|
|
| |
Topic: Economists, Obama administration at odds over role of mortgage debt in recovery |
Economists, Obama administration at odds over role of mortgage debt in recovery
Washington Post, by Zachary A. Goldfarb
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 11/24/2012 5:47:33 AM
|
| One year and one month before President Obama won reelection, he invited seven of the world’s top economists to a private meeting in the Oval Office to hear their advice on what do to fix the ailing economy. “I’m not asking you to consider the political feasibility of things,” he told them in the previously unreported meeting. There was a former Federal Reserve vice chairman, a Nobel laureate, one of the world’s foremost experts on financial crises and the chief economist of the International Monetary Fund , among others. Nearly all said Obama should introduce a much bigger plan
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Michaelus, 11/24/2012 7:11:34 AM (No. 9031443)
In summary - let´s bail out people who bought houses that dropped in value because then these people will go buy new cars and more houses. Brilliant.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 11/24/2012 7:37:47 AM (No. 9031465)
You know why they´re sweating it, don´t you? They have been forced to keep interest rates artificially low up to election time. Now they know they need to let them rise. But if they do, the relatively housing stability they´ve engineered is going to come crashing down as even bigger wave of foreclosures sweeps the country.
They´re stuck. And they are scrambling to come up with some scheme that will get them out of it. Unfortunately, Math never sleeps.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
skedaddle, 11/24/2012 8:23:33 AM (No. 9031530)
Seems like 1932 all over again and we all know how that one turned out.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Country Boy, 11/24/2012 8:26:14 AM (No. 9031534)
People who can´t pay their mortgage have obviously made mistakes. Why reward making mistakes?
All lib "thinking" revolves around magic.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
ROLFnader, 11/24/2012 8:29:35 AM (No. 9031545)
It is a well kept secret that revenues are down at Treasury and we know that we are approaching the limit that other countries are willing or able to lend us. So, where does a socialist dictator go when it all starts unraveling? Why- to the makers , of course. They are the stingy ones who put aside money for a comfortable retirement. That´s just unfair and the takers will have to occupy the street again to get some more Social Justice!
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
jntsrgn, 11/24/2012 8:40:13 AM (No. 9031571)
Just where do they get power to write down the balance of a mortgage? This is insane. If I loan money and the govt steps in to write down the principle, I will be exercising my 2nd Amendment rights.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
JackBurton, 11/24/2012 9:05:52 AM (No. 9031607)
the people who know that lending goes hand in hand with economnic growth think that by lowering rates alone, they can stimulate the economy.
While they are lowering rates, they are also strangling and castigating banks for everything that doesn´t go right. Banks realize that they have to be uber careful this time around and ARE ONLY LENDING TO PEOPLE WHO WILL PAY BACK LOANS... and most of those people, being careful as well...
...aren´t borrowing.
Stop the meddling. Let the market work.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Spidey, 11/24/2012 9:09:18 AM (No. 9031616)
A lot of these houses are underwater from people refinancing and taking cash out. They blew the money and want to government to eat that cost.It has nothing to do with crashing home values.
Appraisers were a big part of the housing crash and they were caught between a rock and a hard place. If the didn´t give generous appraisals, they were blacklisted by loan brokers,so they went along to get a check.
The real problem with the continuing mortgage crisis is the people who think they´re entitled to the house.They´ll hang in until the bitter end waiting on an Omama rescue.Sensible people walked away from their house and moved back home or whatever. They don´t get gold stars for that but at least hey recognize reality in front of their face.
Banks aren´t going to make money giving out 3% loans but they´d rather do that than face billions in lawsuits from aggrieved liberal groups.If you make a loan you suckered them in. If you don´t make the loan it´s race discrimination.They also lowered the debt ratio to get people into houses which defy simple math.
Now they want to sue because banks are doing a better job protecting houses in upscale neighborhoods than poor ones. There´s always an angle with these people.How or why would you protect a house that´s had all the wiring, plumbing and appliances stripped from it.
Obama wants to spend even more stimulus fixing these houses up and reselling them to the same type people that destroyed them.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
NorthernDog, 11/24/2012 10:13:45 AM (No. 9031733)
The government tampering with the housing marketplace is the major cause. First demanding that risky borrowers be given mortgages. Now they keep coming up with schemes that only prolong the problems. They should have let the housing marketplace hit bottom in 2009. It would have been painful but by now we would be on the road to a stable, firm recovery.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
MDConservative, 11/24/2012 10:45:44 AM (No. 9031773)
This is NOT about the ability to pay mortgages; it´s about the choice/ability to spend on anything else for folks stuck with underwater home loans. If my mortgage makes my home unsellable (i.e. I would have to pay off the sale shortage in cash myself with money I do not have), or if I can no longer borrow to buy a new whatever (car, refrigerator, remodel), it translates into lost consumption in the marketplace. In other words, you can´t sell me anything and make money with your goods and services. Get the picture? Harry Homeowner has no money to spend anymore...and Billie Businesswoman isn´t selling Harry anything...so Frankie Factoryworker isn´t needed and gets laid off, just before Billie closes her small biz. Get it now? Those bailouts should have all been predicated on relieving this mess...but, NOOOO! The banks and investment houses, and the foreclosure-threatened got bailed, not the schleps that pay their debts on time to the detriment of other economic activity.
There is a tremendous crash coming to real estate, and it won´t be long in coming as inventory is still incredibly high, and there are also tons of foreclosures just hanging out there that the banks have not pursued yet. Lots of people have long ago just stopped paying, daring the lenders to do something about it.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
lylacat, 11/24/2012 11:00:55 AM (No. 9031794)
There are a couple of generations of people who lived high on the hog using their credit cards to buy anything they wanted. They were allowed to buy houses they cold not afford, they took money out of the house as the price went up and spent every penny, they use one credit card to pay off another, the are getting college loans to subsidize their life style. They get $30,000 a year from a college loan, and take one course, and the rest of the money buys clothes and vacations. This group of people have no savings. Those who have savings will end up paying for these deadbeats´ bills. We are doomed.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
woofwoofwoof, 11/24/2012 11:47:05 AM (No. 9031872)
The problem, once it occurs, is not going to just go away.
If you´re going to bail someone out, you can bail out the bank, or you can bail out the homeowner. And if it´s the homeowner - that is, the borrower - you can do it by allowing EVERYONE to refinance even when under water, OR you can make them not underwater anymore by forgiving principal (and *then* they can refinance).
It all stinks. The actual money is all gone, whoever sold the house last at the inflated amount, is the "winner".
But NONE of this is a problem with the economy, the problem is 10,000,000 jobs shipped to China. If you don´t fix that, there is NO solution to real estate or the economy. None. Zip. Nada. Zero.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Davids918, 11/24/2012 12:37:30 PM (No. 9031952)
The constant theme in the article is how the Obama administration failed to do what was needed early enough.
Remember, he had a Dem House and Senate to work with too.
We are a consuming economy.
So, adding taxes and increasing costs for things like gasoline, electricty and water only hurt the average consumer.
Those same inputs are expenses of government as well, so they require more $$$ to fund.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
ltaormina, 11/24/2012 12:41:41 PM (No. 9031957)
It doesn´t matter what anyone says. Obama meets with all kinds of groups and pretends to listen and then does just what he wants to do. Happened the past 4 years. What a con.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 11/24/2012 12:41:57 PM (No. 9031958)
@#5: Unless you worked for the govn your entire adult life, then your retirement was well earned......../s
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
|
Holding AWOL Obama Accountable
|
|
American Spectator, by Betsy McCaughey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 6:20:22 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama offers only weasel words to explain deaths in Libya and IRS abuses. He’s the master of verbal evasion. House Republicans need to replace debate with action to hold the president accountable on these issues. To get to the bottom of why four Americans died in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, House Republicans should issue a formal resolution demanding to know where the president was on the night September 11 and what role he played. Obama needs to be put on the hot seat. Benghazi- For eight months, the White House has maneuvered
|
| |
|
|
What the White House Really Thinks
|
|
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:59:25 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Much has been written and said about the astoundingly tone deaf performance of White House spokesman Jay Carney during this past month of scandals. The former journalist has lost the confidence of the people who were once his colleagues due to his unwillingness to tell the truth about his own deceptive statements (never mind those he represents in front of the press) about the Benghazi talking points or even to acknowledge that he has changed his story. The same applies to the shifting story he has told about the Internal Revenue Service scandal
|
|
All in the Family
|
|
Washington Free Beacon, by C.J. Ciaramella
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:44:55 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A nonprofit connected to Rep. Corrine Brown (D., Fla.) and run by a local political power player overbilled Medicaid by nearly $1.4 million, the Florida Times-Union reported. According to an audit by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, the Community Rehabilitation Center in Jacksonville overbilled Medicaid by nearly $1.4 million. Reggie Gaffney, a former Jacksonville Port Authority board member, runs the nonprofit, which provides medical services for mental illness, substance abuse, and HIV/AIDS for low-income residents. Brown’s daughter, Shantrel, is a lobbyist for Arlington-based Alcade and Fay, whose clients include the nonprofit. C
|
|
Slain Russian ‘intimidated’ neighbors
|
|
Boston Herald, by Laurel J. Sweet*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:40:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Cambridge neighbors of a Russian mixed martial arts brawler shot dead by an FBI agent early yesterday in Florida — after ?being questioned about his ties to the marathon bombing and a Waltham triple murder — said he was nasty. Ibragim Todashev, 27, also hung around with slain marathon bombing mastermind Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26 — swilling beer and eating chicken on a stoop on Harding Street, they said. “I was the happiest person when they moved. ... It’s a little more peaceful since they left,” a neighbor told the Herald yesterday of the Russian buddies.
|
|
The Real Voter Suppression of 2012
|
|
National Review Online, by John Fund
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:29:41 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The 2012 election season was filled with angry cries of “voter suppression,” almost all of them regarding attempts by states to require voter ID and otherwise improve ballot integrity. Bill Clinton warned that “there has never been — in my lifetime, since we got rid of the poll tax and all the other Jim Crow burdens on voting — the determined effort to limit the franchise that we see today.” Democratic-party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said “photo-ID laws, we think, are very similar to a poll tax.” All of this proved to be twaddle.
|
|
The ‘Criminal’ press
|
|
New York Post, by Michael A. Walsh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:24:39 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Justice Department’s secret seizure of phone records from The Associated Press and its monitoring of Fox News reporter James Rosen are nothing less than thuggish attempts to criminalize the practice of journalism — the only profession specifically protected by the US Constitution. Free and open inquiry is also the cornerstone of our democracy, a legacy of the Enlightenment that found its clearest expression in the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” By which the Founders specifically meant political speech. They understood that, even with the checks and balances
|
| |
|
|
London Attack: The New Face of Terror
|
|
Daily Beast, by Clive Irving
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:11:41 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A blood-splattered jihadist with a meat cleaver in one hand declaring to a bystander’s smartphone camera “Allahu Akbar” and “we will always beat you” in a pronounced south London accent? While waiting twenty minutes for the police to arrive after he’s taken part in what seemed like a ritual assassination of a British soldier? Exactly what terrorist profile does this conform to? None. And that’s what concerns British terrorism officials. Is this bizarre episode the beginning of a new, unpredictable pattern of loners operating without any organized backing behind them, or a one-off?
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner lost her rights
|
|
Politico, by Rachel Bade
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
All of Obama´s Scandals Are Ultimately About Information Control
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s
|
| | |
|
|