|
|
| |
Topic: Exclusive -- Ryan to Obama: Get ´Revenue Through Growth,´ Not Taxes |
Exclusive -- Ryan to Obama: Get ´Revenue Through Growth,´ Not Taxes
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Joel B. Pollak
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 11/14/2012 9:23:46 PM
|
| House Budget Committee chair Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) has rejected President Barack Obama´s demand to raise taxes as part of Obama´s proposal to achieve $1.6 trillion in additional tax revenues to avoid the "fiscal cliff." Instead, Ryan backed Speaker John Boehner´s position, which is that any new tax revenues must be achieved without passing higher tax rates. In an exclusive statement to Breitbart News, Ryan specified that new revenues should come through economic growth and tax reform, not tax hikes: Speaker Boehner has outlined a bipartisan way forward to avoid the "fiscal cliff"
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
tren9, 11/14/2012 9:27:08 PM (No. 9015071)
Growth is the only possible way to increase revenue.Whatever amount of tax rate you set would not possibly raise the dollars needed.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Pearson365, 11/14/2012 9:38:14 PM (No. 9015087)
Obama does not understand revenue growth, and frankly does not care. Raising taxes on "the rich" is his way of reducing the wealth of the successful to please his equally delusional followers. It´s all part of his social justice, environmental justice, racial justice, health care and racialjustice philosophy. Justice is not blind with Obama.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
snowcloud, 11/14/2012 9:49:43 PM (No. 9015099)
Ryan may as well explain the theory of relativity to a cat.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
god of irony, 11/14/2012 10:24:28 PM (No. 9015127)
Imagine if all Republican officials repeated that simple but powerful message every chance they got.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
pearlyjo, 11/14/2012 10:27:07 PM (No. 9015129)
Then we the people need to take it to the other people who voted for this dreadful man. Explain it to them over the lunch table at work, over drinks after work, at your son´s soccer game, after church over donuts and coffee, to the guy sitting next to you on your next flight, you get the drift. Be nice, be clear and don´t back up. Leave them thinking about what you said, not you seething about what they said.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
fayebeck, 11/14/2012 10:45:44 PM (No. 9015145)
#3 you mean a "cool" cat?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
bob913, 11/14/2012 10:51:04 PM (No. 9015150)
They should have been saying this during the election. obama would not have won.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Kurto, 11/14/2012 10:56:48 PM (No. 9015160)
Even a 100% tax on incomes $250,000 and higher would not fully fund 0bama´s handout programs. He´s completely out of his mind.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
FormerDem, 11/14/2012 10:59:15 PM (No. 9015164)
I´m going to imitate Ryan and be constructive about Obama until he starts up with the babykilling again. I mean, if Ryan can, I can. I will pray for him to do a good job, and everything. Until next time he supports PP. May be a week, may be two. Whatever it is. If Ryan can, I can.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
tisHimself, 11/14/2012 11:01:45 PM (No. 9015167)
Ryan is going to have to convert a bunch of not too economically interested republicans to hold the line.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
bubber, 11/14/2012 11:18:15 PM (No. 9015178)
The won doesn´t care as long as it´s "fair"...
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bogeegolf, 11/14/2012 11:38:24 PM (No. 9015192)
Get rid of half the government employees. Or more.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
MissMann, 11/14/2012 11:45:28 PM (No. 9015202)
Duh.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
4Justice, 11/14/2012 11:54:06 PM (No. 9015211)
But Obama doesn´t want growth. He wants to stunt our economy and destroy as many of the smaller businesses as he can. His intention is to create his great toralitarian state where all business is conducted by a few elite whom he controls and the rest of us are living on limited income, government jobs or government checks. How else can you redistribute the wealth so you have only a 1/2% beholden to the government and 99.5% of the rest of us barely scraping by and living check to check.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Davids918, 11/14/2012 11:55:18 PM (No. 9015212)
Stop!
We know the tax rate increase won´t work but it´s the solution the Dems have said will balance the budget.
So, let´s give it to them, and watch it fail. Stop giving the Dems a life raft.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
MissMann, 11/15/2012 1:18:45 AM (No. 9015262)
Yeah...why don´t we check in with George HW Bush on how well it works for republicans when they cave to dhimms demands for higher taxes.
Let the dhimms push through any tax they can, while we throw up as many obstructions as we can. There will come a time when we can say "see, I told you so" and it will carry weight.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Gloating, 11/15/2012 3:40:21 AM (No. 9015311)
THe Republican ought to buy air time on tv . Make a presentation with charts...keep it as simple as they can to show HOW THINGS WORK. Get time on all the stations. Saturate the airwaves with the message. We are truly doomed if they can´t get this across....support Ryan and fiscal sanity as if our lives depend on it because they do! Before big college football games , basketball games, award shows, crap tv.....the people must be exposed to what is truly coming. You cannot tax your way into prosperity.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
pineledger, 11/15/2012 4:19:38 AM (No. 9015330)
3, most cats would understand that explanation far better than The Won would understand economic growth.
The problem is, The Won´s world-view is based on a zero-sum game. There is a pie and it is only so big. What one person or group gets, the others don´t. The idea of voting for revenge and the idea of redistribution of wealth both are posited on zero-sum.
He is a bear of small brain, really.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
drkillj0y, 11/15/2012 11:52:54 AM (No. 9016230)
Commienity Organizers only know how to strong-arm what they want (money, resources, goods, services) from others, they haven´t got the slightest clue how to create anything that can generate real revenue.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Petraeus’s role in drafting Benghazi talking points raises questions
|
|
Washington Post, by Scott Wilson and Karen DeYoung
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 11:03:01 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The controversy over the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack last year began at a meeting over coffee on Capitol Hill three days after the assault. It was at this informal session with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the ranking Democrat asked David H. Petraeus, who was CIA director at the time, to ensure that committee members did not inadvertently disclose classified information when talking to the news media about the attack. “We had some new members on the committee, and we knew the press would be very aggressive on this, so we didn’t want
|
With more clarity, White House adds to confusion on IRS
|
|
Washington Post, by Dan Balz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:59:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It is never good for an administration when a front-page newspaper article about an ongoing controversy begins as follows: “The White House offered a new account Monday of how and when it learned .?.?. ” That’s what readers of The Post awoke to on Tuesday. In trying to contain the controversy and protect President Obama, White House officials have only added to questions about what happened. Until this week, the story of how White House officials learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups was fairly straightforward. White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler was notified in late April
|
| |
|
In AP, Rosen investigations, government makes criminals of reporters
|
|
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:56:21 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There are various reasons you might not care about the Obama administration’s spying on journalist James Rosen and labeling him a “co-conspirator and/or aider and abettor” in an espionage case. Liberals may not be particularly bothered because the targeted journalist works for Fox News. Conservatives may not be concerned because of their antipathy toward the news media generally. And the general public certainly doesn’t have much patience for journalists’ whining. But here’s why you should care — and why this case, along with the administration’s broad snooping into Associated Press phone records, is more serious than the other supposed
|
|
White House meltdown: A truth deficit
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:53:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There seems to be bipartisan consensus that whatever the White House is doing to fend off scandal is making things worse. Howard Fineman sounds a lot like Right Turn these days: “White House aides are tempting fate with their reluctant, piecemeal and contradictory disclosures of what they knew and when they knew it, especially about a report on the Internal Revenue Service’s 18-month effort to target tea party and other conservative groups for special scrutiny.” The constantly shifting stories from Jay Carney and the IRS dissembling and pleas of ignorance only heighten concern that there has been serious wrongdoing.
|
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
|
‘Rosen’s in the Wind!’
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:29:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
John Podhoretz has a good column today on the Obama administration’s travails. I did not know this bit until I read the column: Even more startling, the search warrant makes clear that the FBI already had everything it needed on the leaker, as the request for a search warrant features quotes from an interview that were tantamount to a confession. It asked that the warrant be sealed — in other words, that Rosen not be told — because knowledge might “cause subjects to flee”! Imagine it: Rosen, an on-air reporter
|
All of Obama´s Scandals Are Ultimately About Information Control
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla. tornado for anti-GOP rant over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
| | |
|
|