A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: CIA Director Petraeus Resigns,
Cites Extra-Marital Affair
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
CIA Director Petraeus Resigns,
Cites Extra-Marital Affair

NBC News [Los Angeles], by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/9/2012 3:05:22 PM

Central Intelligence Agency Director David Petraeus has resigned, citing an extra-marital affair, NBC News reported. "Yesterday afternoon, I went to the White House and asked the President to be allowed, for personal reasons, to resign from my position," Petraeus said in his resignation letter. "After being married for over 37 years, I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair. Such behavior is unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organization such as ours." "This afternoon, the President graciously accepted my resignation," Petraeus said in the letter. Refresh

Comments:
How very shocking.

  

Post Reply   Next (100) Replies   End of Thread  

Reply 1 - Posted by: civilservant, 11/9/2012 3:07:29 PM     (No. 9003208)

Now we know why he was quiet about Benghazi....


Reply 2 - Posted by: curious1, 11/9/2012 3:07:33 PM     (No. 9003209)

Think they were holding this over him to keep quiet about Benghazi?


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 11/9/2012 3:07:34 PM     (No. 9003210)

Now they have their Benghazi scapegoat.


Reply 4 - Posted by: michellewsc2, 11/9/2012 3:10:29 PM     (No. 9003217)

Oh please...nobody cared about Benghazi in the first place -- obviously


Reply 5 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 11/9/2012 3:10:32 PM     (No. 9003218)

Night of the Long Knives begins


Reply 6 - Posted by: Douglas DC, 11/9/2012 3:10:57 PM     (No. 9003220)

Why didn't he do this before the election?
Why now? maybe he is about to turn evidence.?


Reply 7 - Posted by: horacer, 11/9/2012 3:13:10 PM     (No. 9003223)

Maybe he was just cheating on his wife and got caught. I've heard it happens.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: altoona, 11/9/2012 3:13:54 PM     (No. 9003225)

Thanks, General. Your timing on this speaks volumes.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Tessie, 11/9/2012 3:14:59 PM     (No. 9003229)

Election's over. Obama sees no point in keeping Petraeus under his thumb now. I wonder when this affair happened and if Obama was using it to keep Petraeus from running against him.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Safari Man, 11/9/2012 3:15:19 PM     (No. 9003230)

My dream for the next four years is that Obama and Biden are tied up in knots dealing with scandals that finally are revealed by people llike Patreus.


Reply 11 - Posted by: KsGirl101, 11/9/2012 3:15:39 PM     (No. 9003234)

Got tired of the blackmail and decided to come clean. Well, okay. As a reason it'll do. Wonder what the real story is.
Petraeus, you betrayed us.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Tigerland, 11/9/2012 3:15:57 PM     (No. 9003235)

Affair with a woman or a man?


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: fayebeck, 11/9/2012 3:17:07 PM     (No. 9003239)

Wonder how a General feels resigning without ever knowing victory.


Reply 14 - Posted by: CEP, 11/9/2012 3:18:34 PM     (No. 9003242)

What is the big deal, look at Bill Clinton.

I go along with #2, he is now free to speak about Benghazi but what difference does it make now.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Yephora, 11/9/2012 3:18:47 PM     (No. 9003244)

And quitting his job is supposed to help his marriage?
Uh-uh, there's more to this than we know.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Evocatus, 11/9/2012 3:19:27 PM     (No. 9003245)

This is absolute and utter bullshat. This is a blackmail attempt for Patraeus' silence regarding White House complicity in the Benghazi abandonment. Pure and simple.

We are now officially in Evil times.


Reply 17 - Posted by: beat the press, 11/9/2012 3:19:39 PM     (No. 9003246)

He'll probably make more $$ writing a Benghazi book.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: enemyofthestate, 11/9/2012 3:21:01 PM     (No. 9003249)

Well was the "extra" a man or a woman? Did the general keep his socks on? These details are always important-- especially when we are going over a financial cliff like an anvil in a Wile E. Coyote cartoon.


Reply 19 - Posted by: rational, 11/9/2012 3:21:13 PM     (No. 9003250)

tee hee hee #6
Like he's going to turn states evidence!!
This president is untouchable and the dear general will fall on his sword and take "credit" for all the nefarious decisions that went on regarding Benghazi.

then, our ever incompetent Darell ISSA will proclaim, "CASE CLOSED!!!"

Lets all move on now and reach across the aisle and pony up more taxes for everyone!!! What a happy 4 years these will be!!!


Reply 20 - Posted by: MSD78, 11/9/2012 3:21:52 PM     (No. 9003252)

This is because he's got too much inside info on what happened in Benghazi...


Reply 21 - Posted by: Quigley, 11/9/2012 3:23:33 PM     (No. 9003259)

At least he says he's sorry.

So he resigns over his affair but remains silent about Benghazi.

Where does the weary eye repose when gazing on the great, where neither guilty glory glows nor despicable fate.

If he kept quiet about Benghazi it is a teachable moment as to why personal conduct matters. Not for Dims, of course, since they wouldn't care about either side of the equation.


Reply 22 - Posted by: mickturn, 11/9/2012 3:24:19 PM     (No. 9003262)

This and Benghazi...the Dims obviously learned from Hoover about having dirt on everyone else to control them...

Why is it dirt doesn't stick to the dirtiest politician to ever don socks...Obie.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: coldoc, 11/9/2012 3:26:34 PM     (No. 9003266)

There is something else going on here. I don't believe in coincidences, especially concerning anyone with the stink of obama on them.


Reply 24 - Posted by: erv, 11/9/2012 3:27:00 PM     (No. 9003267)

I do not understand why whe would resign over an affair.


Reply 25 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 11/9/2012 3:27:02 PM     (No. 9003268)

I think the General just wants to get out of town...


Reply 26 - Posted by: dolphin, 11/9/2012 3:27:10 PM     (No. 9003270)

Revenge round one.


Reply 27 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 11/9/2012 3:28:06 PM     (No. 9003272)

Leftists will be glad to see him go.
(recalling their antagonizing name calling like "General Betrayus" a few years' back).


Reply 28 - Posted by: Calvinesq, 11/9/2012 3:29:14 PM     (No. 9003275)

I agree #15. Something stinks with this. Is the reason "made up"? A cover-up story?


Reply 29 - Posted by: Slimepuppy, 11/9/2012 3:30:20 PM     (No. 9003277)

..the Commander in Chief ALSO has documented extra-marital affairs:

http://hillbuzz.org/is-barack-obama-gay

....will he be next to resign?


Reply 30 - Posted by: Evocatus, 11/9/2012 3:30:35 PM     (No. 9003279)

I'm going to wait and see how General Petraeus and his wife embrace.

I bet the two of them swap a deep, lingering kiss like a pair of lovestruck teenagers.


Reply 31 - Posted by: cav160, 11/9/2012 3:30:41 PM     (No. 9003280)

Might be more to story, but hey having a extra-marital affair would only increase his stock with dims. Gen Creighton Abrams said that a officer who would cheat on his wife would cheat on the Army!


Reply 32 - Posted by: dittohead, 11/9/2012 3:31:10 PM     (No. 9003282)

Since when did a democrat care about someone having an affair?


Reply 33 - Posted by: CEP, 11/9/2012 3:31:37 PM     (No. 9003283)

Well now they have a spot for Colin Powell.


Reply 34 - Posted by: god of irony, 11/9/2012 3:32:34 PM     (No. 9003287)

So in other words they told him to take the fall for Bengazhi, he refused and then they destroyed him personally.


Reply 35 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter, 11/9/2012 3:33:45 PM     (No. 9003289)

obama: "In your statement here, David, where it says 'the President accepted' - I want that to say 'the President graciously accepted.' Got it? Good. Now, Reggie, get him out of here."


Reply 36 - Posted by: nimby, 11/9/2012 3:35:05 PM     (No. 9003292)

The LSM is all over Petraeus for an affair but not over the death of citizens in Benghazi?


Reply 37 - Posted by: peasantnumberthree, 11/9/2012 3:35:57 PM     (No. 9003295)

I smell the handiwork of David Axelrod here.

From the Bamster's earliest days in Chicago, Axelrod specialized in digging up dirt, busting into sealed divorce records, etc. to force Obama's rivals and potential rivals to leave public life.


Reply 38 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 11/9/2012 3:38:14 PM     (No. 9003302)

Another chance for Samuel L. Jackson! What a break!


Reply 39 - Posted by: rambo77, 11/9/2012 3:38:18 PM     (No. 9003303)

Be that as it may, if his name ever were come up on a ballot. I'd vote for him in a heart beat. The man is a leader. In today's world, he has done no wrong.


Reply 40 - Posted by: Holoholo, 11/9/2012 3:39:15 PM     (No. 9003305)

We need an intervention and fast.

This is like a bad plot playing out. Come on, let the good guys win!


Reply 41 - Posted by: SteelTurman, 11/9/2012 3:39:46 PM     (No. 9003307)

I'll bet his paramour is a paid operative of the DNC.


Reply 42 - Posted by: Ribicon, 11/9/2012 3:40:28 PM     (No. 9003308)

Keep it in your pants, no problem. Thanks for nothing, general.


Reply 43 - Posted by: St. Pitbull, 11/9/2012 3:43:18 PM     (No. 9003314)

Who cares?
Anyone this stupid deserves what he gets. He didn't KNOW that everything he does is watched by 1) the Americans, 2) the Russians, 3) the Chinese, and 4) the Israelis. This was probably the worst kept secret in the world intelligence committee. Was he set up? You betcha!


Reply 44 - Posted by: Pearson365, 11/9/2012 3:44:14 PM     (No. 9003317)

Affair was with Debbie Wasserman Schultz. It wasn't the betrayal of his wife that caused his resignation but the fact that it was DWS.

The term, How Could You?!?! has more than one meaning. "With her! You can't mean her. You mean you dumped me and those lookers in your office for DWS? You're sick."


Reply 45 - Posted by: woofwoofwoof, 11/9/2012 3:45:28 PM     (No. 9003320)

yeah right


Reply 46 - Posted by: msjena, 11/9/2012 3:45:28 PM     (No. 9003319)

Won't Petraeus have to testify before Congress about Benghazi?


Reply 47 - Posted by: Momma Walton, 11/9/2012 3:46:35 PM     (No. 9003324)

Is this the lesser of two evils!


Reply 48 - Posted by: LadyHen, 11/9/2012 3:46:54 PM     (No. 9003327)

Would anyone be surprised if they had something similar hanging over Roberts head, hence his beyond the pale ruling? Petraeus was a fool to try and play ball with this pack of jackals.


Reply 49 - Posted by: scarface67, 11/9/2012 3:47:37 PM     (No. 9003329)



I got a bridge I want to sell to poster #7.



Reply 50 - Posted by: cartcart, 11/9/2012 3:47:59 PM     (No. 9003331)

She offered her honor.
He honored her offer.
From that time on...
Honor and offer.

Why can't men think before they do this? It is a career-buster unless you are Jesse Jackson or his son. It takes a wife and trashes her--see Hillary Clinton. It is immoral and if you are the head of the CIA, it compromises the trust people should have for you. It paints you as a liar and a cheat (See Bill Clinton) and nobody but the liberals will ever believe anything you ever say again. Petraeus is an idiot. Did he think he could keep this sort of behavior secret? People always tell. Stupid!!!


Reply 51 - Posted by: fire_mission, 11/9/2012 3:48:28 PM     (No. 9003333)

Now more qualified than ever to be president of a university.


Reply 52 - Posted by: pineledger, 11/9/2012 3:48:49 PM     (No. 9003335)

I agree there is something else going on here. The timing is just too suspicious.


Reply 53 - Posted by: Freeloader, 11/9/2012 3:49:55 PM     (No. 9003344)

Read how Herr Schicklgruber disposed of the uncooperative Field Marshal Werner von Blomberg in 1938.......Looks like someone on The Bamster's Staff might be a student of history!


Reply 54 - Posted by: Salt5792, 11/9/2012 3:52:12 PM     (No. 9003353)

I'm beginning to think that generals, in general, are very horny people.


Reply 55 - Posted by: lana720, 11/9/2012 3:52:12 PM     (No. 9003354)

I believe a couple of things -
first, General Patraeus was smart enough to release this on a Friday;
second, he is a great, great soldier where country comes first;
thirdly, there are men who would follow him to the gates of hell;
fourth, an affair is a badge of honor among dems - we all come short of the glory of God - see above poster on MO of axelgrease;
fifth, the dems play to destroy and to win at all costs, even at the expense of a great soldier; and,
lastly, the MSM will dig thru his trash and try to find the other woman.

Why would anyone devote his life to his country only to be dragged thru the mud like this - OK, so we all sin and he came clean about it. Why would any young soldier aspire to greatness?

We're cutting the military back to its bare bones so when they are needed, they will manage with less and less to be successful and try to protect us.



Reply 56 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 11/9/2012 3:53:03 PM     (No. 9003357)

My brain, without giving a reason, connects the General's resignation with the eviction of the Winston Churchill bust. Brain says Obama just couldn't stand to have Petraeus around just like he couldn't stand to have the bust around.


Reply 57 - Posted by: skedaddle, 11/9/2012 3:53:39 PM     (No. 9003359)

How quaint. If 0bama wanted him to stay, not a word would ever get out about an affair so something else is going on here.


Reply 58 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 11/9/2012 3:54:18 PM     (No. 9003361)

The answer to my oft repeated questions: Where was Petraeus? Where IS Petraeus. I feel sorry for his wife. He DID betray.


Reply 59 - Posted by: JLoophole, 11/9/2012 3:56:19 PM     (No. 9003366)

My very first thought was that he called their bluff. Maybe he was having an affair, but maybe he decided to blow them out of the water by admitting it. maybe he has enough Benghazi evidence to do some real damage. Too weird.


Reply 60 - Posted by: Melody, 11/9/2012 3:57:56 PM     (No. 9003370)

Sure hope we find out the truth soon. #36 sounds about right to me with the letter being dictated by someone else. ''Something else going on here'' - but what?


Reply 61 - Posted by: radrelic, 11/9/2012 3:59:49 PM     (No. 9003373)

So what does the Devil (for those who still believe a dark force called the Prince of the Earth exists)have in common with this those in this story? He uses them and when they have given him their all, he destroys them in delight.

If Satan didn't own the world and the nations, how could he offer the Lord or Lords that perk on the Temple spires.

Luckily he has no power in the other Kingdom, the Kingdom of light, not to menton hope and peace. RIP General.


Reply 62 - Posted by: AnnG, 11/9/2012 4:03:08 PM     (No. 9003380)

This came after the election, how convenient.


Reply 63 - Posted by: John c, 11/9/2012 4:03:45 PM     (No. 9003381)

An affair with Senator Elect Liz Warren's assistant? What a small world, thought it might be a Russian or Iranian spy vs. a Cherokee democrat coat holder.
How convenient that it gets announced after the election, as was the attempted shoot down of a US drown.


Reply 64 - Posted by: toodles3956, 11/9/2012 4:04:40 PM     (No. 9003383)

Men, in general, are very horny people.


Reply 65 - Posted by: rplat, 11/9/2012 4:05:20 PM     (No. 9003384)

I think this slimy bunch in the White House finds early dirt on everyone before they hire them so they can use it as required.


Reply 66 - Posted by: Razorgirl, 11/9/2012 4:05:35 PM     (No. 9003385)

Wait a minute. Maybe the general has just one-upped the slimballs. Could it be they were holding this over him and he has said "fine, I had an affair. I'll admit it. I quit!" Now they have no leverage to blackmail him and he is free to say what he wants.


Reply 67 - Posted by: Momma Walton, 11/9/2012 4:06:49 PM     (No. 9003387)

Was he set up?
Did it just happen?
Did they "always" know about it?

Could/would" Obama use it, "if necessary!

Will Petraeus testify before Congress?

Sadly, Patraeus should have known better! The Libs called him General Betray-US! They have no consideration - only "use" those who do not fit into their plans will be thrown under the bus!

Time for America to rise up and say "Why now!" This should have been reported sooner, if true.

What does Mrs. Petraus say? Is she going along with the Obama henchmen just to have her husband with her.

There is no love between those who will use anyone for their agenda!

Obama may have won, but he is still accountable to Almighty God. He knows the whole truth. He alone is able to define who Obama is and why he does what he does.

This is not over. Obama will trip up one day! The real Obama will stand before US in his empty suit, gazing at his empty chair!

God has His payday, maybe not tomorrow, but Obama will be held accountable. He alone will suffer the consequences of his actions, as will the whole liberal party, mainly the liberal media, who again defied the country, lied about Romney, set in order their socialistic agenda. Sadly, they will lose there too! Satan is a very harsh employer!


Reply 68 - Posted by: earlybird, 11/9/2012 4:08:36 PM     (No. 9003390)

Obama's opposition research team knew of his affair, kept it under wraps, then sprung it just as he was to be called to testify on Benghazi.

Who do they think they are fooling?

I hope that he testifies as former director of the CIA, and that the entity(ies) conducting the hearing(s) do not let this enter into their evaluation of his testimony.


Reply 69 - Posted by: OperaBuff, 11/9/2012 4:08:55 PM     (No. 9003391)


Reply 70 - Posted by: Emmajustin, 11/9/2012 4:11:03 PM     (No. 9003393)

If you can't unseal divorce records, the thug in chief will do the next best thing and find dirty laundry and silence you with it.
But, now the cat is out of the bag, Pet should be able to scream to the heavens about how kenyan idiot boy ignored 3 pleas for help and let 4 Americans be slaughtered.
If he was a real man, Pet would sing like a bird now. But alas, he has been plucked by Jarrett.
Sickening.


Reply 71 - Posted by: killerbee, 11/9/2012 4:11:23 PM     (No. 9003396)

My feeling is that the Gen thought Obama wouldn't win and allowed them to keep him silent for a time. If Romney won, he could aid the investigation. Now he's out and he can aid the investigation. I hope.

I'm probably giving him way too much benefit of the doubt, but he's been solid before this incident so I think he's earned it.


Reply 72 - Posted by: OperaBuff, 11/9/2012 4:13:32 PM     (No. 9003401)

It's disorienting to see someone in DC doing the honorable thing after committing what used to be a dishonorable act. I'm soooo confused...


Reply 73 - Posted by: Jubilationtcornpone, 11/9/2012 4:15:05 PM     (No. 9003403)

I guess Hillary can close her file on Petrarus now. He probably had the goods on the State Deparment over Benghazi and was willing to come clean to keep the CIA from being scapegoated. I suppose he was already retired from the Army, not on loan, so this shouldn't affect his retirement pay.


Reply 74 - Posted by: Keekng, 11/9/2012 4:15:13 PM     (No. 9003404)

No doubt in my mind, Bam Bam had data from Jarrett and they were waiting for the opportune moment to tell Petraeus to resign or they would go public. There was no reason in the world for such information to be given unless obama wanted...... "REVENGE".
Watch for other resignations with the same type of vindictive reasons.


Reply 75 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 11/9/2012 4:17:48 PM     (No. 9003408)

Patraeus: ''Honey, I have to get out of this government before it implodes and takes all of us down with it. Do you care if I claim to have had an affair so that they can't stop me from leaving?''

Mrs. Patraeus: ''Sounds good to me. Say you had 5 affairs with hookers if that is what it takes to get away!!!''

P: ''Thanks, Honey!''

Mrs. P: ''Any time, Babe...''


Reply 76 - Posted by: NancyD, 11/9/2012 4:17:57 PM     (No. 9003410)

I don't believe this for one second. They do NOT want Petraeus to testify. It's BS and once again, the most transparent administration is a total FOG. It's CRAP.


Reply 77 - Posted by: cinwasp, 11/9/2012 4:21:03 PM     (No. 9003416)

It's not confusing. #70 gets the prize.


Reply 78 - Posted by: Geelabeela828, 11/9/2012 4:22:24 PM     (No. 9003420)

#67 - Agreed! Remember Hillary with the 900 FBI files?


Reply 79 - Posted by: rational, 11/9/2012 4:24:06 PM     (No. 9003424)

Just announced on FOX that he WON'T be testifying!!


Reply 80 - Posted by: O.G.'s Mom, 11/9/2012 4:24:48 PM     (No. 9003427)

Unless he was having this affair in the Oval Office,.......oh wait, that happened already and the miscreant got away with it. Never mind.

I agree, he resigned over an affair? Barbra Streisand, there is something WAY more to this.

Just the start of the purge of this corrupt presidency.


Reply 81 - Posted by: FlockO'Seagulls, 11/9/2012 4:24:48 PM     (No. 9003426)

I agree with no. 42--he was co-opted. This is straight out of the KGB play boo--only now the Dems are using it.


Reply 82 - Posted by: SoCalGal, 11/9/2012 4:25:01 PM     (No. 9003430)

It is very difficult to find the serious thinkers on this thread. This really isn't the place for drivebys.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the timing on this is very suspicious. And the fact that we knew Petraeus was going to have to pull the rug out from under Obie and his fools when he went before a hearing, under oath.

The Obama dirt machine knew about the affair and simply held that information until an appropriate time for maximum effect and benefit to Obama. That time was now.


Reply 83 - Posted by: earlybird, 11/9/2012 4:26:19 PM     (No. 9003433)

Fox News just reporting that Petraeus will not be testifying before the Senate Intel Committee.

Obie: "Mission Accomplished!"


Reply 84 - Posted by: starboard, 11/9/2012 4:27:56 PM     (No. 9003438)

We are not stupid General. This is as believable as the U Tube Video that caused the terrorist attack in Benghazi.


Reply 85 - Posted by: daphne, 11/9/2012 4:28:24 PM     (No. 9003439)

I thought Slick Willie made affairs a resume enhancement. Nothing to see here, folks. It's just sex. Confusing.


Reply 86 - Posted by: anonymous, 11/9/2012 4:28:25 PM     (No. 9003440)

There's a strategy here that's related to Benghazi. Obama fears Benghazi more than he does anything else. There's no escape hatch on the Benghazi issue for him.


Reply 87 - Posted by: rational, 11/9/2012 4:31:41 PM     (No. 9003444)

#88
are you kidding me?
no escape hatch for Obammy??
This whole resignation distraction IS the escape hatch.
Petraeus is NOT testifying!!!!


Reply 88 - Posted by: Labrador heaven, 11/9/2012 4:32:19 PM     (No. 9003447)

This left him completely vulnerable to blackmail from our outside enemies...and they are many. He was a massive national security risk and had a target painted on him by engaging in this dishonorable behavior. A huge national security risk.

As it is, his blackmailers may end having been closer to home...the Chicago brigade occupying the White House and most of the rest of government.


Reply 89 - Posted by: namvet66, 11/9/2012 4:33:16 PM     (No. 9003450)

Doesn't pass the smell test.


Reply 90 - Posted by: belwhatter, 11/9/2012 4:34:32 PM     (No. 9003452)

Can't resist rats when I smell them - consider the others of the regime who are resigning too - Hillary, Geitner, Holder and consider too that the tragic "murderous nanny" story was abruptly withdrawn from CNBC [Kevin Klim] -in association with the inquest into the missing 43 $trillions. Something is up - keep sniffing.


Reply 91 - Posted by: zbogwan2, 11/9/2012 4:34:43 PM     (No. 9003453)

I've had problems in my marriage, but I and my wife have worked them out, therefore I elect to remain CIA director. Someone must have threatened Petraeus here(more likely Obama or one of his henchmen)and Petraeus cowered out and resigned?

My God it seems like Satan has found a permanent foothold here in the Obama Administration?


Reply 92 - Posted by: Momma Walton, 11/9/2012 4:37:46 PM     (No. 9003464)

Will his "partner" in crime, confess too?

The Libs identify "with" adultery as well as abortion!

The "majority" had denied God in their Democratic platform, still denying Him on the third vote,then the one in charge declaring they will "change back" to win an election!

Also, the Dems denied Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel. Don't look for any cooperation with Israel, God's people, who promised them the land "forever"! They are trying to usurp God's power! Not a good plan!

The Dems have met their match when they think they can challenge God. The votable Dems loved/loves their entitlements and will cry out "Obama gave it to me", not knowing or want to know that their neighbors (employed) are suffering to supply them with their Obama gifts!

Today, we as Christians, have an opportunity to "let our light shine", knowing God is sovereign and He is just, giving them enough rope to hang themselves! Satan first deceives, then makes his prey to "feel" they are not important, then goes further to "steal/kill/destroy" to further his agenda!

This war is not over. We will have many battles/skirmishes, but God loves US and wants US to make a stand for righteousness and it is only found in Jesus Christ, God's only-begotten Son - John 3:16. He came to set the captives (those under Satanic bondage) free and it only found in Him.

Time to get on your knees and acknowledge God as the only means by which we are/will be saved!

Pray in agreement with God's holy Word! God's Door (Jesus) is open, ready/willing/able to "deliver US from all evil, here and abroad. Amen


Reply 93 - Posted by: tangerinedream, 11/9/2012 4:38:53 PM     (No. 9003468)

Whether or not he had an affair isn't the real issue. What matters is will he still testify on Benghazi and will he tell the truth? Something stinks to high heaven here.


Reply 94 - Posted by: pdmccas, 11/9/2012 4:40:24 PM     (No. 9003474)

If Congress can call Howard Hughs, A private citizen, to testify, why not Petraeus?


Reply 95 - Posted by: Reality, 11/9/2012 4:40:52 PM     (No. 9003475)

It's the Chicago way. Get rid of all the witnesses. 0blamer and Axelrod are experienced in this type operation.
The house should supeona him as a private citizen to be a witness as to what he knew when.
I am really afraid we have just elected a Hugo Chavez clone for at least 4 more years.
Maybe this will be bad enough that even the corrupt Harry Ried Senate will have to vote to convict upon impeachmaent.


Reply 96 - Posted by: FilAm, 11/9/2012 4:40:53 PM     (No. 9003476)

Can he be subpoenad to testify?


Reply 97 - Posted by: PLPointer67, 11/9/2012 4:43:35 PM     (No. 9003479)

From my Conservative Christian friends in Wash. DC, from a Biblical viewpoint -- EVERY man and woman, who comes there to serve, is bombarded by temptations to sin, in EVERY way possible. And, these temptations NEVER stop.

General Petraeus succumbed to the temptations. He, his wife and family, the CIA, and We the People are paying the severe penalty for his sin.

I am making observations. I am not throwing the first stone.

Our actions have consequences... sometimes terrible consequences.


Reply 98 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 11/9/2012 4:45:16 PM     (No. 9003483)

Ummm - - he said he had an "extramarital affair" - - but he didn't say it was a sexual dalliance - - did he?

Maybe it was a financial affair - - maybe a political affair? Certainly an "affair" which Zippy's thugs used to cow him.

Dear friends, always parse the words - - never assume you know the meaning. In fact - - we can't even be sure what the meaning of "is" is.

So - - is it all a bunch of crap? Absolutely. There's so much more going on that our decent, honest minds can't begin to contemplate it. One thing we do know - - with absolute, metaphysical certainty - - - - -

- - - Zippy will skate away - - because he is both pro-abortion and black. No way he can ever be touched.

Move it along - - - - - -


Reply 99 - Posted by: SoCalGal, 11/9/2012 4:47:45 PM     (No. 9003489)

John Bolton is telling Neal Cavuto that Petraeus will be testifying on Benghazi. Even if they have to subpoena him. Bolton is confident that he will have to tell his story, "maybe not Thursday, but in days or weeks". In either open or closed (classified) hearings, he will have to tell what happened from the CIA's point of view.

I trust John Bolton.


Reply 100 - Posted by: yorkiemom, 11/9/2012 4:47:59 PM     (No. 9003490)

How little faith some of you posters have. Charlie Rangel was just on TV, and he said he is not suspicious of the timing. So, now we can all relax, the media will climb all over Petraeus for a few days, then Benghazi and the four dead Americans will never be mentioned again. Obama wins again!!!



Post Reply   Close thread 711410

Next (100) Replies   End of Thread  



Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



National Review Hammers Gang
of Eight for Promoting Amnesty
Breitbart´s Big Journalism, by Warner Todd Huston    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:40:14 PM     Post Reply
In a new editorial, the folks at National Review came out strongly against the immigration plan being sponsored by the "Gang of Eight," a group of Senators that includes Marco Rubio (R-FL), calling the bill "Rubio´s Folly." National Review urges Senator Rubio to vote against the bill he has helped craft. It slams the proposed legislation as, "an amnesty-first, enforcement-maybe program drawn up mainly to reflect the priorities of 11 million citizens of other countries rather than the concerns of more than 300 million citizens of the United States." The editors point out that many of the

Bipartisan bill would
soften ObamaCare mandate
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Sam Baker    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:35:33 PM     Post Reply
A pair of centrist senators introduced a bill Wednesday to soften the employer mandate in President Obama´s healthcare law. The healthcare law requires employers to offer coverage to employees who work more than 30 hours per week. Some employers have said they will reduce workers´ hours to avoid the mandate. Sens. Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) proposed a bill to move the threshold to 40 hours per week, saying the employer mandate should match the traditional definition of a full-time worker. "What we´ve tried to do is be reflective of the businesses we work with,"

Another likely Rubio whopper
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:22:07 PM     Post Reply
Marco Rubio made another one of his seemingly endless appearances on Sean Hannity’s program to advocate amnesty legislation. Rubio told Hannity that he has opposed amendments by Republican Senators to improve the legislation’s enforcement provisions because a new enforcement provision will be proposed tomorrow that is tougher and more effective than what has been proposed so far. Rand Paul’s amendment, which Rubio voted against, would have given Congress, not the Department of Homeland Security, the ultimate authority to determine if the border is effectively secure. It would also have included enhanced security measures, such as requiring a

How Obamacare Is Being Used to
Create a Permanent Democratic Majority
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:16:21 PM     Post Reply
To a remarkable degree, liberalism has been institutionalized as an official ideology, funded by your tax dollars. This editorial in Investors Business Daily explains, in shocking detail, how Obamacare is being used to fund Democratic Party operatives and drive Democratic Party enrollment: The Obama administration granted a whopping $910 million to California to set up its insurance exchange. That money is not for bandages, surgery, nurses and doctors to care for the sick. …Shockingly, the $910 million is slated for bureaucracy, including rich compensation packages for exchange employees ($360,000 a year for the executive director) and contracts for

Kaiser: Faith in Obamacare
plummets to just 35%
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:02:16 PM     Post Reply
The popularity of Obamacare has crashed to its lowest level in nearly two years, according to a new Kaiser Family Foundation poll. Kaiser´s monthly tracking poll found that just 35 percent have a favorable view of the health reform being put into place Jan. 1 while 43 percent view it unfavorably. The favorability rating of Obamacare has been worse only once, in October 2011, when it fell to 34 percent. Not only is the June poll bad news for the president as his administration struggles to have the health reform program ready for people to begin signing up

We´re all potential suspects and
should be treated as such, apparently
Washington Examiner, by Ashe Schow    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 9:49:10 PM     Post Reply
Americans are already wary of the federal government having collected their phone records, but now we have Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., setting up a slippery slope of more and more data collection. Earlier today, a Washington Examiner editorial warned that "if phone records are useful now in stopping terrorist attacks, how long before politicians and bureaucrats decide archiving the entire phone call would be even more useful? How long before the limitations and safeguards now in place are set aside?" Within a few hours, King provided an illustration of precisely what the Examiner editors fear. Responding to a

Right rips Rubio as Republican
immigration votes slip away
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Alexander Bolton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 9:42:52 PM     Post Reply
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is feeling the heat as potential GOP allies are now turning against his immigration reform bill. Republican colleagues who were previously viewed as possible “yes” votes are keeping their distance from the 1,075-page measure. On Wednesday, conservative activists ripped Rubio and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) — both sponsors of the bipartisan immigration measure — at a Capitol Hill rally. The crowd, which was protesting the bill’s effort to put millions of illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship, booed at the mention of Rubio’s name during the six-hour event.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence
in new documentary, claim original
conclusion about cause of crash is wrong

105 replie(s)
FOX News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM     Post Reply
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded

Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says
Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress

53 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM     Post Reply
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.

Obama: ´If Catholics Have
Their Schools and Buildings
and Protestants Have Theirs ...
That Encourages Division´

50 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 3:46:48 PM     Post Reply
Likening religious schools to segregation--a racist system that forced blacks to attend different schools and use different facilities than whites in the American South--President Barack Obama told a town hall meeting for youth in Belfast, Northern Ireland on Monday that there should not be Catholic and Protestant schools because such schools cause division. "Because issues like segregated schools and housing, lack of jobs and opportunity--symbols of history that are a source of pride for some and pain for others--these are not tangential to peace; they’re essential to it,"

Edward Snowden Is In The
Process Of Destroying Any Support
And Sympathy He Has Built Up

48 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM     Post Reply
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information

G8: Barack Obama looks like
a president going through the motions

38 replie(s)
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM     Post Reply
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s

How Democracies Perish, Deathbed Edition
36 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Daren Jonescu    Original Article
Posted By: steveW- 6/18/2013 6:11:46 AM     Post Reply
This is the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of How Democracies Perish, an analysis of the spread of world communism by Jean-François Revel, one of freedom´s most serious French defenders since Tocqueville. At the heart of this work, Revel details "The Tools of Communist Expansion," among which the most relevant for understanding our current situation comes in Chapter 16, "Ideological Warfare and Disinformation." The profound simplicity of Revel´s nuts and bolts account of totalitarianism´s Cold War advance, far from being obsolete

Obama: You Can´t Fathom
´Complexities´ of Syria
Policy ´If You Haven´t Been
in Situation Room´

36 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM     Post Reply
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.


Post Reply   Close thread 711410

Next (100) Replies   End of Thread  




Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~