|
|
| |
Topic: Secession: What’s In a Name? |
Secession: What’s In a Name?
Canada Free Press, by Jim O´Neill
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:snowcloud, 11/18/2012 11:43:06 PM
|
| “A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.[Snip]The name “United States of America” no longer stands for what it once did. It no longer stands for liberty, free enterprise, American exceptionalism, and God—it now stands for welfare, lawfare, warfare, Godlessness, and globalism.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
WAN2, 11/19/2012 12:03:44 AM (No. 9022952)
Secession has been tried, resulting in carnage. No matter, as Americans are no longer up to fertilizing the tree of liberty. Americans of yore were made of sterner stuff.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
snakeoil, 11/19/2012 12:38:39 AM (No. 9022977)
Secession is a emotional reaction to the over throw of our government by an Indonesia socialist. It would be a joke if all of the states had to have their own currency, stamps, armed forces, etc. Like it or not we are stuck together. We need to return to the ideas in place when the Constitution was written. Namely only property owners voted. Translated into today´s terms only taxpayers vote.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
sickened, 11/19/2012 1:10:57 AM (No. 9022994)
The States are the only source of power left in America that might actually rein in the Federal Government. I was surprised recently to read that the United States used to be a plural term (pre Lincoln), and that the agreement ending our Revolutionary War with England referred to ending the state of war with each State separately, not as a whole.
We only need 34 states to call a Constitutional Convention. That means we don´t need any help from the big blue states of California, New York, Illinois, or Massachusetts. Nor do we need assistance from the White House or the Senate or the House. The GOP now has 30 State Governors, certainly enough to get the ball rolling.
How about an amendment repealing ObamaCare? How about another one requiring a 2/3 vote from the States before any increase in the Federal Debt Limit?
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
fishbone, 11/19/2012 1:53:47 AM (No. 9023017)
I´d be very afraid of a constitutional convention. The original one went off their purported guidelines (fortunately, in that instance). However, once the convention is called, then there are no rules controlling the delegates. My fear would be that the delegates would go "rogue".
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Spidey, 11/19/2012 2:42:40 AM (No. 9023030)
Even if I wanted to,there´s no way I would put my personal info on a secession petition going straight to the WH.
It´s interesting to note that Romney won all the states with voter ID laws.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Topic Thunder, 11/19/2012 3:08:07 AM (No. 9023040)
If Texas goes at least half the remaining states will follow. Then like-minded, productive conservative citizens with their capital will pour in. The socialist vampires and parasites will flee to the welfare states to support their habit since they will forever be cut-off, constitutionally, from the slightest possibility of benefits.
Is it completely impossible? No!
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Melody, 11/19/2012 3:15:07 AM (No. 9023045)
´´- leave the Takers to stew in their own juices -´´ That´s not what they would do. There would be civil war once again. And we have very strong foreign enemies that would love to see our country at war with itself.
But something must be done - and done soon. We may be left with only drastic options, but we need to choose wisely. We need to seek the Lord and His wisdom.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
gator, 11/19/2012 3:56:41 AM (No. 9023054)
It´s the only option left to freedom loving Americans. It will be hard, but anything worth doing always is.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 11/19/2012 4:06:48 AM (No. 9023056)
A few citizen´s arrests and trials would benefit more than secession and the resulting destruction.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
mollybob, 11/19/2012 4:15:30 AM (No. 9023059)
Not a good solution, but an appealing one, to be sure. We do indeed need a strategy, but I think #7 says it best. If we are to prevail, we need the Lord´s favor and His guidance. In addition to their own collective genius, that´s what the Founders had, as they would all readily attest.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Country Boy, 11/19/2012 4:24:17 AM (No. 9023066)
The thought of use of force (Civil War) seems appealing, the ultimate in a reality TV show. But in the days since the Civil War, weaponry has advanced to the point that waging war against the U.S. government is silly, pointless. The major weapons platforms the government owns are thousands of magnitudes larger than any citizen could own.
Better to think in terms of Constitutional Conventions. The conservative states still hold the cards (and growing). The disparity between conservative control of states and liberal control of Washington is probably more proof of massive Federal election fraud. And that is the leverage we need to fix this problem.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bumbleshorts, 11/19/2012 5:41:18 AM (No. 9023095)
It´s the wooden stake for the vampire´s heart.
This is not the 1800´s. Militarily crushing a seccesionist rebelion is not as easy as it used to be. The USSR knew this full well when Gerorgia, Ukraine, Khzikistan and others decided to secceed. There is just no way to justify it before the UN, and we know how much obama loves the UN. The federal government in washington actively supported the seccession process in theese former Soviet states which gives the support of legal precedance to secession. If your states governor walks into the UN and declares that your state is soverign nation, you can pretty much be sure that your state will be recognized as a soverign nation by the UN.
With nigh on 60% of the entire GDP dissapearing into the federal black hole (and rising), explain to the people in your state that that 60% will be staying in their pockets. Even the members of the communist part in your state will say, yes, I want that money in my pocket. People do what is in their better intrest to do. Secession is prosperity.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
pliades, 11/19/2012 6:27:51 AM (No. 9023147)
Go ahead and blow off a little steam in a discussion thread, but when push comes to shove see who actually does anything. There´s a good reason for why they fluoridate the water supply, besides making your morning cup of coffee taste funky.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
saguni, 11/19/2012 2:25:32 PM (No. 9023976)
These petitions will never amount to more than a database for new entries to 0bama´s Enemies List.
If you go to the website, https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petitions you will see there is also for:
"We request that 0bama be impeached for the following reasons." It lists four reasons and has 35,618 "signatures" when I post this. You know those signers will go on the Enemies List.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "snowcloud"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "snowcloud"
|
|
‘The Incident in the Rose Garden Rain’
|
|
Canada Free Press, by Judi McLeod
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: snowcloud- 5/17/2013 9:47:21 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Armed by the arrogant confidence that comes via a protective circle of self-serving, back-scratching politicians (including Republican ones), who do nothing to deter his increasing taunts against all things American, President Barack Hussein Obama continues to publicly trash the cherished image of the military. Taking a leaf straight from the book of his overbearing wife, Michelle who used military members in full dress as props on the night she invaded living rooms via satellite from the White House to announce this year’s Best Picture, yesterday big brave BHO used Marines holding umbrellas to shelter both himself and
|
|
Liberal Rednecks: A Salute
|
|
Canada Free Press, by Kelly O´Connell
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: snowcloud- 5/12/2013 10:09:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The term Liberal Redneck will strike progressives as an absurd contradiction. Yet, Conservatives will have an immediate, wearying familiarity with the angry, judgmental, uninformed and doctrinaire viewpoint of this group. In fact, the Liberal Redneck is every bit as small-minded, bigoted, dismissive, self-righteous, judgmental, uneducated and intolerant as the worst fundamentalist. The problem in America today is that there is never a level playing field offered for the discussion of ideas. Therefore, most important topics are only mentioned in a predetermined format. In other words, one can mention, for example—gay marriage,
|
| |
|
The Rogue Helping Obama Steal America
|
|
Canada Free Press, by Judi McLeod
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: snowcloud- 5/10/2013 12:52:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The deadly, almost under-cover assassin of conservatism in America is not the Fundamental Transformation of America-pushing Barack Obama and the Democrats but Karl Rove and his big-money financiers. Conservatism is the dead man walking in the politics of America today, and there’s no way to revive the corpse as long as Karl Rove is still at the GOP helm. From the Truth-is-stranger-than-Fiction department: A brilliant May 8 piece in the New York Times by Thomas B. Edsall draws back the curtain on the forces battling for GOP control between the well-heeled establishment
|
Checkmate: From global makeover to takeover
|
|
Canada Free Press, by Doug Hagmann
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: snowcloud- 5/8/2013 11:41:50 AM
Post Reply
|
We’re rapidly approaching a potential checkmate moment in the Mideast. There are 41 nations plus the U.S., for a total of 42 nations currently participating in military maneuvers off the coast of Iran. Despite all of the saber rattling about Iran, we are being deceived about the coming global battle, which will almost certainly begin in Syria, not Iran. What we are seeing is both deadly serious and under-appreciated by most Westerners, who have grown weary of wars and rumors of wars in the Mideast long ago. Exhaustion aside, the events continue to march Staff has edited headline.
|
|
Nobody Drowned at Watergate
|
|
Canada Free Press, by Joy Tiz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: snowcloud- 5/7/2013 1:09:12 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The mainstream media no longer has the luxury of ignoring Benghazi. Nor can they brush it off as another Watergate type of scandal: nobody died by drowning or other means at Watergate. The emergence of the whistle blowers has made the story too big to ignore, as much as the media would prefer it would go away. You will note that when it wasn’t until after their beloved Obama was safely ensconced in the White House for another four years did the media show any interest in the biggest story of the administration.
|
‘El Obamabore The Hypocrite’ comes to “México”
|
|
Canada Free Press, by Judi McLeod
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: snowcloud- 5/4/2013 10:54:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Legions of American soldiers must have turned in their graves when the President of the Unites States of America made a mockery of their sacrifice by throwing in with Mexico yesterday. Speaking to a captive audience of young minds made up of mostly high school and college students—his trademark age group home and abroad—Obama delivered his address at the iconic National Museum of Anthropology in Mexico City. In his arrogance, ‘El Obamabore’ tried to supplant Davey Crockett, James Bowie and William B. Travis as chief American hero in the minds of today’s Mexican Youth.
|
Yet another communication that never arrived
|
|
Canada Free Press, by Judi McLeod
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: snowcloud- 5/1/2013 1:26:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
We’ll never know for sure whether Saudi Arabia really did warn the USA in writing about the terrorist attack intentions of one Tamerlan Tsarnaev, but we do know that President Barack Obama slept through the slaughter in Benghazi. “A senior Saudi government official told Daily Mail that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia sent a written warning to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in 2012. According to the source, the letter was pertaining to Tsarnaev and potential terror threats.” (Daily Mail, May 1, 2013). Is this a Saudi Arabia/USA “You-cover-my-back-and-I’ll-cover-yours” game? Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud bin al-Faisal attended an unscheduled
|
| |
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, ´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Obama 47 minutes late for his press conference; leaves reporters in the rain
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/16/2013 1:20:06 PM
Post Reply
|
|
“I look forward to taking some questions at tomorrow’s press conference,” President Obama said last night, after announcing the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. The president scheduled a noon press conference today with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in honor of his visit. Reporters, however, found themselves waiting outside in the rain for Obama, who was 47 minutes late. Only New York Times reporter Mark Landler had an umbrella.
|
| | |
|
|