A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Gary Johnson Pulls One
Million Votes, One Percent
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Gary Johnson Pulls One
Million Votes, One Percent

Reason Magazine, by J.D. Tuccille

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/8/2012 11:04:01 AM

Sad to say, the best-qualified presidential candidate in the race, this year — Gary Johnson — pulled just a bit more than one million votes and around one percent of the vote. "Best qualified" I say, since a succesful and popular two-term governor strikes me as having a better resumé than a single-term governor or a half-term senator who put in a p***-poor performance in the White House. That said, Gary Johnson has pulled the most votes in raw numbers of any Libertarian presidential candidate and, as I drain a bottle of truly

Comments:
I disagree that this guy was the most qualified as the author states. As close as this race was this self centered fool could have been what made the difference between Romney winning. I will never understand why people who have no chance to get elected care for themselves more than the welfare of their country.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: tocsin, 11/8/2012 11:11:18 AM     (No. 8999480)

Ditto!-O.P.
Malignant narcissists, indeed.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 11/8/2012 11:12:38 AM     (No. 8999484)

Shame on us for such unutterable stupidity.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 11/8/2012 11:18:11 AM     (No. 8999501)

He may have cost Romney Florida's electoral votes. He got more votes then the difference between Obama and Romney. Otherwise, I'm not sure what he accomplished.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Polecat49, 11/8/2012 11:26:22 AM     (No. 8999528)

Gary helped ruin the Republican party in New Mexico. SO, I guess he thought this would be a good year to do the same to the National Republican party and to the United States.


Reply 5 - Posted by: SgtMike, 11/8/2012 11:29:31 AM     (No. 8999536)

Ass wipes like Johnson ego maniacs that put self above country.


Reply 6 - Posted by: zoidberg, 11/8/2012 11:29:35 AM     (No. 8999537)

The Republican debate organizers should get the blame for this, by doing everything they could to exclude Johnson from the debates. I'm not saying he would have won the nomination, but slights are remembered. And maybe there are some actual libertarians out there that really think he would have governed better than Romney.


Reply 7 - Posted by: lostinmassachusetts, 11/8/2012 11:36:56 AM     (No. 8999560)

Too bad he pulled them from Romney, contributing to Obama's disastrous win. Johnson is a jerk of the first order. His narcissism far exceeds his intelligence and patriotism.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: GreatGreyhounds, 11/8/2012 11:38:17 AM     (No. 8999565)

Gary Johnson is just a taller Ross Perot...


Reply 9 - Posted by: Malia2012, 11/8/2012 11:46:51 AM     (No. 8999599)

Gary Johnson = Punk-wannabe-spoiler of the first order. I hope he and his loser-followers sleep well at night. On second thought, no I don't. I want them wide awake to see what their low-down arrogance has done to this Country..


Reply 10 - Posted by: bmw50, 11/8/2012 11:53:26 AM     (No. 8999628)

FTA: "Sad to say, the best-qualified presidential candidate in the race, this year — Gary Johnson - "

Best Qualified? Does time in office mean you are best qualified? Then explain why Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are such idiots! Time served does not always equate to lessons learned.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Donna M, 11/8/2012 11:56:50 AM     (No. 8999642)

This kind of self-serving c**p is why, although intellectually I'm kind of libertarian in a 'live and let live' way and have little use for the Federal Reserve, I have no use for Reason, movement libertarians and most who write for it.

Those million votes would have put this election into a recount at least.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Donna M, 11/8/2012 11:58:26 AM     (No. 8999651)

I've seen Johnson speak several times on TV and found him whiny, weak and not exactly a guardian of individual liberty where it counts.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: thethirdruffian, 11/8/2012 12:00:10 PM     (No. 8999659)

Sounds like the Republicans should go back to their libertarian core and this won't be a problem.

Republicans trying to out big government Democrats is no choice at all.


Reply 14 - Posted by: retiree, 11/8/2012 12:02:52 PM     (No. 8999670)

Wasn't Johnson in favor of legalizing Pot?


Reply 15 - Posted by: tomishere, 11/8/2012 12:05:16 PM     (No. 8999674)

Thank you third part crowd. I believe we are stupider than democrats


Reply 16 - Posted by: zoidberg, 11/8/2012 12:07:03 PM     (No. 8999681)

It's a testament to how deeply the entitlement mentality is entrenched, that Mitt Romney is considered entitled to the Libertarian Party's votes.

Recriminations are inevitable, but in the midst of the worst economy since the Great Depression, blame should be placed at the doorstep of the candidate who couldn't defeat the sorriest excuse for an incumbent since Jimmy Carter.


Reply 17 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 11/8/2012 12:13:33 PM     (No. 8999700)

I may sound like a broken record, but the Repubican Party, and our country, both died on 11-6-2012.

It's all a mute point now.

With 20,000,000+ new voters, all registered Demon-RATS, coming as soon as NØbama makes all the illegal aliens into US citizens, there won't be a red state left for Repubicans or Libertarians to make any difference in any more.

November 6th was a victory for those people who wanted to see this as a one party third-world cesspool nation. They won, and we all lost.

Any fantasy of there being ''correction'' elections in 2014 or 2016, where the Republicans take back the Senate and presidency, died in Ohio at about 10:30PM on November 6th.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: kanphil, 11/8/2012 12:34:27 PM     (No. 8999768)

Ross Perot lite.


Reply 19 - Posted by: snapper451, 11/8/2012 1:45:28 PM     (No. 8999932)

What a waste of a human being!


Reply 20 - Posted by: rubberneck, 11/8/2012 1:51:37 PM     (No. 8999947)

I tend to agree with #14... my hardest choice this election was between Romney and the Libertarian. (Since I'm Idaho, I knew Romney would have my delegates, with or without me. And the GOP has definitely evolved - in practice if not in rhetoric - leftward.)


Reply 21 - Posted by: skedaddle, 11/8/2012 2:30:48 PM     (No. 9000052)

People who want big government will always vote Democrat so I don't see what good it does to nominate/elect Republicans who espouse somewhat-big government (Bush and Romney come to mind).


Reply 22 - Posted by: Heraclitus, 11/8/2012 2:37:45 PM     (No. 9000080)

Writer from Reason seems to have lost his senses.

Why are there so many on "our" side who have such giant egos that they're willing to risk the Republic for their often (but not always) petty purposes?

The Dem/Left learns from such stuff. They keep their ultimate goal firmly in front of their eyes: POWER. That's it. They'll sort out the little stuff later.

In re: Dem/Lefties' ideology. actually pretty basic marxian clap-trapism.

The question to be posed again and again: Just what is our goal? To preserve Liberty. To save the Republic. To honor and live by the Constitution, as a "nation of Laws and not of men."

Howie Carr was trying to reason with a Ron Paul supporter. It proved impossible.

Every election, we have moved further on down the path to totalitarianism. The way back is extremely difficult. Just ask any emigre from communist countries.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: zjrog, 11/8/2012 5:34:39 PM     (No. 9000568)

Like #21, I voted for the Libertarian. Was he the better candidate? Not in my opinion. But as a resident of Utah, also, I felt my vote wouldn't matter otehr than to give a VIABLE third party more credence. I actually liked H. Ross Perot's stance on many things but couldn't vote for him since he is a quitter. I even gave the Green party a thought for my vote, since at least she isn't ugly. But can't stand her message. Now, if the TEA Party would break from the Rebubbies, they would indeed be a viable, well financed third party alternative. No pandering to outliers, and we won't have to hold our noses in the voting booth.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 11/9/2012 1:36:01 PM     (No. 9002938)

In the words of the late Casey Stengel,
" Does anybody here know how this game is played?" We have here what is called a two party system. After all of the preliminaries are over, there are two major party candidates, and every voter should vote for the one of them who best represents his or her views.

Casting your vote for a third party candidate of whatever merit, your Uncle Joe, or your pet rock is stupid beyond belief, as is staying home without reason.

We weren't defeated by Democratic voters; we lost due to non-Democratic persons who didn't vote for the Republican. We are going to pay a frightful, enduring and demoralizing price.


Reply 25 - Posted by: formerlyphelps, 11/9/2012 1:59:41 PM     (No. 9003022)

Ok – I’m wildly perplexed. One million voters cast ballots for Johnson. Where? I will guarantee you the vast majority of those ballots were cast in states Romney won. I could have personally cast 100,000 votes for Johnson and Romney STILL would have won my state. (For the record, I voted for Romney.)

Next, I predicted at the outset that if Romney lost it would be blamed on conservatives. We were told over and over that Romney’s route to victory was in his appeal to moderates and cross over votes. The conservatives would just follow along obediently, but were less important. (Remember the hot exchanges over Michigan primary?) Now we know that 11 million former -0-bama voters (“moderates”) stayed home. How is it that 1 million 3rd party voters are blamed for a +2 million vote loss, when 11 million voters actually targeted as the path to victory are not?

Please elucidate.



Post Reply   Close thread 711237




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Remember when Fox News
wasn’t ‘real news’?
Human Events, by David Harsanyi    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 10:21:41 PM     Post Reply
We now know that the Justice Department kept exceptionally close tabs on Fox News reporter James Rosen in 2010, following his trips in and out of the State Department, hacking his personal emails and phone calls. Normal newsgathering activities are being treated as criminal activities by the White House. But consider what the same White House had to say about Fox News back in 2009. You might remember the concerted effort by White House officials to brand the right-leaning Fox News as a bogus news outlet, unworthy of attention.

More Secrets From Huma Abedin
FrontPage Magazine, by Arnold Ahlert    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 10:03:59 PM     Post Reply
Huma Abedin, former Secretary of State Hillary’s Clinton’s long time aide with extensive ties to Muslim Brotherhood groups, was granted an arrangement by the State Department to do outside consulting work, even as she remained a top advisor in the Department. Abedin did not disclose either the arrangement, or how much she earned from it, on her financial report, despite a requirement that public officials must disclose significant sources of income. Clinton advisor Philippe Reines contended she was under no obligation to do so. Abedin, who has served Clinton for 15 years, became a “special government employee”

Judge ruled feds need not
notify Fox reporter of search
Politico, by Josh Gerstin    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 6:45:33 PM     Post Reply
A federal judge in Washington ruled in 2010 that the Justice Department was not required by law to notify Fox reporter James Rosen that prosecutors had obtained his emails in connection with an investigation into a leak about North Korean plans to test a nuclear weapon. In September 2010, Chief U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth overruled the conclusion of federal magistrate John Facciola that Rosen—whose Gmail account was searched—was entitled by law to be informed. Prosecutors contended that under the statute used to get Rosen´s emails, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, they were not

DOJ Reacts to Rosen
Report in Statement
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:45:19 PM     Post Reply
The Department of Justice released a statement moments ago amid reports of the department obtaining a subpoena in order to access Fox News reporter James Rosen´s personal emails. "Leaks of classified information to the press can pose a serious risk of harm to our national security and it is important that we pursue these matters using appropriate law enforcement tools. Such investigations and prosecutions, including this particular case, follow all applicable laws, regulations, and longstanding Department of Justice policies intended to safeguard the First Amendment interests of the press in reporting the news and the public in receiving it."

Malkin To Kelly: IRS Not Just
Scandal Because Of ‘Ideology,’
But Because Of Obama’s ‘Brass-
Knuckled Intimidation’
Mediaite, by Matt Wilstein    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:34:03 PM     Post Reply
Michelle Malkin joined Megyn Kelly on Fox News Monday afternoon to discuss the latest developments in the investigation into the IRS targeting conservatives for audits. Malkin insisted it was not merely her “ideology” that has led to critique the Obama administration on their handling of the IRS issue and others, but rather the evidence she’s seen of their “bully brigade tactics” to “intimidate and criminalize their political opponents.” Malkin began by going after White House Press Secretary Jay Carney for his handling of the various Obama “scandals,” saying the “clown Carney press briefings have turned in

Fox News Will Defend Reporter
Against ´Co-Conspirator´ Charge
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:05:36 PM     Post Reply
The Justice Department, already under fire for seizing AP phone records, also viewed e-mails of Fox News chief Washington correspondent James Rosen, calling him a criminal ´co-conspirator´ for his reporting. Fox News´ executive vice president of news, Michael Clemente, released a statement defending Rosen. The statement issued Monday afternoon is below: "We are outraged to learn today that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter," Clemente said. "In fact, it is downright chilling. We will unequivocally

Former Counterterrorism Head:
FBI Never Called Ft. Hood
´Workplace Violence´
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Kerry Picket    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 2:49:11 PM     Post Reply
Michael Steinbach, former head of the FBI’s counterterrorism division and now special agent in charge of Miami, told over 30 congressional staffers in March of 2012 that, contrary to the White House´s classification, the bureau does not refer to the Fort Hood shooting as "workplace violence." As head of the FBI counterterrorism division, Steinbach oversaw the investigation into the mass murder at Texas Army base. Steinbach made this claim during an unclassified counterterrorism briefing on Capitol Hill. “Do you guys teach your agents that Fort Hood was workplace violence?” one staffer asked.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement


Post Reply   Close thread 711237





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~