Stupid. The nyt motto: all the news that fits our views.

If it´s so outlandish, Mr. Stenographer, why waste the ink on it?

Wasn´t the mantra of Obama´s campaing something like "Al Quaeda or Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive?"
This fits the narrative for the campaing.
How does the NYT stay in business?

Under the table bailouts, i suspect, #3.

Is "conspiracy theory" their new "racism" - a way to automatically discredit legitimate critique of Dear Leader? I´ve been noticing how often the court eunuchs cry "conspiracy theory!" lately when Dear Leader gets caught with his pants on fire.

And speaking of that still very suspicious birth certificate...

The Democrats continuously create what is known as "a target rich environment".

Fist off Andy, who cares what you or that worthless rag think? Your slavish devotion to this administration is glaringly evident so anything you say is viewed with skepticism.

Second, nothing you said conflicts with the theory that I and millions of americans hold which is, this administration withheld information and distorted the information they released in order to help Obama win the election.

So a Senator trying to do his best to represent the citizens and keeping the fire lit under a lying, corrupt WH, which still hasn´t come out with the truth about this awful incident is milking a conspiracy theory? Must be painful to be impaled on McCain´s hook Andrew.

I don´t need a lecture from the snide, lying NYTs.

nytimes is owned in part by carlos slim- mexican billionaire.

Obamaphones are given out by a firm owned by carlos slim and paid for by the us govt.

that´s the quid and the pro.

Interesting view, particularly if you like talking gerbils.

Based on the testimony it is no longer in dispute that the -0- administration peddled a false story – i.e. “lied to the American people”.

The comment that -0- has ordered the killing of people in the war on terror is odd, and weirdly out of place. The issue here is that 4 Americans were murdered in what was obviously a terrorist attack on US soil, and the administration lied about it, and continues to obfuscate for political cover. That really isn’t even in dispute at this point. There are lots of unanswered questions, and the lack of media curiosity is surreal.

I don´t know about you, but it is becoming more and more obvious to me that they are trying to make us fire the first shot.

Americans saw and heard the president, the Secretary of State, and Susan Rice repeatedly claiming that the attacks were spontaneous demonstrations caused by an anti-Islam film. The president went before the UN and said this. These pathetic people with their deceptions actually started Americans talking and arguing about the limits, if any, of freedom of speech.

We HEARD this and we SAW this. Does the writer think we havve forgotten it? Does he think we are idiots?

It is one thing to say that doubt remains as to whether Al Quaeda or any other group was involved. No one can argue with caution in assigning specific responsibility before the facts support it. But this is not the question at hand.

The administration´s talking points were that the attacks were caused by an anti-Islam film. They expressed no doubt whatever about this. They claimed that the demonstrations were spontaneous. Again, they expressed no doubt about this. They apologized to Muslims for the film they claimed, right away, immediately, the moment the attacks took place, while they were still going on, caused the whole thing.

This is a disgraceful article by a man so blinded by his partisanship that he no longer dwells in the same world as the rest of us. It is, or would be, if it were not the norm, unbelievable.

The NYT is but one voice in the choir of the MSM´s portrayal of Sen. McCain as a demented Captain Ahab pursuing his whale.

The JournOlists are in full battle mode.

Shut up Rosenthal.

The Middle East is aflame and who is the champion of Hamas?

Bow-Boy you idiot.

And who is the champion of Islam?

Bow-Boy and the infiltrators you idiot.

And who is Bow-Boy´s enabler?

PIAPS.

No conspiracy here.

Yeah, d-bag, and there were no conspiracy theories from the Left when GWB was in office?
911 Truthers? Blood for Oil? Halliburton?

Ludicrous on parade at the NYTimes, yet again.

As soon as I started reading Andrew´s article, I could feel the saliva building in my mouth... and a strong desire to spew it in Andrew´s face -- had he been in the same room as I. (+ I´ve never spit at anyone!)

The root of Benghazi is that it is a MURDER investigation of four Americans, and one of the four an Ambassador wilfully abandoned (by the U.S. Government/President)without sufficient protection.

Please: do NOT allow the word ´Murder´ to drop from any of these discussions/investigation.

And yes, #5 - I think "´conspiracy theory´ their new ´racism´ - a way to automatically discredit legitimate critique of Dear Leader." Let´s not walk into their verbal traps.

fta: "Republicans have the same basic attitude toward conspiracy theories as the Plains Indians had toward the buffalo – they are the basis of life, even religion," .... This is playground abuse. The left is indeed a cult if this passes all the checks.

So do you suppose Mr. Rosenthal also believed Nixon was just trying to protect the families of the Watergate burglars?
S/O.

What a bald-faced propagandist.

How they pine for the good old days when they could blame it on a video.

Sure, Andrew. According to you ´n Pinch at Da Noo Yawk Twimes, any perp (D) not found guilty by a jury of his oldest drinking buddies and first cousins, is really a victim of right wing conspiracy theories cooked up by malevolent kooks.

Here´s a couple of rebuttal words for you: Anthony and Weiner.

shut up, andy

Nothing to see here, folks. Move along.

Isn´t it a tragic commentary that only republicans care about our mudered Americans.

Hey Andy, I am not a conspiracist, I am a realist, anybody with even a rudimentary amount of common sense could see that this Benghazi Debacle was the result of a novice practitioner in the fine art of foreign affairs not understanding the game at hand (too complex). Then said practitioner lied to the American people on numerous occasions...come clean, the truth will set you free or get you impeached!

Well, this conspiracy "theory" has more evidence backing it up than your much vaunted "theory" of interspecies evolution which you now hold as an axiom. Go ahead and ridicule this as fanciful thinking but like the McCarthyism liberal boogeyman, this too will be shown, too late for those hurt by it, to have basis in reality. This time, though, many lives will be lost while Obama plays savior to the islamic world.

What do you call a president sending someone with no direct knowledge of the Benghazi attack to speak for his administration, spouting out lies not once but five times before an election that he would have lost if he was shown to be a liar on having defeated islamic terrorism rather than enabling it? I would say that there was a conspiracy among Jarrett, Donilon, Clinton, Obama and Rice at the very least to lie about the cause of the attack when they all knew otherwise.

RINO´s Succeed in muddying the true issue.

Thanks, McCain... for making it near impossible to redirect attention to the real issue... Why they were´nt properly protected & why the rescuers were told to Stand Down. Thanks a bunch.

Can´t imagine why people would suspect that this had something to do with Obama´s election- other than the fact that all he has ever done and all he can ever do is campaign.

You don´t have to vote for him but you should realize that you are a racist if you criticize anything he does or says.