|
|
| |
Topic: Rep Gowdy: Either Petraeus Will Come and Testify to Congress Or He Will Be Subpoenaed |
Rep Gowdy: Either Petraeus Will Come and Testify to Congress Or He Will Be Subpoenaed
Breitbart TV, by Staff
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:earlybird, 11/10/2012 7:56:51 PM
|
| Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) “The fact that he’s resigned and had an affair has nothing to do with whether he will be subpoenaed to Congress. I hope we don’t have to subpoena a four star general and a former CIA director. I would hope he would come voluntarily but if he won’t he will be subpoenaed. And none of what happened today is an offense to a subpoena… He’s either a witness in our case in chief or he’s gonna be a rebuttal witness if Susan Rice and others blame him for their failure of intelligence and failure of information.
|
Comments: Video accompanies article.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
janylou, 11/10/2012 8:03:10 PM (No. 9006091)
I love this guy. Why isn´t he in a leadership position in our party?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Coy860, 11/10/2012 8:04:04 PM (No. 9006093)
100% correct. His testimony is an integral part of the investigation, irregardless of an affair. Since when has being caught having an affair exempted someone from testifying? The American People will not stand for this.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
sfacheem, 11/10/2012 8:06:10 PM (No. 9006094)
CLANK.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Momma Walton, 11/10/2012 8:07:52 PM (No. 9006100)
This is a "need to know" for the whole country!
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
fed-up, 11/10/2012 8:12:57 PM (No. 9006106)
another one of the good guys from our state! Go get ´em!!
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
billa, 11/10/2012 8:19:33 PM (No. 9006118)
With this administration, DOJ, SOS, complicit House and Senate Dems and spineless girlie-men Repubs, this ain´t going no where. He will retire in reletive luxury with a ginormous pension from military and the fed. govn´t, plus all of the perks that go with being a general.
The corruption and cover up of this administration in countless of criminal conduct out does the corruption in South and Central America and Africa combined.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Grant Hodges, 11/10/2012 8:37:40 PM (No. 9006140)
Seems to be a quality man. Hope he stays that way.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
ruready?, 11/10/2012 8:42:43 PM (No. 9006143)
What a talent. He sure skinned Holder.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Maybeth, 11/10/2012 8:44:27 PM (No. 9006144)
Yes, of course. And tell us, Trey .... what of Hillary?
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
preciosodrogas, 11/10/2012 8:54:28 PM (No. 9006155)
Rep. Peter King (R-NY) also issued a public statement to the same effect ... and soon.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
cinwasp, 11/10/2012 9:05:47 PM (No. 9006168)
I came upon an EU times article that is written like a spy article. A coup existed against Obama by the military? Crazy stuff.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
devnull, 11/10/2012 9:08:04 PM (No. 9006170)
Or what? Huh? What are you going to do cry? All he has to say is that it is an issue of national security and he cannot talk about it in any capacity because .... wait for it .... he has been debriefed and no long has any security clearance. Neat how that works. And if you think that spineless, oversized emo oompaloompa Boehner has that testicular fortitude to do anything but cry, you´ve been into the Obama stash. So just shut your piehole and be and good little beltway parasite.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 11/10/2012 9:29:29 PM (No. 9006195)
Have no idea what #12 just said. Petraeus is under no obligation to protect Obama and Co. and stating facts on who said or did what regarding sending help to Benghazi doesn´t break any security. It might even get Patraeus off the hook.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
judy, 11/10/2012 9:41:32 PM (No. 9006203)
Next week when the won has a meeting with the repubs to tell them he won...I hope someone says repubs won too...we won the house againnnnnn.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 11/10/2012 10:18:30 PM (No. 9006233)
I have posted previously that the deal is done between Petraeus and President Zero. Petraeus will take the bullet for Benghazi, and Zero will give him a presidential pardon for any crimes that may have been committed. He is the firewall for Zero, and Hillary may have outed Petraeus. She never did like him. Remember the senate hearing? "suspension of disbelief" which was essentially calling Petraeus a liar? That was hillary in action.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
susieq1, 11/10/2012 10:32:10 PM (No. 9006256)
Trey Gowdy is an upstanding American.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
toinee, 11/10/2012 10:33:30 PM (No. 9006259)
Trey Gowdy. Even his name is cool. Go get it, Rep. Gowdy!
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
FilAm, 11/10/2012 11:31:00 PM (No. 9006312)
My take on this...He gets subpoenad,gets before congress and protects Obama,he becomes a hero for the left.He will be forgiven for the affair,even lauded as courageous and goes on the MSM as their new darling.He portrays the Republicans as evil and politicizing the death of the ambassador.The left will somehow skillfully meld the affair into the hearings and presto! Those republicans are at again,recalling Clinton and K Starr.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
FilAm, 11/10/2012 11:47:28 PM (No. 9006328)
The left will masterfully juxtapose this against the so called fiscal cliff and portray the republicans as putting politics first and not the country.Obama´s answer to all these,even if Petraeus nails him is.."I need to get back to work for the people" now excuse me.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
noddy, 11/10/2012 11:52:19 PM (No. 9006333)
That would make him a traitor #18. It would go against the grain for him to do that. Sure hope you´re wrong.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
rocket scientist, 11/11/2012 12:57:29 AM (No. 9006375)
This whole situation is weird. We get this announcement out of the blue that Gen. Petraeus is resigning due to an affair with his biographer, but in true Øbama Regime fashion the news is announced on a Friday afternoon news dump before the weekend. Øbama seems to have some kind of weird control over anyone who might thwart his plans. First we had the traitor Justice Roberts turn into a rabid Liberal supporting Øbamacare, then we have Chris Christie hugging and kissing Øbama in front of all the cameras right before the election. Don´t count on Petraeus saying anything that would point to any wrongdoing by pea-brain Barry. Petraeus seems to have drunk a couple of gallons of Øbama koolaid recently. He´ll keep mum on what really went down in Benghazi. I´m waiting for crying-man Boehner to pull a Justice Roberts any minute now when it comes to new taxes. Isn´t Kabuki theater wonderful?
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 11/11/2012 1:45:52 AM (No. 9006412)
I am so thankful for House members like this - ever more so with the pathetic leadership they must endure. God bless you for your courage, Rep. Gowdy. Luv that name
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Spidey, 11/11/2012 3:41:19 AM (No. 9006470)
Gowdy should be a rising star in the GOP.But Boehner is a goodole boy network type and will give chairmanships to to dunces like Buck McKeon(sp?) and the other guy from Mich.,can´t think of his name off hand.
My guess is Boehner would have to approve calling the general in any form and he wouldn´t dare.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 11/11/2012 4:56:00 AM (No. 9006488)
I suspect #15 is absolutely correct.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
sfacheem, 11/11/2012 6:51:00 AM (No. 9006565)
This is very simple to me.
He will be asked questions while under oath. If he refuses citing "national security", he will be required to testify in private session. If he refuses he will be cited for contempt and sent to prison.
Yes, you send a 4-star to prison for contempt when he´s guilty of it. Yes you do.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
franq, 11/11/2012 7:28:17 AM (No. 9006605)
Re #21´s Svengali effect. Maybe Obama IS the antichrist.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
rational, 11/11/2012 7:39:54 AM (No. 9006622)
AHHHHH #25 You forgot Bammy´s hand.... He PARDONS the dear General on Jam.20th
See it all ties together quite nicely in a little package!!
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
4freedom, 11/11/2012 7:48:46 AM (No. 9006632)
When Petraeus testifies I think will come down to what the definition of "is" is.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
rplat, 11/11/2012 8:02:53 AM (No. 9006654)
Doesn´t Petraeus make you proud? Why don´t we have a strong personality like Gowdy for Speaker instead of wimpy the panderer?
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
rustycfc, 11/11/2012 8:09:08 AM (No. 9006665)
Petraeus betrayed us.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Southern Oracle, 11/11/2012 8:16:03 AM (No. 9006678)
It´s one thing to cheat on your wife or husband. But QUITE another for an American general to knowingly abandon his men to their doom and then avoid all questions. He should be stripped of rank, dishonorably discharged, and have all retirement benefits withdrawn.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
FenwayFrank, 11/11/2012 8:17:30 AM (No. 9006683)
Patraeus needs to remember the officers´ credo of not lying, cheating or stealing, or tolerating those who do. He can regain some stature, and take down obama and his band of assclowns.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
suedotsue, 11/11/2012 8:23:45 AM (No. 9006689)
This means nothing. Boehner already had a conference call reported in detail by the NY Times to subdued GOP after the election. Boehner told the GOP they lost the election badly and now must get along with Obama. The GOP had no intention whatever that Obama admin. would be punished for mass murders in Fast and Furious--none. An occasional sound bite is thrown to us as a crumb. The GOP got all they wanted which was an excuse to tell the Silent Majority to go back to being Silent. These men are beneath contempt to me.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 11/11/2012 8:23:52 AM (No. 9006690)
Source, #11?
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
pliades, 11/11/2012 8:28:43 AM (No. 9006700)
It´s Gowdy Doody Time. It´s Gowdy Doody Time. By gosh it even rhymes! It´s Gowdy Doody Time.
That name made my day. I had the shot ... and took it ;-)
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
LZK, 11/11/2012 8:39:12 AM (No. 9006718)
Boener can huff and puff and cry all he wants. WE the people want some answers....
I´m still inclined to believe -- Petraeus was issued an ultimatum by obama. Shut up -- or -- we´ll leak the affair to my media pals...
Petraeus said -- the "F U" words and went to the media himself. Good military move -- when cornered -- go on the offensive.... Right Sarah?????
I like it!!
LZK
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
dman, 11/11/2012 8:58:27 AM (No. 9006756)
I just hope Petraeus has some good bodyguards, and doesn´t go out alone for any late-night runs.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
marthaville, 11/11/2012 8:59:09 AM (No. 9006757)
Some of you are selling Petraeus short. Why don´t you wait and see what happens this week and the next couple, if necessary.
He is too smart and too honorable to turn his back on his country.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Feebie, 11/11/2012 9:23:51 AM (No. 9006815)
I can´t believe the denial (bless you all, seriously) of some of my fellow Ldotterrs. Especially after this rigged election.
Gen. P is now a private citizen. Supeona or not, he does not have the clearance to testify. Then there is the fifth.
Think about it. This is the Chicago Way. His family was probably threatened too.
There will be no testimony. We are under facist rule now.
Kaffee: "You think I can´t subpoena Markinson?" Ross: "You won´t find him. Do you know what Markinson did for his first 22 years in the Marines? Counterintelligence. Markinson is gone. There is no Markinson."
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
papasparky, 11/11/2012 9:33:42 AM (No. 9006836)
A crusty old lineman who was a mentor during my apprenticeship was known to say, "talk´s cheap, but it takes money to by whiskey". After that, good deeds or owning a mistake came to be known as "buying whiskey".
Seems to me it´s time for the General to buy some whiskey.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
Mustang, 11/11/2012 9:55:24 AM (No. 9006873)
I would like everyone to give this guy some credit (pet raus). You have no idea what kinda of threats he faces from the enemy in the White House.He is fighting for his future and yours.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
kens, 11/11/2012 9:57:55 AM (No. 9006882)
Here´s the deal. If supeoned, Patraeus can´t talk about anything. HE IS A CIVILIAN WHO HAS SIGNED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS. Divulging anything classified in this status subjects him to prison. Just like the administration is persecuting the Navy Seals.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Grandpa Bill, 11/11/2012 10:25:29 AM (No. 9006948)
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
fayebeck, 11/11/2012 10:53:10 AM (No. 9007020)
Forget it Trey. The voters have decided that the Libyan Affair is not important just as Fast and Furious was not important.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
EnsignO´Toole, 11/11/2012 11:23:54 AM (No. 9007090)
#15 is on to something. Remember when Hillary said the "suspension of disbelief"? Did Hillary know about the "affair" back then, perhaps? Maybe she was relating Petraeus´s affair to Bill and Monica, but didn´t feel she could "out" Petraeus without further proof. Probably not but one does wonder.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
Linder, 11/11/2012 11:35:59 AM (No. 9007117)
Only half of the American people care and without the Press I´m afraid that isn´t enough. Four Americans were murdered as the Obama Administration watched and not a one of them will pay any price. It leaves me sad and sick to my core.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 11/11/2012 12:15:34 PM (No. 9007201)
Rep. Gowdy is delusional. What Gowdy seeks will never happen.
Ya´ll are failing to recognize what´s actually going on. You could ask Senator John Tower and he´d tell you if you could seance him. You could seance Clark Feister. Or Vince Foster. Especially William Colby. The list is long, long, long.
There is a war inside the Beltway.
Has been.
But you refuse to see it.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Slimepuppy, 11/11/2012 12:20:48 PM (No. 9007216)
Private Investigator 101:
.....I know what you´re thinking... but the first step is to find out what politician nominated Paula to West Point...
http://www.chs.bismarckschools.org/chs/chshof/2006/academics/
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
Feebie, 11/11/2012 1:22:12 PM (No. 9007323)
Thanks #49. Great catch. Socialist Byron Dorgan
http://www.porcelainonsteel.com/2010/03/honored-role-part-15-paula-broadwell-arc-of-a-driver/
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
capt scurvey, 11/11/2012 2:06:16 PM (No. 9007389)
One question, General: Who ordered you to lie to the American people?
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
OhMy, 11/11/2012 2:38:52 PM (No. 9007436)
Why would Petraeus fare any better than Gaddafi with Obama. Supporting Obama does not guarantee that he will not throw you under the bus. I would be very wary of getting Obama off the Benghazi hook while relying on his promise of a pardon.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
osprey21, 11/11/2012 3:01:52 PM (No. 9007478)
I have nothing to say that would NOT garner me a visit from Obama´s gestapo.
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
bob913, 11/11/2012 3:09:58 PM (No. 9007493)
I agree with #31
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
Cat Ballou, 11/11/2012 3:32:05 PM (No. 9007540)
If he blew the top off all this while testifying to Congress, as in fresh air is the best antiseptic, could anyone really "get" him? With this Congress & the Republicans we have, possibly I´m sorry to say.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
preciosodrogas, 11/11/2012 3:50:34 PM (No. 9007568)
Being a civilian and therefore no longer having a security clearance doesn´t protect him from testifying. Regardless of his status he would not be allowed to disclose secrets - else ever spy could just resign and be free to disclose everything they know. But he could be required to testify in closed session under the right circumstances. Signing confidentiality agreements would have no effect on his subpoenaed testimony. Think about it. If it were so then every criminal would have confidentiality agreements in their back pocket at the ready to protect against being ratted out. And there is no Fifth Amendment unless there is the potential of a crime, which yet remains to be seen, and, if there is, it can be simply overcome by granting him immunity for his testimony. No, there are ways for him to testify if he wants to and possibly ways not to if he doesn´t. It may not be pretty if he has blood on his hands but if he wants to put country first he can.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
mominNoCA, 11/11/2012 4:01:21 PM (No. 9007585)
The GOP needs more Gowdys.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
mkbobkbt, 11/11/2012 4:45:47 PM (No. 9007678)
I read a comment on a different site that really raised my eyebrow regarding the ´who knew what when´. Is it possible all this info regarding his affair was being held back to ensure testimony on Libya coincided correctly with the WH - and rather than give in or comply he outed himself?
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Philipsonh, 11/11/2012 5:13:28 PM (No. 9007724)
Fox Cable News article states the President only learned of this situation Wed, after the election. Overseas websites state the Administration would have known about the situation weeks ago. The ONLY news media that we can trust appear to be outside the U.S. General P´s wife was given a cosy job recently. The CEO of Lockheed-Martin recently resigned for the same reason that Gen P did. But the President knew nothing. If that is true, he runs the most incompetent Administration in history, and if it is a lie, then it is all another scandalous cover-up. One can assume, just thinking, blackmail, pay-offs, and even worse, the "T" word.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
RussVet, 11/11/2012 6:01:50 PM (No. 9007812)
Benghazi= Obozo Criminally Negligent = Obozo TREASON= evil ..
Is it so hard to figure out why Obozo had to fire the head of the CIA Petraeus who knew the story & would not lie and would not take the blame for letting the embassy employees die, especially the military seals ... the affair is just normal Obozo style misdirection for Benghazi and Obozo´s voting machine fraud that got him re-elected.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
Stopstoreload, 11/11/2012 7:19:33 PM (No. 9007921)
All of the BS about David´s private affairs is a distraction from the main issue: What will he say when he testifes- by subpoena or otherwise- about the Benghai disgrace?
Small people care about his love life, such as it was. Serious thinkers want to know about what he can disclose about the government´s disgraceful abandonment of our embassy and CIA personnel.
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 11/11/2012 8:42:49 PM (No. 9008022)
The aftermath of GOP losses seems to always result in absolute descent into the kind of reaction one expects resembles ranting children playing the same blame games just like their counterparts. Attack anyone who is accused before facts are weeded out from the political dust. yell about standing up to the offenders while expecting someone else to pull the wagon. We lost the election because we failed to keep it honest and we failed the nation because we don´t want to take the responsibility. If you don´t like the leadership in the house demand a few resignations. name calling without action is just so the voice flitting on the wind.
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 11/11/2012 11:59:11 PM (No. 9008188)
Why wasn´t the same thing said to Shillary ?
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
|
Outgoing Head Of IRS Gets Grilled By Republican Lawmakers Who Call Him ´Uncooperative´ And ´Drunk On Power´
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/17/2013 2:23:00 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Members of Congress grilled former IRS Acting Commissioner Steven Miller on Capitol Hill Friday morning, in an attempt to get answers on the IRS´ inappropriate targeting of conservative-sounding groups that were applying for tax-exempt status. Republicans and Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee both said that Miller and other IRS officials should have alerted Congress in testimony last year that they knew the agency was giving extra scrutiny to conservative and Tea Party groups.
|
Obama eyes Gov. Deval Patrick to replace Eric Holder at Justice
|
|
Chicago Sun-Times, by Michael Sneed
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/16/2013 2:29:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Tipsville . . . Sneed is told that Attorney General Eric “Fast and Furious” Holder’s days are numbered. Sneed hears President Barack Obama, who is this/close to Holder, has set his sights on Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick as a possible replacement “when the heat dies down on the latest hot-button scandals to hit the U.S. Justice Department,” said a top White House source.(Snip)“Holder is also a close buddy of Obama’s senior adviser Valerie Jarrett,” the source said. “Obama knows a change has to be made, but he wants Holder to leave with his reputation intact.”
|
In wake of scandal, Obama ousts IRS chief -- who was planning to resign anyway
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/16/2013 10:01:47 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama announced Wednesday that acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller would resign in the wake of the agency scandal in which conservative groups were targeted -- though Miller was apparently set to step down anyway. An official close to Miller told Fox News, shortly after Obama´s brief announcement, that the IRS chief was "set to resign the position of acting commission as of early June." He was planning to leave the IRS entirely a "couple of months later, regardless of the current controversy," the source said. These details were not mentioned by the president
|
Director of IRS Tax-Exempt Determinations Office Is Obama Donor
|
|
National Review Online, by Eliana Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/16/2013 7:38:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The director of the Office of Rulings and Agreements, which oversees the determinatons of tax-exempt organizations, is a donor to Barack Obama. Holly Paz donated $2,000 to Obama’s 2008 campaign, according to Open Secrets, which maintains a database of individual political donations. An inspector general’s report released yesterday concluded that the IRS improperly targeted Tea Party and other conservative groups for undue scrutiny, and Paz heads the office in which the wrongdoing is said to have occurred. National Review Online reported earlier today that agency officials are currently copying the hard drives of every employee on Paz’s watch.
|
Benghazi emails show State Department had heavy hand in watering down account of attack
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/15/2013 6:31:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – State Department officials repeatedly objected to -- and tried to water down -- references to Al Qaeda and prior security warnings in Libya in the Obama administration´s initial internal story-line on the Benghazi terror attack, according to dozens of emails and notes released by the White House late Wednesday. The documents were released under pressure after whistle-blowers testified on the Hill and some email excerpts leaked to the media last week. The 100-page file showed that State Department officials were even more heavily involved in editing the "talking points" than was previously known.
|
Jury: Jodi Arias was cruel in 2008 murder
|
|
CNN, by Catherine E. Shoichet and Graham Winch
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/15/2013 6:23:29 PM
Post Reply
|
|
[Breaking news update at 6:09 p.m. Wednesday] A jury found Wednesday that Jodi Arias was cruel when she killed ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander in 2008. That means she´ll face the possibility of the death penalty in the next phase of the trial. [Original story, posted at 6:06 p.m. Wednesday] Was Jodi Arias cruel? Jury reaches verdict in next phase of murder trial A verdict has been reached in the aggravation phase of the Jodi Arias trial.
|
|
Faith or Consequences
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by James Taranto
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/15/2013 4:18:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"One of the central goals" of President Obama´s administration, Bloomberg´s Margaret Carlson helpfully informs us, "is to rebuild faith in the federal government." A good example is this passage from the president´s May 5 commencement speech at Ohio State University: Unfortunately, you´ve grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that´s at the root of all our problems; some of these same voices also doing their best to gum up the works. (Snip)Where have we heard that before? Oh yes, it was on another college campus:
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Obama’s attempt at damage control laughable
|
|
Boston Herald, by Joe Battenfeld
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/16/2013 6:00:07 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Nice try, Mr. President. Feigning anger, firing an unknown bureaucrat and fleeing the podium won’t cut it with voters, or stop the hemorrhaging of the scandals that have spawned a Watergate-like feel around the Obama administration. There was a certain panicky look about the way the president quickly delivered a rare evening White House statement to try to quell the growing outrage over the IRS targeting of Tea Party groups. The move showed how damaging the scandal has become to Obama’s second term and maybe even his presidency. But Obama took no questions and, more importantly,
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Benghazi Emails Directly Contradict White House Claims
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Stephen F. Hayes
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 7:30:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The White House on Wednesday released 94 pages of emails between top administration and intelligence officials who helped shape the talking points about the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that the CIA would provide to policymakers in both the legislative and executive branches. The documents, first reported by THE WEEKLY STANDARD in articles here and here, directly contradict claims by White House press secretary Jay Carney and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the revisions of those talking points were driven by the intelligence community and show heavy input from top Obama administration officials, particularly those at the State Department.
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, ´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|