|
|
The Nasty GOP?
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 11/20/2012 2:31:34 PM
|
| ‘The Republican brand is deeply damaged” was a painfully common assessment after the election. A lot of Republicans were eager to blame the party’s thoroughly lousy performance on the presidential nominee, but there is considerable evidence that the unpopularity goes well beyond that: Romney won more votes than GOP Senate candidates in almost all of the swing states — and in some fairly red states, including Arizona, Montana, Nebraska, and North Dakota. Conservative ideas, though, won in distinctly Democratic-leaning states once the word “Republican” was no longer associated with them. In Michigan, where Obama won handily,
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
supersid, 11/20/2012 2:45:14 PM (No. 9026026)
A good cataloguing of all the wrong things going on.
FTA: Now, think about how this argument sounds to any gay or lesbian or to anyone who loves them — to their mothers, fathers, brothers, and friends. It takes a consensual relationship that more and more Americans see practiced by their friends, neighbors, and relatives and equates it with criminal acts, among the most reviled in our society.
Only way for GOP to win national elections in the future is to appeal to all Americans. No Palinesque classification into ´real´ Americans and not real ones.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 11/20/2012 2:49:01 PM (No. 9026032)
[high fiving #1]
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 11/20/2012 2:49:04 PM (No. 9026033)
The republican senate candidates in Indiana and Missouri were just plain stupid. It is not necessary to have an opinion about everything, and even if you do, there are times when one should shut up. Most of us learn that as teenagers. The two candidates mentioned, did not.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
harleynyc, 11/20/2012 2:55:07 PM (No. 9026045)
Voter fraud is the ONLY reasom the GOP isn´t winning the white house. All these articles are worthless. In local races, the GOP gained seats....where obama commies didn´t deploy their illegal activities.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Flipper3, 11/20/2012 2:57:39 PM (No. 9026047)
I agree with #4.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bkt23, 11/20/2012 3:25:30 PM (No. 9026101)
I´d vote for a GOP candidate if s/he wasn´t a leftist along the lines of McCain or Romney. You know, someone who actually understood the issues and respected the rule of law. If the constitution is passe and individual freedom a chimera of the past and everyone else in the nation believes this, then at least have the stones to repeal our founding documents and start anew.
I´m not sure where those of us who understand why property rights are the foundation of all rights will go or what we´ll do. But we´ll manage.
On the other hand, if the bulk of Republicans actually do, honestly, believe in rugged individualism then the solution is not to make the GOP indistinguishable from the Democrat party (it´s nearly to that point as it is) but instead to truly embrace what we know works: sound social, economic and foreign policies.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
caddyjak, 11/20/2012 3:27:18 PM (No. 9026103)
At least 17 GOP States must invoke their 12 Amendment rights regardless of any potential national chaos. It is the only sane hope for America and the world.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
formerlyphelps, 11/20/2012 3:52:27 PM (No. 9026147)
Sorry Jim, after you got done with Romney’s “47%” remark you kinda went off the rails. The reason why literally all of these “issues” were big is because the Democrats and media made them. None of these are accurate portrayals of GOP positions, which is why they were news. In order for this assessment to be true, it would also HAVE TO BE TRUE that the majority of Americans are far left, ignorant and uninformed. Jury’s out.
Opposition to state forced un-defining of marriage is not hateful. Opposition to taxpayer funded abortion of any kind for any reason is not hateful. Opposition to taxpayer funded contraception is not hateful.
The “magic negro” comment originated from a liberal columnist at the LA Times, Jim. Why didn’t you mention that?
One of the worst analyses I’ve seen yet.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
formerlyphelps, 11/20/2012 4:11:17 PM (No. 9026172)
Can’t resist: FTA: “Put another way, if some jerk in a bar came up and compared your relationship to your spouse to bestiality, you would probably be sorely tempted to knock his teeth out.”
So you’re saying the GOP is composed of drunken jerks who hang out in bars and make stupid remarks about men’s wives? And the proponent of un-defining marriage is calmly sitting at a table minding his own business?
What a lame a** illustration. Anyone who thinks that’s even a remotely accurate analogy to the marriage debate is too stupid to vote. But it is a perfect example of how the narrative is skewed to make the wrong party look like the one causing a fight.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
janjan, 11/20/2012 4:20:43 PM (No. 9026184)
Jim if you want to drink the koolaid because you think somehow turning into liberal-lite will win votes from committed socialists, leave me out. We need less spineless RINO´s who haven´t won an election decisively since Reagan won one for you to sit down and shut up. Don´t lecture me about how conservatism doesn´t work. It does work when we actually nominate one.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
TexaTucky, 11/20/2012 4:25:18 PM (No. 9026193)
Interestingly, #1, Romney said nary a word about gaydom. Yet he lost anyway. Hunh.
´Only way for GOP to win national elections in the future is to appeal to´ . . . American citizens. Period. AND to fix our broken ballot system. Locking arms, singing kumbaya, and becoming Liberal Lite won´t win anything because the Democrat Party will always one-up Republicans with even better door prizes.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Burger, 11/20/2012 4:35:36 PM (No. 9026223)
This article neatly outlines how the GOP´s shift to a more moderate left wing party has absolutely destroyed the GOP´s national election chances.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 11/20/2012 4:40:21 PM (No. 9026233)
Jim, as long as the Democrat lites continue to slam conservatives, the Republican brand will remain a big fat loser. Basically, this was a round about article telling conservatives to shut up and join their wishy washy stand for nothing.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
ivehadit, 11/20/2012 4:47:45 PM (No. 9026247)
The media is going to spin, spin, spin no matter what. The conservative candidate must be likeable above all else because of this, like it or not.
Now as to this past election, anyone who is trying to extrapolate ANYTHING from that election with its busloads of Somali´s who can´t speak english being brought into many, many counties to vote, etc, is NUTS. You can´t extrapolate anything from that. Or the others who don´t even know what they are voting for...sheeze.
Bottom line: WE MUST GET OUR PEOPLE OUT TO VOTE. PERIOD. no more orca-size failures (intentional or not) please.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
starboard, 11/20/2012 5:35:29 PM (No. 9026316)
"The Republican brand is deeply damaged." Oh really, to who, the media, the Dems?
Okay, so we lost a presidential election to the first Black President. Even though he was the worse president in recent memory, he was the incumbent and he ran a dirty campaign with he media covering for him.
So who´s the Nasty Party? The GOP needs to stop talking about this election. It´s over. They need to get dialed in and learn a thing or two and next time have a winning strategy.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Coach Springer, 11/20/2012 5:59:38 PM (No. 9026374)
If only the GOP would behave perfectly and praise liberal shibboleths so that Geraghty didn´t have to buy the Demagogy. Did he blame the tea party for spitting on black congresspersons and calling them the n word over Obamacare too?
Yeah, if only Romney and the GOP base weren´t so badly outclased by Obama and the Dem base in 2012, we´d have won by 20 points. And Benghazi was the fault of that vile tea party video. s/o If we had to do 2012 over again, I´d go Atwater for a change. Romney bent over backward doing Geraghty and lost because the other side really was nasty.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Hamrman, 11/20/2012 5:59:59 PM (No. 9026375)
Massive voter fraud...and a supermega database?
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
WIBadger, 11/20/2012 6:08:45 PM (No. 9026386)
Jim Geraghty´s brand is damaged (permanently)
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Starlady, 11/20/2012 7:42:57 PM (No. 9026547)
I live in VA . After the election I was watching DVR´d shows and saw one of the ads Zero had placed locally. During the campaign I just fast forwarded through any campaign ads. This Zero ad was a definite scare ad toward people in nursing homes or families who might have a loved one in nursing homes. My eyes were opened to the lies Zero told during the campaign to possibly receive the majority of the vote in my state. I still think voter fraud gave him the win here.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Who Actually Cracked Linear B, the Ancient Code of the Mysterious Knossos Labyrinth?
|
|
Daily Beast, by Malcolm Jones
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 4:58:46 AM
Post Reply
|
|
As Margalit Fox says at the outset of The Riddle of the Labyrinth, the story of Linear B is well known. This 3,000-year-old language was discovered on clay tablets excavated in 1900 on the island of Crete. It thereafter puzzled scholars for half a century before it was decoded by Michael Ventris, an English architect with no formal training in archeology or linguistics. Linear B’s history is an absorbing tale, full of mysteries both intellectual and historical, and it’s been told and retold since Ventris made his breakthrough. The problem, as Fox sees it,
|
How Mothers from Hell Raise Their Boys to Do Evil
|
|
PJ Media, by Robert Spencer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 4:47:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
“Peace will come,” Golda Meir once famously remarked, “when the Arabs start to love their children more than they hate us.” The obstacle to peace was not actually Arabs as such, but Muslims who had imbibed Islam’s doctrine of jihad and hatred of non-believers and primarily Jews — a hatred so intense that it drives people to prefer death (and murder) to life. And as we have seen recently with the monstrous grandstanding of Mama Tsarnaeva, this hatred is passed on in some Muslim families – and Zubeidat Tsarnaeva is by no means the only mother from hell.
|
| |
|
Carney: What are these ‘scandals’ of which you speak?
|
|
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 4:42:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No, really, Jay Carney would like to know. Even though he only showed his face in the briefing room twice this week, and even though the White House press corps used him as a punching bag, Barack Obama’s press secretary wants you to know he’s really enjoyed having to address this avalanche of scandals. Wait — did we say scandals? We mean, er, opportunities:(Snip for video) “I dismiss the premise, the idea that these are scandals,” Carney said flatly, calling the controversy over Benghazi a “total concoction by Republicans,” and the IRS scandal merely
|
Tsarnaev’s lawyers seek permission to photograph him to show ‘evolving mental and physical state’
|
|
Boston Globe, by Milton J. Valencia
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 4:33:41 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Lawyers for the Boston Marathon bombing suspect want to be able to take pictures of the 19-year-old now and over time to show evidence of his injuries and his “evolving mental and physical state,” according to a filing in federal court in Boston. As the defense team for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev argues against the death penalty, it would use the photo evidence to challenge whether he was fit enough to voluntarily provide statements to investigators just after his arrest, according to the filing. US Magistrate Judge Marianne Bowler partially granted the request today. She said the US Bureau of Prisons
|
Orb favored to take Preakness, set up Triple try
|
|
Associated Press, by Richard Rosenblatt
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 4:29:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
BALTIMORE -- Orb is ready for his whirl at history. The Kentucky Derby winner was in a playful mood the day before the Preakness, making faces for photographers between nibbles of grass outside his stall at Pimlico Race Course. "I couldn´t be more pleased with the way he´s doing," trainer Shug McGaughey said at his final pre-Preakness media briefing Friday morning. "I can´t see any adversity. I would have to think it would take a pretty darn good horse to beat him if he goes over and runs his race." If he can defeat eight rivals
|
$1M in jewelry stolen at Cannes film festival
|
|
USA Today, by Bryan Alexander & Korina Lopez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 1:15:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
CANNES, France -- This weekend, stars may sport a little less bling and the parties could be a little less sparkly. Thieves broke in the hotel room of a Chopard employee, where the jewels were being kept in a safe in a hotel room. The robbers ripped the safe off the wall and left with everything in it, about $1 million in jewels, which were meant to loaned out to stars during the festival. Ironically, the jewels were stolen around 2:30 a.m., a few hours after the cast of director Sofia Coppola´s new film The Bling Ring
|
Feds to Students: You Can´t Say That
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Greg Lukianoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 10:05:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The scandals roiling Washington over the past two weeks involve troubling government behavior that had been hidden—the IRS targeting of conservative groups and the Justice Department´s surveillance of the Associated Press, among others. Largely overlooked amid the histrionics has been a shocker hiding in plain sight. Last week, the Obama administration moved to dramatically undermine students´ and faculty rights at colleges across the country. The new policy was announced in a joint letter from the Education Department and Justice Department to the University of Montana. The May 9 letter addressed the results of a year-long joint investigation
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Obama’s attempt at damage control laughable
|
|
Boston Herald, by Joe Battenfeld
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/16/2013 6:00:07 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Nice try, Mr. President. Feigning anger, firing an unknown bureaucrat and fleeing the podium won’t cut it with voters, or stop the hemorrhaging of the scandals that have spawned a Watergate-like feel around the Obama administration. There was a certain panicky look about the way the president quickly delivered a rare evening White House statement to try to quell the growing outrage over the IRS targeting of Tea Party groups. The move showed how damaging the scandal has become to Obama’s second term and maybe even his presidency. But Obama took no questions and, more importantly,
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Benghazi Emails Directly Contradict White House Claims
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Stephen F. Hayes
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 7:30:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The White House on Wednesday released 94 pages of emails between top administration and intelligence officials who helped shape the talking points about the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that the CIA would provide to policymakers in both the legislative and executive branches. The documents, first reported by THE WEEKLY STANDARD in articles here and here, directly contradict claims by White House press secretary Jay Carney and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the revisions of those talking points were driven by the intelligence community and show heavy input from top Obama administration officials, particularly those at the State Department.
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, ´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
| | |
|
|