A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Military timeline from night of
Benghazi attack begs more questions
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Military timeline from night of
Benghazi attack begs more questions

Fox News, by Jennifer Griffin & Adam Housley

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 11/11/2012 5:39:07 AM

After more than nine weeks of trying to reconcile their story line with that of the State Department and the CIA, the Pentagon finally released its timeline of the Libya terror attack during a Friday afternoon, off-camera briefing with an official who could only be quoted anonymously. The news was overtaken almost immediately by the announcement that Gen. David Petraeus had resigned, purportedly due to an extramarital affair. He was slated to testify in closed-door hearings on Capitol Hill this coming week before the Senate and House intelligence committees. Petraeus no longer plans to testify.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: steveW, 11/11/2012 6:01:40 AM     (No. 9006534)

The ongoing MSM/Obama campaign will now identify, target and destroy scapegoats. One does suspect that covering-up for His Majesty will be difficult for another full four years, but on the other hand the electorate doesn´t really care, do they? The truth about Obama´s role in Benghazi will be whitewashed, and we will all move on.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Haskell, 11/11/2012 7:37:30 AM     (No. 9006618)

Where is General Ham now, after having been fired? Will he be subpoened to testify before Congress? And where is Admiral Gauroutte, wh was also fired?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: pliades, 11/11/2012 8:36:01 AM     (No. 9006713)

If you want a real timeline, try this one on for size. I found it last Sunday.
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/11/twin-timeline-what-was-happening-in.html


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: LZK, 11/11/2012 8:50:58 AM     (No. 9006743)

Are you ready for some "impeachment"..........?

Looks to me like the foreign operatives in OUR White House betrayed our country -- and those poor brave men in Libya....

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Pearson365, 11/11/2012 9:02:49 AM     (No. 9006766)

The scandals of Benghazi (lack of security, the CIA contingent gathering arms and Obama´s video lies) died with Petraeus´ resignation. As of Friday afternoon, 4 deaths in the desert became Obama´s first sex scandal. From now on, it´s Broadwell not Benghazi. And after the videos of her are exhausted, the issues will go away.

The only thing that will keep this scandal alive would be NY Times article on how Valerie Jarrett arranged for the publisher for Broadwell´s book. And how Val Jar encouraged favorable reviews. However, pro-Obama Times would never rat on a pro-Obama publishing house or Obama loving book critics. Plus, Broadwell is an Obama Democrat. An exposé would be treason.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: ebgodard, 11/11/2012 9:11:31 AM     (No. 9006781)

Petraeus was being blackmailed, not by enemies of our nation- that was the initial concern- but by our OWN government. Obama knew months ago. A massive treasonous cover-up. Impeachment is imperative for the safety of our country. We have found the enemy and he is within. God help us.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: BuckeyeRon, 11/11/2012 9:16:42 AM     (No. 9006792)

Fact--CIC and National Security Council did not issue an alert for the region (NoAfrica and MiddleEast) prior to 9/11.

Fact--the commander of AFRICOM whose area includes all the Arab Spring countries was at the Pentagon on 9/11.

Fact--The only military assests Dempsey and Panetta (despite meeting with Zero, Biden, and National Security Adviser Donilon minutes into the massacre) ordered deployed into Libya were unarmed drones...what, to get video of the massacre?

Fact--intercepts w/n two hours of the attack identified the group that executed it, and indicated Tripoli was a target, so it was criminally insane to pull a team from Tripoli, which included Doherty who was slain, to go to the aid of Benghazi, as opposed to sending a military team to Benghazi, and and another to re-enforce protection of the Americans in Tripoli...

Fact--this timeline does not detail position of Naval and land based aircraft in the Med or Sosuthern Europe.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Peach1, 11/11/2012 9:17:13 AM     (No. 9006793)

I am so ready for Obama to be impeached, but is it possible with the senate controlled by dems? Can someone here please answer that for me?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: AnnaS, 11/11/2012 9:19:43 AM     (No. 9006802)

I have heard very little about Benghazi since the election. Is it move along now, nothing to see here? Besides it was all Petraeus fault, right? The MSM will continue to cover up!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: smobooks, 11/11/2012 9:21:43 AM     (No. 9006810)

Obama certainly could be impeached by the House, but the trial is in the Senate, which will never convict him (even if there is video evidence of Obama cheering on the terrorists and ordering an airdrop of weapons to them).


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: M2, 11/11/2012 9:24:47 AM     (No. 9006820)

To date no retaliatory strikes have taken place,..

...and one nutjob amateur "filmmaker" is in jail in America for exercising his First Amendment rights. Please explain how either of these events, or non-events, has solved the problem, made things, better or can keep things from getting worse, both here and in Libya?

Our enemies are now emboldened by our inaction and our failure to retaliate or even to rescue our own people! They already know we´ve been weakened by Obama and his Administration. Now they also know we don´t have the stomach to even come to the aid of our own people.

The normal response by our enemies is the following: make a bolder attack at America´s forces elsewhere in the world and even on our own continental soil.

President Jarrett, decidedly Muslim-sympathetic, will clear the path for Sharia Law in America by allowing all Muslim attackers and infiltrators full access and protection.

After all, she did say, "It´s our turn now", and she is Iranian-born. You really think she won´t trample white Judeo-Christian values, as Obama has done, in favor of Muslim interests?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: lylacat, 11/11/2012 9:33:28 AM     (No. 9006835)

And Hillary says she is just too busy to testify. That wretched woman is a disgrace; she has a duty to testify. She said she takes full responsibility; just words. If she has nothing to hide and thinks she did a good job, she definitely needs to tell the American people and the parents of the four dead Americans that she would not give aid when they begged for help. Hillary is a coward and probably a liar.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: fed-up, 11/11/2012 9:34:03 AM     (No. 9006839)

Without a curious MSM, Fox will not be able to get much further with this, I dont believe. It will be talked about and all say how we should have done more, yada yada. The Petraeus complication, and to me blurring of the story, will suck the oxygen from the real facts of what happened. Obama acted out of politics, the rest are so busy covering their butts, that it is all going to fade away. Makes me so angry I can´t see straight.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: ilovedogs, 11/11/2012 9:44:18 AM     (No. 9006856)

Is there anyway we the people can force this issue? By calling and harassing the MSM? I just don´t want to take anything from this Banana Republic group.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: hoofanmom, 11/11/2012 10:14:44 AM     (No. 9006929)

The consensus in many quarters is that the Libyan mission was being used to run guns and jihad militants through Turkey to Syria. If so, this handicapping of our military options makes sense. They would not want boots on the ground uncovering the operation that is arming those who are fighting and killing our soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq. Can you imagine the leaks and outrage? No, it would have to be handled by CIA, directed by their puppet leader Petraeus, who was hamstrung by their newly revealed hold over him. Look at what O has done in Egypt and Libya; more of same in Syria. Hope this theory doesn´t prove true.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: planetgeo, 11/11/2012 11:03:51 AM     (No. 9007043)

#8, impeachment is a two-step process. The House begins by determining if there are sufficient charges and if so votes to impeach. Clinton, for example, was impeached by the House. The trial for removal from office then takes place in the Senate. And in Clinton´s case (as would be the case for Obama, with a Democrat-controlled Senate), there was no removal from office.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: zek, 11/11/2012 2:01:31 PM     (No. 9007385)

Impeachment? That is just wishful thinking. How quickly we forget about what just happened last Tuesday. America does not care about this. They only care about what others have that they don´t have, and how can they get it from them. Obama will get away with Benghazi, and he will get away will 4 more years of putting it to anyone he disagrees with. The Obama administration feels they were given a mandate for whatever they want to do. Sadly they basically got that mandate from a completely ignorant, selfish electorate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 11/11/2012 2:10:53 PM     (No. 9007397)

There´s a bit of difference with Clinton and hussein. Clinton´s deal did not end with the death of Americans. I believe there are enough True Americans even in the Senate that if given indisputable facts about F&F and Benghazi, they would be compelled to vote or conviction against hussein.

Even with Clinton, several Senators were shown some very, very incriminating documents that were enough to convince some senators to convict, but as Oren Hatch(?) said the consensus was that the consequences and repercussions were just too great.

That might be the case here. No doubt that riots and chaos would ensue, but that in itself should not be the deciding factor. The criminal element of hussein´s reign should be the basis of conviction.

The critical question is, do these senators have the guts to stand up for our liberties?

FYI: A conviction requires 2/3 of senate members PRESENT which must be sufficient for a quorum which requires one more than half the members. If only 51 senators showed up for the vote, it would only take 34 votes to convict. If all 47 repubs, (present count) and 2 indies showed up and only 21 demns, the 47 could convict. Not likely, but possible.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Javelin, 11/11/2012 7:05:50 PM     (No. 9007896)

Will we ever again see the day when headline writers know what beg the question means?
Morons everywhere.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Trigger2, 11/12/2012 5:31:06 AM     (No. 9008294)

The whole disgusting mess started with the Hildebeast´s Stateless Department, who refused extra security in the first place. It was more important that the military support group along with their airplane was needed in Jamica for a youth field day.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 711553




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



President Obama’s ‘Selfie Doctrine’
Washington Times, by Charles Hurt    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 6:06:43 AM     Post Reply
In these selfie times when freedom, joy and posterity are just a head-tilt, grin and finger-click away, it is only fitting that the United States of America would have as commander-in-chief the undisputed King of Selfies. The Selfie Presidency for the Selfie Generation in a Selfie World. President Obama is that rightful king. There he is with the greatest baseball players of our day. The president mugging for a selfie outside the White House. Later he feigned outrage when it became public that the picture of him with Boston Red Sox slugger David Ortiz and a “44” jersey was just part of

   

 



 
Obama and the Most [REDACTED]
Administration in History
Reason Magazine, by Gene Healy    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 6:00:37 AM     Post Reply
Good news: thanks to a ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Monday, the "most transparent administration in history" is going to have to tell American citizens when it believes it´s legally entitled to kill them. The lawsuit arose out of Freedom of Information Act requests by two New York Times reporters for Office of Legal Counsel memoranda exploring the circumstances under which it would be legal for U.S. personnel to target American citizens. The administration stonewalled, asserting that "the very fact of the existence or nonexistence of such documents is itself classified," and a federal district judge

How Lindsey Graham
outmaneuvered the tea party
Politico, by Manu Raju    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:57:13 AM     Post Reply
SUMMERVILLE, S.C. — Sen. Lindsey Graham recognized the threat years before it had a chance to form — and knew immediately what he had to do. After the tea party wave in the 2010 election, right-wing groups were itching to get one of South Carolina’s newly elected conservative congressmen to challenge Graham, the blunt-spoken, deal-making congressional veteran of two decades. Rep. Mick Mulvaney, a favorite of the grass roots, was high on their list. So when Graham got wind in 2012 that Mulvaney wanted a seat on the House Financial Services Committee, he quietly lobbied his longtime friend, Speaker John Boehner, to

The Problem With Student-Loan Forgiveness
National Journal, by Sophie Quinton    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:51:46 AM     Post Reply
If you have student loans, chances are you wish there was a way to make them disappear. And in a way, there is: The federal government now offers three repayment plans that lower monthly payments and will—eventually—forgive remaining debt. A separate plan forgives loans for people who take certain public-service jobs. Some of these options, however, are so new that nobody knows how well they´ll serve borrowers. Even when it comes to well-established repayment plans, many students don´t truly understand their options. And some analysts say that policy adjustments are needed to ensure that students don´t get too comfortable taking on

BOOM: The Left’s Favorite Talking
Point Disproved by Science
Washington Free Beacon, by Andrew Stiles    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:35:05 AM     Post Reply
The Democratic Party’s obsession with income inequality and “the one percent” is factually misguided, science has found. Over the weekend, leading academic professor Mark R. Rank discussed the findings of a recent scientific study on income inequality in the New York Times. It turns out that, according to scientific data, the Left’s horror stories about a rigid class structure in the United States fueled by nefarious, wealth-hoarding one-percenters is false. “The picture drawn of the 1 percent has been that of a static population, just as the 99 percent is often portrayed as unchanging,” Rank writes. “There is a line drawn between

Raced-Based Preferences Forever
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:32:21 AM     Post Reply
You can often tell when advocates of one side in an argument fear they will ultimately lose. They change their branding. A few years ago, warnings about “global warming” were replaced with scare stories about “climate change.” One reason? The Earth had stopped appreciably warming in the late 1990s, making the change a PR necessity. Supporters of affirmative action are now signaling similar weakness. What was called “racial quotas” in the 1970s and has been referred to as “affirmative action” since the 1990s is giving way to a new term: “race-sensitive admission policies.” The language shift is telling — race-based preferences

Mozilla, Duck Dynasty, Chick-fil-A,
and the politicization of everything
Daily Caller, by Casey Given    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:24:53 AM     Post Reply
Would you boycott a family dinner because your grandfather holds some politically incorrect views about welfare recipients? Or, would you uninvite a neighboring family from attending a block party after learning that they attend an evangelical church that upholds a traditional definition of marriage? Most reasonable people would say “no,” adhering to the old adage that it’s rude to talk politics in polite company. Unfortunately, this rule of etiquette that has governed civil society for ages seems to be quickly evaporating in the world of commerce, as highlighted by the now notorious case of Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich. This impolite seed



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Obama to free hundreds of drug
felons under clemency rules
designed to un-do mandatory
sentences from ´War on Drugs´ era

54 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/21/2014 11:37:51 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is poised to entertain a flood of new clemency applications from thousands of federal prisoners who were given harsh sentences under mandatory-minimum laws following drug convictions, Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday. Holder said in a short videotaped statement that he wants to shrink the federal prison population by a modest amount while ensuring ´that those who have paid their debts have a chance to become productive citizens.´ At the center of the move is a set of old sentencing rules that punished crack-cocaine offenders with more time behind bars than users or traffickers of powder cocaine.

Dole: Cruz, Paul & Rubio
lack experience for 2016

44 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Mario Trujillo    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 11:18:06 AM     Post Reply
Former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) said a number of junior GOP senators considering a presidential run in 2016 do not yet have the experience — specifically naming Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Texas). The former 1996 GOP presidential candidate sounded particularly skeptical of Cruz in an interview this week with The Wichita Eagle. "A number of the younger members, first-termers like Rand Paul, Rubio and that extreme-right-wing guy, Ted Cruz — all running for president now. I don´t think they´ve got enough experience yet," Dole said. The 90-year-old former senator said, however, his main concern about 2016 is living

Jeb Bush is your only chance
against Hillary, Republicans

42 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Bob Schrum    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/22/2014 6:32:54 AM     Post Reply
If Jeb reaches for the nomination, there will be a titanic battle between the party establishment and the Tea Party. Steve Schmidt, McCain’s strategist in 2008, insists that in the end Republicans usually settle on the most electable candidate. To get by, this Bush may be forced to trim his positions, although the cautionary tale of Romney suggests that he would have to tack artfully and carefully for the sake of the general election. Certainly he will have the resources to outlast, discredit, and disqualify his rivals.

Michelle Obama:
´splurging is the key to life´

40 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/21/2014 9:31:25 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Michelle Obama said "splurging is the key to life" if you regularly eat right and stay active. Her biggest guilty pleasure: French fries. "How would you appreciate vegetables if you never had chocolate?" she asked. "You couldn´t live without a little chocolate, a little French fries." The first lady took questions from children reporters Monday after appearing at the White House Easter Egg Roll. She told the children that if they eat right the majority of the time, then a splurge or snack is not going to hurt them. "I still splurge when I can, but that's why I try to exercise almost every day," she said.

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if
US hadn´t ´switched sides in the War on Terror´
and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach
al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

38 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 7:02:40 PM     Post Reply
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn´t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier. ´The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,´ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline. She blamed the Obama administration

Fraud runs rampant in Census Bureau
37 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:03:20 AM     Post Reply
There’s a pattern of falsifying statistics throughout the entire Census Bureau. And anyone who attempts to blow the whistle on the fraud is either retaliated against or ignored, according to two new sources who have experienced the process firsthand. As I’ve been writing for more than six months, the Census Bureau office in Philadelphia uncovered a case of fraud in 2010, did nothing about it and allowed the practice to continue. In that instance, a data collector named Julius Buckmon was faking reports that went into the nation’s all-important jobless tally and consumer-inflation survey. Because the Census Bureau’s surveys are scientific — meaning

Professor: ‘Colleges Will Start Closing Up’ if
‘Racist, Misogynist, Money-Grubbing’ GOP Wins

36 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/22/2014 4:42:50 PM     Post Reply
New audio reveals an Eastern Connecticut State University professor warning that Republicans will “want things to go back — not to to 1955, but to 1855? if they win control of Congress in November. Republican victories could also put him out of a job, he cautioned. “We will live in a very, very, very different kind of country if that happens,” Professor Brent Terry told students in his Introduction to Creative Writing course, according to audio obtained by Campus Reform. “I mean, colleges will start closing up if these people have their way.” Over the course of his rant, Terry characterized conservatives

   

Post Reply   Close thread 711553





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~