|
|
| |
Topic: Krauthammer: White House ´Held Affair Over Petraeus´s Head´ For Favorable Testimony On Benghazi |
Krauthammer: White House ´Held Affair Over Petraeus´s Head´ For Favorable Testimony On Benghazi
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 11/13/2012 10:36:40 PM
|
| Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer on Tuesday said the White House used David Petraeus’s affair to get the CIA director to give testimony about the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that was in line with the administration’s position on the matter. Appearing on Fox News´s Special Report, Krauthammer said, "The sword was lowered on Election Day" (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: I think the really shocking news today was that General Petraeus thought and hoped he could keep his job. He thought that it might
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Urgent Fury, 11/13/2012 10:39:02 PM (No. 9012644)
When did these idiots have time to do their jobs?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
greg1a, 11/13/2012 10:42:13 PM (No. 9012647)
Chuck has it right!! It will ALL eventually come out and we can hope it leads to impeachment.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
CEP, 11/13/2012 10:46:55 PM (No. 9012656)
I thnk that Krauthammer is on to something.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
wepeople, 11/13/2012 10:47:05 PM (No. 9012657)
Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
JoElla Bee, 11/13/2012 11:08:17 PM (No. 9012693)
FTA: "I think the really shocking news today was that General Petraeus thought and hoped he could keep his job. He thought that it might and it would be kept secret, and that he could stay in his position."
That would make him worse than the people he lied to protect.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 11/13/2012 11:09:14 PM (No. 9012696)
If a peasant tried something like that it would be called blackmailing a witness and lead to jail time. At some point high up on the government ladder crimes stop being crimes.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Moonspinner, 11/13/2012 11:13:13 PM (No. 9012701)
Would not surprise me if this woman and others like her are plants by the Obama Administration to "neuter" certain generals, admirals, etc. I believe Obama needs to get the military under control so they do not pull a coup when Obama goes for total control. Nothing would surprise me anymore. I never thought the US would have such a president. I never thought my rights as a US citizen would be in jeopardy. So why not a president who believes he can take complete control and he must get the military under his control before he can make his move? Just a thought. Sex is always the weapon of choice to bring a man with power down or to get control of him.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Kurto, 11/13/2012 11:28:23 PM (No. 9012732)
Krauthammer is a genius, and he is probably correct on this. I am looking one step beyond this to the DiFi and House hearings. If Petraeus was pressured to lie or face exposure he could be ready to turn on those who turned on him. He was in the situation room and monitored the attack in real time. He also went to Benghazi, himself, to investigate. He has already been exposed, His original testimony was not under oath, so not much to lose in telling the truth.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
RussVet, 11/13/2012 11:35:10 PM (No. 9012743)
Krauthammer: "White House Held Affair Over Petraeus´s Head For Favorable Testimony On Benghazi"
Guess that Chicago style blackmail backfired on Obozo didn´t it.. Petraeus step up and told the story himself instead of being force to be a liar for voting fraud usurper Obozo .... Petraeus/West for President when Obozo is arrested for fraud, which he has already done with his forged Barf certificate ...
Benghazi=Obozo TREASON
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
noddy, 11/13/2012 11:37:13 PM (No. 9012746)
I don´t believe that telling the truth under oath is any different from simply telling the truth. You´re either honest or you´re not.
And I too think that Krauthammer has pounced right in the middle on this one. Keep it up Doctor, we need you voice out there to be heard.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
LadyVet, 11/14/2012 12:15:04 AM (No. 9012785)
#9, I´d say that he succeeded. It delayed until after the election, which was the whole point.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
JimS, 11/14/2012 1:22:13 AM (No. 9012837)
And now that Petraeus has neutralized the blackmail by going public, does anyone believe he will testify at all?
Certainly not, with the possibility of trumped-up charges (conduct unbecoming...) against him and the threat of losing his military pension.
Well played, Valerie Jarrett.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/14/2012 1:46:36 AM (No. 9012854)
A lesson for all. Don´t lie to protect the one. The one has no honour and only a man of honour can really go up against him. Petraeus is much better than Obama and should never have allowed himself to be in that den of thieves. Wrestle with pigs in the mud and you will get dirty.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/14/2012 3:16:45 AM (No. 9012879)
Another thought on this: David Petraeus should take a lesson from his name sake King David. He had a time of weakness ( Bathsheba ) and bad judgement but he followed up with true sorrow for this episode with the beautiful penitential psalms… David was truly sorry and God forgives such a person. David Petraeus now sees where it is getting him lying for the one and trying to cover his own lack of honour and judgement. Now is the time to show true sorrow and do things right. Testify about what really happened in Benghazi. Obama will pull your pension etc. That is inevitable - you see what happens when you lie to save yourself by saving Obama - he throws you under the bus anyway. Just do the right thing starting now. Things will work out for the better as they did for King David.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
M2, 11/14/2012 6:51:19 AM (No. 9013032)
#7, I agree. President Jarrett, this Administration and its Agencies are far too sinister to ever have been contemplated here in America only 4 years ago.
The Marxists have waited patiently and have planned for this very moment for decades, when they knew the populace was ignorant, uneducated, too caught up in their entitlements and their hedonism to care and that the military was weakened by political correctness.
I hope I´m not around to watch the rest of this horror show.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
heneverlies, 11/14/2012 6:52:19 AM (No. 9013035)
Princeton Petraeus has certainly gotten himself in quite a pickle, so smart in the head, so dumb in his pants!
Anyone see a pattern with Obama and his clan? How neat of them to play this game of political hardball. Even Alan Colmes stands strong with Obama-Mao as this ship of evil slowly but certainly begins to drift and attract the icebergs just waiting beyond the horizon.
However, we American citizens will and are going to pay a very dear price for "our foolishness" in electing these people, starting with the "realities" of the health care bill of 2700 pages plus, which Nancy Pelosi made her soon to be famous remark.
How many will fall by the wayside like our soldiers in the Bataan death march?
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ebgodard, 11/14/2012 7:04:46 AM (No. 9013055)
Obama, Biden, Mueller, Clapper, Holder, Clinton, Panetta, Axelrod and Jarrett all knew and all need to go.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
O.S. Banker, 11/14/2012 7:16:01 AM (No. 9013067)
I wish I shared the optimism of others that this would lead to Impeachment. But impeachment requires Congressmen and Senators who will uphold the Constitution despite the risk to their personal popularity. This Congress is not capable of leading a parade down MainStreet, USA in Disney world. To expect them to actually do their duty is the height of Hope over Experience.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
pineledger, 11/14/2012 7:21:24 AM (No. 9013078)
And when Petraeus went to Benghazi at the end of October to see for himself, he essentially cooked his own goose, because the Admn. could see that he might not stay in his box.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
cake crumb, 11/14/2012 7:23:32 AM (No. 9013086)
FTA:"If Krauthammer is correct, it´s going to be very interesting to see if and how the Obama-loving media reports it."
Simple: they won´t.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Judith, 11/14/2012 7:29:45 AM (No. 9013096)
Remember that old tale about the scorpion and, how in the end, due to its nature, it stung the victim? And old story but how true today. Obama´s nature is to destroy everyone and anything else to protect himself. And I believe that is the nature of ALL liberals. Destroy this country as long as they get the free stuff.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Really?, 11/14/2012 7:31:24 AM (No. 9013102)
I am very worried for Petraeus. He´s now expendable and his silence would be valuable to the regime. Keep an eye on him. If something happens it will be easy to "blame" the right wing as "angry over his betrayal".
The guy is in big trouble.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 11/14/2012 7:46:51 AM (No. 9013147)
DP is lucky to be vertical right now, I agree...
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Catherine, 11/14/2012 7:48:45 AM (No. 9013152)
Big surprise. Should have known Obama would find a fall guy. As for impeaching him, never happen. Too many scared of this guy - and with good reason. I don´t think we have brave patriots in Washington anymore.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
sorosisbehindit, 11/14/2012 7:51:32 AM (No. 9013164)
The admission of guilt was neither planned by the administration nor Petraeus. The administration was happily going along with a blackmailed general in their pocket to say and do what they told him to say and do. Petraeus was glad to participate, in an effort to protect his legacy and his marriage. Their hand was forced when a "right wing" whistle blower in the FBI went around his boss and let Rep. Cantor find out about this mess. Had it not been for Cantor, Petraeus would have dug in his heels and blackmailed them right back, refusing to go. Near the end the discussion and decision was about whether they could manage to time "the big reveal" to be post election and yet beat the republicans to the microphone with the news. I am sure they were holding their breath as the final days of the election approached, waiting for the shoe to drop. Which may explain some of the defeated/panicked look we saw in Obama´s eyes near the end.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
MOBeef4u, 11/14/2012 7:51:44 AM (No. 9013167)
While this evil cabal could have trumped up something to neutralize Petraeus, he made it easier by leaping into the honey trap. Are there no men or women in power with integrity or morals? And yes, I blame the women as much as the men. I know there are, but some days... (sigh)
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 11/14/2012 7:56:11 AM (No. 9013179)
They are ALL in on it. They ALL knew before the election. They ALL know that if the truth comes out over Benghazi and the cover-up Obama will be impeached, if only by the House. Obama deserves to be stained with the disgrace of impeachment. He is a lousy president. He has lied to the American people just like Nixon and Clinton. He does not deserve better treatment just because of his skin color.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
tappin52, 11/14/2012 7:57:02 AM (No. 9013181)
As to the argument that a man in his position opens himself to the danger of blackmail, who would have believed that the blackmail would have come from his own boss?
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Mermaid1, 11/14/2012 7:58:05 AM (No. 9013183)
The good news is that now that there is sex involved in the Benghazi massacre the media will actually pay attention.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Really?, 11/14/2012 7:58:22 AM (No. 9013185)
The first "rule´ for Congressional Republicans is to NOT put the cart before the horse, that is, do NOT talk about "impeaching" anyone before there is an investigation.
This situation ABSOLUTELY is worthy of an investigation or "audit" by the Congress and whatever is revealed can be taken from there.
It would be completely improper to leave the public wondering if we can trust our Government to be honest with us. Right now, the inconsistencies of the statements made by our President MUST be clarified. We MUST know that we can trust our Commander in Chief.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Danceman, 11/14/2012 8:03:39 AM (No. 9013194)
What happened to their West Point Cadet Honor Code, Patraeus Class of ´74, Broadwell Class of ´95, that "A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal or tolerate those that do?" Wasn´t that oath supposed to hold for life?
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Hugh Akston, 11/14/2012 8:06:02 AM (No. 9013201)
#30 - If we are going to put TRUST and Commander-in-Chief in the same sentence, it will have to be someone other than this FRAUD currently in office or anyone else associated with the current crop of criminals in and abetting this administration.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
suziannr, 11/14/2012 8:10:30 AM (No. 9013211)
We cannot trust the cic. He will not be "stained" by impeachment, were anyone to have the guts to impeach him, anymore than bill clinton is "stained" by his impeachment. I am a normally optimistic, peaceful through faith in my Lord, person who is looking at the landscape of this great country and wondering where do we go from here?
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
MattMusson, 11/14/2012 8:19:24 AM (No. 9013232)
SPECIAL PROSECUTOR!!
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
krause, 11/14/2012 8:30:40 AM (No. 9013257)
If Petraeus can secure his military retirement, he can be free to tell the whole story.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
LZK, 11/14/2012 8:33:16 AM (No. 9013270)
I think impeachment is a bit "much" to hope for -- but -- the "giggle" factor is starting. Each time DC opens it´s mouth the citizens "giggle".....
No one believes DC anymore..... Each citizen is shoring up his/her assets and moving to republican held states. The governors of these states will surely put up a line of defense...
The reality is -- the "gooooberment spongers" need someone to "sponge" from -- and WE the taxpayers are very clever. WE ´re moving our assets and packing up for friendlier states....
Good-bye Illinois....
LZK
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino, 11/14/2012 8:45:36 AM (No. 9013300)
#27 hits the bull´s-eye - - they´re all in on it - - including those valiant warriors, the Pubbies.
Sen. Dine Fine Stein is in full coverup mode - - despite her wide-eyed protestations of innocence - - and the Pubbies will be dragged along on the usual leash.
Anyone expecting consequences from these multiple acts of treason is delusional. All of the perpetrators are pro-abortion - - so all of them will skate away.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Libertygal, 11/14/2012 9:03:37 AM (No. 9013353)
Breaking just now! He is going to voluntarily testify! This is going to be good.
I am more worried than ever for his life, now...
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
walcb, 11/14/2012 9:14:07 AM (No. 9013387)
So if this is true, Petraeus´s honor was compromised due to a sexual fling, not by foreign agents but by our own administration. What a sorry state of affairs we have come to.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
10chuckarnold65, 11/14/2012 9:16:05 AM (No. 9013392)
ok, is there anybody walking around upright, and breathing, who didnt already know this.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 11/14/2012 9:18:55 AM (No. 9013399)
Don´t get too excited, DP may fall on his sword to save 0´s disgusting azz.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 11/14/2012 9:18:56 AM (No. 9013401)
Women seeking importance and self regard by having affairs with powerful men- a la Lewinsky. They usually end up destroying the object.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
AutumnJoy, 11/14/2012 9:20:32 AM (No. 9013408)
In the future, depending upon what comes out, I don´t care whether impeachment is successful or not. I just want to have that option go before congress. I want this guy´s official history to be blemished. Of course an impeachment threat and then resignation would be a dream come true, but I am not that optimistic.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
nonsense, 11/14/2012 9:21:39 AM (No. 9013416)
I think this is absolutely stunning from the man who said very clearly that he does not believe in Conspiracy Theories. Proves that the inside the Beltway types know more about the truth of the corruption than they have been telling us.
Chrissy Mathews has commented that he was shocked at the interplay at the W.H. It seems as if he was referring to the cat fights that go on between ValJar and other females and males in the Obama administration.
The rats truly are sailing the ship of state.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
carolina blue, 11/14/2012 9:26:16 AM (No. 9013431)
First i dont want to say i condone what the god general did concerning the girl. but who amoung us have not lust after the opposite sex. who has not maybe fallen. but I believe the man will do what is right and honorable for the troops and I hope he blows the might O and his gang out of the water with his upcoming testomony before the special committee and I hope he has some good Body Guards as i dont put nothing past this Chicago GANG OF THUGS.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
gobushcheneygo, 11/14/2012 9:32:36 AM (No. 9013457)
The timing of all this "affair" business is just too perfect. What a distraction for the state-run media. No time to investigate the stolen Presidential election, the rampant voter fraud. No sir. That´s all history now. No time to investigate what really happened in Benghazi and who knew what and when. No siree. More important things to uncover. Have to find out all the salacious tidbits for the sex obsessed masses. Priorities, folks!
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Eheu Fugaces, 11/14/2012 9:44:03 AM (No. 9013478)
These are Democrats (or collaborators.) Why is anyone surprised by any of this?
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
jrldev, 11/14/2012 9:54:42 AM (No. 9013501)
Sad but True: The Sad Part: Every comment made here is 99.9% accurate. The True and Real-LIfe Part: The entire congress: Representatives and Senators are worthless when it comes to do what is right for the country. They do what is right for THEM as individuals. That goes for Republicans as well as Democrats.The old saying "TALK IS CHEAP" should be inscribed at the entrance of both houses.
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 11/14/2012 10:00:23 AM (No. 9013521)
Gen. DP has always been an ´academic´ style General. This does not bode well for his ´unvarnished´ testimony.
He may decide to deliver a huge, steaming pile of nuance.
Val-Rod is unlikely to fumble the ball at this critical juncture.
DP, like Ryan & Romney, is crippled by the fact of having a conscience.
Libs play this game unfettered by such silliness.
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
trapper, 11/14/2012 10:12:23 AM (No. 9013563)
My gut tells me not to expect much. While my first thought upon hearing of this scandal was also "blackmail," upon reflection I doubt he needed much coaxing to be persuaded to go along with the Obama fairy tale about demonstrations over a youtube video. He has described himself as a "Rockefeller Republican," so he views conservatives as the enemy and Obama and his crew as just fellow liberals, not as radical leftists. My money says he won´t give them up. My money also says he won´t be asked any useful questions anyway.
They just cut Petraeus´s throat and threw him out of the life raft to attract the sharks while Obama and crew paddle for safer waters. The election was only a WEEK ago and it has been erased from the news in favor of a sex scandal. We are SO easy.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
Pepper Tree, 11/14/2012 10:22:11 AM (No. 9013598)
There is every reason and a good chance for an Obama impeachment. But with a Senate majority of dullards and blowhards led by sociopaths, how does he get removed from office?
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
roger h. cook,MD, 11/14/2012 10:29:10 AM (No. 9013632)
Gee No.2 I wish that could be true, but I don´t beleve it will happen. I can only dream.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 11/14/2012 10:29:33 AM (No. 9013633)
Bwa-hahahaha
I can´t believe how easily "Conservatives" are suckered
It matters not at all if Petraeus "testifies"
Haven´t you figured out what matters are the Questions members of the Congressional committee ask???
The real and everlasting problem will be sitting in front of Petraeus.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/14/2012 10:30:44 AM (No. 9013635)
Petraeus needs to kiss his military retirement good bye #35 - He has already experienced what hoping for loyalty from Obama brings you. His retirement is gone baby gone. If he wants to rebuild his honour and integrity he must start now with telling the truth. Better late than never with a winning strategy!
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
starboard, 11/14/2012 10:31:50 AM (No. 9013639)
I totally agree with Krauthmmer´s assessment. Now that Obama is no longer the CIC of General Petraeu, he needs to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This is the only redeaming factor to this mess. My only fear is a Vince Foster or Ron Brown type of situation. Do the right thing general and tell the truth. the American people will stand behind you.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
OperaBuff, 11/14/2012 10:41:24 AM (No. 9013673)
Quite a twist of fate, to know that General Petraeus was blackmailed for his adulterous affair by none other than the President of the United States.
I love the smell of impeaches in the morning...
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Browneyes, 11/14/2012 10:46:35 AM (No. 9013695)
To my mind,there is one component to this Bengazi story and that is the absence of the name SOS Clinton. She held the "cards" re: all jurisdictions over which she presided. I recall she and her hubby were on a "mini" vacation earlier this year, after which came her decision to resign after the election.
The General, as CIA chief was truly between a rock and a hard place when he echoed HER pronouncement that it was the "mob" meme. His dalliance, not withstanding and his statement that "no one in his department told any one to step down"
We´ll see.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
Aunt Agnes, 11/14/2012 10:49:50 AM (No. 9013708)
Two thoughts - dictators are always brought down BECAUSE of their innate ruthlessness. The people whom they trust to protect their secrets can´t themesleves trust the guy at the top to protect them. Anyone in BO´s cabal knows that he cold-bloodedly turned his back on Amb. Stevens - why would anyone really trust him with their careers or LIVES after that? Also, is the real story here making the generals look foolish & weak so that BO can easily install more moslem-sympathizing generals in their places? Look at how the mid-east is now dominated by the moslem brotherhood. Think the NASA moslem "outreach" program. And one more thing -there has been a lot of excited talk about seccession by more and more states. IF this is for real - it is at the very least, a way to keeps up the pressure on our Feds. They know, now, that they are not so well-loved or trusted & the states might just do something about it. If nothing else, the movement is a bargaining chip - a threat of action - to get states rights back.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
Trust No One, 11/14/2012 10:59:56 AM (No. 9013734)
What would make one think he´ll begin to tell the truth next week?
Under Oath??? Humfffffffff
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 11/14/2012 11:00:19 AM (No. 9013736)
How about testifying to AMERICA, not a closed session of Congress?
I´m tired of recycled, regurgitated almost-truth.
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
EQKimball, 11/14/2012 11:03:04 AM (No. 9013745)
For now he should avoid walks in Ft. Marcy Park.
|
Reply 63 - Posted by:
Papa27, 11/14/2012 11:04:29 AM (No. 9013748)
Advice to the General - don´t accept the invitation to meet at Ft. Marcy Park.
|
Reply 64 - Posted by:
thatsomewhereplace, 11/14/2012 11:45:11 AM (No. 9013854)
I´m becoming more cynical. Had a feeling the admin was screwing around with the general. As for the general. As head of the CIA he should have known the consequences. Like black mail, like giving away secrets to protect his arse. And what to you suppose will become of Barack "Hugo Chavez" 0bama? Not a damn thing will happen. Swept under the persian carpet. Deny deny deny until no one gives a flying you-know-what. Always remember Chris Stevens. Tyrone Jones. Sean Smith. Glenn Dorherty.
|
Reply 65 - Posted by:
little guy, 11/14/2012 11:53:21 AM (No. 9013884)
Seriously, think about this. Could it be the good general is pulling a Samson on Obammy? You destroyed me by playing on my weakness for women --- I lost my strength & I was blinded by it all --- but now I will pull the temple down with you in it!
David P. WAS being blackmailed by none other than people he worked with but he knew it was Obammy himself who was behind it. So what does a real soldier do when he let´s down his own troops? He doesn´t just fall on his own sword if he can kill himself by killing the traitor too. Maybe ... just maybe ... the good general wanted Obammy to win as the only way to really get him.
By resigning the day of the election, and now agreeing to voluntarily testify, the General is sending the message that I am dead ... but so are you! You´re coming with me over the cliff because that is the only way to make things right.
If the General pulls Obama down, he will be a hero again and may realize that it is the only way back into the light from out of his personal darkness. Beware, General, your life many be in danger but I think you know that and now no longer care. Obama destroyed everything you love & hold dear so what do you have to loose now? HOWEVER --- Obama´s entire presidency may be hanging now. This is much more serious than most realize about what is really going on behind the scenes.
|
Reply 66 - Posted by:
Slimepuppy, 11/14/2012 11:56:14 AM (No. 9013889)
...as an avid runner, Petraeus is ALWAYS a potential ´sudden heart attack´ risk....
....much less suspicious than a puffy-pink Breitbarting....
|
Reply 67 - Posted by:
Nevadadad46, 11/14/2012 12:43:40 PM (No. 9014026)
When will the sitting Democrats in the Senate get a belly full? Are they that owned by Øbama? Can they possibly remain men and women of America and go on accepting their status as only kissers of the Charlatan in chief´s posterior? The world wonders.
|
Reply 68 - Posted by:
miceal, 11/14/2012 1:17:38 PM (No. 9014135)
Where I on that Committee, my FIRST question would be "do you remember your West Point oath?" If so, repeat it here and now....
|
Reply 69 - Posted by:
donnaclaire, 11/14/2012 8:45:06 PM (No. 9015015)
Back in the olden days when I worked for a PD in Texas, the gals who liked to hang around the cops were called ´fender lizards´. I guess the women who follow the rock stars are called ´groupies´ and probably worse. Wonder what we should call those who hang around and cultivate the attention of generals? They may be well-educated, well-married and high profile but, in my humble opinion, they still fall into a somewhat dubious category.
|
Reply 70 - Posted by:
get er done, 11/14/2012 10:05:01 PM (No. 9015107)
Thankfully, despite his affair, David Petraeus has many more friends in the military than Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro. Petraeus friends will have his back now that they know BHO/BS was behind the blackmail. The old say, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." Do names like Reggie, Donald come to mind?
David Petraeus is a trained killer. One would think twice about trying to take Petraeus out in the way Brietbart left us. This would lead to a military coup -- those generals have access to big guns and troops. They should seize the billions of rounds of ammo purchased by Homeland Security, Social Security and other agencies.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Senate Committee Poised to Beat Up On Apple
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 10:17:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Steve wrote this morning about a hearing being held this week by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, in which Apple’s CEO, Tim Cook, will testify tomorrow. The subcommittee apparently is trying to highlight supposed tax avoidance on the part of American companies, as the Associated Press reports: Apple Inc. employs a group of affiliate companies located outside the United States to avoid paying billions of dollars in U.S. income taxes, a Senate investigation has found. The world’s most valuable company is holding overseas some $102 billion of its $145 billion in cash, and an Irish
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee Urged Feds to ´Investigate True the Vote´ in 2010
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Brandon Darby
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 10:06:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) asked Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate election integrity org True the Vote and its associated Tea Party group, King Street Patriots, immediately before the IRS and DOJ began targeting the group in June 2010. Rep. Jackson Lee sent a letter to Holder which alleged that True the Vote was intimidating voters and their election monitors were crossing the line in unspecified “instances” of voter intimidation. The letter went on to directly assert that the “alleged events” were factual and that the True the Vote effort was behind the crimes
|
Gunmaker tops list of Massachusetts’ 100 best companies
|
|
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:54:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Gunmaker Smith & Wesson tops the list of best businesses in bright blue Massachusetts — after not making the list at all last year — a new report in the Boston Globe found. The 161-year-old company, based in a state with some of the stricter gun control laws in the nation, tried to diversify its holdings by acquiring a security company in recent years, only to do an “about-face” by focusing on its product line, the newspaper said in its explanation of the Springfield firm’s top spot. “We went back to what we do best, which is handguns,”
|
Justice Department’s scrutiny of Fox News reporter James Rosen in leak case draws fire
|
|
Washington Post, by Ann E. Marimow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:49:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Journalists, First Amendment watchdogs and government transparency advocates reacted with outrage Monday to the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks. Critics said the government’s suggestion that James Rosen, Fox News’s chief Washington correspondent, was a “co-conspirator” for soliciting classified information threatened to criminalize press freedoms protected by the First Amendment. Others also suggested that the Justice Department’s claim in pursuing an alleged leak
|
IRS´s Lerner Had History of Harassment, Inappropriate Religious Inquiries at FEC
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Mark Hemingway
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:30:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Perhaps no other IRS official is more intimately associated with the tax agency´s growing scandal than Lois Lerner, director of the IRS’s Exempt Organizations Division. Since admitting the IRS harassed hundreds of conservative and Tea Party groups for over two years, Lerner has been criticized for a number of untruths—including the revelation that she apparently lied about planting a question at an American Bar Association conference where she first publicly acknowledged IRS misconduct. Still, Lerner has her defenders in the government and the media. Shortly after the scandal broke, The Daily Beast published an article headlined "IRS Scandal’s Central
|
Obama administration mistakes journalism for espionage
|
|
Washington Post, by Eugene Robinson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:24:12 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama administration has no business rummaging through journalists’ phone records, perusing their e-mails and tracking their movements in an attempt to keep them from gathering news. This heavy-handed business isn’t chilling, it’s just plain cold. It also may well be unconstitutional. In my reading, the First Amendment prohibition against “abridging the freedom .?.?. of the press” should rule out secretly obtaining two months’ worth of the personal and professional phone records of Associated Press reporters and editors, including calls to and from the main AP phone number at the House press gallery in the Capitol
|
Tea party looks to take advantage of moment
|
|
Associated Press, by Thomas Beaumont
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 11:02:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DES MOINES, Iowa — Is the tea party getting its groove back? Shouts of vindication from around the country suggest the movement´s leaders certainly think so. They say the IRS acknowledgement that it had targeted their groups for extra scrutiny — a claim that tea party activists had made for years — is helping pump new energy into the coalition. And they are trying to use that development, along with the ongoing controversy over the Benghazi, Libya, terrorist attacks and the Justice Department´s secret seizure of journalists´ phone records, to recruit new activists incensed about government overreach.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|