A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The Hollywood Reporter,
After 65 Years, Addresses
Role in Blacklist
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The Hollywood Reporter,
After 65 Years, Addresses
Role in Blacklist

Hollywood Reporter, by Gary Baum, Daniel Miller

Original Article

Posted By:JoniTx, 11/19/2012 5:44:24 PM

Billy Wilkerson was nervous. it was July 1946, and The Hollywood Reporter owner, editor and publisher was preparing to embark on a landmark campaign that would expose communists working in Hollywood. He would name the alleged Reds in his "Tradeviews" column and expose this lurking menace. Wilkerson already had begun his crusade a year or so earlier, penning fiery editorials that railed against communism and targeted the Screen Writers Guild, the WGA precursor that he believed was the seat of what he termed the "Red Beachhead." But this would be different. Wilkerson -- who was mustachioed, 5-foot-7 and

Comments:
[Scott Feinberg contributed]

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: goose, 11/19/2012 6:00:06 PM     (No. 9024294)

Well, they were communists and sympathizers. And Hollywood still has an anti-American bias.


Reply 2 - Posted by: bullhead, 11/19/2012 6:24:02 PM     (No. 9024316)

A very long piece. When I came to this "The Blacklist era is perhaps Hollywood´s darkest chapter," and a quote from Kirk Douglas, "In retrospect, the Blacklist era was the most sinful period in Hollywood history." I stopped reading.

Hollywood is still digging to reach its "darkest" and "most sinful" condition.

What a bunch of arrogant, sanctimonious, fops.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: chumley, 11/19/2012 6:28:21 PM     (No. 9024319)

Gee, no agenda in that article.
I, too stopped reading about 50 pages down. I may have missed it, but did they ever say anyone identified as such was NOT a communist?
Now we have them in the WH. I guess Hollywood can feel better about itself now.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 11/19/2012 7:30:57 PM     (No. 9024431)

This is quite a conundrum.

On the one hand - - you have Stalin murdering 25-30 million innocent people and terrorizing billions of people for decades.

On the other hand - - you have some Hollywood writers working under pseudonyms.

My brain hurts from trying to figure out which side to take. Can anyone figure out this puzzle?


Reply 5 - Posted by: janylou, 11/19/2012 7:41:01 PM     (No. 9024441)

You only have to look at the degradation of Hollyweird, the anti-religious theme, the bashing of big business, the promoting of their enviro agenda, etc. to realize what a bunch of commits they are. Although when it comes to salaries, I don´t see the big stars, directors, studio heads, etc. taking the same pay as everyone else. If they are so big on communism you´d think they would want equality for all!


Reply 6 - Posted by: calgrammy, 11/19/2012 7:53:30 PM     (No. 9024457)

McCarthy was right. Hollywood is infested with commies red diaper doper babies.


Reply 7 - Posted by: ScrIbelus, 11/19/2012 8:10:16 PM     (No. 9024473)

Communist infiltration of the labor movement, the entertainment industry and the Federal government in the 30´s, 40´s and in to the 50´s reached such intensity as to become, and remain for the time, a perilous danger to America. Identification of such agents and operators was a patriotic duty. Blacklist, hell! Those evil persons should have been deported to their Workers´ Paradise foever!
If historical truth is not preserved and taught, as it is not, expect many more examples of the shameless drivel as presented here.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: jond, 11/19/2012 8:12:53 PM     (No. 9024476)

The article did suggest that some of the accused and blacklisted were not communists or sympathisers, but was short on details.

One detail they were short on was understanding control of mass media in Communist propaganda campaigns.

One need only research that subject to understand that Communist membership or sympathy was more than just a matter of opinion.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 11/19/2012 10:34:40 PM     (No. 9024598)

#4 - - The beloved Sen. McCarthy had nothing to do with Hollywood or the entertainment industry. He was chairman of a subcommittee which investigated government workers.

The Roosevelt and Truman administrations were crawling with communists traitors. We now know most of their names and even how much they were paid by Stalin to betray this country.

The communist traitors played a big role in helping Stalin acquire the atom bomb and in helping the world´s biggest mass murderer - - Mao - - take over China.

The commies and the total idiots who gave (and give) them support are directly responsible for the mass murder of tens of millions of innocent people.

Yet today´s Hollywood dopes think that the commies were the "victims." There´s no way to be dumber than that - - none.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Judith, 11/20/2012 7:51:05 AM     (No. 9024958)

Many years later, the proof of hollywood´s communist and anti-american attitudes is overwhelming. Too bad the blacklisting was not successful. My generation and the following ones have been contaminated by the filth, depravity and hatred of the USA that has been produced, repeatedly, by that cesspool.



Post Reply   Close thread 712663




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"



Obama admits he’s a socialist
New York Post, by Kyle Smith    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:59:42 PM     Post Reply
You may be forgiven if you missed it during last week’s tsunami of scandals, but President Obama finally let slip that he is a socialist. Buried in the 17th paragraph of one of those mewling New York Times pieces on the woes of Obama — can we start calling him Woe-bama yet? — appeared these two words: “going Bulworth.” Obama himself, the Times explained, has been “longingly” telling his inner circle that what he’d really like to do is what Sen. Jay Bulworth, played by Warren Beatty in his 1998 movie “Bulworth,” did: to go public as

   

 



 
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

WH: Legality of IRS Action
Against Conservatives ´Irrelevant´
Breitbart Big Government, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:43:10 PM     Post Reply
Appearing on Sunday morning on ABC News’ This Week, White House Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer told a credulous George Stephanopoulos that the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups was “inexcusable,” and that the law with regard to the activity was “irrelevant.” “I can’t speak to the law here,” he said. “The law is irrelevant. The activity was outrageous and inexcusable, and it was stopped and it needs to be fixed so we ensure it never happens again.” When asked for clarification, Pfeiffer expounded: “What I mean is, whether it’s legal or illegal is not important to the fact

WH: ´Irrelevant´ Who
Edited Benghazi Talking Points
Breitbart Big Government, by William Bigelow    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:40:46 PM     Post Reply
Appearing on CBS’ Face the Nation, White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said that it was “largely irrelevant” who edited the talking points the Obama administration trotted out in the aftermath of the terrorist attack in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Host Bob Schieffer asked, “That was just a PR plan, to send out somebody who didn’t know anything about what had happened. Why did you do that? Why didn’t the Secretary of State come and tell us what they knew, and if they knew nothing, say ‘We don’t know yet?’ …. Why are you here today?

WH: ´Irrelevant´ Where Obama
Was During Benghazi Attacks
Breitbart Big Government, by Ben Shapiro    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:37:54 PM     Post Reply
On Fox News Sunday this morning, White House spokesman Dan Pfeiffer was asked by Chris Wallace where in the White House President Obama was during the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans. “Question,” asked Wallace. “What did the President do the rest of that night to pursue Benghazi?” Pfeiffer answered, “Look, the President was kept up to date on this as it was happening the entire night, from the moment it started until the very end …. I recognize that there’s a series of conspiracy theories Republicans have been spinning about it

Non-deportation rate
drops — to 99.2 percent
Washington Times [DC], by Stephen Dinan    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:28:53 PM     Post Reply
The Homeland Security Department has granted legal status to 99.2 percent of all illegal immigrants who have applied under President Obama’s new non-deportation policy for young adults, according to the latest numbers released Friday. That’s a slight drop from the 99.5 percent approval rate reported last month. The policy, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, grants legal status to most illegal immigrants under the age of 31 who came to the U.S. before age 16 — usually brought by their parents. They are allowed to remain in the U.S. without fear of deportation, and are given work

   

 

  


 
Obama gets personal about
race and manhood in Morehouse
speech
Washington Post, by Philip Rucker    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:21:26 PM     Post Reply
President Obama on Sunday summoned the graduates of historically black Morehouse College to “transform the way we think about manhood,” urging the young men to avoid the temptation to make excuses and to take responsibility for their families and their communities. Delivering a commencement address at the all-male private liberal arts college in Atlanta, Obama spoke in deeply personal terms about the “special obligation” he feels as a black man to help those left behind. “There but for the grace of God, I might be in their shoes,” Obama said. “I might have been in prison.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
59 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

54 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

   

 



 
Camelot Is Burning
43 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

42 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

   

Post Reply   Close thread 712663





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~