A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: “Could We Fix An Election –
Sure. They Would Never Know It”
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
“Could We Fix An Election –
Sure. They Would Never Know It”

Ulsterman Report, by Ulsterman

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/9/2012 2:25:56 PM

Thank you to all the readers who sent this to me. Apparently from testimony following the 2004 election, this computer programmer makes clear UNDER OATH, of how easily it would be for an organization, be it Democrat or Republican, to “flip” the election outcome via a rather simple code. – a code this programmer himself easily manufactured. This is further confirmed at the 3:10 of the video where the programmer notes how the entire system can be “hacked” to control the final voting outcome.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: country boy, 11/9/2012 2:42:24 PM     (No. 9003143)

I used to be a JavaScript developer (aka programmer) for a large multinational bank. Everything this guy is saying is 100% reasonable.

I do think the election was rigged by the DEMS, they substantially altered the Romney vote count (and possibly many down-ticket candidates). It was the election of the century. No way was there 12 million fewer votes than 4 years ago.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Edgelady, 11/9/2012 2:48:05 PM     (No. 9003155)

Really, can someone say just who this Ulsterman is?


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: dman, 11/9/2012 2:50:27 PM     (No. 9003161)

Stunning testimony. Stunning, but not surprising to anyone who programs computers. A paper trail is a minimal defense, along with stringent source code certification and long CRC checks that only certified source code was actually loaded into the machines.


Reply 4 - Posted by: lancelink1, 11/9/2012 2:51:21 PM     (No. 9003164)

truthers

birthers

fixers

You won't get much traction with this no matter how bad this election smells....


Reply 5 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter, 11/9/2012 2:53:41 PM     (No. 9003173)

Doesn't have to be implemented on a national scale. There were only 7 states up for grabs - obama took 6 and is leading Florida.


Reply 6 - Posted by: dman, 11/9/2012 2:55:51 PM     (No. 9003178)

I should clarify. Source code is compiled into machine code. The CRC (Cyclic Redundancy Check) would verify that the machine code loaded into the machine was compiled from certified source code.

In the "weeds", but at the heart of the matter.


Reply 7 - Posted by: daria, 11/9/2012 2:57:35 PM     (No. 9003185)

As odd as this might sound, this gives me hope. If the election was stolen, it means that a majority of Americans did not turn their backs on the good and toward darkness.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: country boy, 11/9/2012 2:59:40 PM     (No. 9003190)

The source code should be verified by both parties, then published. There is nothing confidential about it.


Reply 9 - Posted by: RockingStrata, 11/9/2012 3:08:09 PM     (No. 9003213)

Having the program report its CRC assumes that the code which reports the CRC actually calculated the CRC, and that it has not been altered to emit the expected answer instead of the correct answer.


Reply 10 - Posted by: dman, 11/9/2012 3:11:52 PM     (No. 9003222)

That can be done in hardware, #9. If you're at that level, it's no different from fixing a traditional mechanical machine. There is no 'fail safe' - there is only a degree of safety. Just ask those who program our nuclear missiles or those who programmed Iran's centrifuges.


Reply 11 - Posted by: god of irony, 11/9/2012 3:13:28 PM     (No. 9003224)

Folks the only way to stop this is change the laws in your states so there is a paper audit trail to verify the results.


Reply 12 - Posted by: curious1, 11/9/2012 3:14:00 PM     (No. 9003227)

So you load in certified code. Then I load a dynamic patch in place to intercept and change however many out of the total to go to a certain party. Said patch disappearing when machine power is turned off.

I say every red county in this country should show 99% of their eligible voters - just like Philly and elsewhere - going entirely for the conservative ticket the next two elections. Ignore the screaming. Then do what needs to be done in the house, senate and WH to trim government and disenfranchise every libtard in this country. This is a war, for those of you who haven't been paying attention, and there is only one rule in a war - Make sure you win. Time to fish or cut bait.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Hank Reardon, 11/9/2012 3:15:25 PM     (No. 9003231)

Many years ago, here in guns and religion PA, a small-county official told me that if you knew which way the electorate was going to vote, i.e. local tax, liquor law, etc., all he had to do was input the reverse of the ballot prior to the election and the loser becomes the winner.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Hermoine, 11/9/2012 3:15:38 PM     (No. 9003233)

I think a lot of folks were "strung along" and "had" by this so-called insider from the Ulsterman Report.


Reply 15 - Posted by: janjan, 11/9/2012 3:16:12 PM     (No. 9003236)

I manage computer programmers and I can guarantee you if one of them did this they would not be able to keep their mouth shut about it and I don't care how much they got paid. They would be too proud of their work. If this happened it will come out sooner or later.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 11/9/2012 3:23:13 PM     (No. 9003258)

Impound the machines from suspicious locations in swing states along with the source code, and have an independent auditing firm evaluate.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Avogadra, 11/9/2012 3:27:51 PM     (No. 9003271)

If stories are to be believed, electronic vote fixing has been done in the past. In fact, the guy in this YouTube is testifying about the 2004 election. Nobody blabbed, probably because it would have cost them their life.

It will be hard, but while we refocus on passing laws requiring voter ID, we also need to insist that voting go back to paper ballots. There will still be fraud, but least there will be physical evidence to examine, as opposed to easily-modified and easily-deleted code.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: mickturn, 11/9/2012 3:28:22 PM     (No. 9003273)

This is simple...

Englishisized so computer users (not programmers) will understand.

AT poll closing + 10 minutes
IF Obama is less than Romney;
THEN Switch vote totals;


Reply 19 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 11/9/2012 3:41:54 PM     (No. 9003310)

IMO, it is a foregone conclusion in every election since Clinton there has been collusion if not outright vote-fixing. Prove me wrong.


Reply 20 - Posted by: peasantnumberthree, 11/9/2012 3:46:14 PM     (No. 9003323)

I am a "programmer" type myself.

In addition to what others have already said, are you aware that ne'er do wells often penetrate bank defenses, which are far stronger that what he is talking about here?

Very easy to do. The last generation was a wireless insert placed into the ATM card reader of an ATM machine. Looked just like the real thing.

Just pulled the data from the ATM cards and beamed it to a wireless hotspot nearby (like in a car in the parking lot).

The banks' counter to this was a whole new generation of ATM machines that look like Las Vegas slot machines, all blinking lights and strange noises.

Idea being that the customer is used to the Las Vegas blinking lights and when they aren't on the ATM the customer wants to use, they get suspicious and go to some other ATM.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Amicus Veritatis, 11/9/2012 3:49:53 PM     (No. 9003343)

If you really want to fix the system, as opposed to speculate about how it can be cheated, then outright disenfranchise anyone who cannot prove their american citizenship/identity AND show proof that they pay INCOME tax. At least that way if the fix was in, we would all know it without even asking.


Reply 22 - Posted by: pineledger, 11/9/2012 4:13:07 PM     (No. 9003400)

You all remember the last time when there was supposed to be a meeting of Pubs with Zippy to discuss some issue over which there was disagreement? He reminded us all that HE WON. The Child won't let this go anywhere. If the Justice Department won't prosecute a blatant instance of physical voter intimidation by the New Black Panther Party, investigating this doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: jimmiet, 11/9/2012 4:15:44 PM     (No. 9003405)

Get Holder on it right away! We are so screwed.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Namma, 11/9/2012 4:21:12 PM     (No. 9003417)

If anyone, including WHI, know this happened for a fact, and does not come forward immediately, then I hope and pray they fry in hell...they are aiding many deaths because of this obamacare being implimented..Obamacare is nothing but murder. Why would a person not come forward and save this country....


Reply 25 - Posted by: Razorgirl, 11/9/2012 4:26:26 PM     (No. 9003434)

#23 and anytime a state tries to pass voter ID laws the just-us department shoots it down. For our democratic process to be legit, in order to vote you shoud have to pass a civics test. When you do you get a voter ID card with your picture on it. And you should have to apply your thumb print to the ballot just like when you cash a check at a bank that is not yours. What does it say about a candidate that has to cheat to win? Honest? No. Integrity? None whatsoever. Intelligent? Just like the kid that steals the answers off someone elses paper. Qualified? Not be a long shot! He may have stolen the election, but he's still a loser.


Reply 26 - Posted by: snowcloud, 11/9/2012 4:34:06 PM     (No. 9003451)

It's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes. Josef Stalin is alive and well and have just taken over America.


Reply 27 - Posted by: amylu, 11/9/2012 5:06:18 PM     (No. 9003545)

I've been haunted by a remark Obama's campaign manager made the day before elections. She warned DemocRATS not to be alarmed if the exit polls showed Romney leading. She said, and I'm paraphrasing here, "We have the votes we need."

What a smug comment, unless the election was already "fixed"!


Reply 28 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 11/9/2012 5:46:32 PM     (No. 9003639)

Of course it was fixed and all parties were in on it, so don't be expecting no cavalry to ride in and save the day...


Reply 29 - Posted by: Dixie, 11/9/2012 6:36:41 PM     (No. 9003746)

People tend to lie in Exit polls...particularly in Union states.

That said, just 100 lines of source code would be easy to either hack or code in a patch that was separate from the original code.


Reply 30 - Posted by: eoddad, 11/9/2012 7:06:52 PM     (No. 9003784)

#7 I agree. I would rather think it was stolen than believe so many American's are so F*** up.


Reply 31 - Posted by: mominNoCA, 11/9/2012 7:24:08 PM     (No. 9003818)

Republicans need to fight smarter. Doesn't have to be dirty like the Dems, just smarter.


Reply 32 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 11/9/2012 7:35:59 PM     (No. 9003838)

It matters not how many paper ballots are printed or posted. The secondary level is the machines that count the ballots are just as easy and maybe easier to dump some script into that will shed or flip votes at will.

You know, "who counts the votes."


Reply 33 - Posted by: mollybob, 11/9/2012 8:03:19 PM     (No. 9003878)

I was convinced that this is what happened even before reading this piece. I'm equally convinced that nothing can or will be done about it. We can't beat the devil at his own game in his own back yard.

Our only hope is to turn to God in a serious way. That will only happen if the Holy Spirit brings a level of conviction and repentance to the nation the like of which has seldom been seen...and He just might do that. I, for one, am asking.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Java D, 11/9/2012 8:20:32 PM     (No. 9003906)

JFK cheated to get elected (Illinois) & look what happened to him. Hope history repeats itself.


Reply 35 - Posted by: BitTwiddler, 11/9/2012 8:20:57 PM     (No. 9003908)

If the machines could be re-calibrated to fix the problem, why couldn't they have been re-calibrated to create the problem?

Couldn't they binary compare the code in multiple machines in the polling place to detect anomalies since not all machines appear to be altered?


Reply 36 - Posted by: Pepper Tree, 11/9/2012 9:11:01 PM     (No. 9004010)

How can election fraud be seen as any less than treason against that state and the republic? And if it is, why should any (high tech) ballot box-stuffer escape the gallows?

Countless people have risked and sacrificed their lives and health for our freedom. I'm not queasey about slimey freedom thieves losing their lives even for an attempt.


Reply 37 - Posted by: toddh, 11/9/2012 9:53:12 PM     (No. 9004086)

What if, the voting was done on or with paper or paper-like material. That is automatically a "paper trail" and it could be inspected by the voter before submission. Such a medium could be read by simple machines - too simple to run programs. The error rates of the machines would be a tested and known quantity. Should the vote differences be within this known error, the medium could be re-run through the machines to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. Of course, a physical medium might degrade if run too many times - this would also be a tested and known function.


Reply 38 - Posted by: get er done, 11/9/2012 11:19:36 PM     (No. 9004220)

Over 3/5 of our states have Republican governors. The States have the power to fix this problem. The States also have the authority to investigate the elections in the six or seven swing states. Obama may come home from his latest overseas jaunt and find out that he is NOT president.


Reply 39 - Posted by: TheMom, 11/9/2012 11:45:08 PM     (No. 9004272)

Oh, 39, that would be a happy day! I and my friends would be dancing in the streets.


Reply 40 - Posted by: NYbob, 11/10/2012 12:17:05 AM     (No. 9004299)

Voting fraud in this country has been a national disgrace since Chicago thugs stole the 1960 election for JFK. Way past fixing it. Republicans in office are the only card left and they have 2 years to do something about it. Can we depend on a party so inept, so weak, that they haven´t been pushing since 1960, for national voter accountability? Doubtful. All of them combined were too stupid and too gutless to do anything about the usual, deliberate, effort of Democrats to deny US troops the vote. Not a word, no bills, no questions about it in the debates. Of course they didn´t even comment on the fact that the sudden effort to replace all machines with ones controlled by a European company, was partially backed by George Soros. All Republicans seem to be good for is being dim scapegoats for any idea the son of communists, Axlerod, dreams up.


Reply 41 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 11/10/2012 12:41:50 AM     (No. 9004326)

We seem to be the only ones concerned. Why isn´t Congress tackling the issue ? Any issue ? Many of them will be scrambling in two years for us to re-elect them.



Post Reply   Close thread 711408




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Mediaite Exclusive: Internal Memo
Proves That CBS’ Sharyl Attkisson Did
Not Get Benghazi Emails Story Wrong
Mediaite, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/19/2013 10:17:21 AM     Post Reply
The revelation that the government’s talking points in the wake of the Benghazi attacks were edited to reflect the concerns of a variety of federal agencies has sparked a firestorm of controversy in recent weeks. Some early reports on that email exchange created the erroneous impression that the White House was more deferential to the concerns of State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, who sought to remove from those talking points a variety of references suggesting the Benghazi attack was the result of a coordinated act of terror. The actual interagency email exchange, released by the Obama administration on Wednesday,

Colorado sheriffs seek to
block new gun restrictions,
file lawsuit against state
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM     Post Reply
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations

´We could lose everything´: Tea
Party groups prepare to sue IRS
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.

First Lady Expands Anti-
Obesity Campaign to Museums
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community

Congressman: IRS asked pro-
life group about ´the content
of their prayers´
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM     Post Reply
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although

Treasury Knew of I.R.S.
Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,

HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t
Employees More Time for ´Planning
and Preparing Healthy Meals´
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM     Post Reply
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
65 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

55 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

Camelot Is Burning
45 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part


Post Reply   Close thread 711408





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~