|
|
| |
Topic: Navy Fires Two More Commanders |
Navy Fires Two More Commanders
Stars and Stripes, by Cristina Silva
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Grateful, 11/21/2012 10:45:06 AM
|
| NAPLES, Italy — The Navy on Monday dismissed two commanders amid allegations of misconduct, weeks before they were both scheduled to assume new commands. Capt. Ted Williams was relieved as commander of the amphibious command ship USS Mount Whitney, and Cmdr. Ray Hartman was relieved as commander of the amphibious dock-landing ship USS Fort McHenry, said Cmdr. Marc Boyd, spokesman for U.S. Naval Forces Europe/Africa. The Navy would not describe the nature of the allegations. Both investigations center on personal conduct, Boyd said.
|
Comments: What is going on in the senior military ranks? 22 other commanders have been relieved by the Navy this year
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Griz70, 11/21/2012 10:55:15 AM (No. 9027565)
Sounds a lot like the Stalin purges before WWII. Would like to know some specifics to warrant the changes, or else it could be purging and revenge.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Feebie, 11/21/2012 11:00:45 AM (No. 9027576)
Yup. I am thinking it´s those that were a threat to the current adminstration.
Anyone seen so many "misconduct/infidelity" charges EVER in any adminstration?
Between the Secret Service and Military ranks?
Commies are in control.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
PageTurner, 11/21/2012 11:02:32 AM (No. 9027581)
It´s called Stalin´s purges. Obama doesnt trust the military and looks to put his own loyalist in instead. Look for Janet Napolitano & David Axelrod types to people the flag ranks now, mouthing the glories of gays in the military, political correctness, birth control and all the other totems of the left. It´s going to get bad out there.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
RightShoe, 11/21/2012 11:10:03 AM (No. 9027604)
We had a commander in chief that forced his superiors to make him take a DNA test to prove the case against his personal conduct. We did nothing to him.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
ebgodard, 11/21/2012 11:10:32 AM (No. 9027606)
And so Obama continues to gut the military. Traitor.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
capt scurvey, 11/21/2012 11:11:34 AM (No. 9027610)
Practically speaking, military resistance is the only thing our rogue government would possibly have to fear.
A dollar to a do-nut these guys are all republicans...
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
steveracer, 11/21/2012 11:21:57 AM (No. 9027632)
My Russian-American friends see the similarities.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
babsathome, 11/21/2012 11:26:28 AM (No. 9027647)
I believe many do fall for the "It;s all about me" mentality when promoted. Many do not fall into the trap though. Many more are getting ready to leave because Bamster is putting MORE of his Behind Kissers in place to move up the ranks. I pray for our Servicemen daily because we are a military family. Do Not think this is being lost on our enlisted troops. They have learned well from Benghazi- every man for himself. Now if those brass that willingly leave will speak up, corrections could be made.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
No Arm, 11/21/2012 11:37:10 AM (No. 9027669)
Some of these individuals are solid experienced leaders. They will continue to be of high value in the future.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
god of irony, 11/21/2012 11:41:43 AM (No. 9027686)
What we are seeing that since 9-11 the military has slacked in enforcing standards puting warfighting and retention first. Now we are slashing end strength everyone is looking for discrimanators to get rid of people.
In the Army they are doing this by refusing to let career NCO´s re-enlist if they had a blemishes as small as being being overweight or failing a PT test even if they overcame those issues and met the standards.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
birddog, 11/21/2012 11:50:46 AM (No. 9027718)
It might be interesting to track who gets promoted into these 22 positions. I´m guessing it will be a veritable "Rainbow Coalition" of females, Blacks, Hispanics, Middle Eastern and Gay "Military of Tomorrow" types.
The Norks recently fired a military commander by placing him under a pre-targeted Mortar barrage. Not the same..but similar.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
FL_Absentee_Voter, 11/21/2012 12:11:17 PM (No. 9027761)
Leadership begins at the top. It also fails from the same echelon. I held on from 1993-2001; can´t imagine what it must be like these days. And now there´s a $500 million budget cut looming on the horizon.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
comstock, 11/21/2012 12:42:28 PM (No. 9027829)
Williams was headed for the prestigious command of one of the few heavy aircraft carriers. He served as XO on a carrier. The path is - command of a deep draft auxiliary - then the the command of a carrier on the way to his flag.
Not much info on Hartman.
I don´t think this is a purge. These guys were pretty low on the feeding chain. They are three or four steps down from the four-stars like Ham, Allen, Sinclair, Patraeous and Ward
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
tipover, 11/21/2012 1:09:31 PM (No. 9027873)
Many of these are due to zipper control problems.
Women on deployed ships don´t help zipper control whether Officer or Enlisted.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
chumley, 11/21/2012 1:22:10 PM (No. 9027889)
He saw the assignment said "Mount Whitney" and thought it was an order.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
KTWO, 11/21/2012 1:42:23 PM (No. 9027916)
I suspect it is less purging than emptying command slots so the right people can be moved up faster.
The right people may be of a favored sex or race or sexual orientation. Or have the right political views. Or just be related to a VIP or big donor.
We can only speculate about specific cases. But more generally, in a regime like Obama´s the military will be corrupted rapidly.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Jubilationtcornpone, 11/21/2012 1:54:50 PM (No. 9027935)
Post of the day, #16. I salute you, sir.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Grumpy Yee, 11/21/2012 2:05:56 PM (No. 9027952)
In researching the reasons for the dismissals, I found that most were for administrative deficiencies and command and control inabilities. This what happens when pc runs amok in the services. Real men of character are avoiding commands because they are vulnerable to the pc regulations that are pervasive military regs. One fact also noted that four of five women commanders were relieved of duty because they did not command with strength and respect. My conclusion is that the new USN commanders who can command are out there and they keep their commands close to their vests and do a really good job. It´s these 22 who failed to uphold the integrity of their positions as commander.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
mitzi, 11/21/2012 2:22:31 PM (No. 9027973)
I read something just the past few days ... Obama´s getting rid of military leaders who might participate in a "coup."
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
lavalette, 11/21/2012 3:50:49 PM (No. 9028100)
You can be sure that no one is getting three or four stars without being an Obama loyalist, but these command level firings are all due to sexual misconduct which is all due the women in combat and gays in the military thing which is quietly destroying our military culture like cancer,
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Grateful"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Grateful"
|
|
Navy Fires Two More Commanders
|
|
Stars and Stripes, by Cristina Silva
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Grateful- 11/21/2012 10:45:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
NAPLES, Italy — The Navy on Monday dismissed two commanders amid allegations of misconduct, weeks before they were both scheduled to assume new commands. Capt. Ted Williams was relieved as commander of the amphibious command ship USS Mount Whitney, and Cmdr. Ray Hartman was relieved as commander of the amphibious dock-landing ship USS Fort McHenry, said Cmdr. Marc Boyd, spokesman for U.S. Naval Forces Europe/Africa. The Navy would not describe the nature of the allegations. Both investigations center on personal conduct, Boyd said.
|
| |
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
| | |
|
|