A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Susan Rice’s Talking Points
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Susan Rice’s Talking Points
Weekly Standard, by Stephen F. Hayes

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 11/17/2012 5:23:38 AM

At his first press conference after being elected to a second term, President Barack Obama did everything he could to avoid directly answering the difficult questions on the growing scandal about his administration’s handling of the terrorist attacks in Benghazi. But in so doing, the president inadvertently told us quite a bit.At one point he said: “And we’re after an election now. I think it is important for us to find out exactly what happened in Benghazi, and I’m happy to cooperate in any ways that Congress wants.”

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Spidey, 11/17/2012 5:35:17 AM     (No. 9019969)

These people systematically leaking the truth out does nothing to bring 4 people back to life or change the left´s thinking on it´s muslim outreach.

Obama´s smooth talking this now so he can get Rice confirmed without a hassle.The cacking old hens in the House are saying this is racist,sexist and political to oppose Rice.

These old bags see nothing wrong with a woman being marched on TV to tell an intentional lie,they all admit now.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: pineledger, 11/17/2012 5:37:13 AM     (No. 9019971)

Right. Couldn´t possibly "find out exactly what happened" while pulling the wool over the nation´s eyes, could he?

Since, by The Won´s own declaration, Rice had "nothing to do with Benghazi," why was she trotted out to (count them) five Sunday political news shows? Because Hillary wouldn´t go? Because Petraeus wouldn´t go? Because not even Panetta would go?

And now we learn that the talking points had been scrubbed of any mention of terrorism and specifically, AQ?

There is something unseemly about the tone of The Won´s defense of Rice. Just saying.





  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Mike PHX, 11/17/2012 5:40:50 AM     (No. 9019975)

Pay attention, everyone. Steve Hayes is the best actual journalist in the Capitol. "Woodstein" all in one; emphasis on "actual" journalist, as opposed to the collective official excuse-makers in the so-called "news" biz.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: planetgeo, 11/17/2012 5:53:41 AM     (No. 9019980)

I believe they´re counting on "truth fatigue from a thousand drips". They know that indisputable evidence exists showing Obama knew the circumstances and purposely sent Rice out with a false set of talking points. So they´re preemptively leaking a few tidbits at a time, knowing that fatigue eventually sets in and the MSM moves on to other stories.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Haskell, 11/17/2012 5:56:16 AM     (No. 9019981)

Stephen - this is a rational explanation regarding the talking points which were clearly diluted for political purposes in the run-up to the election. But what is missing is why Petreaus himself blamed the "video" in his first briefing to Congress in September.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: mws50, 11/17/2012 6:04:45 AM     (No. 9019984)

Obama lied and watched our citizens die at Benghazi. Susan Rice intentionally lied about Benghazi.

We re-elected the sleaziest, worst president our Nation has ever seen, so believing he and the democrats cheated to get re-elected is an easy analysis of the situation. Or we have a LOT of the dumbest people on this planet living among us...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: lakerman1, 11/17/2012 6:37:16 AM     (No. 9020015)

I believe that the kardashian voters just do not care. And Susan Rice is utterly charmless, so those democratic hags in congress, yesterday, had to mount a 1950s defense of a poor woman who was being picked on by mean men, because she was female and black.
Such a defense tells the lie of the women´s movement. Don´t open that door for the woman, you pig of a man. that´s an insult to her and to all women.
But when a woman messes up, as Rice did, attack the men who say anything negative about her. She is helpless, don´t you know?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: GringoinQuito, 11/17/2012 7:07:04 AM     (No. 9020057)

Honey Boo Boo for administration spokesperson!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: planetgeo, 11/17/2012 7:34:41 AM     (No. 9020093)

As for why Susan Rice, #7 correctly points out why she was their perfect choice...female, black, and clueless. They calculated (correctly) that any criticism of her or what she falsely presented could and would be immediately defended by various groups as sexist, racist, and mean-spirited (i.e., McCainist). It even gave Obama an opportunity to hermaphrodite up by swinging his man purse at the impudent questioning of her choice.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: scarface67, 11/17/2012 8:13:29 AM     (No. 9020157)

Re poster #5: "But what is missing is why Petreaus himself blamed the ´video´ in his first briefing to Congress in September."

The hearing was behind closed doors and I bet that question was asked. The answer may well be so explosive that no one wanted to publicly reveal it... yet.




  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 11/17/2012 8:17:39 AM     (No. 9020168)

I´m not original in this thought, but I´ll point it out again: Obama was far more indignant at the impudent questioning of his poor little ambassador-lady (uh - black - ambassador-lady, that is), than he was at the MURDER of his own (gay white) Ambassador in a hell-hole by islamist orcs.

Ah, the ´war on women´ proceeds apace.

And don´t insult those muslims either!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Arby, 11/17/2012 8:36:48 AM     (No. 9020200)

The possibilities: she was an unwilling tool in Fauxbama´s hands; she was an evil servant willingly doing his bidding.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: LZK, 11/17/2012 8:46:03 AM     (No. 9020231)

She´s black and a woman -- SO -- she doesn´t have to take responsibility for her actions. She´s an affirmative action U.N. ambassador.

Com´on stop picking on her. Why should she have to actually do her job. She doesn´t know better -- she´s black -- or so the blackrepresentative from Michigan said....

Poor me -- I didn´t know better. I should be given a bigger job because I´m black..and a woman....

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Red Jeep, 11/17/2012 8:57:06 AM     (No. 9020256)

We have an affirmative action President, an affirmative action U.N. Ambassador, and an affirmative action Attorney General.

Can any of these 3 trace their roots back to slavery which ended 1 1/2 centuries ago?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Illinois Resident, 11/17/2012 9:07:47 AM     (No. 9020282)

I think Obama is indignant over Rice because by attacking her stupid statements he feels he is being attacked (and rightfully so). This entire story points to the juvenile thinking of Obama and the attempt of covering his own imcompetence with lies and excuses. Why is he unable to visualize his outrage over Rice (because he is defending himself) tells the story because there has been no outrage over the deaths of 4 Americans?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Chiritwo, 11/17/2012 9:08:14 AM     (No. 9020284)

I want to know who gave the order to "stand down". That´s a very easy question to answer.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 11/17/2012 9:11:32 AM     (No. 9020291)

And if they could, #14? Big whoop!

As said in a thread above the big question is not the changing of talking points, but why was layer after layer of security removed each time the consulate was previously attacked? And why was the ambassador that day? And why was the staff still there after all other diplomats had fled?

This is far from being resolved. There are at least 30 staff members from whom we have not heard. What do they know and where are they being secluded to be de-briefed?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: TruthandJustice, 11/17/2012 9:41:19 AM     (No. 9020343)

Obama and Petraeus and Hillary among others continue to lie to the American people because they know the people have been infected with the SJS virus ...slack jaw stupid.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: RancherJack, 11/17/2012 9:55:53 AM     (No. 9020380)

NPR early this morning. Some yammering yammerhead (Eleanor Holmes Norton) from Congress was telling NPR that ...

" ... Susan Rice is a Rhodes Scholar! Of course she´s qualified to be Secretary of State!"

You could hear the spittle flying.

Holmes? If you´re impressed by academic credentials, then you´re the biggest loser.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: nonsense, 11/17/2012 9:58:43 AM     (No. 9020384)

The Obama regime watched 4 Americans be murdered in real time. Yet they sleep just fine at night. Doesn´t that just give you the shivers?

What kind of people have no conscience? no morality? Are they even human?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: enuf8, 11/17/2012 10:02:35 AM     (No. 9020395)

My take on Petraus´ first appearance to cite the "video" was an ´or else´ situation. Say it was the "video" or else we will spill the beans about your ´Broadwell´ affair. Perhaps a niggling conscience then made him decide to fess up to the affair in his reason for resigning from the CIA. Blackmail???
Why had the Drone been dispatched to Benghazi? For the Drone´s appearance as early in the evening it had to have been sent hours before the assassination. Why?? Who ordered it to cover Benghazi? Lots of unanswered questions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: bighambone, 11/17/2012 10:39:11 AM     (No. 9020471)

Barack Obama has been airbrushing Islamist terrorists out of just about every obvious terrorist event that has occurred since he was elected. This is just another instance of that.

Remember the Fort Hood murders by a Muslim who was shouting in Arabic "god is great" as he was performing his personal jihad against American soldiers. Following that, the politically correct Obama crew, both military and civilian, denied that the murders were an act of terrorism, and still refers to the incident as "workplace violence". It looks like the majority of American voters go along with that!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: rplat, 11/17/2012 10:48:27 AM     (No. 9020492)

So, they made up a lie then rushed out to find some mindless dupe to present it to the public and not question its content. Tells you a lot about Rice, doesn´t it?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: MattMusson, 11/17/2012 10:56:46 AM     (No. 9020506)

What is the difference between a Used Car Salesman and a Spokesperson for the Obama Administration?

The Used Car Salesman actually knows when he is lying.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: rochow, 11/17/2012 2:24:48 PM     (No. 9020855)

Then the ambassador who set her straight was making it all up.....as she continued to deny and lie!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: GreatPlains, 11/17/2012 2:40:30 PM     (No. 9020872)

FTA- " The staffer said Petraeus testified that he allowed other agencies to alter the talking points
as they saw fit without asking for final review, to get them out quickly.”
Petraeus is looking shadier every day.
And just as corrupt as the rest of the Obama Administration.
It´s telling that not a single member of the gerbil media has asked Obama-exactly what time were you notified
and what specifically did you do ?
And how did you spend the evening ?
Other than going to bed early.
It´s pretty obvious by all the wishy washy and lawyerly
answers from Carney and Barry,
that he did not convene a meeting of the NSC
( except for the
military , it consists of the usual bozos like Rice, Biden ,Timmy Geithner, Panetta , Hillary , Petreaus , Jay Z , Beyonce and possibly Jarrett and Holder ) and didn´t consider
the attack and the deaths to be any big deal.
Obama gave more tributes to Michael Jackson than he has to the four dead Americans.
Ed Henry of FOX began asking Barry a tough question, but , then wavered and weakened by the end.
I wish FOX would make Hume their WH correspondent , he would not grovel like the rest.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Words have Meaning, 11/17/2012 2:49:19 PM     (No. 9020879)

Here is my opinion on Susan Rice. I think she was being setup to to take the fall so Jay Carney could get in front of the press corp and say "She obviously does not speak for the WH. We knew all along this was terrorist, but she went rogue on us and began spewing this video response."

It all went south when Gen. Petraeus went "All In". It is a good thing he testified when he did so doesn´t go all "Vince Foster" on us and wind up dead.(See Clinton Admin for clarification on Vince Foster.)


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 11/17/2012 3:58:56 PM     (No. 9020956)

If this delicate little Rhodes scholar can´t take the heat now what in the heck makes Obe determine she can stand up to the Sharia law muslim brotherhood to be an effective Sec. State promoting American agendas NOT Obama kissy agendas.
Of course he doesn´t and she is their for more cover and the race excuse.
Remember Rhodes does not signify intelligent candidates as the picks are the most promising little socialist of the new crop.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: GreyedOut, 11/17/2012 4:19:45 PM     (No. 9020981)

(Im)plausible deniability. They´re ALL liars. Next, they´ll claim George W. edited the CIA report to eliminate the Al Queda reference. That´s the ticket!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: suejeanne, 11/17/2012 4:52:11 PM     (No. 9021012)

Reminding me more of Watergate with every passing day, every "drip, drip, drip" -

who is going to be "Deep Throat" in this -

when are we going to see and hear the "missing tape" (with Nixon, it was the 18 1/2 minutes missing that was so serious, but it did not involve people being savagely murdered right in front of the CIC) -

I daresay there must be plenty of "expletives deleted" going on in the past week, since Petraeus announced his resignation -

now who is going to get their foot (or something) caught in a wringer?



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Franz, 11/17/2012 5:57:54 PM     (No. 9021093)

It is interesting that the administration’s spokesperson about what happened in Benghazi was the least knowledgeable about what happened. The fact that Susan Rice was willing to parrot whatever she was told by somebody in administration puts in question if she totally lacks a brain. Somebody showing less intelligence than the village idiot should not be made Secretary of State. She is either a liar, a fool, or both.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 712395




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Cults In Our Midst: Patty Hearst
And The Brainwashing Of America
The Federalist, by Stella Morabito    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/16/2014 5:39:12 AM     Post Reply
Exactly forty years ago Patricia Hearst stunned the nation when she turned up as a bank robber, a mere two months after she was kidnapped by the violent cult that called itself “The Symbionese Liberation Army.” Her astonishing transformation was documented by bank cameras on April 15, 1974. There she was — granddaughter of William Randolph “Citizen Kane” Hearst — wielding a sawed-off assault rifle and terrorizing people in a bank. She had recently announced in a taped SLA communique that she had voluntarily joined the SLA in its fight against the “fascist” United States. She took the nom de

Chevron, Dole cases expose lawyer corruption
USA Today, by Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/16/2014 5:35:01 AM     Post Reply
A few years ago, the corruption convictions of several prominent plaintiffs´ lawyers put a spotlight on dishonesty in American civil courts. Now the sleaze has burst back into the news with cases involving Chevron and Dole Food Co., this time with an international twist. Last month, a federal court in Manhattan found that a U.S. plaintiffs´ lawyer had masterminded a multibillion dollar fraud and extortion scheme against Chevron in Ecuador. Three days later, a California appellate court affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit against Dole as a "fraud on the court" perpetrated by U.S. and Nicaraguan plaintiffs´ lawyers. These rulings are welcome

Not all of the Pulitzers were
won by the media Goliaths
Washington Examiner [DC], by Mark Tapscott    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/16/2014 5:13:25 AM     Post Reply
NFL players have Most Valuable Player awards. Major League Baseball players strive for Cy Youngs and Gold Gloves. For journalists, it´s the Pulitzer. Every year, when Pulitzers are announced, most of them are awarded to big corporate media outlets with huge staffs and budgets devoted specifically to the contest. But not always. On Monday, David Philipps, an investigative reporter for the Colorado Springs Gazette, claimed a Pulitzer for his three-day series, Other Than Honorable. Philipps exposed the shameful treatment of members of the U.S. military, many of them wounded combat veterans, in the drawdown of American military forces. Too often,

Joker sob story is just sickening
Boston Herald, by Howie Carr    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/16/2014 5:01:49 AM     Post Reply
Another sob story in the left-wing media about Dzhokhar Tsarnaev? Yesterday it was the turn of The New York Times, under the headline, “Marathon Bombing Suspect Waits in Isolation.” Needless to say, the ACLU is up in arms. Boo-hoo-hoo. And if he were in general population, rest assured the headline would have been, “Marathon Bombing Suspect Waits in Fear of his Life.” Needless to say, the ACLU would be up in arms. This one was perfectly timed — on the first anniversary of the Joker placing one of his kettle bombs in front of little Martin Richard, who had moments

Feds Begin Fingerprinting ´High Risk´
Medicare Providers and Suppliers
Weekly Standard, by Jeryl Bier    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/16/2014 4:52:57 AM     Post Reply
Four years after Obamacare became law, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is notifying Medicare providers and suppliers of new fingerprint-based background checks. Eventually, all individuals who hold a five percent or greater stake in a Medicare supplier or provider that is categorized as "high risk" will be subject to the requirement. The provision is part of the Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP Program Integrity Provisions (Title E) of the Affordable Care Act, and gives the HHS secretary broad discretion in applying the background check requirements depending on the potential for abuse, fraud, and/or waste. The new requirements are spelled

Obama Administration Wants UN to Come Up With
Fake Numbers to Back ‘Climate Change’ Legislation
PJ Media, by Bryan Preston    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/16/2014 4:33:40 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is just fraud all the way down. U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration is concerned that a crucial United Nations report on climate science may be too harsh in assessing the cost of fighting global warming. Such a finding may lower the incentive for the world to reduce fossil fuel pollution and feed the arguments of those skeptical about whether it’s worth spending money to curtail rising temperatures. Global temperatures haven’t risen in 15 years, but never mind that. Pay no attention to the Sun’s role in our climate. The UN report is set for release next week. Plenty of time to

Greg Abbott Beating Wendy
Davis in Texas Among Women
Townhall, by Katie Pavlich    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/16/2014 4:24:57 AM     Post Reply
Texas Attorney General and Gubernatorial Candidate Greg Abbott is beating State Senator and feminist hero Wendy Davis in the Lone Star State...among women. According to new data from the left leaning Public Policy Polling, Abbott is not only leading Davis with overall voters, but by a whopping eight percent among female voters. Further, Davis´ has an overall 47 percent unfavorable rating while Abbott enjoys a favorable rating of 40 percent. Among women, Davis´ approval favorable rating is just 32 percent.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

54 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

46 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

32 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it


Post Reply   Close thread 712395





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~