|
|
| |
Topic: Hostess liquidation puts 286 in NC out of work |
Hostess liquidation puts 286 in NC out of work
News Observer [Raleigh,NC], by Kelly Poe
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Fiesta del sol, 11/17/2012 7:14:04 AM
|
| ROCKY MOUNT -- The 286 people who work in the Merita bread factory on North Church Street are out of work following Friday’s announcement that parent company Hostess will seek permission to end operations and liquidate its assets. About 75 of the workers participated in a nationwide strike that started at midnight Tuesday. Hostess Brands had warned the workers to return to work by 5 p.m. Thursday or face the company’s liquidation. The deadline came and went as picketers stood around a heater under umbrellas in the rain. “It’s five o’ clock and nobody’s crying,” one woman yelled.
|
Comments: The comments on this article are indicative of the tolerant liberal mindset. These people don´t deserve their jobs because people are getting fat on unhealthy Twinkies made out of GMO´s. Totalitarianism comes so easy to them. The enviro movement and the ´healthy lifestyle´ liberals scare me.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Blue Hen1, 11/17/2012 7:20:05 AM (No. 9020075)
Hey, at least Sandra Fluke still has free birth control, right?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Keekng, 11/17/2012 7:21:36 AM (No. 9020077)
The strikers make as much sense as the occupy Wall street group.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Tucker, 11/17/2012 7:22:54 AM (No. 9020078)
Another example of how stupid the American people have become. Amazing.....And Trunka is blaming Romney. Trunka is just another name for big, arrogant thug.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
pineledger, 11/17/2012 7:34:17 AM (No. 9020092)
Well, NC is a right-to-work state, for all the good it did those 286.
This is one of Old Bev Perdue´s farewell gifts as she departs the governor´s mansion.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
escaped commieny, 11/17/2012 7:34:46 AM (No. 9020094)
We are a right to work state, yet: About 300 workers at the Merita Bread plant in Orlando may soon be out of a job after the Hostess company filed for bankruptcy last week. The wonderful warm bread smell from Michigan Ave to I-4, will be sadly missed.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 11/17/2012 7:38:22 AM (No. 9020098)
Reminds me of that Seinfeld episode where Kramer had been on strike against the bagel shop for a decade. And no one knew that he was on strike.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Spidey, 11/17/2012 7:43:59 AM (No. 9020106)
These people actually think they´re heroic for surrendering their jobs at the altar of Obama.Too bad the people with this same mentality are running the government from top to bottom.Of course nobody quits a government job while they congratulate morons like this.
If you ever showed a liberal a balance sheet,smoke would come out of their ears.I only wish the owner blamed the closing on Obamacare.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
gunnut13, 11/17/2012 7:45:40 AM (No. 9020108)
I say if you participate in a strike that puts the company out of business and therefore you out of work you shouldn´t be entitled to unemployment benefits since you voluntarily participated. Same as quitting!
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Yephora, 11/17/2012 7:47:06 AM (No. 9020111)
Wonder how many of the now unemployed workers will be attending the Union´s "We Won!" victory party...
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 11/17/2012 7:47:20 AM (No. 9020113)
No worries. Obamaphones, food stamps, and lots of tv time await them.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
capecodfox, 11/17/2012 7:50:32 AM (No. 9020123)
I´m just waking up and haven´t caught up on reading, but is there a connection between the Hostess Company being brought down on the same week that Hostess Jill Kelley has had her troubles? There´s a pun in there somewhere.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Chabis, 11/17/2012 7:53:45 AM (No. 9020132)
"Single parents," out-of-date job skills and now out of work. The sad remnants of the dynamic and responsible America many of us still remember.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Patchy Groundfog, 11/17/2012 7:56:09 AM (No. 9020136)
We´re out of a job!
We...win?
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Yephora, 11/17/2012 7:56:15 AM (No. 9020137)
Well, she may have emailed a certain 5-star General "You´re my little twinkie" but that cannot be confirmed.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
ROLFnader, 11/17/2012 8:11:19 AM (No. 9020150)
FTA:"Johnny Thomas, who worked at the plant nine years, said he started taking classes after being unhappy with the way he was treated, and plans to finish his degree now. He hopes to work with developmentally disabled adults."
Johnny- some would argue that you already were working with them.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
MObeef4u, 11/17/2012 8:11:25 AM (No. 9020151)
Well we know the entire Administration is a bunch of "Ding Dongs". But sadly, they aren´t going away any time soon. And all my Ho Hos were gone on the 7th.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 11/17/2012 8:12:00 AM (No. 9020153)
Welcome to Obama´s America. How many more stories like this will we read before he is sworn in again? These fired workers will live on food stamps and charity for the rest of their lives. Elections have consequences and so does union membership.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Tianne, 11/17/2012 8:15:51 AM (No. 9020161)
AFL-CIO leader Richard Trumka, most frequent visitor to the White House, has led the Obama parade in switching blame (for everything) from President George Bush to Mitt Romney. He has invoked and blamed Bain Capital in his fiery speeches against Hostess Brands Co. Now, his union workers are out of their jobs and Mr. Trumka is claiming victory. The workers are blindly cheering, too, because they think that President Obama will take care of them while they lounge around idly and that will probably be true - for a little while - and then the free benefits are going to go away and reality will set in. Mr. Trumka is going to have less dues-paying members and yet all of these people rejoice. One more step ´forward´ for President Obama´s non-producing and idle America - God help us.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Observer177, 11/17/2012 8:16:57 AM (No. 9020165)
Hostess was in bad financial shape. In the last 10 years they had already gone through one bankruptcy and were in the midst of another, and they told their workers that their financial situation was precarious and that, in order for the company to survive, workers had to give back some of the gains they had made in salary and benefits (that were major factors in Hostess bankruptcies) in terms of an 8% pay cut.
So, let me get this straight. On the one hand there was having a job--at reduced pay, but still a job and, on the other hand, there was having no job. Those were the choices, and union workers chose to strike, and push the company over the cliff to its death.
What logic. Way to go!
I guess they all thought (that fraction of union workers that even bothered to vote on a strike) that the company--staggering along on its last legs--was bluffing, or perhaps they figured an Obamaphone and free air time, welfare, and sitting at home watching endless TV were peferable to having a real job.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Tillster, 11/17/2012 8:17:43 AM (No. 9020169)
Its Saturday 8am are you crying now?
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Observer177, 11/17/2012 8:27:16 AM (No. 9020180)
P.S.--According to another article about this situation here on Lucianne, these workers --bakers, and delivery truck drivers remember, not highly educated rocket scientists--were pulling down as much as $22 per hour plus medical benefits, 9 weeks annual paid vacation, and a company pension.
Moreover, the Teamsters, the other union involved, decided not to strike and had issued a statement saying that its own financial experts had certified that Hostess was, indeed, on its last financial legs and was not bluffing about having to close if there was a strike against it, and still the Bakers union went on strike.
Talk about" cutting off your nose to spite your face"!
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
balogreene, 11/17/2012 8:33:49 AM (No. 9020189)
The Teamsters talked to management and saw the balance sheet, and told their members not to strike. They even urged the AFL-CIO to not be stupid. Trumka is still telling his out-of-work members management took 300% pay increases, and this was just a union busting ploy. And the idiots who struck still believe him.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
uno, 11/17/2012 8:34:51 AM (No. 9020194)
Just more dependent residents checking into Obamaville. Mmmmm, mmmmm, mmmmmm! And the King grins ear to ear....
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
M2, 11/17/2012 8:35:23 AM (No. 9020196)
Is it too naive to ask why Hostess didn´t simply hire other non-union workers who wanted jobs?
Remember the airline strike during the Reagan years? He fired their arses and the airlines hired other people. Why can´t this be done? You mean to tell me that non-union workers cannot be found to replace the Hostess union workers in a State like NC where jobs are scarce?
I don´t get it. Where is it carved in stone that when union workers refuse to work, they get fired and replaced by non-union workers who are willing to work?
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
M2, 11/17/2012 8:42:30 AM (No. 9020220)
Sorry. Last line should read "Where is it carved in stone that when union workers refuse to work, they DON´T get fired and replaced by non-union workers who are willing to work?"
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
novakid, 11/17/2012 8:58:30 AM (No. 9020263)
Biting the hand that feeds you....
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
raisedright2, 11/17/2012 8:59:33 AM (No. 9020268)
M2, the company did bring in some temps. Some jobs require experience, and cannot be taught in a day.
Observer 177, the delivery truck drivers are not just delivering product: they are responsible for sales, too.
Shipping and sales route drivers all came into work. Do not blame them. Some production workers crossed the line as well, but not nearly enough. Production was less than half. Obviously, food is sensitive in production, especially bread, where shelf life is short. The Philadelphia plant completely shut down when they went on strike. Rocky Mount could not begin to keep up with Philadelphia´s demands as well as their own.
Lamont Phillips misunderstanding of his pension is telling: he thought that because the company could no longer contribute to it, that it no longer existed. I have no doubt the union encouraged this thinking.
My husband *was* the plant manager in Rocky Mount. He worked 60 hours a week, including weekends at home. As I asked in another post, who pickets a company in bankruptcy?
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Maybeth, 11/17/2012 9:25:08 AM (No. 9020312)
´It´s 5 o´clock and nobody´s crying,´ shouted one ignorant woman. .... Ditto to the #20 comment which wonders if she is crying today.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
bighambone, 11/17/2012 9:56:03 AM (No. 9020381)
Trumka can just as well blame Michelle Obama for telling people not to purchase and consume items like Twinkies. It´s pretty simple, when a company can no longer sell enough of its products it will eventually go out of business, and there is nothing that the loud talking union thugs can do about that, everybody just loses their jobs.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
ranger06, 11/17/2012 10:12:16 AM (No. 9020417)
http://management.fortune.cnn.com/2012/07/26/hostess-twinkies-bankrupt/
http://freebeacon.com/all-in-the-family/
Love the liberals behind this mess - Collins and Gephardt... Don´t expect to hear about the liberal ties from the LSM...
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 11/17/2012 10:16:11 AM (No. 9020421)
Not to worry all you little Obama love birds, Daddy Long legs will get them food stamps right out to ya.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
secondtimelucky, 11/17/2012 10:37:06 AM (No. 9020466)
Thomas had thought the threat to liquidate was hollow, but even though it wasn’t, he still thinks holding out was the best decision.
“We just could not keep giving and giving and giving,” Thomas said.
Silly wabbit. Now, instead of being short 8%, you´re short 100%.
I´ve worked for companies that suspended 401K contributions in hard times. That doesn´t mean the 401K goes away - you´re still contributing. What a bunch of fools. AND - I understand that after 01/01 the unemployment eligibility time will be dialed back from 99 weeks to 29 weeks. Happy Holidays - hope your kids enjoy the lump of coal.
´´mommy, why didn´t Santa come to our house this year?´´
´´because your daddy´s a moron who listened to a fat pig union leader´´...
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Paul248, 11/17/2012 10:39:15 AM (No. 9020472)
It is 10:30 are you crying yet? The federal unemployment office will open on Monday, and I sure your Union will support you for the rest of of your life, Are you still standing outside a close factory? Maybe the frist thing in the retraining program should be to tell you to come in out the cold.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
DustDevil31, 11/17/2012 11:01:00 AM (No. 9020514)
When junk food companies go under it is more than the economy. It´s the over regulation, and the ridiculous union demands.
Junk food is recession proof, Hershey PA thrived during the depression because even in the worst of time sugar sells.
Blame the government and unions.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
mamafrog, 11/17/2012 11:44:03 AM (No. 9020590)
This country has a finite need for bread and tasty snacks. The loss of this company means opportunities for others. We do not buy bread from China. Those jobs cannot be outsourced.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Rumblehog, 11/17/2012 1:39:58 PM (No. 9020781)
If only more companies, especially automotive, did this then perhaps we´d become competitive again.
FTA: “To just snatch that away from me, that’s not fair,” Phillips said.
OK, Mr. Phillips, go start your own company, provide healthcare, matching 401k, pension plan, etc. for YOUR workers, and come back and tell us how easy it is.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Kansas Conservative, 11/23/2012 7:44:15 AM (No. 9030279)
Here are my favorite parts from the article:
1) Lamont Phillips worked at the plant for 23 years. He is 41. He would qualify for full pension benefits in about 8 years. That would mean he could retire at age 49! Say what?
2) Johnny Thomas worked at the plan for 9 years. Thomas said he worries for those co-workers who can’t go back to school. He said many of his colleagues are single parents.
Typical Obama voters. Retire on a union pension early, don´t go to school (too hard, I guess), and don´t get married. Believe in Obama and the union bosses for your future. And when Obama and the union bosses throw you overboard, guess what? Obama and the union bosses WILL get their pensions. These sorry sap Hostess union workers will not get theirs. Serves them right for being ignorant, dumb, and stupid.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Fiesta del sol"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Fiesta del sol"
|
Rubio Stares Down the Right Over ´Undocumented Democrats´
|
|
National Journal, by Tim Alberta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/18/2013 10:26:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Marco Rubio was not amused. The senator from Florida had listened patiently as a panel of hand-picked conservatives, lined up across a long table at the front of the room, took turns speaking about the prospects of immigration reform.(snip)Referencing a Jay Leno one-liner, Burgess questioned fellow conservatives about the wisdom of giving citizenship to "11 million undocumented Democrats." Laughter, some of it nervous, spread throughout the room. But not everyone found Burgess´ crack funny. According to several people who attended the June 5th gathering, Rubio glared at Burgess.
|
Marco Rubio doesn´t know if ´he´s getting played´ by Democrats
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/17/2013 6:42:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Is Marco Rubio, R-Fla., getting played by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.? During his interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl this morning, Rubio didn’t even seem to understand what that meant. “Are you being played by the Democrats?” asked Karl. “Is Chuck Schumer playing you?” “I don’t — I quite frankly, I don’t even know what that means,” Rubio replied. “Is he using you?” Karl continued. “Is he using you to try to accomplish something that the Democrats want and is not — not a conservative bill?” Rubio responded that immigration reform was a bi-partisan issue that “all Americans
|
Melendez warns without legal status ´there will never be road to White House for GOP´
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/16/2013 2:41:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Gang of Eight member Bob Menendez advised Republicans to accept legalization status for current illegal immigrants if they ever want to see another president from their party. “I would tell my Republican colleagues — both in the House and the Senate — that the road to the White House comes through a road with a pathway to legalization,” the New Jersey senator said on State of the Union this morning. “Without it, there’ll never be a road to the White House for the Republican party.” Menendez also warned of triggers on border security
|
Norquist, Rubio allies to paint immigration bill opponents as nativists on conference call
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Matthew Boyle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/14/2013 7:28:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
An employee of Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) president Grover Norquist and a political ally of “Gang of Eight” member Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) believe groups opposed to the immigration bill pending in the U.S. Senate are "nativists," Breitbart News has learned. ATR’s Josh Culling and Hispanic Leadership Fund (HLF) president Mario Lopez will make the argument on a conference call with mainstream media reporters on Friday at 11 AM EDT. Brad Bailey of the organization called Texas Immigration Studies will join them on the call. “As the momentum behind immigration reform continues to
|
Senate Says No To Border Security-First Amendment
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Stiles
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/13/2013 11:49:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Senate has rejected an amendment to the Gang of Eight bill calling for a “border security first” approach to immigration reform. A motion to table the amendment, which was authored by Republican senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa and previously defeated in the Judiciary Committee, passed 57 to 43, largely on party lines. The measure would have required the Department of Homeland Security to demonstarate effective security of the southern border for six months before illegal immigration are granted legal status. The Gang’s proposal would provide legal status before additional border security measures are measured or implemented.
|
Wal-Mart´s every day hiring strategy: hire more temps
|
|
Reuters, by Dhanya Skariachan and Jessica Wohl
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/13/2013 7:14:56 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Wal-Mart Stores Inc has in recent months been only hiring temporary workers at many of its U.S. stores, the first time the world´s largest retailer has done so outside of the holiday shopping season. A Reuters survey of 52 stores run by the largest U.S. private employer in the past month, including one in every U.S. state, showed that 27 were hiring only temps, 20 were hiring a combination of regular full, part-time and temp jobs, and five were not hiring at all. The survey
|
If the GOP is this stupid, it deserves to die
|
|
Daily Caller, by Ann Coulter
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: fiesta del sol- 6/12/2013 6:51:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Democrats terrify Hispanics into thinking they’ll be lynched if they vote for Republicans, and then turn around and taunt Republicans for not winning a majority of the Hispanic vote. This line of attack has real resonance with our stupidest Republicans. (Proposed Republican primary targets: Sens. Kelly Ayotte, Jeff Flake, Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio.) Which explains why Republicans are devoting all their energy to slightly increasing their share of the Hispanic vote while alienating everyone else in America. It must be fun for liberals to manipulate Republicans into focusing on hopeless causes
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
Barbara Walters Defends Maher Calling Trig Palin Retarded: ‘I Don´t Think He Intended it to be Mean-Spirited’
|
|
Newsbusters, by John Nolte
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?
|
Who is he? Obama keeps allies, enemies guessing in second term
|
|
The Hill, by Justin Sink
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 6/17/2013 6:31:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is. Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric? Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations. His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue.
|
Jeb Bush labels conservative critics ‘the chirpers’
|
|
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative
|
Marco Rubio doesn´t know if ´he´s getting played´ by Democrats
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/17/2013 6:42:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Is Marco Rubio, R-Fla., getting played by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.? During his interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl this morning, Rubio didn’t even seem to understand what that meant. “Are you being played by the Democrats?” asked Karl. “Is Chuck Schumer playing you?” “I don’t — I quite frankly, I don’t even know what that means,” Rubio replied. “Is he using you?” Karl continued. “Is he using you to try to accomplish something that the Democrats want and is not — not a conservative bill?” Rubio responded that immigration reform was a bi-partisan issue that “all Americans
|
Obama: You Can´t Fathom ´Complexities´ of Syria Policy ´If You Haven´t Been in Situation Room´
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.
|
The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Jeffrey Lord
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 10:37:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Marco Rubio. Paul Ryan. The IRS. Illegal immigration. And fraud to the tune of billions.. Now there’s a combustible mix. Let’s start with the IRS, illegal immigration and fraud. We’ll come back in a minute to Senator Rubio and Congressman Ryan. For those who came in late, a year before the IRS scandals burst onto the scene in early May of 2013, an alert investigative reporter for WTHR-Indianapolis (Channel 13), Bob Segall by name, produced a stunning piece of journalism. Segall’s video report is found here and we will quote from his story for the basics.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|