A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Both Sides Must Give Ground
to Avoid Fiscal Cliff
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Both Sides Must Give Ground
to Avoid Fiscal Cliff

Creators Syndicate, by Michael Barone

Original Article

Posted By:garnet, 11/19/2012 7:30:33 PM

In his first formal press conference in months, Barack Obama showed that getting re-elected can increase a president´s confidence and combativeness. He staked out tough stands on several issues, especially on the looming budget negotiations. Looking ahead to the "fiscal cliff" on Dec. 31, when the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts expire and sequestration cuts government spending sharply, Obama demanded $1.6 trillion of increased revenues as part of any budget bargain. That´s twice the number he and Speaker John Boehner agreed on in the grand bargain talks in the summer of 2011. Those talks fell apart

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: pizzaman, 11/19/2012 7:36:45 PM     (No. 9024435)

The ball´s in Obama´s court. Let´s see his detailed plan.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 2 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 11/19/2012 7:39:51 PM     (No. 9024438)

I want to go over the cliff, the sooner the better.

It´s like pulling off a hanging scab....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Country Boy, 11/19/2012 7:41:21 PM     (No. 9024442)

Ideologues don´t give ground.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Mr. Hanky, 11/19/2012 7:48:14 PM     (No. 9024448)

Let´s see Obama propose a budget that even a single member of his party will have the guts to vote for.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 5 - Posted by: biggun, 11/19/2012 7:49:56 PM     (No. 9024452)

Raising taxes increases revenue only in the short term, as Democrats know all too well. Then the revenues nosedive because money taken out of the private sector reduces economic activity; hence, reduced tax revenues. Reducing taxes has always increased revenues as Democrats going back to JFK also know all too well. Dems don´t care about the amount of revenue - they just want to control a larger percentage of the revenue in order to increase their control over our lives. Barone is full of crapola.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 6 - Posted by: controlfreak, 11/19/2012 7:57:39 PM     (No. 9024459)

I am so dang tired of hearing the term ´fiscal cliff.´

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 7 - Posted by: cav160, 11/19/2012 8:13:11 PM     (No. 9024477)

Agree with #1, time to go over cliff! Any new revenues (Taxes) taken in thru compromise will be spent before ink is dry! Also, take a look at 1963 Communist Manifesto, there isn´t much left to compromise on!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: wideout, 11/19/2012 8:20:07 PM     (No. 9024483)

Let us go over the cliff...i want kenyaboy to explain it to the American public..and Michelle start walking to Vail..

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 9 - Posted by: Axeman, 11/19/2012 8:21:15 PM     (No. 9024489)

When you compromise with evil, evil always wins.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: jond, 11/19/2012 8:34:34 PM     (No. 9024505)

Anyone who accepts a promise of a spending cut in return for a real tax increase doesn´t deserve to be in Congress.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 11 - Posted by: texaspast, 11/19/2012 8:44:41 PM     (No. 9024514)

The problem with that, #8, is that his only explanation will be ´it is the republican´s fault for not compromising with me!´ That´s all he will say, and the LSM will echo his words, and 2/3 of the country will believe it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: sunsong, 11/19/2012 8:49:27 PM     (No. 9024523)

The pubbies must NOT cave. Everybody shares the sacrifice if we go over the cliff. That´s the real fair choice.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: jntsrgn, 11/19/2012 9:20:48 PM     (No. 9024543)

"I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" - Wimpy

GOP will cave, taxes will go up, cuts will NEVER materialize.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 14 - Posted by: bob913, 11/19/2012 9:41:52 PM     (No. 9024557)

I heard Hugh Hewitt today saying he was open to higher rates! They (congress0 never cut spending. Cut spending is the answer. What are republicans trying to do? Next they will be open to amnesty.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 15 - Posted by: LWGII, 11/19/2012 9:45:10 PM     (No. 9024561)

The sooner the crash, the sooner we can start rebuilding. Brace...for...impact.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 16 - Posted by: BcdErick, 11/19/2012 9:46:04 PM     (No. 9024563)

Absolutely, totally 100% false. Americans had a choice this November, and they voted for bigger government. Rather (than) shielding voters from the consequences of their decisions, let them pay for it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 17 - Posted by: kOok, 11/19/2012 10:10:24 PM     (No. 9024581)

We flew off the fiscal cliff a long time ago. Now we´re just grasping for a root sticking out along the way.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: M Stuart, 11/19/2012 10:12:48 PM     (No. 9024583)

Where are our negotiators? Why aren´t they repeating as a tag on every sentence, "We´re waiting for 0bama to tell us where we must cut the entitlements which account for __% of the deficit and tax increases on the rich which would only fund the govt for ___days.

0bama is repeating ad nausem the same "punish the rich" in every other sentence. Why don´t the repubs fight fire with fire?


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 19 - Posted by: Safari Man, 11/19/2012 10:23:30 PM     (No. 9024591)

I agree with others that I want the implosion that will come from the cliff, but from a purely personal perspective, theres one tax increase in there that will cost our family a huge amount. Im afraid its a fait accomplis.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 20 - Posted by: photoman628, 11/19/2012 10:39:02 PM     (No. 9024599)

Just vote "present" on everything. Watch it crash and burn-then be there to pick up the pieces. Nothing else will put us back on the right track. We really do need to hit bottom.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: ivehadit, 11/19/2012 10:42:46 PM     (No. 9024600)

As an aside, has anyone stop to think about this: The two poorest states in the Union, one of which is the largest state in the Union, voted for obama.

The most successful state which is also the second largest state in the the Union, voted for Romney.

What say ye, o leftists and liberals?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 22 - Posted by: peasantnumberthree, 11/19/2012 10:43:42 PM     (No. 9024601)

I don´t think compromise will happen at all - we will go over the "fiscal cliff".

Obama is a total ideologue and I believe he does want the country to go over the cliff. He doesn´t believe any of this budget/deficit stuff anyway, it will bring in a lot of new revenue to the Feds and it will give him a golden opportunity to blame the resulting recession/depression on the Republicans.

How could he do this? Easy. Whenever the Republicans agree with his proposal, he can just up the stakes. At some point, the Republicans will refuse to budge any further, and - poof - Obama can blame the Republicans.

In the past, whenever Obama has been offered a choice between doing the best thing for Obama vs the best thing for America, he 100% of the time chooses what he thinks is best for himself.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Spot On, 11/19/2012 11:03:28 PM     (No. 9024608)

I agree with 21, Just vote present and when it all crashes wrap it around their necks & maybe the gimmie public will suffer enough to get some sense. They fail to see what Socialist Europe is encountering or they don´t care. God help us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: BarryNo, 11/19/2012 11:33:29 PM     (No. 9024630)

The only problem is that when a Democrat talks about both sides giving ground, it´s about the GOP giving ground and the Democrats demanding they give more ground.

Or the Democrats saying they will give ground at a later date that never comes...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 25 - Posted by: ivehadit, 11/20/2012 12:10:57 AM     (No. 9024655)

Vote "Present" and let the chips fall where they may, Republicans. The orchestrators need to OWN IT ALL.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 26 - Posted by: Achilles, 11/20/2012 2:28:54 AM     (No. 9024696)

Treat the fiscal cliff like the republicans treated obamacare. Since no republicans voted for it, it is all theirs. Also, I have hear this line the democrats are touting before: they will gladly pay us tuesday for a hamburger today. Don´t give any ground. Let´s go over the cliff.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 27 - Posted by: Nimby, 11/20/2012 3:57:21 AM     (No. 9024754)

All he does is yap! If he were serious about the fiscal cliff,he wouldn´t be jet setting around the world at tax payers´ expense making goo goo eyes. What exactly is he doing there that his diplomatic corp cannot achieve?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: mathman, 11/20/2012 6:34:43 PM     (No. 9026417)

Ha.
Ha.
He-he-he-he.
There will be no giving ground.
Harry Reid does not negotiate. There will be higher taxes and even more spending.
We will spend until we are bankrupt, and then we will spend some more.
They did it in the Weimar Republic.
They did it in Argentina.
Has been done many times. Just keep printing money.
Waste of time.
Whatever happens, happens.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 712670




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"



Meet Sylvia Burwell, the
Titanic’s New Captain
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 4/14/2014 7:08:54 AM     Post Reply
The replacement of Kathleen Sebelius by Sylvia Mathews Burwell as the Secretary of Health and Human Services has been portrayed by the legacy “news” media as a new lease on life for Obamacare. The party line is that Sebelius was mortally wounded by GOP exploitation of a single uncharacteristic mistake—the botched rollout of Healthcare.gov—while Burwell is a brilliant Beltway veteran unsullied by controversy and possessing the very administrative skills needed to save Obama’s “signature domestic achievement.” (snip) This tale fails to conform to the facts, however.

No, The Obamacare Debate
Isn’t Over
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 4/7/2014 7:03:29 AM     Post Reply
Last Tuesday, our President swaggered into the Rose Garden to announce that 7.1 million people have signed up for health coverage through Obamacare’s exchanges and that all further argument about the future of his “signature domestic achievement” was pointless: “The debate over repealing this law is over. The Affordable Care Act is here to stay.” The problem with this claim is that no one with a basic grasp of arithmetic believes Obama’s enrollment figures, only about a quarter of the electorate supports his “reform” law, and it is still the target of multiple lawsuits challenging its constitutionality.

Obamacare:They Shoot Horses
Don´t They?
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/31/2014 7:31:12 AM     Post Reply
A new survey reveals that public esteem for Obamacare is continuing to plummet, hitting yet another historic low. (snip) The AP survey shows that a mere “26 percent of Americans support the Affordable Care Act.” (snip) When the law was passed, 39 percent of the public supported it. But the President, along with his accomplices in Congress and the media, assured us that this percentage would rise once “reform” was implemented. In other words, Obama and his minions are no better at prognostication than they are at managing websites, insurance exchanges or anything else relating to health care.

Hobby Lobby Has Its
Day in Court
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/26/2014 8:13:39 AM     Post Reply
One of the reasons Clarence Thomas gives for the studious silence he maintains during Supreme Court hearings is that his fellow justices have shown an increasing tendency to talk too much during oral arguments, thus preventing advocates from presenting their arguments coherently. Yesterday’s Supreme Court hearing in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius suggest that Thomas is right. Paul D. Clement, who appeared on behalf of the two companies challenging the Obamacare contraception mandate, was repeatedly interrupted and badgered by justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Ginsburg.

Why Obama Scares Me
Creators Syndicate, by Mona Charen    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/21/2014 8:32:16 AM     Post Reply
The most febrile of George W. Bush haters liked to claim during his tenure that the former president "scared" them. There is far more reason to be frightened by President Barack Obama, because fecklessness and inconstancy trigger wars. The outstanding example of weakness inviting aggression was the conduct of the democracies toward Adolf Hitler in the 1930s. Though it has been retroactively tainted as shameful cowardice, the policy of appeasement grew out of a "war weariness" that was far more understandable than our own. Britain and France suffered millions of dead and wounded in World War I and were desperate to

Kos Folds Up the Big Tent
Politico, by Matt Bennett and Jim Kessler    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/21/2014 8:25:35 AM     Post Reply
If Markos Moulitsas had his way there’d be no Affordable Care Act, no Dodd-Frank, no economic stimulus package. That’s the price when purity tests are applied to Democrats. In a remarkable post yesterday, Moulitsas, founder and publisher of the progressive community site DailyKos, celebrates the departure from the Senate of 10 moderate Democrats over the last decade, and makes clear his hope that Senators Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) and Mary Landrieu (D-La.) lose their tough reelection battles this year. He doesn’t name some other moderates in tight races, like Mark Begich (D-Alaska) and Kay Hagan (D-N.C.), but his logic suggests that he’d

Closing in on No. 1
New York Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 3/21/2014 8:19:10 AM     Post Reply
Mayor de Blasio took great pride Thursday in signing the first piece of legislation of his mayoralty: the paid-sick-leave bill. But the move only illustrates why a personal-finance Web site has just ranked the city one of the worst places for finding a job. Under the new law, come April 1 companies with as few as five workers must offer at least five paid sick days a year. But April 1 is likely to turn out to be April Fool’s for New York workers. Because the consequence of this law is likely to be .?.?. fewer jobs. Businesses that can’t afford to



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

53 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

44 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

43 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it

Atlanta Braves flooded with Hank
Aaron hate mail: He’s a ‘s*****g’

30 replie(s)
Washington Times (D.C.), by Cheryl K. Chumley    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/15/2014 3:23:19 PM     Post Reply
Hank Aaron’s recent comments about the need for America to realize that racism is still very much alive and thriving — only now due to those who wear “neckties and starched shirts” rather than KKK hoods — has sparked an angry backlash and many fans are turning the tables, calling the baseball legend himself a racist. “Hank Aaron is a s*****g piece of [expletive] [racial slur],” one man said in an email to the Atlanta Braves’ front office, one of the teams Mr. Aaron used to play for, CBS News reported. “My old man instilled in my mind from a


Post Reply   Close thread 712670





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~