|
|
| |
Topic: How Many 2008 McCain Voters Went Libertarian in 2012? |
How Many 2008 McCain Voters Went Libertarian in 2012?
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 11/19/2012 5:22:55 PM
|
| Campaign Spot reader Michael writes in, having examined the claim of the missing Republican voters — the drop off from McCain’s 2008 total to Romney’s 2012. Immediately after the election, many were left incredulous in response to the apparent news that Romney received 3 million fewer votes than McCain did. As more and more states have counted their absentees and reported 100 percent of precincts, the numbers are less shocking. Michael points to Dave Leip’s Atlas of US Presidential elections and calculates the drop off is now only 479,000.* Most intriguingly, many of those missing
|
Comments: It seems we have our own share of short-sighted voters.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bkt23, 11/19/2012 5:40:55 PM (No. 9024260)
I did.
If it´s short-sighted to embrace the rule of law and individual rights, color me short-sighted. And I´m proud to be so.
The truly short-sighted are those who voted for a gun-grabbing, big-government collectivist as well as those who voted for Obama.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
forward, 11/19/2012 5:49:56 PM (No. 9024277)
I know a few in NY state who did. Of course this is a non-swing state, but still it does affect popular vote total.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Susannah, 11/19/2012 5:59:11 PM (No. 9024292)
A vote for the libertarian was a vote for Obama. As Geraghty points out, the libertarian message isn´t going to be heard in Washington.
I´m pretty sure the students who voted for Johnson weren´t voting for smaller government but for the right to get baked legally.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Merrijane, 11/19/2012 6:14:22 PM (No. 9024307)
I´ll color you short-sighted indeed. If you want to argue that voting libertarian was staying true to principle, then I´ll give you your point. But if you´re going to try to argue that voting libertarian did diddly squat to advance the libertarian cause ... well, let´s just say I need more convincing. However, it doesn´t look like libertarians crashed Romney. His own campaign did.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
kelty, 11/19/2012 6:25:05 PM (No. 9024317)
No, it isn´t a vote for Obama. A libertarian or other third party vote, is a vote for your beliefs as they stand so you can get a proper, quality demographic read on the population - and the main parties can take that into account and start pandering to those segments in the next election.
Otherwise you end up with mathematical mediocrity.
Easy version:[www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo]
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
chumley, 11/19/2012 6:42:49 PM (No. 9024350)
To me, short sighted is voting for bad just to get rid of worse. Thats what got us into this mess in the first place. Both parties have done their level best to restrict our freedoms and loot our money. Romney was no different. He talked a good game toward the end, but his history of actions contradicted his words. Words from a politician mean nothing. Past behavior means something.
On an unrelated note...who decided what color the parties would be? It is far more appropriate for the Dems to be red.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
SouthSanAntonio, 11/19/2012 6:44:50 PM (No. 9024354)
Libertarians are idiots!!!!! They played a major part in killing this nation on 11-6-2012 by assuring that NØbama was re-elected.
There were two men running in this last election that had the chance to be president, NØbama and Romney. Unless you voted for Romeny, it was as good as voting for NØbama. Voting for a third-party candidate, or not voting, to make a ´´statement´´, simply made the statement that your ´´principals´´ were more important than the survival of this republic. Period!!!
This election was not about principals. It was about saving this nation from single-party Demon-RAT rule! We lost, and idiotic libertarians get a big chunk of the blame for that!!! Now, as soon as NØbama makes all 20,000,000+ illegals into citizens, and they all register and Demon-RATS, we will have that one-party rule for as long as it takes to make this once-great nation of freedom and liberty into a third-world cesspool.
Shove your principals, Libertarians. You blew it. And you won´t have another chance for those principals to mean spit again!!!!!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
yorkiemom, 11/19/2012 7:08:07 PM (No. 9024391)
#4 is correct as usual. I saw and heard the moron Libertarians in my state.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
zoidberg, 11/19/2012 7:36:17 PM (No. 9024434)
If I thought my vote would have counted for anything, I would have voted for Romney to get rid of Obama. But I live in Maryland.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
sickened, 11/19/2012 10:22:09 PM (No. 9024590)
I voted for Gary Johnson. If the Romney people wanted the Ron Paul supporters´ votes, they wouldn´t have replaced a good chunk of the duly elected Paul convention voters with Romney replacements. They would have not changed the rules so that Paul would not be nominated, contrary to what the rules going into the convention would have allowed. Those actions told me what a Romney administration would really be like: Strong armed tactics, no respect for Tea Party supporters or Constitutionalists.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 11/19/2012 10:30:01 PM (No. 9024595)
I know people who voted for Gary Johnson because they thought it was safe to make a protest vote.
Also the Ron Paul people need to thank their hero. Ron Paul could have done the decent thing and supported the party´s candidate. He and Ross Perot are two of a kind IMHO.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
steveW, 11/20/2012 1:11:30 AM (No. 9024679)
I know libertarians who helped Obama get reelected by doing this. In my view, they intentionally helped Obama get reelected because their libertarianism leans more Left than Right, but they´d never ever admit this to anyone, including themselves.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 11/20/2012 3:04:33 AM (No. 9024710)
All this navel gazing is a waste of energy. If they don´t fix how elections are conducted in the US, we will never again have a real one.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Judith, 11/20/2012 8:03:16 AM (No. 9024988)
Exactly what does the new and improved republican party have to offer? The recent party has offered us two rinos who really want to be dems. They even went so far as to offer a man who initiated the original obamacare, signed into law gay marriage and is at heart, pro-abortion. Now tell me, if that is not a dem, what is? And he could not be elected because? With the new ideas of the upcoming class of republicans, there is nothing left for a white right winger. One who believes in the U.S.A. Constitution, God, family, hard work, good education and being successful based on merit. Attacking someone like me is useless. YOU adapt and become the popular party (won´t happen, the dems have that niche). Don´t revile others for retaining their standards. Your new idols, dems, don´t do that.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
civilservant, 11/20/2012 8:56:25 AM (No. 9025125)
To all who voted to retain their ´purity´, I hope it keeps you warm when the fit hits the shan.
You´re desire for ´purity´ stuck a stake in the heart of this country, and for that I wish you all suffer the same fate I have in mind for the Leftists, who also have done PRO-ACTIVE harm to this Country.
A pox on both your houses.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Quaestio, 11/20/2012 1:11:50 PM (No. 9025858)
Kudos #16. Hey, all you so-called libertarians who are so proud they voted for their principles, riddle me this. How did you vote for your principles by voting for a man who will ensure that this country becomes a socialist state? I guess this is a revelation, but we have a 2 party system, not a multi-party system. If you don´t like the way the Republican Party does things, then work within the system to make the Republican party reflect your principles. Start with local offices. Oh wait, that would take work, commitment, and more than just whining that Ayn Rand isn´t on the ticket. What you´ve done is simply hand this country to the leftists. I will make sure my children know that you are just as responsible for the coming end as the die-hard Marxists and ignorant leftists.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Bla Bla, 11/20/2012 1:34:28 PM (No. 9025895)
What the post above me said.
Only it wasn´t just A vote, it was TWO votes!
When I was in line to vote, in walked my Democrat neighbors. Since our line wound down the hall & doubled back in the rec room, we stood facing each other for a few minutes. Loudly she said to me, "We´re just here to cancel out your votes. That´s the only reason we came."
"Isn´t America WONDERFUL????!!" I proclaimed, even louder.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Bla Bla, 11/20/2012 8:38:50 PM (No. 9026651)
P.S. I bit my tongue first, because I really wanted to say, "What a coincidence! That´s why we´re here, too -- to cancel yours!"
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Despite the WaPost, Benghazi Is a Major Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.
|
Role of Health-Law ´Navigators´ Under Fire
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"
|
Labor unions break ranks with White House on ObamaCare
|
|
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal
|
| |
|
|
Issa Warns Hillary
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee
|
|
Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM
Post Reply
|
|
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...
|
How Hope and Change Gave Way To Spying on the Press
|
|
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,
|
Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama
|
|
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner lost her rights
|
|
Politico, by Rachel Bade
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
| | |
|
|