A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Israel Vs. Hamas Is
Civilization Vs. Savagery
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Israel Vs. Hamas Is
Civilization Vs. Savagery

Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial

Original Article

Posted By:SoCalGal, 11/21/2012 9:34:26 PM

Mideast: Celebration within Gaza after the bombing of a bus filled with innocent Israeli civilians is an object lesson on the so-called Palestine question. Those who would celebrate such a cowardly act are savages. No one can imagine Washington´s troops firing shots to celebrate a supporter of American independence trying to kill a group of Royalist civilians. During the Cold War, U.S. support for Lech Walesa´s Solidarity would have dried up if he handed out candy after a Polish nationalist targeted, say, innocent Muscovites going to work. We may live in a complex world, but evil is identifiable even

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: dcomd, 11/21/2012 9:47:14 PM     (No. 9028571)

Savages? Savages! That´s a step UP for these vermin.


Reply 2 - Posted by: miceal, 11/21/2012 9:55:02 PM     (No. 9028580)

Islam IS NOT compatible with Western Civilization. Sadly, there seems to be a majority of liberal/progressive thought infected citizens who think differently. I fear for my Country and my way of life....


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: archbishopofaberlour, 11/21/2012 9:57:20 PM     (No. 9028581)

Is this what America voted for in the last election?


Reply 4 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 11/21/2012 10:10:05 PM     (No. 9028592)

Query; Would Arabs know right from wrong if it bit ´em on the asp?


Reply 5 - Posted by: bifgroovey, 11/21/2012 10:20:49 PM     (No. 9028603)

Liberals support "Palestine" (as if such a people existed) in the same sort of dysfunctional way OJ Simpson supports Battered Women Shelters.

Homeless unemployed Jordanians ("palestinians") should stop trying to murder innocent people at their home.


Reply 6 - Posted by: JAN, 11/22/2012 5:35:08 AM     (No. 9028849)

The msm and now seemingly the Vatican would have us believe that it´s the Israeli´s who are the savages.

The evil doer in the white house is on board with this assessment.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Rinktum, 11/22/2012 6:51:08 AM     (No. 9028892)

The truth in this article should be all we need to know regarding who the bad guys are in this situation. How the world can ignore this evil is beyond comprehension. It makes no logical sense. However, this might explain at lot to those who believe the Bible.

Genesis 16: 11,12

11 The angel of the Lord also said to her: "You are now pregnant and you will give birth to a son. You shall name him Ishmael, for the Lord has heard of your misery.

12 He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone and everyone´s hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers."


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Judith, 11/22/2012 6:57:46 AM     (No. 9028898)

Savages is an appropriate word for hamas...and for its ally, liberals in the USA.


Reply 9 - Posted by: rightdog, 11/22/2012 7:03:05 AM     (No. 9028905)

Calling Hamas savages is an insult to self respecting savages. How about "oxygen consuming rotting excrement". I like the ring of that better.


Reply 10 - Posted by: LZK, 11/22/2012 7:43:00 AM     (No. 9028952)

Here´s the hamas/game/plan....

They are running short on money. Soooooo -- they start the raining of rockets on Israel. Israel responds with some serious answers. hamas and egypt cry and obama sends in the shrew to load their pre/paid cash card...

Hope Israel got a few licks in before the obama/sell/out....

Go Mossad!!

LZK


Reply 11 - Posted by: M2, 11/22/2012 8:28:43 AM     (No. 9029000)

Quickly channel-surfing coverage of the "cease fire" last night, I heard Christien Amanpour refer to "the Israeli terrorists".

I couldn´t stomach any more. Do people still watch CNN?


Reply 12 - Posted by: Grambo, 11/22/2012 8:29:53 AM     (No. 9029004)


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Grambo, 11/22/2012 8:30:36 AM     (No. 9029005)

Hit enter too soon.

As we know from 9/11 (both of them), the Hamas savagery is not limited to the Israeli conflict, it is aimed at us too. Until the West openly acknowledges that Islam is antithetical to civilized human society and acts accordingly, murder and mayhem will continue.


Reply 14 - Posted by: vesicant, 11/22/2012 8:57:27 AM     (No. 9029042)

This is not an aberration. This is the essence of islam.


Reply 15 - Posted by: saguni, 11/22/2012 10:06:46 AM     (No. 9029163)

It is not that they are savages, it is that they have been exposed to civilization, yet they choose savagery.

Judaism and Islam alike (also Christianity) require acts and donations to "charity" yet we describe it as helping anyone in need and the savages describe it as helping convert those in need to Islam and only allow help if it will further Islam.

Every word of Shari´a "law" violates some portion of our Bill of Rights, yet the "mulitculturalists" among us say that their culture is equal to our own, and acquiesce to the savages´ desire to implement their savagery within our country.


Reply 16 - Posted by: nevernaught, 11/22/2012 10:54:47 AM     (No. 9029267)

It is foolish to argue or negotiate with people who fire machine guns straight up into the air to celebrate anything. Best to just watch the destruction from afar or on TV when the bullets come straight back down.

Hint...that is why they invented helmets and they offer better protection than dirty rags wrapped around your heads. Heathens.


Reply 17 - Posted by: RancherJack, 11/22/2012 11:07:42 AM     (No. 9029303)

Perfect headline


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Chief1942, 11/22/2012 11:56:13 AM     (No. 9029394)

Hard to imagine why we would inject ourselves into conflicts in any Muslim nation. The more they kill each other, the fewer we will ultimately have to deal with. I sse little difference between these animals and their counterparts on the plains of Africa. Their apologists need to be immersed into those areas of conflict and we could effectively "kill two birds with one stone". Sympathy? Empathy? Not one shred.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Freeloader, 11/22/2012 12:13:51 PM     (No. 9029430)

"Believers! wage war against such of the infidels as are your neighbors, and let them find you rigorous: and know that Allah is with those who fear him."

SURA 9:123

Deadly Islamic Terrorist attacks since September 11, 2001:

19,968*

*The Religion Of Peace website


Reply 20 - Posted by: carolina blue, 11/22/2012 12:32:34 PM     (No. 9029460)

I would keep all those troops in place and the first time the broke the treaty i would move in like the original plan, these people understand nothing, peace treaty my eye, they are a little above an ape in intelligence and I hate to insult an ape.,..


Reply 21 - Posted by: federale, 11/22/2012 3:20:08 PM     (No. 9029635)

Obama´s Muslim allies will soon rule the world as they breed at an extremely high rate and don´t tolerate opposing views.


Reply 22 - Posted by: St. Pitbull, 11/22/2012 8:10:51 PM     (No. 9029885)

This IS where we are in America now! Some people do not understand and they are going to continue to disbelieve until it is way too late.


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 712964




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "SoCalGal"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "SoCalGal"



Afghanistan´s Benghazi:
The Shoot-Down of Extortion 17
Townhall, by Diana West    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/20/2013 4:46:07 PM     Post Reply
Grief and politics don´t mix. When raw, aching grief and the dirtiest kind of politics meet, a hot volcano of pain and outrage erupts that is unstoppable. But it is necessary.(Snip)before Benghazi, there was Extortion 17, the call sign of a special operations mission in Afghanistan on Aug. 6, 2011. Three months after the strike on Osama bin Laden, 30 Americans -- including 15 from the bin Laden strike-team unit, Navy SEAL Team 6, and two other SEALs -- were killed in the costliest single-day loss for the U.S. military in the Afghanistan war, and the largest SEAL loss

Faulty wheel jeopardizes
Kepler space telescope´s
quest for alien life
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/16/2013 12:39:40 PM     Post Reply
A faulty steering apparatus may bring an early end to NASA’s Kepler space telescope, a $600 million tool in the space agency’s quest for life elsewhere in the universe. Kepler is the first NASA mission capable of finding Earth-size planets in or near the habitable zone, the range of distance from a star where the surface temperature of an orbiting planet might be suitable for liquid water. Launched in 2009, it has discovered thousands of such planets, including a pair just 1,200 light years away.(Snip) But yesterday, Kepler’s mission ran into trouble.

The IRS´s Nonprofit Helper
Wall Street Journal, by James Taranto    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/14/2013 4:10:56 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service last year supplied a left-leaning nonprofit charity with confidential information about conservative organizations, which the charity disseminated to the public, ProPublica reported yesterday. The charity in question was ProPublica itself. We should acknowledge that "left-leaning" is our characterization; ProPublica describes itself in its own tax filings as "entirely non-partisan and non-ideological." ProPublica is legally obliged to be nonpartisan, for it enjoys tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which means that contributions to it are tax-deductible.

A Tainted Campaign?
National Review Online, by Victor Davis Hanson    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/14/2013 1:44:02 PM     Post Reply
If it is proven that the IRS thwarted some groups from obtaining tax-exempt status in fear that their traditional or conservative messages might hurt the 2012 Obama campaign (especially if it did so under pressure from White House-affiliated operatives), and if it is proven that the Obama administration deliberately ignored warnings about lax security at the Benghazi consulate, missed real opportunities to send help, or deliberately massaged intelligence reports in order to mislead the pre-election public about the true nature of Benghazi in order to further a false campaign narrative of a near dormant al-Qaeda

Stealing Style From Granny
Wall Street Journal, by Alexa Brazilian    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/13/2013 7:45:00 PM     Post Reply
IS CONSERVATIVE THE new radical? The fashion world certainly seems to think so. This season, designers filled their runways with restrained silhouettes that echo the graceful, showing-less-is-more aesthetic of generations past. Designers are reimagining soignée staples for spring and summer—skirt suits, twin sets, below-the-knee dresses, kitten heels and frame bags—that appear anything but moth-eaten. In fact, fashion´s neoconservative coup d´état feels deliciously defiant, given the excessively revealing styles pop culture celebrates. A quick flip through any supermarket tabloid yields an

Sanford victory shows adultery,
lies can´t trump party loyalty
Los Angeles Times, by Robin Abcarian    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/13/2013 12:01:45 AM     Post Reply
It would be too easy to make fun of the good Christian voters of South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District who saw fit to return their disgraced former Gov. Mark Sanford to the office he once held. I won’t do it. Well, maybe just a little. Sanford, whose political rise was fueled by his conservative principles and focus on family values, did not stay true to his wife. But in the end, the voters in South Carolina’s 1st stayed true to him.(Snip)“Obviously, there´s a vulnerability to me now that people respond to," Sanford told

Jay Carney attempts to
throw CIA under the bus
on Benghazi talking points
Legal Insurrection, by William A. Jacobson    Original Article
Posted By: SoCalGal- 5/10/2013 5:07:56 PM     Post Reply
I’ll post the video when available. (Wow, GOP Rapid Response got this video out really quickly)(Snip for Video)Here are some tweets as it took place: Throwing CIA under bus never works, ask every prior President–> payback leaks — Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) May 10, 2013 Carney: Should we have overruled the intelligence community?We relied on what they thought.Fighting words. — Guy Benson (@guypbenson) May 10, 2013 “These were intelligence community talking points” -Jay Carney — Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) May 10, 2013



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

   

Post Reply   Close thread 712964





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~