A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Time for a new Republican Party
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Time for a new Republican Party
Washington Times, by Joseph Curl

Original Article

Posted By:garnet, 11/12/2012 11:19:38 AM

The Republican Party did not lose last Tuesday´s election. It was obliterated, crushed, slaughtered, massacred, squashed, annihilated — and, let’s hope, extinguished. For the party of Lincoln, it’s been a week of sifting through the carnage: What went wrong? How could a party that just a decade ago controlled all of government have been so completely nullified that an incumbent Democrat who was quite possibly the worst president in a century handily defeated the Republican nominee? The soul searching followed the standard stages of grief: There was denial.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: michellewsc2, 11/12/2012 11:33:40 AM     (No. 9008948)

The only problem with the Republican party was not standing up to the massive voter fraud we all know took place on Nov, 6 2012.


Reply 2 - Posted by: snowcloud, 11/12/2012 11:37:42 AM     (No. 9008955)

They don´t fight against Leftists, only their own. Look at what they did to Sarah Palin and Allen West. There are plenty more but I can´t think of them right now.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: curious1, 11/12/2012 11:38:21 AM     (No. 9008957)

Umm, Joseph, you´re talking about things that aren´t enshrined in the constitution, they´re discovered in emanations from the penumbra of the constitution. Not the same thing at all. And communists cheating to win an election isn´t the same as failing to sell a message. The turn-out showed people understood; those who counted the votes decided to vaporize votes for Romney and pad the votes for Capt Zippy, it´s that simple and blatant.


Reply 4 - Posted by: horacer, 11/12/2012 11:40:10 AM     (No. 9008961)

The impending monetary and fiscal collapse will take care of everything. Democrats can be the party of inflation, debt, and misery - Republicans the party of austerity, limited government and riots.


Reply 5 - Posted by: F16 guy, 11/12/2012 11:51:22 AM     (No. 9008977)

I am now convinced that a DEM will win again in 2016. I see no way the R´s can regain any momentum as long as they continue to preach fiscal conservatism, and taking away "free stuff" from the voters.

Reducing food stamps useage- HAH!
Making people search for work in order to get welfare- HAH!
Limiting welfare to 26 weeks-HAH!
Taking away the Obamaphones-HAH!

and on and on..............

We´re screwed !


Reply 6 - Posted by: LittleHoodedMonk, 11/12/2012 11:55:01 AM     (No. 9008981)

In an article I posted yesterday, I stated that there are many issues [abortion, feminism, gay rights, illegal immigration and race] that we have allowed the dRATS to smoke-screen their dumb-down their voters in every election I can remember. The real issues of the economy, murder of Ambassador Stevens and three others and immediate disinformation from the White House about them in Benghazi, Iran and their nuclear quest, EU folding under weight of socialism, debt and high unemployment, Supreme Court picks, Al Qaeda resurgence, etc.

I am a ´´Hispanic´´ GOP voter who assimilated since birth and yet people I tried to speak to turned their head away from any discussion prior to election about it. Especially minorities. I see the same lack of community in the Catholic Church, unless you follow their actions and try not to ´´lead.´´

I follow certain basic beliefs, after years of Church-going and soul-searching: One is that we are all blessed by the treasure of Love by God giving each of US Life. And, it´s how we share that Love with others along the journey of Life that we will meet final Judgment.

If you think ´´sex & politics´´ should not be done in conversations, how would you discuss the current affairs of General Petraeus and his betrayal in Benghazi and ultimately the American people? Oh, get rid of the dRATS issues and maybe we can final face the ´´real´´ ones.


Reply 7 - Posted by: trapper, 11/12/2012 11:56:34 AM     (No. 9008986)

Vastly premature. We haven´t even watched the game film yet. Too early to be talking trades.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Iowadad, 11/12/2012 11:57:55 AM     (No. 9008991)

The Rebublican party should reform itself not by currying favor with every Tom, Dick and Juarez, but by promulgating the unvarnished truth.

It must systematiclly debunk the leftist garbage coming from the media and academia, and be sure that everyone knows the peril we (and all of Western Civilization) face if we don´t take painful but effective action to balance the budget.


Reply 9 - Posted by: sfacheem, 11/12/2012 12:06:41 PM     (No. 9009008)

I´ve grown tired of this kind of hysterical over-reaction.

For God´s sake, it was one election. Suck it up and win the next one. Just two years ago I was reading about the "demise of American liberalism". Now we have to destroy the Republican Party and remake it again? No. We need to increase our voice and presence through the grass roots ala the Tea Party and run it better, that´s all.


Reply 10 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 11/12/2012 12:07:04 PM     (No. 9009010)

@#2: The RNC ignored Michele Bachmann also. She barely squeaked by this election cycle. She may not be so lucky in 2014.

It is shameful how the GOP treats its membership. Supposedly 3 million republicans stayed home on Nov. 6th. Personally, I don`t think they care. They seem to be content living in 2nd place. Even when they win they act like losers.

Welcome to California everyone.


Reply 11 - Posted by: JoniTx, 11/12/2012 12:11:53 PM     (No. 9009014)

We´ve gone through these cycles before. Way too early to talk like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: noproblems, 11/12/2012 12:16:27 PM     (No. 9009020)

Time for new political parties. Republicans and Democrats got us to $16 trillion in debt and cultural rot.

I still think this is past election may be similar to the election of 1856; hopefully without civil war on the horizon. The election of 1860 was the first election that a republican won. The election of 2016 should be the election of a Tea PArty president.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: pearlyjo, 11/12/2012 12:21:49 PM     (No. 9009028)

The opportunity to convert the other side is right before us. Are we up to the challenge? There is an economic, security and cultural disaster looming (actually blooming). We should never let a disaster to waste either.
I´ve begun my own little listening tour with co-workers and neighbors. I work in hospitality, so lots of Hispanics, Asians and black associates. Starting out slow, they are still on a sugar high, so to speak, from last week, but I figure as we approach Christmas the scales may begin to fall from their eyes.


Reply 14 - Posted by: iamtinman, 11/12/2012 12:28:19 PM     (No. 9009040)

What a pile of steaming excrement by a writer who should know better. 10 million fewer voters came to the polls this last election. The number of college age students who were actively ccourted by the left was a major determinent in the final result. The GOP didn´t lose because it had the wrong message, it lost because the democrats ran a better ground game and the Republicans are still learning how.

While the GOP should and will try to extend its message to Hispanic, Black, Asian Americans and the new voters, it won´t change its vision of America at the cost of losing the values which differentiate it from the democrats. Candidates like Rubio, Jindal, West, and Martinez will help diversify the GOP base without having to dilute the message.


Reply 15 - Posted by: addicted_to_coffee, 11/12/2012 12:30:39 PM     (No. 9009045)

Why should anyone vote for the current crop of Republicans when they can vote for the real Democrat in the race?

Republicans will lose again and again if they can´t articulate a positive difference between themselves and the Dems AND the reasons behind the differences.

Educate your children.


Reply 16 - Posted by: mathman, 11/12/2012 12:36:02 PM     (No. 9009057)

It is time for the failed leaders to be put out of the party.
Where is Trump when we need him?
Rove? You are fired.
Limbaugh: you are fired.
Hannity: you are fired.
All the Romney handlers: you are fired. No more campaigns for you.

But the entrenched chattering class of Pubbies will cling to power, as was true in the 1970s. Better to be in office as a minority than to yield to a new generation.

Those in control of the party in 2012 failed. Whether it was the failure to coalesce after Romney cinched the nomination, defend Romney from the scurrilous lies of Obama, insist on precinct workers in every precinct, insist on lawyers to be available when said precinct workers were ejected, organize car pools for voters, guarantee our rights as voters by Voter ID laws (I was disenfranchised by fraud), or fail to find a compromise with the tea party, the leaders failed.

Such failure must be rewarded with expulsion. If they can´t do the job, hire someone else.

Our elections are no longer fair. Cheating is rampant, and will not be investigated. There is no fix short of a new party.


Reply 17 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 11/12/2012 12:44:57 PM     (No. 9009077)

Yeah, it was a painful loss, but Romney got 48% of the popular vote. Do you really want to throw that all away? Republicans made some mistakes but it wasn´t a massacre. Learn from your mistakes and carry on to fight another day.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: dwa, 11/12/2012 12:54:22 PM     (No. 9009100)

With supposed "conservatives" like Curl, Noonan, Crystal, etc, the Republican party will never be truly conservative.


Reply 19 - Posted by: surgedr, 11/12/2012 1:00:19 PM     (No. 9009123)

I disagree with those who think the ´rats are going to continue to win. Even David Plouffe when asked about his get out of the vote organization and will work in 2016? said NO, we had the right candidate for this to work. It won´t be as effective with another candidate other than Obama! i.e. Biden.

Republicans have stronger, younger, more charismatic candidates and Mr. Obama unless I´m severely mistaken can never run again!

Anyway by the time 2014 roll around the Dems will be owning this terrible economy..and these young people, young women and Latinos don´t vote in off year elections, we will take the Senate and we will win in 2016!


Reply 20 - Posted by: Cleanhousein2012, 11/12/2012 1:16:55 PM     (No. 9009152)

15 - you are right.

20 - you are overlooking the number of voters (and participants) the GOP has lost this election. The "hold your nose, ABDem meme" has lost its effectiveness.. And the GOP is going to struggle mightily (if it can overcome it) to get folks like me to EVER support the Republican candidate or work for them again. I will invest and work for specific candidates or a different party, but am done with GOP, and know many like me, If You are going to represent me by acting like a Democrat, I might as well just vote for the Democrat.


Reply 21 - Posted by: attymitch, 11/12/2012 1:28:47 PM     (No. 9009182)

This is absurd. The election was close. A few changes in a few key states and it goes the other way. Obama failed, but the media let him get away with it and his ads denied the truth, and it worked. The answer isn´t giving in, it´s getting even. Now, more than ever, the GOP needs to stick to principles and remain a very vocal opposition.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Gale, 11/12/2012 1:34:33 PM     (No. 9009196)

Every state governed by a Republican must have a vigorous Voter Fraud program and have voting machines that produce a paper vote receipt for each ballot cast. Be ready for 2014.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: JHHolliday, 11/12/2012 1:59:04 PM     (No. 9009249)

I am sick of being told by those on the left that we have to change. By that they mean go left and become a permanent second place party.

I vote Reublican because their candidates come the closest to my views. I still believe abortion for convenience is murder and am damned well not going to change because it might get more votes or it´s the ´with it´ and progressive view.

I have heard all this ´magnanimous´ advice from the leftists before but the Republican Party has never won and never will win trying to be a lesser version of the Democrats. I´ll stick with what I believe, thanks, or go down with the ship if that´s the way it has to be.


Reply 24 - Posted by: bluefindad, 11/12/2012 2:05:31 PM     (No. 9009268)

Second, gay marriage. On this, simply — who cares? America 2012 has enormous problems. Is this really an issue that matters to — anyone? Christians, two men getting married doesn’t affect your marriage in any way. Get over it.

First, if the author thinks that I, and a vast number of Christian voters will support anyone who openly advocates gay marriage, he is delusional. This is a moral issue - a character issue.

Second, is the author actually believes that there is no fiscal impact from destroying our moral infrastructure, he is more than delusional. The further degradation of the sanctity of marriage will continue to destroy families. Marriage will become a matter of temporal convenience. Divorce rates will accelerate, and the cost of divorce will add to our social burden. Further, policies that economically favor marriage will have to be rescinded because so many will marry solely for economic benefit.

Finally, abortion must be recognized as a critical boundary, a redoubt demarking our resistance to the devaluation of human life that threatens to become the hallmark of the ´managed society´. People like Holdren, who believe that animals and humans are equivalent and should be equally ´humanely´ treated, will fall to Peter Singer´s philosophy of the humane allocation of resources. Human life will be weighed according to measures established by ´death panels´ and extinguished or allowed to continue accordingly. All of this begins with our attitude toward abortion. Once we accept abortion, our slide down this slippery slope will inevitably accelerate.


Reply 25 - Posted by: gmoore, 11/12/2012 2:22:16 PM     (No. 9009315)

Either there are real differences between Liberals and Conservatives, or members of each party are interchangeable parts and it doesn´t matter which one the public chooses.

Sounds like some of the Republican pundits are suggesting that the Republican Party needs to become "Democrat-lite" to win more voters. That only succeeds if the Conservatives in the Republican Party are prepared to sacrifice the core values of conservatism.

Conservatives need to clearly define their core principles which make them different from liberals in BOTH PARTIES. Making that case that the conservative approach is better for everybody needs to be the focus when discussing the issues every day and with each election.

Conservatives also need to recognize that some people will never accept these principles, and that the Conservatives will lose elections because of this. Better to lose while true to your conservative principles than to win by sacrificing your principles on the liberal altar of convenience.


Reply 26 - Posted by: maitaisoo, 11/12/2012 2:33:50 PM     (No. 9009340)

I really wish that Obama tests the 22nd Amendment in 2016... run for a 3rd term. Why shouldn´t he?

I would bet good money that the voters re-elect him again with the LSM´s complicity. This happens and it will finally prove beyond a doubt how "stuck-on-stupid" the US voter really is.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Axeman, 11/12/2012 3:04:42 PM     (No. 9009407)

Time for a more Constitutional, America loving party.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 11/12/2012 5:13:53 PM     (No. 9009601)

Nonsense. The purpose of the Republican Party is to oppose the evil Democratic Party. It ain´t brain surgery; whoever they put up to run the country, you vote for the other guy. I would have voted for Jo-Jo the dog-faced boy before letting Obama win.

Heaven preserve us from know nothings, and do nothings and feeble whiners.



Post Reply   Close thread 711699




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"



Has the IRS Already Seized
Your Medical Records?
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 5/20/2013 6:46:32 AM     Post Reply
As gratifying as it was to see the “news” media actually do its job last week when the IRS scandal broke, it was also odd that the coverage focused exclusively on abuses of power relating to various Tea Party and anti-abortion groups. A much scarier IRS story has been virtually ignored by the establishment press. On Wednesday, it was reported that a class-action lawsuit had been filed against a group of IRS agents who, according to the complaint filed by “John Doe Company” in the Southern District of California, “stole more than 60,000,000 medical records of more than 10,000,000 Americans

Kathleen Sebelius dances
on an ethical line
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 5/19/2013 10:45:45 AM     Post Reply
ONE OF THE BIGGEST questions hanging over the health-care system is how many young Americans will sign up for coverage once the Affordable Care Act begins to phase in this October. If too few buy insurance on the markets that the government is creating, insurance companies would be stuck covering primarily the the old and the sick. They would have to pay out more per customer. Their customers, in turn, would have to pay more to those companies for coverage. The stakes for the Health and Human Services Department, which is overseeing the transition, are tremendous.

This is not the President Obama
we voted for
Guardian [UK], by Heather Long    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 5/19/2013 10:35:41 AM     Post Reply
You can argue that Republicans have blocked President Obama from doing just about anything. You can argue that he´s had bad luck. You can argue that he isn´t always the greatest orator. But you can´t argue away that the Department of Justice took the unprecedented step of seizing phone records from the Associated Press. Or the flimsy rationale justifying drone attacks abroad and at home. Or the bizarre step the Pentagon has taken to expand the ability of the military (Snip) These are actions that President Obama and his top team have taken on their own.

The Benghazi Emails´ Backside-Covering
Washington Post Writers Group, by David Ignatius    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 5/19/2013 10:27:43 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON -- The hundred pages of Benghazi emails released last week tell us almost nothing about how four Americans came to die so tragically in that Libyan city. But they are a case study in why nothing works in Washington. Rather than reading these messages for their substance on Benghazi (on which officials were still basically clueless three days after the attack), try perusing them as an illustration of how the bureaucracy responds to crisis -- especially when officials know they will be under the media spotlight.

Justifiable Cause
Slate, by John Dickerson    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 5/16/2013 7:25:16 AM     Post Reply
It must get confusing in the IT department at the Associated Press: Are you talking about the hackers who hacked our Twitter account or the Justice Department hackers who hacked our phones? Monday, the Associated Press reported that the Justice Department had secretly obtained two months of records of phone conversations by its reporters. Meanwhile, the Washington Post revealed that the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups was more widespread than first reported. (Snip)The Obama administration is doing a far better job making the case for conservatism than Mitt Romney, Mitch McConnell, or John Boehner ever did.

IRS official Lerner speedily
approved exemption for Obama
brother’s‘charity’
Daily Caller, by Charles C. Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 5/14/2013 7:50:27 PM     Post Reply
Lois Lerner, the senior IRS official at the center of the decision to target tea party groups for burdensome tax scrutiny, signed paperwork granting tax-exempt status to the Barack H. Obama Foundation, a shady charity headed by the president’s half-brother that operated illegally for years. According to the organization’s filings, Lerner approved the foundation’s tax status within a month of filing, an unprecedented timeline that stands in stark contrast to conservative organizations that have been waiting for more than three years, in some cases, for approval.

The Grand Old Poseurs
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 5/13/2013 6:47:01 AM     Post Reply
Last week, Speaker of the House John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell ostentatiously announced their intention to fight implementation of the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). They sent a letter to the President decrying the way IPAB will “impact America’s seniors … in the absence of the democratic process.” Sadly, the exercise was a charade. McConnell and Boehner know perfectly well that Obama has no intention of setting up this controversial board until after 2015.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement


Post Reply   Close thread 711699





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~