|
|
| |
Topic: Marco Rubio Heads to Iowa. 2016 Starting Already? |
Marco Rubio Heads to Iowa. 2016 Starting Already?
ABC News, by Shushannah Walshe
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/8/2012 2:22:25 PM
|
| Mitt Romney only lost his presidential bid on Tuesday night. So when does the courting of voters for the Republican 2016 nomination begin? How about next week? Florida Senator Marco Rubio is heading to the first caucus state of Iowa on Nov. 17 to headline an annual campaign fundraising birthday party for Iowa governor Terry Branstad. Last year all the presidential hopefuls, except for Mitt Romney, came to the party to court the governor and Iowa political dignitaries who attended the bash. The governor’s spokesperson, Tim Albrecht, a caucus expert himself, told ABC News that Branstad invited Rubio
|
Comments: It's a little early to start making these assumptions isn't it?
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
jond, 11/8/2012 2:31:45 PM (No. 9000056)
Forget it Marco. Republicans hate Hispanics /s
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
jackson, 11/8/2012 2:56:46 PM (No. 9000161)
Rubio has a chance... unfortunately. See, America has shown that it will elect a callow, inexperienced, ambitious politician-for-life boy-toy, as long as he is "inspirational." Boy Rubio inspires some. Pathetic.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
michellewsc2, 11/8/2012 3:03:05 PM (No. 9000176)
I like Rubio...but he needs to back way off on this. Way tooooo early for all that.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
fayebeck, 11/8/2012 3:03:59 PM (No. 9000183)
Of course he's a RINO and not a TRUE conservative. Let's start that crap up again.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
veritas, 11/8/2012 3:28:34 PM (No. 9000241)
Follow this complex explanation carefully, please.
Marco Rubio is not eligible.
He is not a Natural Born Citizen.
End.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
miceal, 11/8/2012 3:34:23 PM (No. 9000252)
What Veritas said....
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Stlouislaxbros dad, 11/8/2012 3:40:19 PM (No. 9000271)
#5 and #6... you are wrong.
Marco Rubio was born in the United States in Florida. He is therefore a natural born citizen.
The fact that his parents did not become citizens until several years later...does not affect his status.
See the background of Chester Arthur.. born in Vermont to an American mother and a foreign nationality father.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
graniteman2009, 11/8/2012 3:40:27 PM (No. 9000272)
Well it looks like we are back to our favorite past time, lets eat the young.
and we wonder why can't win the whitehouse?
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Stlouislaxbros dad, 11/8/2012 3:48:57 PM (No. 9000297)
Regarding my post at #7 above... see Michael Zak's article of 4-26-12 at www.humanevents.com
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
janylou, 11/8/2012 3:55:53 PM (No. 9000320)
I'd love to see a Ryan/Rubio ticket. They would be a true dynamic duo!
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Coy860, 11/8/2012 4:00:15 PM (No. 9000340)
Rubio is a citizen, but not natural born. Natural born means that at the moment of birth, because of citizen parents, citizenship is naturally passed to him irregardless of where he was born. (Children of military serving overseas, for instance.) His parents were not citizens at the time of his birth. He is actually what is considered an anchor baby. It is pretty clear that Republicans will never get the Latino vote because like blacks, most are interested in FREE stuff, not that concerned about immigration and sealing the border as elite Republicans would have you believe. Unless Republicans start being agreeable to giving away the store, Latinos will continue to vote for the party that gives them FREE stuff.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
KsGirl101, 11/8/2012 4:07:42 PM (No. 9000365)
Thanks #11. I was listening to Rush this afternoon explaining why hispanics didn't vote for a Republican, and never will. It's the free stuff! Just like he said. I was screaming at the radio, "you're just now figuring that out!" I could have told him 20 years ago when our area started being innundated by the migrants. Our welfare office, health dept and every other agency that gave away free stuff was innundated. Just watch them in the grocery story, swiping their cards, and we know what kind of cards. Our newspaper editor had the audacity to write an article several years ago about the vast amounts of money that was being wired from our county to Mexico every month and what a financial blow it is to our local economy. Of course, he was called a racist by every brown face in the area.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 11/8/2012 4:20:16 PM (No. 9000394)
With the Republican Party in shambles, rootless, brand is damaged, etc. why talk about 2016? I turned off Rove this morning, pontificating on with his trusty white board. Such a loser and he makes six figures. We will likely see him at the helm of the 2016 election, again "helping" us cruise to victory.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Attila DiMedici, 11/8/2012 4:22:26 PM (No. 9000400)
Why worry about the 2016 election. It does not matter any more. The American people have spoken. They no longer wish to be ruled by the rule of law, they would rather be ruled by the edict of the man who promises to give them the most.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
RUReadyY3K, 11/8/2012 4:23:35 PM (No. 9000403)
Instead of worrying whether or not Rubio is a natural born citizen, why not ask what the heck are the Republicans thinking when they participate in a caucus in Iowa which went for Obama? Should be an open primary in a bigger state. Why should Iowa be rewarded with outsized influence?
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
forward, 11/8/2012 4:33:12 PM (No. 9000414)
Agreed about Iowa, and why NH every time? NH has seen an influx of Massachusetts people moving up and in - they have tilted leftward over the past decade and it shows. Pundits are saying Romney got the white vote, well, New Hampshire is 96% white and they voted for Obama both times. Why do they have a hammerlock on the primary calendar?
Natural Born Citizen: that phrase has been widely debated. Most scholars today agree it simply means "born in the US" and they would grant a wider definition to include citizens like John McCain, who was born on a US military base in Panama.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
msjena, 11/8/2012 4:50:04 PM (No. 9000458)
Rubio is a natural born citizen because he was born here. A U.S. birth certificate is all that is needed to prove citizenship for passports, social security and running for President(actually, you can run for President without a birth certificate--see BO). If you are not natural born, you do not have a U.S. birth certification and you have to prove you were "naturalized." Rubio is natural, not naturalized.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 11/8/2012 5:26:24 PM (No. 9000543)
Ryan/Rubio 2016!
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 11/8/2012 5:35:10 PM (No. 9000570)
Good grief. Make it stop!
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
veritas, 11/9/2012 2:58:52 AM (No. 9001470)
OK, everyone who is of the opinion that Rubio is NBC, please answer the following [no, opinions do not qualify as answers; sorry, but thanks for playing] -- who was Emmerich de Vattel? What signal book did he write? How many copies of it were at the Constitutional convention in Philadelphia? Please indicate whether you are including or excluding the personal copy Benjamin Franklin got in 1775. Which of the Founders debated the issue? Who wrote on it, and made clear that birth situs is immaterial in determining citizenship? Why were overseas births specifically discussed, and offshore children held to be citizens? How many times does the term "natural born citizen" appear in the US Constitution? What does that use[s] reference? Both NBC and native born appear in the Constitution because they are not the same status. The opinions of later writers and judges and pundits are immaterial. They didn't write the Constitutional language, which has not been changed in the only permissible way -- by Amendment. Point of logic -- assertion is not demonstration. Two words that do not appear in the US Constitution are "birth certificate." Two words that do not appear in the Founders writings on the Constitution are "birth certificate." There are 3 Constitutional requirements for Presidential [and Vice-Presidential] eligibility. One of them [being a citizen at the adoption of the Constitution] is moot, all persons it applied to being deceased. Neither of the remaining 2 requirements are for a birth certificate. Chester Arthur didn't run in 2012, and won't run in 2016. There. My first opinion in this post. Thus, his status is meaningless to the discussion. Even if not NBC, that doesn't change the Constitution. Correctly understanding the Constitution as written and following it matters. Darn. Outta space.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
| |
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
| | |
|
|