|
|
| |
Topic: Ted Cruz: Mitt Romney ‘French- kissed’ Barack Obama |
Ted Cruz: Mitt Romney ‘French- kissed’ Barack Obama
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:JoniTx, 11/18/2012 9:00:21 AM
|
| Sen.-elect Ted Cruz believes Mitt Romney got a little too close to Barack Obama in the third presidential debate. “I’m pretty certain Mitt Romney actually French-kissed Barack Obama,” Cruz said in a speech at the Federalist Society’s annual conference Friday.Cruz said that conservatives failed to make their case to the American people, leaving Romney no choice but to move toward the president. “We didn’t win the argument, we didn’t even make the argument” throughout much of 2012, Cruz said. But in the first debate, he argued, that changed. “It was the one time we actually contested ideas,
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 11/18/2012 9:15:28 AM (No. 9021746)
Cruz is great. Right in there with Trey Gowdy.
Mitt is a choir boy.
We needed a bull dog.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Vast Right Winger, 11/18/2012 9:26:18 AM (No. 9021763)
Mitt Romney went to a gun fight with a plastic knife.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
wordstress, 11/18/2012 9:28:02 AM (No. 9021765)
It was for exactly this kind of reason that Cruz was not my candidate in the primary. He sometimes hurts the party by dividing it when it´s not necessary -- just for the sake of it sometimes, it seems. He has strengths, but he doesn´t have to be mean.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Lala, 11/18/2012 9:28:10 AM (No. 9021766)
I´m disappointed Romney lost, but I´m also disappointed to hear Senstor-elect Cruz speaking this way. When will Republicans stand together and address the issue of vote harvesting and dirty tricks? It´s easy to throw mud on the losing candidate two weeks after an election, but cheap. Thought Cruz was better than that.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
FlatCityGirl, 11/18/2012 9:30:20 AM (No. 9021772)
I voted for Cruz but this is not the first thing I´ve seen from him that I don´t like.
I don´t see any reason to slime a good and honorable man who made a valiant effort to wrest this nation from the grasp of a Marxist regime.
I´m sick of the Romney bashing from a number of other sources, as well.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
cheeflo, 11/18/2012 9:31:38 AM (No. 9021775)
How vulgar.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
PageTurner, 11/18/2012 9:34:49 AM (No. 9021781)
Word #3 and #4. I think Romney did make a mistake not going after Obama on Benghazi and Obamacare and opted instead to just ´look´ presidential, and Ryan didn´t come across strong enough against the repulsive, hideous Biden either. There were mistakes, miscalculations. But there´s no need to go into hyperbole and call it a French kiss, it was nothing like that. Mitt deserves better.
The French kisser is Obama, any time a dictator blows into town.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
TheMotherCO, 11/18/2012 9:38:12 AM (No. 9021787)
cruz seems to be lewd, crude and socially unacceptabe. Not classy and that is an understatement, glad I didn´t have to vote for him.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
RoseOfTexas, 11/18/2012 9:40:12 AM (No. 9021791)
There´s a mental picture I could have done without. Please keep your comments G-rated Mr. Cruz ~ your words reflect on your (& my) church family as well as the great state of Texas.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
earlybird, 11/18/2012 9:46:34 AM (No. 9021803)
Crude Cruz just disqualified himself in my estimation. He seemed like a lounge show warmup at the convention. He talks like one, too.
Read the Must Read: "The Victim of a Crime".
Cruz and those who believe the loss of the election was Romney´s fault are delusional. We know how it was lost. The robber - Obama.
No one we´d have run would have fared any differently than Romney did.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
SoCalGal, 11/18/2012 9:49:07 AM (No. 9021807)
Trey Gowdy and Cruz similar? Be serious. Gowdy is a strong man, a potential patriot, and a gentlemn.
Cruz is a flashy, shiny suit with a foul mouth.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
AnnG, 11/18/2012 9:49:10 AM (No. 9021808)
I´m also tired of the Romney bashing. It serves no purpose whatsoever ..
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 11/18/2012 9:49:15 AM (No. 9021809)
Many of us here were not big fans of Mitt Romney from Day One, but when it became clear he ´´won´´ the nomination, we got fully behind him. I went, enthusiastically, to every rally in Las Vegas he appeared at. And an couple of Obama´s, as a protestor outside the event.
Along the way, however, Mitt lost (if he ever really had) the conservative core that Cruz and other conservatives live and breathe. Still, yes, he put up as good a fight as he could have. As HE could have.
Cruz is right, whether you want to admit it, or like it, or not.
Until we present candidates, like Cruz, who demonstrate a clear difference between Republicans and Democrats, we will keep losing. The Republican Party has become Democrat-Lite. And it´s obvious today that when it comes to a choice between Democrat and Democrat-Lite, most American voters (setting aside the fraud factor) went with the real thing.
Perhaps the French-kissing comment has you disturbed, but the Republican Establishment lost many races around the country with their Demo Lite strategery. Mitt tried. And lost.
Cruz actually IS, and won.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
JAN, 11/18/2012 10:07:36 AM (No. 9021847)
Thank you #3 5 8
When I saw him at the convention I thought....little bantam rooster.
Ugh. His swagger is revolting.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
JAN, 11/18/2012 10:08:27 AM (No. 9021849)
And 10
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 11/18/2012 10:22:31 AM (No. 9021872)
Ted Cruz is a trial lawyer and this is what trial lawyers do. It´s why I voted for Dewhurst in the primary. But, Cruz, up until now, has done a good job supporting Romney as our nominee and mending the Texas fences with those of us who distrusted him.
This is a step backward, Mr. Cruz. You haven´t built enough creds yet to be cutting down Mitt Romney.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
shamus, 11/18/2012 10:23:11 AM (No. 9021874)
I think Romney is absolutely outstanding as a person, but not as a candidate. Winning elections in the US means explaining difficult things to dimwits. It´s akin to teaching civics to preschool children. If you can´t manage this, then it´s hard to get elected.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
ramona, 11/18/2012 10:38:09 AM (No. 9021893)
I find this remark distasteful as well. If the RNC could only figure out that in this sentiment is the disdain so many of us have for the party that sets up such flawed candidates, even a wonderful individual like Governor Romney, who refused to engage the party of doom. Ramona (the Pest)
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
jrmax13, 11/18/2012 10:40:07 AM (No. 9021898)
It is this exact same MEAN STREAK that caused me to vote against Cruz in the TX primaries. Spoiled, rotten. More than likely an only child.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
enuf8, 11/18/2012 10:48:35 AM (No. 9021914)
It was either the comment by Cruz of "french Kissing" or "kissing obama´s backside" which Romney did. Wimpy candidates who think it was "their turn to be The Candidate" never win. Romney has a mean streak--that was used in the primaries against his peers-BUT, was able to keep his hands clean and say it was the PACS and he had no control. Strange, when complaints of other PACs were made, the candidate who was supported by those PACs immediately said for those ads to be pulled or that they did not agree with those ads. Romney´s surrogates, although not too publicly but in a sneaking way, spent over 4 years going after the person he knew could keep him from being "the" candidate for pres. It´s a crying shame Romney didn´t have the GUTS or BACKBONE to confront the muslim fraud in the WH. Ted Cruz is spot on! Darn happy I voted for him. Anyone professing Dewhurst as their choice approves of crony capitalism, the elite ruling class/establishment in DC, who get along to see who can best fleece the citizenship; no backbone for their beliefs.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Coach Springer, 11/18/2012 10:48:54 AM (No. 9021915)
I thought Romney had drawbacks in early 2012, but he emerged as the best candidate and I said nothing more about my apprehensions. Good Man and thanks to him for going where few dared.
What Cruz said reflects the real drawbacks including the likelihood of too many "me too, Mr. President" moments in the final weeks. Mitt underperformed McCain in Republican votes if he picked up more than 790,000 independent votes that everybody says he did. Thinking about that.
But more than anything, it was the media. There were better moves available using all of media and message strength and exposing the demagoguery were parts of that equation. We will have to do these things next time and the good news is that it will be a little easier next time too. But we still have to do them - effectively.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
A Balrog of Morgoth, 11/18/2012 10:51:52 AM (No. 9021922)
So, on one hand, we needed to confront Obama and the progressives directly and forcefully, while, on the other, we get the vapors every time one of our guys fails to utter a stream of focus-grouped inanities.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Pluperfect, 11/18/2012 10:54:22 AM (No. 9021925)
"Romney´s surrogates, although not too publicly but in a sneaking way, spent over 4 years going after the person he knew could keep him from being "the" candidate for pres."
???? Every person who wanted to run for president, and who had the guts to actually get into the race and campaign, did so. If there were any who chose not to step up, that person has forfeited allegiance or belief in being the one who could have stopped Mitt Romney.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
LittleHoodedMonk, 11/18/2012 10:59:30 AM (No. 9021934)
´´This is a step backward, Mr. Cruz. You haven´t built enough creds yet to be cutting down Mitt Romney.´´
As someone who voted for Ted Cruz in Texas, this comment about Romney is quite perplexing at this point. It is true that one needs to first be sworn in and establish some political savvy first in submitting and supporting key GOP legislation, instead of going backwards and attacking our ´´flawed´´ candidate.
Romney was on the bottom of my list as far as candidates go in the primary. I forgot until someone pointed it out here that he got to the top by slinging mud at all the other GOP conservative front-runners and knocking all of them out of contention. That he DIDN´T rub salt in 0bama´s political gaping wounds during his blitz to election day is beyond me.
Romney, like a general who tied his fate to his past victories & spotless uniform with many campaign medals, didn´t inspire US in the present to come out in enough numbers to win the one final battle for him to claim victory.
Cruz, we need forward thinkers, not another ´´mouth from the South.´´ Keep focused on our conservative values by being a role model for other Tea Party candidates.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Chuzzles, 11/18/2012 11:16:23 AM (No. 9021954)
Rush has always said that given a choice of dem or dem-lite, democrats will always go with the real democrat. Why vote for the fake? Until the RNC takes this advice to heart and runs a conservative in the Reagan mold, they will always lose the race.
I voted for Romney, but would have preferred a more conservative candidate.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
tomishere, 11/18/2012 11:27:53 AM (No. 9021984)
To all of you crying about Romneys mud slinging. Gingrich was much to unstable to endure a presidential campaign, Santorum would have given Obama a forty state victory. Did Romney make mistakes yes, did bigoted social conservatives not vote for Romney because he´s a Mormon, yes, and may they burn in hell, is Cruz right Romney should have stayed tough during the last debate yes, is Cruz a slob and a pig yes.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
TXspyder, 11/18/2012 11:32:10 AM (No. 9022000)
Voted for Cruz and have no problem with what he said. The very good and accomplished Rep candidate went up against a street fighter, and lost.
Vote for revenge?
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Susannah, 11/18/2012 11:32:58 AM (No. 9022003)
I´d like to see some documentation of the fact that Romney´s surrogates spent four years preventing anyone from getting into the presidential race, plus some details on how they accomplished this goal. Otherwise it just appears to be a hollow rationalization.
As for Cruz, he should know better than to join the circular firing squad. This accomplishes nothing.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 11/18/2012 11:36:57 AM (No. 9022012)
Absolutely terrific! Note Cruz would not bite when asked about Mitt´s comments about Obama´s "gifts?" BRAVO. I get so irritated at our guys falling for the same media traps time after time.... Cruz is AWESOME!!!
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 11/18/2012 11:40:13 AM (No. 9022022)
...BUT the French kissing comment was unnecessary and he better lay off that stuff from now on. Otherwise, fine.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Skeptical1, 11/18/2012 11:43:57 AM (No. 9022032)
I caught part of Cruz´s speech on C-SPAN, and speaking as a former Romneybot, I thought he was right on. He was not attacking Romney, but just stating the obvious. At one point, Cruz talked about the "mendacity" of the "War on Women" theme, mocking and refuting it very effectively, I thought. Why couldn´t Romney have done the same thing?
But we knew going in that for all his personal gifts, Romney is not especially good at conveying strength and talking about ideas.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
mws50, 11/18/2012 11:57:18 AM (No. 9022050)
I voted for Romney, but wanted to vote for Palin. Maybe next time.
Cruz got it right. Romney did not present a compelling reason to vote for common sense and logic and against the imbecile we are stuck with.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Malia2012, 11/18/2012 12:17:34 PM (No. 9022077)
Cruz is CRUDE! What #3, #5, #8, #10 #11 and #12 said, and any others who see Cruz for what he really is, a loudmouth-opportunist-wannabe-GOP-"star" who sounds a lot more like a demonrat than a Conservative. BTW, is HE supposed to be the kind of "Conservative" that represents the Tea Party now? If he is, count me out. Cruz´ name and Trey Gowdy´s should not be used in the same sentence...Ever...
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
kahunavol, 11/18/2012 12:19:40 PM (No. 9022081)
#26 - before you blame social conservatives and say they should rot in hell perhaps it would be better to see if your hysterical analysis had actual facts to support it.
79 percent of white evangelicals voted for Romney on Tuesday. That´s the same percentage that Bush received in 2004, and more than Sen. John McCain received in 2008. The evangelical vote was 27 percent of the overall electorate -- the highest it´s ever been for an election.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Sunhan65, 11/18/2012 12:38:46 PM (No. 9022130)
In retrospect, it seems neither Romney´s supporters nor his critics saw him entire and clear. Mitt Romney is, by all accounts, an extraordinary man with deeply conservative instincts governing how he has led his life. Successful in business, sincere in his faith and, above all else, secure in his love of family. He is a living archetype of what conservative values look like in practice. His critics (myself included) were slow to recognize the good in Mitt the man, and his supporters were too quick to assume that Romney´s personal values would translate into the political virtues that win elections. As a politician, Romney was opportunistic in his embrace of conservative positions and dishonest in his attacks on conservative rivals. He was inconsistent and ineffective in advancing conservative ideas against Obamaism and completely failed to engage and defeat the liberal media complex that was his true opponent. The Romney Campaign was a mess without a message--bad polling assumptions, no campaign slogan, reactive on the air, and inept on the ground. With an economy this bad, it was Romney´s election to lose, and he did.
Weighing all this up, I come to this: Ted Cruz was right in what he said, and wrong to have said the way he did.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 11/18/2012 12:42:10 PM (No. 9022138)
Another classless Haavard Law Ambulance Chaser speaks. We would have been better off with the Dewhurst fella. This guy is as phony as Jindal is awkward.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
SouthSanAntonio, 11/18/2012 12:48:40 PM (No. 9022150)
If someone wanted a nice career politician who would ´´play nice´´ and say politically correct things, you probably voted for Senator Cruz´s opponent in the primary.
The Republicans are never going to win another key election by ´´playing nice´´. Period!!! We need candidates that can get in the Demon-RAT gutter and out-nasty the Demon-RATS.
The rules have changed. The people have proven they don´t want ´´nice´´ any more. They ignore nice. They sit home knowing that nice can´t win.
I, for one, hope Senator Cruz is just getting started, and will be a HUGE thorn in both the Demon-RAT´s, and the establishment RINO´s, sides for many years to come!!! That is exactly why I voted for him every step along the way!!!
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
pensom2, 11/18/2012 12:50:52 PM (No. 9022156)
Cruz is obviously an amateur. In politics, the Left and the stupid celebrate crudity.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
yottyhere, 11/18/2012 12:59:06 PM (No. 9022174)
Next,I suppose, Cruz will be rubbing his nose with his ´bird´ finger as he says other Republican names so he will look as gangsta as dearLeader. My my how droll. Cruz is a lout. I´m sure he and Al Franken will become BFFs as soon as he is sworn in…. (And I am so thankful we didn´t send him a single dime.)
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
fayebeck, 11/18/2012 1:05:18 PM (No. 9022193)
Nolan Ryan supported Dewhurst in the Texas primary and that´s good enough for me. Seems as if the Tea Party does have a knack for picking too many jerks.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
god of irony, 11/18/2012 2:34:33 PM (No. 9022321)
It is easy to talk trash after the fact. Where was Cruz when he could have made a difference?
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
yorkiemom, 11/18/2012 10:11:18 PM (No. 9022843)
Ted Cruz sounds like a disgusting fool. And, if people think he is a "real" conservative, just give him a few months in DC. He´ll turn in to a lib just like everyone else.
I am convinced our country doesn´t deserve a decent, honest man like Romney as president.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
judy, 11/18/2012 10:14:11 PM (No. 9022847)
Sorry Cruz I had high hopes for you but you are crude & rude. Probably a closet dem.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
|
Update: Car hits crowd of hikers; at least 50 injured, 4 seriously hurt
|
|
Herald Courier [Bristol VA], by Kevin Castle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/18/2013 7:45:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DAMASCUS, Va - At least 50 people were injured Saturday after a car struck a crowd of hikers in the Appalachian Trail Days parade in Damascus. A Virginia State Police reconstruction team has closed off the bridge where the incident happened and is investigating it as a crime scene. According to authorities, a green Cadillac was traveling on Route 91 in Damascus around 2:15 p.m. when his vehicle cut through a nearby car wash located off Third Street, where the parade was taking place. The car then went around several vehicles in the parade and plowed
|
Obama invokes his fatherless childhood at stop in Baltimore
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/18/2013 5:48:01 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama spoke of the importance of fathers to their sons on Friday after a young man he met at a community center in Baltimore mentioned wanting to provide for his sons. “You know, one of the biggest challenges – I grew up without a father,” Obama said at the Center for Urban Families, which serves fathers and their families. A man named Marcus Dixon had just told him about the center´s key role in helping him learn to provide for his family after being released from jail. "You know, I always tell people that, as great and heroic
|
IRS targeting overlooked biggest players in outside political spending
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/18/2013 5:35:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON There´s an irony in the Internal Revenue Service´s crackdown on conservative groups. The nation´s tax agency has admitted to inappropriately scrutinizing smaller tea party organizations that applied for tax-exempt status. But the IRS largely maintained a hands-off policy with the much larger, big-budget organizations on the left and right that were most influential in the 2012 elections and are organized under a section of the tax code that allows them to hide their donors. "The IRS goes AWOL when wealthy and powerful forces want to break the law in order to hide their
|
Congressmen: Were Conservative Car Dealers Targeted for GM Closures?
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Alexander Marlow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/18/2013 1:26:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Two Congressmen are asking the Treasury Department if it inappropriately scrutinized conservative-owned businesses the same way it targeted Tea Party groups filing for tax-exempt status. Republicans Mike Kelly (PA-03) and Jim Renacci (OH-16) circulated a letter Thursday requesting Treasury Secretary Jack Lew to release documents detailing the process and methodology the Automotive Task Force used to shut down General Motors dealerships in 2009 during the automotive industry crisis. Renacci´s Northeast Ohio Chevrolet dealership was closed in 2010 after losing a battle with General Motors. Congress loaned General Motors $50 billion in 2009 after GM declared bankruptcy, which resulted
|
Armed Forces Day and America´s vigil keepers
|
|
Washington Times [DC], by Dennis Jamison
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/18/2013 11:24:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
SAN JOSE— For most Americans in the United States, Armed Forces Day is not on the lists of likely holidays to honor the country’s military in celebrations of Memorial Day or Veteran’s Day. Sadly, most Americans may not even realize that Armed Forces Day is even a legitimate holiday. Armed Forces Day was established to be celebrated on the third Saturday in May. It started during Harry Truman’s administration when he led an effort to consolidate the various holidays supporting each separate branch of the military into a simple unified holiday to honor the four branches together.
|
Aging falcon succeeds with her 42nd chick
|
|
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette [PA], by Don Hopey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/18/2013 10:28:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Dorothy, the 14-year-old peregrine falcon that since 2002 has nested on a 40th-floor ledge of the Cathedral of Learning in Oakland, was perched on the limestone railing next to that nest and her lone chick shortly before 9 a.m. Friday. She´d just fed the 22-day-old chick a small bird for breakfast. "Baltimore oriole ... again," said Kate St. John, who blogs about the city´s peregrines. Someone else watching from the office inside the window next to the nest said it looked like Dorothy was calmly "chilling." Ms. St. John´s response was that nothing could be further from the truth.
|
Obama administration knew about IRS scrutinizing conservative groups in June: inspector general
|
|
New York Daily News, by Dan Friedman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/18/2013 9:43:53 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — An Internal Revenue Service watchdog testified Friday that he told Obama administration officials in June that he was looking into allegations the IRS targeted conservative groups for extra scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status. The revelation by Inspector General Russell George came at the first congressional hearing on the IRS misconduct, which has generated a political firestorm since it was disclosed a week ago. George’s testimony represented the first evidence that officials in the Obama administration knew of the allegations as long as a year ago, during the presidential campaign.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|