|
|
| |
Topic: Both Sides Must Give Ground to Avoid Fiscal Cliff |
Both Sides Must Give Ground to Avoid Fiscal Cliff
Creators Syndicate, by Michael Barone
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:garnet, 11/19/2012 7:30:33 PM
|
| In his first formal press conference in months, Barack Obama showed that getting re-elected can increase a president´s confidence and combativeness. He staked out tough stands on several issues, especially on the looming budget negotiations. Looking ahead to the "fiscal cliff" on Dec. 31, when the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts expire and sequestration cuts government spending sharply, Obama demanded $1.6 trillion of increased revenues as part of any budget bargain. That´s twice the number he and Speaker John Boehner agreed on in the grand bargain talks in the summer of 2011. Those talks fell apart
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
pizzaman, 11/19/2012 7:36:45 PM (No. 9024435)
The ball´s in Obama´s court. Let´s see his detailed plan.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Not your typical New Yorker, 11/19/2012 7:39:51 PM (No. 9024438)
I want to go over the cliff, the sooner the better.
It´s like pulling off a hanging scab....
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Country Boy, 11/19/2012 7:41:21 PM (No. 9024442)
Ideologues don´t give ground.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 11/19/2012 7:48:14 PM (No. 9024448)
Let´s see Obama propose a budget that even a single member of his party will have the guts to vote for.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
biggun, 11/19/2012 7:49:56 PM (No. 9024452)
Raising taxes increases revenue only in the short term, as Democrats know all too well. Then the revenues nosedive because money taken out of the private sector reduces economic activity; hence, reduced tax revenues. Reducing taxes has always increased revenues as Democrats going back to JFK also know all too well. Dems don´t care about the amount of revenue - they just want to control a larger percentage of the revenue in order to increase their control over our lives. Barone is full of crapola.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
controlfreak, 11/19/2012 7:57:39 PM (No. 9024459)
I am so dang tired of hearing the term ´fiscal cliff.´
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
cav160, 11/19/2012 8:13:11 PM (No. 9024477)
Agree with #1, time to go over cliff! Any new revenues (Taxes) taken in thru compromise will be spent before ink is dry! Also, take a look at 1963 Communist Manifesto, there isn´t much left to compromise on!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
wideout, 11/19/2012 8:20:07 PM (No. 9024483)
Let us go over the cliff...i want kenyaboy to explain it to the American public..and Michelle start walking to Vail..
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Axeman, 11/19/2012 8:21:15 PM (No. 9024489)
When you compromise with evil, evil always wins.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
jond, 11/19/2012 8:34:34 PM (No. 9024505)
Anyone who accepts a promise of a spending cut in return for a real tax increase doesn´t deserve to be in Congress.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
texaspast, 11/19/2012 8:44:41 PM (No. 9024514)
The problem with that, #8, is that his only explanation will be ´it is the republican´s fault for not compromising with me!´ That´s all he will say, and the LSM will echo his words, and 2/3 of the country will believe it.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
sunsong, 11/19/2012 8:49:27 PM (No. 9024523)
The pubbies must NOT cave. Everybody shares the sacrifice if we go over the cliff. That´s the real fair choice.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
jntsrgn, 11/19/2012 9:20:48 PM (No. 9024543)
"I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" - Wimpy
GOP will cave, taxes will go up, cuts will NEVER materialize.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
bob913, 11/19/2012 9:41:52 PM (No. 9024557)
I heard Hugh Hewitt today saying he was open to higher rates! They (congress0 never cut spending. Cut spending is the answer. What are republicans trying to do? Next they will be open to amnesty.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
LWGII, 11/19/2012 9:45:10 PM (No. 9024561)
The sooner the crash, the sooner we can start rebuilding. Brace...for...impact.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
BcdErick, 11/19/2012 9:46:04 PM (No. 9024563)
Absolutely, totally 100% false. Americans had a choice this November, and they voted for bigger government. Rather (than) shielding voters from the consequences of their decisions, let them pay for it.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
sickened, 11/19/2012 10:06:52 PM (No. 9024578)
We would be better off if the Republicans left on a 9 month holiday. Let the Fiscal Cliff happen, and let the Spending Limit be met. If the Obama supporters want it, let them have it.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
kOok, 11/19/2012 10:10:24 PM (No. 9024581)
We flew off the fiscal cliff a long time ago. Now we´re just grasping for a root sticking out along the way.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 11/19/2012 10:12:48 PM (No. 9024583)
Where are our negotiators? Why aren´t they repeating as a tag on every sentence, "We´re waiting for 0bama to tell us where we must cut the entitlements which account for __% of the deficit and tax increases on the rich which would only fund the govt for ___days.
0bama is repeating ad nausem the same "punish the rich" in every other sentence. Why don´t the repubs fight fire with fire?
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 11/19/2012 10:23:30 PM (No. 9024591)
I agree with others that I want the implosion that will come from the cliff, but from a purely personal perspective, theres one tax increase in there that will cost our family a huge amount. Im afraid its a fait accomplis.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
photoman628, 11/19/2012 10:39:02 PM (No. 9024599)
Just vote "present" on everything. Watch it crash and burn-then be there to pick up the pieces. Nothing else will put us back on the right track. We really do need to hit bottom.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
ivehadit, 11/19/2012 10:42:46 PM (No. 9024600)
As an aside, has anyone stop to think about this: The two poorest states in the Union, one of which is the largest state in the Union, voted for obama.
The most successful state which is also the second largest state in the the Union, voted for Romney.
What say ye, o leftists and liberals?
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
peasantnumberthree, 11/19/2012 10:43:42 PM (No. 9024601)
I don´t think compromise will happen at all - we will go over the "fiscal cliff".
Obama is a total ideologue and I believe he does want the country to go over the cliff. He doesn´t believe any of this budget/deficit stuff anyway, it will bring in a lot of new revenue to the Feds and it will give him a golden opportunity to blame the resulting recession/depression on the Republicans.
How could he do this? Easy. Whenever the Republicans agree with his proposal, he can just up the stakes. At some point, the Republicans will refuse to budge any further, and - poof - Obama can blame the Republicans.
In the past, whenever Obama has been offered a choice between doing the best thing for Obama vs the best thing for America, he 100% of the time chooses what he thinks is best for himself.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Spot On, 11/19/2012 11:03:28 PM (No. 9024608)
I agree with 21, Just vote present and when it all crashes wrap it around their necks & maybe the gimmie public will suffer enough to get some sense. They fail to see what Socialist Europe is encountering or they don´t care. God help us.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
BarryNo, 11/19/2012 11:33:29 PM (No. 9024630)
The only problem is that when a Democrat talks about both sides giving ground, it´s about the GOP giving ground and the Democrats demanding they give more ground.
Or the Democrats saying they will give ground at a later date that never comes...
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
ivehadit, 11/20/2012 12:10:57 AM (No. 9024655)
Vote "Present" and let the chips fall where they may, Republicans. The orchestrators need to OWN IT ALL.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Achilles, 11/20/2012 2:28:54 AM (No. 9024696)
Treat the fiscal cliff like the republicans treated obamacare. Since no republicans voted for it, it is all theirs. Also, I have hear this line the democrats are touting before: they will gladly pay us tuesday for a hamburger today. Don´t give any ground. Let´s go over the cliff.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Nimby, 11/20/2012 3:57:21 AM (No. 9024754)
All he does is yap! If he were serious about the fiscal cliff,he wouldn´t be jet setting around the world at tax payers´ expense making goo goo eyes. What exactly is he doing there that his diplomatic corp cannot achieve?
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
mathman, 11/20/2012 6:34:43 PM (No. 9026417)
Ha. Ha. He-he-he-he. There will be no giving ground. Harry Reid does not negotiate. There will be higher taxes and even more spending. We will spend until we are bankrupt, and then we will spend some more. They did it in the Weimar Republic. They did it in Argentina. Has been done many times. Just keep printing money. Waste of time. Whatever happens, happens.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"
|
Has the IRS Already Seized Your Medical Records?
|
|
American Spectator, by David Catron
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: garnet- 5/20/2013 6:46:32 AM
Post Reply
|
|
As gratifying as it was to see the “news” media actually do its job last week when the IRS scandal broke, it was also odd that the coverage focused exclusively on abuses of power relating to various Tea Party and anti-abortion groups. A much scarier IRS story has been virtually ignored by the establishment press. On Wednesday, it was reported that a class-action lawsuit had been filed against a group of IRS agents who, according to the complaint filed by “John Doe Company” in the Southern District of California, “stole more than 60,000,000 medical records of more than 10,000,000 Americans
|
Kathleen Sebelius dances on an ethical line
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: garnet- 5/19/2013 10:45:45 AM
Post Reply
|
|
ONE OF THE BIGGEST questions hanging over the health-care system is how many young Americans will sign up for coverage once the Affordable Care Act begins to phase in this October. If too few buy insurance on the markets that the government is creating, insurance companies would be stuck covering primarily the the old and the sick. They would have to pay out more per customer. Their customers, in turn, would have to pay more to those companies for coverage. The stakes for the Health and Human Services Department, which is overseeing the transition, are tremendous.
|
This is not the President Obama we voted for
|
|
Guardian [UK], by Heather Long
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: garnet- 5/19/2013 10:35:41 AM
Post Reply
|
|
You can argue that Republicans have blocked President Obama from doing just about anything. You can argue that he´s had bad luck. You can argue that he isn´t always the greatest orator. But you can´t argue away that the Department of Justice took the unprecedented step of seizing phone records from the Associated Press. Or the flimsy rationale justifying drone attacks abroad and at home. Or the bizarre step the Pentagon has taken to expand the ability of the military (Snip) These are actions that President Obama and his top team have taken on their own.
|
|
The Benghazi Emails´ Backside-Covering
|
|
Washington Post Writers Group, by David Ignatius
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: garnet- 5/19/2013 10:27:43 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON -- The hundred pages of Benghazi emails released last week tell us almost nothing about how four Americans came to die so tragically in that Libyan city. But they are a case study in why nothing works in Washington. Rather than reading these messages for their substance on Benghazi (on which officials were still basically clueless three days after the attack), try perusing them as an illustration of how the bureaucracy responds to crisis -- especially when officials know they will be under the media spotlight.
|
|
Justifiable Cause
|
|
Slate, by John Dickerson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: garnet- 5/16/2013 7:25:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
It must get confusing in the IT department at the Associated Press: Are you talking about the hackers who hacked our Twitter account or the Justice Department hackers who hacked our phones? Monday, the Associated Press reported that the Justice Department had secretly obtained two months of records of phone conversations by its reporters. Meanwhile, the Washington Post revealed that the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups was more widespread than first reported. (Snip)The Obama administration is doing a far better job making the case for conservatism than Mitt Romney, Mitch McConnell, or John Boehner ever did.
|
IRS official Lerner speedily approved exemption for Obama brother’s‘charity’
|
|
Daily Caller, by Charles C. Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: garnet- 5/14/2013 7:50:27 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Lois Lerner, the senior IRS official at the center of the decision to target tea party groups for burdensome tax scrutiny, signed paperwork granting tax-exempt status to the Barack H. Obama Foundation, a shady charity headed by the president’s half-brother that operated illegally for years. According to the organization’s filings, Lerner approved the foundation’s tax status within a month of filing, an unprecedented timeline that stands in stark contrast to conservative organizations that have been waiting for more than three years, in some cases, for approval.
|
|
The Grand Old Poseurs
|
|
American Spectator, by David Catron
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: garnet- 5/13/2013 6:47:01 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Last week, Speaker of the House John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell ostentatiously announced their intention to fight implementation of the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). They sent a letter to the President decrying the way IPAB will “impact America’s seniors … in the absence of the democratic process.” Sadly, the exercise was a charade. McConnell and Boehner know perfectly well that Obama has no intention of setting up this controversial board until after 2015.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla. tornado for anti-GOP rant over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|