you know it, the only remedy is for single-payer. Mission accomplished.
The Congress has already foreseen this and made sure that they will never need to compete with the masses for their healthcare. The Congress also made exempt all federal judges and the upper echelon of the Executive branch.
Some words and phrases can best be defined by giving an example. The Yiddish word chutzpah is one -- what the Congress did in exempting itself and other blessed ones is the definition of "insult to injury."
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
LZK, 11/25/2012 9:01:02 AM (No. 9032850)
Have faith everyone....
Somewhere there´s a clever attorney. He/she will read the whoooooooole bill and find one little option out for each citizen....
Trust me -- I feel it happening -- just as the conservatives opted out from busing in Chicago and dropped the public school system here to last place.....The conservatives left and saved the private school system overnight.
WE opted out of that goooooberment debacle -- WE´ll opt out of this mess.
Just wait and see....
LZK
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
bassman, 11/25/2012 9:04:38 AM (No. 9032854)
It´s time for a new party! I say call it The Free Party. The people who are for liberty will think it stands for freedom and the people who want free stuff will think it is for free stuff. Can´t lose!!
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Grambo, 11/25/2012 9:07:29 AM (No. 9032857)
Before the next four years are out, we will witness the manifestation of two laws, Stein’s and Thatcher’s.
Stein’s: (paraphrased) “Things that can’t go on forever won’t.”
Thatcher’s (paraphrased) “Socialists eventually run out of other people’s money.”
Obama is soon going to demonstrate both of the above.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
gone2pot, 11/25/2012 9:18:06 AM (No. 9032871)
The bottom line is mass confusion. Please read Rules for Radicals and read the Port Huron Statement. Confusion is not the bottom line, it´s the goal and it worked beautifully November 6th. The GOP will remain blithering idiots about it even in 2014. The GOP will be blameless in this fiasco.
and
It’s hard to see how the elections of 2014-16 won’t severely damage the Democrats and make them a minority party for the foreseeable future. Really? It´s hard to see? Do you really think the blue electoral districts will be smarter with facts then than they were between 2008 and 2012? The GOP couldn´t open a bag of reality dust if it was opened for them, and it has been opened for them. Google Penn and Teller, cups and balls trick with clear cups and you have the American voter in a "nutshell" who will pick the empty clear cup knowing and seeing the ball in the other cup. Yes, they´re that stupid and they´ll willingly only get worse.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
artman1746, 11/25/2012 9:28:46 AM (No. 9032881)
Don´t count on it. The liberals always come up with some crazy reason that its not their fault. They may just go back to blaming it on Bush. Hell, they fell for it before.
The Dems will just throw something out there, the MSM will get the high sign and start pounding it into the ignorant and gullible. The comedians will start making fun of the Rrpublicans for blaming the Dems and academia will be brainwashing the kids who cast their blind vote. Before its all over the jobless, the takers and the gullible will be convinced that another vote for the Dems will be in their best interests.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 11/25/2012 9:29:23 AM (No. 9032883)
What is that sound I hear? Ah yes, tis the whistling in the dark.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
Mrs. Obelix, 11/25/2012 9:35:32 AM (No. 9032891)
The real question is: who is our A team? Rubio? Rand Paul? Guiliani? Palin? Gingrich? Santorum? Will they tear each other apart? will competition force the best to rise to the top? And what about the fact that the people in power are already using our tax dollars to promote What Your Country Can do for You to the 47%.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
Cdunnrun, 11/25/2012 9:54:16 AM (No. 9032915)
We got rid of slavery.
We WILL get rid of Obamacare.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 11/25/2012 10:42:30 AM (No. 9032975)
A third party is more likely going to be the next majority party. The GOP has lost so much support after this past election from their base and everyone they disinter mediated in ensuring Romney was their candidate, and are unlikely to regain it.
If it votes like a Dem, we might as well elect a Dem.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
caddyjak, 11/25/2012 10:47:41 AM (No. 9032981)
RNC, please wake up. If 17 states don´t show for the electoral voting, the House can elect Romney. Am I the only one in this country who knows constitutional law?
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 11/25/2012 11:07:16 AM (No. 9033003)
Doctor-to-patient prescription prior to January 1, 2013:
“Take two aspirin and call me in the morning!”
Doctor-to-patient prescription on or after January 1, 2013:
“Take two cyanide pills! Wait! I think I’ll join you.”
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
ketchuplover, 11/25/2012 11:22:17 AM (No. 9033023)
FTA: "The Democrats will be forced to defend a law that caused a recession, significantly increased insurance costs to families, and brought many businesses to their knees. It’s hard to see how the elections of 2014-16 won’t severely damage the Democrats and make them a minority party for the foreseeable future." Yeah? How did that work for pinning the housing/banking crisis on the Dems, who were by far responsible for it? How did that work in defeating Dem senators this month who voted in favor of Obamacare as well as keeping their own Cadillac plan?
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 11/25/2012 11:25:13 AM (No. 9033027)
Bwa-hahahahaha
Moran is smoking some fine chronic if he actually believes this
Wow
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
bhkat, 11/25/2012 11:49:28 AM (No. 9033068)
People that voted for Obama in 2012 because they still blamed W for the economy are too stupid to connect the failure of Obamacare to the dems.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 11/25/2012 12:25:59 PM (No. 9033123)
The history of all such massive government programs is that once they are in, they never go away. They just get bigger and more expensive. Think Social Security. Think Medicare. Now Obamacare.
Politicians come and go, but bureaucracies go on forever...until, that is, they ultimately consume their host.
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
WIBadger, 11/25/2012 12:35:42 PM (No. 9033137)
Right. And for the last 3 years we also heard how the looming threat of Obamacare´s implementation would make the GOP a majority party this year. How did that work out again ?
I´m tired of all these pontificating pundit types who claim to see the future. They can go pound sand.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 11/25/2012 1:04:05 PM (No. 9033186)
That is a question I have been asking too #22. Why did Congress exempt itself an all federal workers from Ocare? How is that equal protection under the 14th Amendment? Also, I believe one day when the full effects of Ocare begin to show themselves, a case can be made that Ocare is unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment`s `cruel and unusual punishment` clause.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
agrippa123, 11/25/2012 1:08:58 PM (No. 9033190)
Need we remind ourselves that Republican nominee this year promised to keep key parts of Obamacare intact, including the individual mandate and the prohibition of pre-existing condition denials? Or that his political career embraced big govt policies including massive bailouts and gun control? The article describes the Republican strategy: retaining power through perpetual opposition to another perpetual govt program. That´s how the two parties (actually a single great two-winged party) maintain hegemony.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
agrippa123, 11/25/2012 1:18:08 PM (No. 9033208)
As for the Constitutional analyses, don´tcha know? The Constitution doesn´t mean what it says; it means what the last Republican President´s Chief Justice says it says. Or did we all forget the role Republicans played in passing and affirming this law?
Pull the scales from your eyes.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua, 11/25/2012 2:12:07 PM (No. 9033269)
Far from certain as long as the liberal media continues to control the narrative. If the Dems mobilize in off year elections like they do during presidential elections...
Listen to the liberal media and: - The economy will be the result of the Republicans. - The Republicans are too conservative. - The Republicans are too moderate. - The Republicans don´t care about black rights, hispanic rights, women´s rights, and gay rights. - The Republicans will take away your free stuff.
Also add in the number of moderates that won´t vote conservative and vice versa.
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Attercliffe, 11/25/2012 2:23:10 PM (No. 9033286)
For obvious copyright reasons I have to summarize what I read today in a forum which is basically run and populated by a number of Duke University faculty and staff who live in a neighborhood not far from the school.
One said Blue Cross/Blue Shield is about to raise their rates by 30%. Wanted to know if anyone in the group knew of an alternative with cheaper rates.
Another one basically said ditto and that those with BC/BS would have an expensive year until things change in 2014 when AFCA takes effect.
Seems they´re under the impression that Obamacare is going to be "free"or at least less expensive than BC/BS. These are definitely the well-paid liberal elites we know and loathe so well. If they all think this way--and I believe they do--then they´re in for a huge surprise. I don´t see them voting for anyone but another Democrat, though. They´re hard-core.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
GreatPlains, 11/25/2012 3:06:48 PM (No. 9033331)
# 6 If 23 million un and underemployed ( plus the promise of the creation of 12 million new jobs ) couldn´t convince the Moron -Americans to vote Republican , the loss of another 800, 000 jobs won´t mean a thing.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
SteelTurman, 11/25/2012 3:28:48 PM (No. 9033356)
Wait until they turn all the VA hospitals into ´community health care centers´ ...
... all those old vets (and their families) will get off their duffs and vote.
Take a look at the nearest VA hospital to you ...
... see all the recent renovations?
Better to serve the public than vets.
I expect it´ll happen in about 18 months.
Mark my words.
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
PageTurner, 11/25/2012 11:33:47 PM (No. 9033770)
Moran overestimates the intelligence of the average low-information Obama voter. They won´t make any connection between who they voted for and their skyrocketing health care costs. It doesn´t compute.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Despite the WaPost, Benghazi Is a Major Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.
|
Role of Health-Law ´Navigators´ Under Fire
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"
|
Labor unions break ranks with White House on ObamaCare
|
|
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal
|
|
Issa Warns Hillary
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee
|
|
Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM
Post Reply
|
|
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...
|
How Hope and Change Gave Way To Spying on the Press
|
|
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,
|
Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama
|
|
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla. tornado for anti-GOP rant over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
McCain warns Obama-Nixon comparisons are ‘overreaching’
|
|
Boston Herald, by Hillary Chabot
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/20/2013 9:36:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
U.S. Sen. John McCain bucked the party line coming from many of his fellow conservatives this morning, saying suggestions that compare the trio of scandals gripping the White House to Watergate are “overreaching.” “I think it’s overreaching. We need a full and complete investigation and then we will decide the dimensions of it,” said McCain while campaigning for Republican Senate candidate Gabriel Gomez in Dorchester. “It is terrible but we have to have a full investigation before we leap to conclusions.” The maverick’s caution is a sharp contrast to the response of many Republicans
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|