|
|
| |
Topic: Ryan pins blame for Republican ticket´s loss on ´urban´ voters as it´s revealed that Romney did not win a single vote in 59 Philadelphia voting districts |
Ryan pins blame for Republican ticket´s loss on ´urban´ voters as it´s revealed that Romney did not win a single vote in 59 Philadelphia voting districts
Daily Mail [UK], by Hayley Peterson
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Attercliffe, 11/14/2012 6:17:28 AM
|
| In his first post-election interview, Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan blamed the loss by the Republican presidential ticket last week on high turnout among ´urban´ voters. ´We were surprised at the outcome,´ he told WISC-TV, his home state´s CBS affiliate. ´We knew this was gonna be a close race. We thought we had a very good chance of winning it.´ ´Losing never feels good,´ he added. Ryan said he was expecting to get more support from voters in big cities, which generally tend to vote Democratic.[Snip]Ryan´s liberal critics accused him of suggesting that inner-city minorities were responsible for Obama´s win.
|
Comments: So whaddaya call an area deep in the city? It´s not urban? And if I live there, does that mean I´m black? Or was?
A Hillary adviser snarkily corrected Ryan because, it seems, "urban" is no longer a code word for "black." Really? I didn´t know it was until I read this. Does that mean because I´m a suburbanite I´m no longer a sub-black or am I simply a confused old geezette?
That last was a strictly rhetorical question. Don´t touch it, I haven´t been in a good mood since the election.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
geo11, 11/14/2012 6:24:49 AM (No. 9012984)
The Democrat party have developed voter fraud to an art form. Republicans will never win a national election until they figure out a way to stop it.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
CecilStrange, 11/14/2012 6:28:04 AM (No. 9012987)
If the shoe fits....
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
country boy, 11/14/2012 6:30:04 AM (No. 9012990)
Oh yeah, ...The voting divisions, which counted 19,605 votes for Obama and zero votes for Romney
Saddam Hussein didn´t even get voting results like that. I think we may hear more from Paul Ryan on this issue from his seat in the House of Representatives.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Anner40, 11/14/2012 6:32:02 AM (No. 9012994)
When the ´free stuff´ gives out...we will find another Santa Claus.....
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
JimS, 11/14/2012 6:41:02 AM (No. 9013010)
I would have to think it is statistically impossible to get 19,605 votes for Obama and 0 votes for Romney. There was not one single person opposed to abortion, gay marriage, high unemployment, huge deficits, etc? These districts are not 100% black voters. And the same thing happened in sections of Cleveland and Cincinnatti. Coincidence? No, it can only mean election fraud. So brazen and in-you-face that they don´t even bother to hide it with a 95% - 5% outcome.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
nina584, 11/14/2012 6:43:29 AM (No. 9013016)
They always steal Penn throughPhilly. That is well known.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
NancyD, 11/14/2012 6:44:26 AM (No. 9013019)
It´s an articulate way to point out FRAUD, CHEATING the democRAT way.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
GringoinQuito, 11/14/2012 6:44:38 AM (No. 9013021)
The Republican leadership better get their heads out of their a...s and call for an investigation of this travesty.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 11/14/2012 6:47:47 AM (No. 9013027)
Honest people tend to expect honesty in others. They even project honesty onto others when it is not deserved.
We are so screwed.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Keekng, 11/14/2012 6:51:36 AM (No. 9013033)
I would blame the loss on fraud and ballot stuffing. There is no way that many precincts could have been 100% for bam bam. This type of ´malarky´ should only take place in the former USSR, Cuba and Venezuela.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Spidey, 11/14/2012 6:52:06 AM (No. 9013034)
A lot of these voting machines are still being made by Diebold under a different name. But since Obama won,they´re all honest machines now.My guess is these Philly voting machines were all rigged to flip Romney votes,not that nobody voted for him.
One thing you need to know about liberals is if they´re cheating in one area of the country,it´s actually all over.
Notice how absolutely nothing happened to teachers erasing wrong test scores,instead they blamed it on NCLB.The fact that there was widespread cheating is irrelevant.
At least Ryan has the guts to speak out on this.Some of these wards also had 99% turnout rates which also suggests cheating but no investigation. Send a nasty e mail and you will be investigated then.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
TigerLilly, 11/14/2012 6:59:23 AM (No. 9013045)
I wish Romney would turn his loss into a mission for ensuring honest elections. Ryan, being a statistics guy, ought to be a great partner in this. If the Dems can steal this election for the worst president ever how will we ever win again? Even the best candidate ever can´t win if the voting machines are pre-programmed for the Demos.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
heneverlies, 11/14/2012 7:00:26 AM (No. 9013048)
No need to teach Greek/Roman history in our school system, none whatsoever. Teach little Johnnie and Mary all about dealing with their feelings, diversity and gay marriage. Tear down all major institutions, including Lance Armstrong´s many wins. Don´t go by the rules that were in place, bring in your new rules and make them retroactive on all those you never liked, those winners who bet you are your own games...
Totems come down, replaced by what? Ask the people who still live in Detroit and Trenton.
Animals who like being with fellow animals. The blacktop jungle is here, front and center for all to see and get car jacked!
Play some rap music, some urban ghetto music, give me some Jay Z tunes with Beyonce shaking her booty all about as she writes a love note to her other man, the metrosexual clown Obama-Mao!
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Mabeldog, 11/14/2012 7:05:22 AM (No. 9013058)
I personally know a black voter from the East Side of Cleveland one of the polls that was 100% for the worst president in US history who voted for Romney. I saw his ballot he voted by mail. Ryan sounds ready to take on this shameless voter theft. Romney probably figures f$@k it. Let Zero´s "voters" pay. Zero has already thrown gays and food stamp nation aside. He "won".
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
kanphil, 11/14/2012 7:08:41 AM (No. 9013063)
There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum and there is no voting district in the US that does not contain at least one contrarian. This is blinding voter fraud.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Freeloader, 11/14/2012 7:17:27 AM (No. 9013070)
Gee whiz Congressman Ryan. Do you think the Democrats might have cheated?.......Not even Uncle Joe Stalin or Herr Schicklgruber ever pulled down the kind of numbers The Bamster had in Philadelphia and Cleveland!
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 11/14/2012 7:23:22 AM (No. 9013085)
Hey Mr. statistician, 100% votes in 59 districts after GOP observers are kicked out, what are the odds? Idiot! You petition signers are starting to make some sense.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
hoopsfan, 11/14/2012 7:24:30 AM (No. 9013088)
Voter fraud? Well, could be. Would it be any better if Romney had gotten less than 1 per cent?
The better explanation is that it represents tribal behavior on the part of a certain portion of the electorate in Philadelphia (and the same, or close to it, in some other big cities).
I´m not sure it´s any better than voter fraud when it comes down to it.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
pineledger, 11/14/2012 7:32:55 AM (No. 9013106)
I would say the quotes should go around the word "voters," rather than "urban."
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
god of irony, 11/14/2012 7:34:10 AM (No. 9013112)
The Republicans will never win national elections if they are willing to cede such huge blocks of the voting populace.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
fljack, 11/14/2012 7:37:27 AM (No. 9013120)
59 precincts and not ONE vole for Romney? No cheating going on here!!
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
49 Ford, 11/14/2012 7:42:51 AM (No. 9013139)
Correct me if I´m wrong, but I believe that in the election of 1860 Abraham Lincoln did not receive a single popular vote in any of the about-to-become confederate states.
Just thought I´d toss that in.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Really?, 11/14/2012 7:48:20 AM (No. 9013151)
I would think that UF there were actually voters in those precincts that DID vote for Romney, that they would be talking right now.
What would YOU do if you found that your precinct went 100% for Obama ? I honestly don´t know what my first step would be, but I would do SOMETHING !!
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Really?, 11/14/2012 7:50:04 AM (No. 9013157)
Okay.....IF there were...
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Pros7767, 11/14/2012 7:55:31 AM (No. 9013177)
Romney should be challenging this election. I keep waiting...
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Rotten In Denmark, 11/14/2012 8:09:25 AM (No. 9013209)
PA´s R governor Corbett apparently hasn´t said a word about this. There ain´t no way in hello that this isn´t fraud, plain and simple. Based on Florida from the past we know that RATS can´t vote without many mistakes....not 1 vote eh?
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
disasterman, 11/14/2012 8:13:12 AM (No. 9013219)
An honest media would be all over this. How hard would it be to find several hundred people that voted Romney? They could even hide their identity so they wouldn´t end up dead like snitches do in those precincts.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Nimby, 11/14/2012 8:15:32 AM (No. 9013224)
They should have obtained a list of those with Obama cell phones and told them that they would be getting Romney iPads if they voted for Romney
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
antiquegolf, 11/14/2012 8:19:36 AM (No. 9013234)
Consider how many stupid, illiterate dregs were included in the 19,605 who cast ballots in these Philadelphia districts. Then establish odds that not even one of them mistakenly voted for Romney. My chances on the lottery this week must be substantially better.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
M2, 11/14/2012 8:22:24 AM (No. 9013242)
It is not realistic to believe that not a single person in 59 Philly districts voted for Romney. This is as blatant a case of voter fraud, probably by machine-tampering, as there has ever been.
Is anyone paying attention out there? Oh, GOP? You there?
{{crickets}}
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Yephora, 11/14/2012 8:24:29 AM (No. 9013247)
Hear ya, #25, but it´s not going to happen. There was massive Demonrat cheating occurring all over the country in a dozen different ways from thousands of deep-sixed military votes to voting machine fraud to polling place intimidation to bogus voter registrations to flipped votes to bussed-in illegals to voting more than once to nationwide SEIU/NAACP thuggery, etc, etc!
And the doe-eyed STUPID Party ignored it all!
Only Demonrats challenge voting results, and that with admirable ferocity (Bush-Gore, FL)
The Stupid Party always plays nice.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Newtsche, 11/14/2012 8:41:31 AM (No. 9013290)
Seem to be only two possibilities, vote fraud or a psychotically monolithic black voting. Lose/Lose
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
andyboy, 11/14/2012 9:23:48 AM (No. 9013422)
What if hundreds or thousands of angry voters from these districts were come forward and say, "Hey, wait a minute -- we all voted for Romney?"
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Hobbiest, 11/14/2012 9:23:59 AM (No. 9013424)
#22. Highly unlikely. Unless of course they counted ballots the same way they do in Philadelphia. There were strong pockets of Unionism all across Appalachia.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Hobbiest, 11/14/2012 9:38:27 AM (No. 9013467)
Fraud or some very, very heavy intimidation, which is just as illegitimate. When I lived in Chicago I´d come across both black and white people who were convinced their ballot was not secret and they could get into trouble with city/county employees if they didn´t vote straight Democrat. Even then the Democrats weren´t stupid. They´d have at least two Republican votes per precinct to make the "Republican" election judges look legit.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
privateer, 11/14/2012 10:04:35 AM (No. 9013536)
I f true, 22, that may only prove election fraud by dhims has a long, long history.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Attercliffe"
|
Surge protection plan will keep lights on for millions of Americans in case of nuclear bomb or solar flare
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/19/2013 9:20:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A vast tract of the East Coast, from Washington DC to New York is in danger of being without power for up to two years, if a massive solar flare knocks out the power grid. With the Sun pushing out unusually large solar flares, capable of disrupting power supplies, a device is being proposed that would prevent more than 300 million Americans being left without power. House Republicans have proposed legislation to push the Government to provide surge protectors and grid-saving devices that would offer protection in case of a massive electromagnetic pulse from either a flare or nuclear weapon.
|
Afghanistan suspends talks after US-Taliban move
|
|
BBC News [UK], by staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/19/2013 8:34:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Afghanistan has suspended talks with the US to discuss the nature of US military presence after foreign troops withdraw in 2014. A spokesman for President Hamid Karzai said the decision was taken over "contradictions" in the US proposal of direct talks with the Taliban. Mr Karzai also ruled out talking to the Taliban until the peace process was "Afghan-led". Earlier, four US soldiers died in a Taliban attack at an Afghan air base. A spokesman for the Taliban said the militants had launched two rockets at Bagram airbase, the largest military base for US troops in Afghanistan.
|
Afghanistan: Watch what the Taliban do, not what they say
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Rob Crilly
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/19/2013 8:13:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
You don´t need to know much about Afghanistan, the nature of extremist movements or world affairs in general to understand one important principle: Never mind what they say, what are they doing? So while last night the Afghan Taliban released a statement (carefully co-ordinated with the White House) expressing their commitment to finding a political solution to Afghanistan´s conflict, this morning we wake to news that they launched a mortar attack on Bagram air base last night, killing four Americans. [Snip] The problem is that the US is negotiating not from a position of strength but a position of weakness.
|
When it comes to climate change, we have to trust our scientists, because they know lots of big scary words
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Sean Thomas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/19/2013 8:05:34 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Whither the weather? As you may have heard, a conference of national forecasters assembled this week in Exeter: to discuss the future of the British climate, following the spate of harsher than expected winters, and unusually wet summers, since 2007. Already, commentators are asking if global warming is to blame. In particular, some are wondering if the direction of the Jet Stream is being altered by Arctic ice melt. Others are speculating that natural variations, such as the “Atlantic multi-decadal oscillation”, might be responsible for recent evolutions. However, most of this reportage has been second-hand. Unprecedentedly, I had direct access
|
The Taliban must prove they are serious about peace
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Con Coughlin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/19/2013 7:59:49 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Yesterday´s surprise announcement by President Barack Obama that America is to engage in direct talks with the Taliban is a welcome and long overdue development in the decade-long Afghan conflict. As I and others have argued for many years, there is no military solution to the Afghan conflict, even if the sustained military effort--which has so far cost in excess of 3,000 Nato lives--has been necessary to force the Taliban to the negotiating table. Without the relentless military pressure provided by American, British and other Nato forces these past few years, I very much doubt that the Taliban would
|
Would you be caught wearing these? The ´hairy leg´ stockings designed to help women ward off unwanted male attention
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Sadie Whitelocks
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/19/2013 12:08:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
It might seem like the androgynous fashion trend taken too far, but a Chinese company’s new ‘hairy leg’ hosiery hopes to help women ward off unwanted male attention. A photograph posted to the Shanghai-based website ChinaSMACK shows a model from the waist down wearing the on-trend stockings. A caption below touts them as the perfect ´summertime anti-pervert´ device and ´essential for young girls going out’. It does not state where shoppers can find the garment and internet searches prove fruitless. The image of the tights has triggered hundreds of responses from amused and horrified viewers. ‘Damn, so disgusting!’ commented one.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of crash is wrong
|
|
FOX News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded
|
Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
Barbara Walters Defends Maher Calling Trig Palin Retarded: ‘I Don´t Think He Intended it to be Mean-Spirited’
|
|
Newsbusters, by John Nolte
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?
|
Obama: You Can´t Fathom ´Complexities´ of Syria Policy ´If You Haven´t Been in Situation Room´
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.
|
The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Jeffrey Lord
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 10:37:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Marco Rubio. Paul Ryan. The IRS. Illegal immigration. And fraud to the tune of billions.. Now there’s a combustible mix. Let’s start with the IRS, illegal immigration and fraud. We’ll come back in a minute to Senator Rubio and Congressman Ryan. For those who came in late, a year before the IRS scandals burst onto the scene in early May of 2013, an alert investigative reporter for WTHR-Indianapolis (Channel 13), Bob Segall by name, produced a stunning piece of journalism. Segall’s video report is found here and we will quote from his story for the basics.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|