A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Sick veterans wait for Obama’s promise
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Sick veterans wait for Obama’s promise
Washington Times, by John Solomon

Original Article

Posted By:garnet, 11/12/2012 7:41:02 AM

It was one of the simplest, most poignant promises Barack Obama made in 2008 in his first campaign for the White House: He would fulfill “a sacred trust with our veterans” by significantly reducing the government’s lengthy backlog of pending claims for disability coverage. The goal: All veterans could get a decision on disability claims within 125 days. But on this Veterans Day, as Mr. Obama prepares for his second term, the president’s pledge not only remains unfulfilled, it has become a rallying cry for sick veterans,

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: idahospanky, 11/12/2012 8:00:19 AM     (No. 9008449)

I am a veteran, West Pointer, US Navy submariner, and I know I have back problems that are directly related to an injury sustained in the submarine service that has plagued me for over 25 years, but I will never apply for veterans disability benefits because there are so many more deserving veterans that I cannot in good conscience take something from someone who gave so much more to their country in the defense of our liberties. My father, who died 4 years ago next February, had lung cancer attributed to agent orange. He was 100 % disabled veteran and received his benefits and is survived by my mom. Zero made another empty promise to true patriots. He should be tried for treason for crimes against the Constitution, and any true patriot and relative of a veteran should do everything in their power to see Zero impeached for anything.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: CEP, 11/12/2012 8:20:06 AM     (No. 9008473)

He said yesterday that he was keeping this promise?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: idahospanky, 11/12/2012 8:22:34 AM     (No. 9008478)

Like all of his other promises.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: CEP, 11/12/2012 8:34:37 AM     (No. 9008506)

Yes

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: lakerman1, 11/12/2012 8:53:35 AM     (No. 9008542)

I´m covered by the VA, and have nothing but good things to say about the care providers.
The administrators are a different matter. They are bureaucratic beyond belief. And each minor administrator seems to build his or her own little kingdom.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: iamtinman, 11/12/2012 9:18:00 AM     (No. 9008585)

Why would anyone, especially veterans, trust this government to do anything? This thugocracy is dedicated to taking from those who earn and giving to those who want as long as they support the leftist in the white house. Veterans are not included in that group. It´s a national disgrace and in a just world would create a nationwide outcry but in Washington these days "sacred trusts" aren´t valid more than 5 minutes after the votes are counted.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: frenesi1, 11/12/2012 11:29:39 AM     (No. 9008942)

Americans put Obama back in office. They don´t care about Veterans.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Coy860, 11/12/2012 11:35:52 AM     (No. 9008951)

Or their widows. My spouse died of service connected illness. It has been one year since I applied for widow´s benefits, and for reimbursement of his final expenses. I am still waiting. Every 3 months I receive a letter telling me they are "working" on the claim.
He applied in 2007 and was finally rated Feb. 2012..3 months after he died.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: idahospanky, 11/12/2012 11:47:03 AM     (No. 9008972)

My father had similar experience with his benefits and it took almost two years for her to receive her death benefits after my dad´s passing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: galbaccr, 11/12/2012 6:53:29 PM     (No. 9009778)

#6 - Our local VA clinic had a really bad (typical) administrator. Arrogant and a real thorn in the side of both the caregivers and the vets. There were lots of complaints and, apparently enough of them that they finally moved this person elsewhere (they never fire them, I suspect). The new administrator was apparently aware of his predecessor´s reputation and probable reason for transfer. He has been super kind and gets along well with everyone. These admins cannot fix overall VA problems themselves (they are just one cog in the bureaucracy - but they can at least not add to the problems or not impede the solutions by not being a pain in everyone´s rear.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment



Post Reply   Close thread 711664




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "garnet"



President Obama, disregarding his
own red line, dithers on Ukraine
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 4/22/2014 9:19:52 AM     Post Reply
After an agreement to “de-escalate tensions and restore security” in Ukraine was announced Thursday, Secretary of State John F. Kerry was very explicit about U.S. expectations. “We fully expect the Russians?.?.?. to demonstrate their seriousness by insisting that the pro-Russian separatists who they’ve been supporting lay down their arms [and] leave the buildings” in eastern Ukraine, he said. “I made clear to Foreign Minister [Sergei] Lavrov today that if we are not able to see progress?.?.?. this weekend, then we will have no choice but to impose further costs on Russia.” The weekend has come and gone, and far from

   

 

B-G1


 
Kicking the Keystone can
Boston Herald, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 4/22/2014 9:14:28 AM     Post Reply
Any notion that the Obama administration might be taking its deliberations over the proposed Keystone XL pipeline seriously went up in smoke late Friday, when the State Department announced a delay that will push a final decision past the November midterm elections. It was a weekend news dump on steroids — on Good Friday, buried under the weight of so many chocolate Easter bunnies. But the White House cannot avoid scrutiny of such a nakedly political decision — not given the stakes. The delay will please the liberal activists and wealthy green elites who propel Democratic campaigns. But it will do so at

Why Democrats Are the
Party of Inequality
The Federalist, by Robert Tracinski    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 4/22/2014 9:05:48 AM     Post Reply
So now we know why the Democrats are adopting economic inequality as their central issue: because their constituents, the people who live under policies crafted by the left, are the ones who experience the highest degree of income inequality in their own lives. That’s the upshot of a recent study of income inequality organized by congressional district: “Across the country, inequality is lower in Republican districts than in Democratic ones” and is “highest in the New York City district of Representative Jerry Nadler, a liberal Democrat.” Who has the congressional district with the least income inequality? That would be Tea Party

Mrs. Clinton’s New Memoir
Wall Street Journal, by Peggy Noonan    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 4/22/2014 8:56:03 AM     Post Reply
Yesterday on a panel on “Face the Nation,” we briefly discussed Hillary Clinton’s forthcoming memoir of her four years as secretary of state. It is called “Hard Choices”—they appear to be running low at the book-title store—and will be published June 10. The announcement of the title alone made news, which is a measure of how much interest the book, good or bad, will engender. Books are good and it’s good to write them; the always more or less beleaguered publishing industry needs bestsellers, and Mrs. Clinton has provided them, most spectacularly with her previous memoir, “Living History,” in 2003.

Obama´s Good News Isn´t
Getting Across
Bloomberg, by Albert R. Hunt    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 4/21/2014 10:03:24 AM     Post Reply
Here´s a bit of good news for nervous Democrats: President Barack Obama´s health-care law isn´t going to be the albatross many feared it would be in this year´s congressional elections. Enrollment has soared, and the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the program will cost less than initially projected and that premiums will rise only slightly this year. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid aren´t popping the Champagne, however. The economy could clobber Democrats in November. And the president continues to alternate between telling Americans how much better things are and deploring how many are being left

Don´t Believe the Spin,
Obamacare Is Still a Loser
Creators Syndicate, by Scott Rasmussen    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 4/21/2014 9:15:01 AM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama announced triumphantly that 8 million people selected a private insurance plan through the health care exchanges created by legislation known as Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act. He added his own interpretation of the numbers: "This thing is working." At the same time, however, Democratic candidates across the country still see the health care law as a drag on their campaigns in the midterm elections. After four years of trying, there is still no evidence that the president´s signature piece of legislation has become popular. If the law was really working, and voters were excited about it, Democratic

   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
‘Obamacare is Working!’
American Spectator, by David Catron    Original Article
Posted By: garnet- 4/21/2014 7:25:29 AM     Post Reply
Last Thursday, the president announced the Obamacare debate over for the second time this month. The pretext for his repetition of this talking point was yet another implausible claim concerning the number of people his health care law has helped gain coverage. (snip) If you feel that President Obama is protesting a bit too much, you are not alone. Public opinion surveys consistently show that most Americans still oppose Obamacare. Moreover, a growing number of Americans believe the president to be a habitual liar. According to a new Fox News poll, “Thirty-seven percent think Obama lies ‘most of the time.’



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Obama to free hundreds of drug
felons under clemency rules
designed to un-do mandatory
sentences from ´War on Drugs´ era

54 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/21/2014 11:37:51 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is poised to entertain a flood of new clemency applications from thousands of federal prisoners who were given harsh sentences under mandatory-minimum laws following drug convictions, Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday. Holder said in a short videotaped statement that he wants to shrink the federal prison population by a modest amount while ensuring ´that those who have paid their debts have a chance to become productive citizens.´ At the center of the move is a set of old sentencing rules that punished crack-cocaine offenders with more time behind bars than users or traffickers of powder cocaine.

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if
US hadn´t ´switched sides in the War on Terror´
and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach
al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

45 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 7:02:40 PM     Post Reply
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn´t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier. ´The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,´ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline. She blamed the Obama administration

Dole: Cruz, Paul & Rubio
lack experience for 2016

44 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Mario Trujillo    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 11:18:06 AM     Post Reply
Former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) said a number of junior GOP senators considering a presidential run in 2016 do not yet have the experience — specifically naming Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Texas). The former 1996 GOP presidential candidate sounded particularly skeptical of Cruz in an interview this week with The Wichita Eagle. "A number of the younger members, first-termers like Rand Paul, Rubio and that extreme-right-wing guy, Ted Cruz — all running for president now. I don´t think they´ve got enough experience yet," Dole said. The 90-year-old former senator said, however, his main concern about 2016 is living

Jeb Bush is your only chance
against Hillary, Republicans

42 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Bob Schrum    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/22/2014 6:32:54 AM     Post Reply
If Jeb reaches for the nomination, there will be a titanic battle between the party establishment and the Tea Party. Steve Schmidt, McCain’s strategist in 2008, insists that in the end Republicans usually settle on the most electable candidate. To get by, this Bush may be forced to trim his positions, although the cautionary tale of Romney suggests that he would have to tack artfully and carefully for the sake of the general election. Certainly he will have the resources to outlast, discredit, and disqualify his rivals.

   

 



 
Michelle Obama:
´splurging is the key to life´

40 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/21/2014 9:31:25 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Michelle Obama said "splurging is the key to life" if you regularly eat right and stay active. Her biggest guilty pleasure: French fries. "How would you appreciate vegetables if you never had chocolate?" she asked. "You couldn´t live without a little chocolate, a little French fries." The first lady took questions from children reporters Monday after appearing at the White House Easter Egg Roll. She told the children that if they eat right the majority of the time, then a splurge or snack is not going to hurt them. "I still splurge when I can, but that's why I try to exercise almost every day," she said.

Why Does Nation Tolerate A
Habitual Liar As President?

40 replie(s)
Investors Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/22/2014 2:10:54 PM     Post Reply
Public Trust: Sixty-one percent polled say President Obama lies "some of the time" or "most of the time" on matters of national importance. Americans have to ask: Why do we let him get away with it? It´s no surprise that a Fox News poll of 1,012 registered voters last week found immense distrust of a president whose main domestic initiative was based on a lie. The shock is that the same poll found his disapproval level down to its lowest since last fall. Asked, "How often do you think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters?" 37% replied "most of

Fraud runs rampant in Census Bureau
37 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:03:20 AM     Post Reply
There’s a pattern of falsifying statistics throughout the entire Census Bureau. And anyone who attempts to blow the whistle on the fraud is either retaliated against or ignored, according to two new sources who have experienced the process firsthand. As I’ve been writing for more than six months, the Census Bureau office in Philadelphia uncovered a case of fraud in 2010, did nothing about it and allowed the practice to continue. In that instance, a data collector named Julius Buckmon was faking reports that went into the nation’s all-important jobless tally and consumer-inflation survey. Because the Census Bureau’s surveys are scientific — meaning

   

Post Reply   Close thread 711664





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~