A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The Petraeus Affair
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The Petraeus Affair
American Spectator, by Jed Babbin

Original Article

Posted By:garnet, 11/12/2012 7:50:05 AM

It´s such a cliché. A powerful man, away from home for years at a time, in jobs that put him under enormous emotional strain. A younger woman, attached to him by her job, spending endless hours with him on and off duty. That they fell into a love affair is so ordinary as to be boring. What makes the sudden fall of CIA Director David H. Petraeus different? Nothing, really, except perhaps the timing of his defenestration, and even that is only mildly suspicious. Petraeus had almost disappeared from sight after his move to the CIA last year.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: pineledger, 11/12/2012 7:55:32 AM     (No. 9008442)

I urge you all to Google "YouTube Denver Alumni Symposium 2012 Paula Broadwell" and watch the video before they take it down. The URL is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPaf5OJSskY

A number of interesting things come out there, among them the information that Petraeus was being passed over for Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and that HE was the one who suggested he head up the CIA.


Reply 2 - Posted by: hardhead, 11/12/2012 7:58:24 AM     (No. 9008445)

FTA´ Unless congressional Republicans are complete idiots, they will get his testimony early next year.´ There is nothing to suggest that they are NOT complete idiots.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 11/12/2012 8:02:57 AM     (No. 9008451)

I thought these people worked for us and for the benefit of the U.S.

Turns out neither we the people or even the congress are allowed to know what in the wide, wide world of sports is going on.


Reply 4 - Posted by: CEP, 11/12/2012 8:19:23 AM     (No. 9008472)

Who took care of her children? Wasn´t her husband the least bit concerned?


Reply 5 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 11/12/2012 8:22:27 AM     (No. 9008477)

´Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.´
- Proverbs 16:18


Reply 6 - Posted by: dreedle, 11/12/2012 8:31:19 AM     (No. 9008499)

As soon as I got to the word "defenestration" I stopped reading.


Reply 7 - Posted by: pinger, 11/12/2012 8:34:30 AM     (No. 9008505)

You know....the irony of the Bengazi "investigation" is that no matter what are determined to be the facts around the attack(and of course, we all know that the investigation was completed within 8 or 10 days of Sept. 11), can we now really trust the government....or the media....to tell we the people the true and real story? I think not.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 11/12/2012 8:36:59 AM     (No. 9008508)

First, easy rule of DC political scandals: as long as the Clintons are around, suspect them first.


Reply 9 - Posted by: lakerman1, 11/12/2012 8:51:03 AM     (No. 9008535)

Paula was not attached to Petreus because of her job.. That is a lie.
Petraeus was speaking at Harvard, she was in the audience, he gave her his card, and told her to call him. And she probably smiled, breathed deeply, thrust her breasta at him...and the romance novel began.
Then the lebanese babe horned in on Paula´s territory, and Paula lost it.
I think that may be the correct story, although there may be more women involved..


Reply 10 - Posted by: LanieLou, 11/12/2012 9:33:44 AM     (No. 9008623)

1) Petraeus challenged the Obama strategy as illegal.

2) Paula enlisted to seduce general for blackmailing.

3) The Lebanese babe enlisted to act as cover for conduit to the FBI... to muddy the trail of how they got involved.


Reply 11 - Posted by: AGGW, 11/12/2012 9:39:58 AM     (No. 9008644)

#6 got further than I. I couldn´t get past "love affair."
Affairs are not love affairs; they are lust affairs.


Reply 12 - Posted by: steveracer, 11/12/2012 9:51:07 AM     (No. 9008681)

For reasons unknown to me, the first thing I thought of was that wacky astronuatrix some years back who travelled across country non stop wearing a diaper to warn off another woman not to mess with her man. That wasn´t Paula, what it?!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 11/12/2012 10:03:41 AM     (No. 9008721)

That speech is from an intelligent and capable woman who got caught up in the grasp of lust. The life of a warrior and the separation from family and friends for months and years at a time takes its toll.

What a tragedy for her and her family and their hopes for the future. What a loss, hopefully temporary for a woman who can be a real asset to this country.

There are going to be horrible hits on her and Petraeus on this thread and others, and rightfully so. At these levels of security it is not tolerable, but in the overall view of humanity it is understandable. And the women who constantly lambast the men/horndogs gotta remember there´s very often a woman involved if not flaunting their wares. And that´s not to excuse.


Reply 14 - Posted by: fed-up, 11/12/2012 10:19:23 AM     (No. 9008766)

It´s not the affair .... its the timing and the testimony. As many who know how things are done, this is something that had to have been known many months ago. Long before Bengazi. He came out with the statement that it was the video too soon, but then later made sure that it was known that no one at CIA ever turned down request for help.. I thought at the time it was kind of a convoluted statement, but now I can see it clearer.
Obama (or his handlers)stalled out the story till after the election but held this affair over his head for hopes he would be discredited. And so far its working. Shame on folks for falling for it!


Reply 15 - Posted by: Felixcat, 11/12/2012 10:56:16 AM     (No. 9008859)

If Petraeus does testify - he´ll plead the Fifth.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 11/12/2012 1:27:42 PM     (No. 9009181)

The comments here stretch the meaning of "ludicrous.". I am not going to dignify them with an explanation. Thank you in advance for not insisting.


Reply 17 - Posted by: bighambone, 11/12/2012 10:19:57 PM     (No. 9010134)

Have you ever heard of a 4 star general taking the fifth before the Congress?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: pigop, 11/12/2012 10:26:37 PM     (No. 9010145)

#17 There is always a first time for everything.



Post Reply   Close thread 711665




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"



Do You Trust This Man?
National Journal, by Ron Fournier    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/18/2013 8:46:19 AM     Post Reply
There is a common element to the so-called Obama scandals—the IRS targeting of conservatives, the fatal attack in Benghazi, and widespread spying on U.S. journalists and ordinary Americans. It is a lack of credibility. In each case, the Obama administration has helped make controversies worse by changing its stories, distorting facts, and lying. The abuse of trust may be taking a toll on President Obama´s reputation. A CNN/ORC poll of 1,104 adult Americans June 11-13 shows the president´s job approval rating at 45 percent, down 8 percentage points in a month. Among young voters, only 48 percent approve of the president´s performance,

No Need to Rewrite History,
Mr. President
Real Clear Politics, by Carl M. Cannon    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/17/2013 7:49:39 PM     Post Reply
In a sign of our (not very civil) times, Michelle Obama was heckled at a recent Democratic Party fundraiser by a perturbed lesbian activist, Ellen Sturtz. The first lady seemed ruffled. "One of the things I don´t do well is this," she said, as she left the podium, moving toward the protester. Looking at Sturtz, but addressing the crowd, Mrs. Obama said, "You can listen to me or you can take the mic, but I´m leaving. You all decide. You have one choice."

When Lying Is Acceptable,
The Public Loses
Associated Press, by Liz Sidoti    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/17/2013 7:44:14 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — A member of Congress asks the director of national intelligence if the National Security Agency collects data on millions of Americans. "No, sir," James Clapper responds. Pressed, he adds a caveat: "Not wittingly." Then, NSA programs that do precisely that are disclosed.It turns out that President Barack Obama´s intelligence chief lied. Or as he put it last week: "I responded in what I thought was the most truthful or least most untruthful manner, by saying, ´No,´ because the program was classified."

   

 



 
Privacy Isn´t All We´re Losing
Wall Street Journal, by Peggy Noonan    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/14/2013 12:26:17 PM     Post Reply
The U.S. surveillance state as outlined and explained by Edward Snowden is not worth the price. Its size, scope and intrusiveness, its ability to target and monitor American citizens, its essential unaccountability—all these things are extreme. The purpose of the surveillance is enhanced security, a necessary goal to say the least. The price is a now formal and agreed-upon acceptance of the end of the last vestiges of Americans´ sense of individual distance and privacy from the government. The price too is a knowledge, based on human experience and held by all but fools and children,

Liberalism Is Bankrupt
American Spectator, by Marta H. Mossburg    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/14/2013 6:09:28 AM     Post Reply
The high priests of liberalism must be tossing and turning in their organic cotton bedding and downing more small-batch artisanal whisky each night trying to cope with the abject failure of their cause. They know, even if the masses do not yet fully understand, that their worldview no longer makes sense in light of scandal after scandal in Washington and that the end result could be a great, if slow, deconversion on the scale of the millions who no longer believe in the Christianity its philosophy replaced.

You Thought You Had Privacy
Before the NSA Leak?
What About Facebook?
Daily Beast, by Michael Daly    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/13/2013 7:44:25 AM     Post Reply
Your privacy has already been invaded by Facebook and the other tech giants that collected the data in the first place. If the government is turning to Big Brother in an effort to safeguard the homeland, then the tech companies are Rich Uncles, intent on getting ever richer. And for Facebook and the others, data translate to advertising dollars. Click on the word “privacy” at the bottom of “your” Facebook page and you are told, “We receive data about you whenever you interact with Facebook,

Self-Proclaimed Economic Wizards
American Spectator, by Ralph R. Reiland    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 6/11/2013 1:28:41 PM     Post Reply
With the U.S. economy in its slowest job-market recovery since World War II and still 2.6 million jobs short from its payroll peak in January 2008, it’s good to hear there’s finally someone in the Obama administration who says he knows how to jump-start an economy. On May 26, Secretary of State John Kerry announced at the World Economic Forum in Jordan that he’s been working with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair on a “transformative” economic plan that could grow the Palestinian economy by an astounding 50 percent in three years.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Edward Snowden Is In The
Process Of Destroying Any Support
And Sympathy He Has Built Up

47 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM     Post Reply
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information

Barbara Walters Defends Maher
Calling Trig Palin Retarded:
‘I Don´t Think He Intended
it to be Mean-Spirited’

45 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by John Nolte    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM     Post Reply
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?

Who is he? Obama keeps allies,
enemies guessing in second term

44 replie(s)
The Hill, by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: ketchuplover- 6/17/2013 6:31:12 AM     Post Reply
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is. Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric? Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations. His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue.

Jeb Bush labels conservative
critics ‘the chirpers’

44 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM     Post Reply
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative

Rubio Aide: ‘There Are American
Workers Who, For Lack of a
Better Term, Can’t Cut It’

42 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Rich Lowry    Original Article
Posted By: trapper- 6/16/2013 11:18:45 PM     Post Reply
Politico’s Playbook has an excerpt from a new Ryan Lizza piece from the New Yorker that is not yet online. It contains a passage on the back-and-forth between labor and the Chamber that has a quote from a Rubio staffer that is going to raise eyebrows, to say the least: “There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.” Here is the entire context:

Iran to send 4,000 troops to
support President Assad in
Syria as British Armed Forces
play war games on border

38 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Suzannah Hills    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/16/2013 11:08:12 PM     Post Reply
Iran is preparing to send 4,000 troops in to Syria to support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in the wake of America´s announcement it will be providing ´military aid´ to the country´s Muslim rebels. President Barack Obama made the pledge earlier this week after the U.S. claimed it found ´conclusive evidence´ Assad´s regime has used chemical weapons against the rebel forces--which includes the most extreme Sunni Islamists--and has called for Britain and France to back the move. While Britain hasn´t made a guarantee either way as yet, more than 350 Royal Marines are being sent to Jordan

Marco Rubio doesn´t
know if ´he´s getting
played´ by Democrats

37 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/17/2013 6:42:44 AM     Post Reply
Is Marco Rubio, R-Fla., getting played by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.? During his interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl this morning, Rubio didn’t even seem to understand what that meant. “Are you being played by the Democrats?” asked Karl. “Is Chuck Schumer playing you?” “I don’t — I quite frankly, I don’t even know what that means,” Rubio replied. “Is he using you?” Karl continued. “Is he using you to try to accomplish something that the Democrats want and is not — not a conservative bill?” Rubio responded that immigration reform was a bi-partisan issue that “all Americans

   

Post Reply   Close thread 711665





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~