A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Bleary Eyes, Broken
Hearts, We Lost
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Bleary Eyes, Broken
Hearts, We Lost

PJ Media, by Bryan Preston

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/8/2012 10:54:50 AM

Let’s get the emotional response to the Disaster of 2012 out of the way. I don’t know about you, but this is how I felt last night and continue to feel today. I couldn’t have said it better, Chuck. Sixty million Americans did vote to blow it up. Emotion out of the way, what happened to about a million John McCain voters? In 2008, the uninspiring nominee who became the GOP standard-bearer because of a timely endorsement from orange Charlie Crist racked up 58,343,671 votes. In 2012, four years after America has seen Barack Obama’s special blend of malevolent

Comments:
The author asks where the approximately one million votes went who voted for McCain. I have not seen one article mention Gary Johnson. The link below from the Washington Times stated that in Ohio alone a poll showed Johnson getting 5 percent of the vote. That spelled disaster.

http://tinyurl.com/d322sp4

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: lalo, 11/8/2012 10:59:37 AM     (No. 8999446)

The Bible says the poor will always be with us, but they should also have mentioned idiots - we will always have them with us as well unfortunately - synonymous with third-party candidates & third parties.


Reply 2 - Posted by: NYbob, 11/8/2012 11:05:13 AM     (No. 8999461)

Exactly right OP. TWO terms of Clinton should have made this crystal clear for every dope that voted 3rd party or who didn't vote. ALL of what follows is on YOU. Sending a message in 2008 resulted in all the debacles of BHO and the much bigger long term problem of a Supreme Court about to negate the entire check and balance system. So great job. Not voting for McCain got you Sortofanightmare and Kegan. Voting for Gary Johnson will get you our worst fears. Wonderful and thanks for destroying the country Johnson. Your vanity trip empowers the alien.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: EQKimball, 11/8/2012 11:05:46 AM     (No. 8999466)

It wasn't just a million McCain voters who did not show up, according to Sean Trende at RCP, 7 million fewer white voters showed up. All day long, the national press reported that this was a record turnout, long lines everywhere. Yet in the end the popular total was down 8 million from 2008. So strange.


Reply 4 - Posted by: STLstudent, 11/8/2012 11:10:45 AM     (No. 8999479)

Why does the Republican Party keep throwing old, washed-up, unprincipled, country-club-loving piles of goo at us? Republican presidential candidates since 1988 have been garbage.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Persecutor2, 11/8/2012 11:14:29 AM     (No. 8999492)

Evangelicals? Early on, Fox news mentioned that they didn't seem to be coming thru for Romney in one state or another , I think it was Virginia.


Reply 6 - Posted by: bamapreacher, 11/8/2012 11:16:19 AM     (No. 8999497)

Even though I voted I guess those 8 million felt the way I did, that there was no real chance, and that, in the event of an Obama victory, I would just shrug my shoulders and say goodbye to the United States. Empires and nations come and go, and it's just our turn to go. I'm ashamed to be an American, ashamed that there are people who would vote for Obama not to mention Warren, Pelosi, Lee, Grayson and a host of others. Ashamed of a country that pays any attention to movie stars offscreen, and reality stars anywhere. Ashamed of a country that allows itself to become just another country on the world map, and ashamed of a country that let millions of its soldiers die for a country that turns out to be, in the end, just another on the dustheap of history. Only God endures.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 11/8/2012 11:19:14 AM     (No. 8999508)

Here's the general rule I follow without fail: I show up and vote for the person who most nearly represents my views, because, if you don't, the other person might win.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Hairy Eyeball, 11/8/2012 11:23:11 AM     (No. 8999519)

Looks like the Mayans were right.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Poliskeptic, 11/8/2012 11:45:48 AM     (No. 8999590)

In Re: free stuff

Maybe all the people out of work who normally would want a job were scared enough to vote for Obama, the best hope to continue their 'free stuff.' It will no doubt be worse four years from now.......the Socialists will have guaranteed their staying in power with more and more people receiving free stuff. They will print money to fund the jobless....meanwhile, the rest of us who actually worked and earned our little stockpile of money will find it worth less and less. I'm bereft.


Reply 10 - Posted by: noproblems, 11/8/2012 11:46:27 AM     (No. 8999595)

I have been commenting on Lucianne that American needs new political parties. I understand that 15 million fewer people voted in 2012 than in 2008, and that Romney got less votes than McCain. How can this be with so much at stake?

The answer is that less and less people have faith in our political process, our politicians, and our political parties.


Reply 11 - Posted by: andyboy, 11/8/2012 12:05:31 PM     (No. 8999676)

The GOP should seek out the millions of voters who backed McCain and not Romney and find out why. Answering that question might be the key to victory in 2016.

My guess? The GOP needs to be more inclusive toward a certain group -- not Hispanics, women or gays... but Conservatives.


Reply 12 - Posted by: EQKimball, 11/8/2012 12:06:00 PM     (No. 8999677)

If true, this election means several contradictory things: 1. It was not the "record turnout" reported in the press all day long. 2. Despite enthusiastic reports from the Romney campaign and the RNC, the Republican GOTV was an absolute disaster. 3. The counties where Rove said the Republican vote total was up from 2008 on election night were actually down. 4. Despite the lack of large crowds in the closing days for McCain and huge crowds for Romney, Republicans were wildly more enthusiastic about McCain.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: philemon1967, 11/8/2012 12:06:36 PM     (No. 8999680)

Hold onto your guns. You will be needing it for defense against Obama minions coming for your goods. Obama will find America isn't like Zimbabwe.

With the media firmly on the progressives' side, it is a matter of time before the Obama oligarchy starts nationalizing private property and robbing from his subjects to reward his cronies. In 2012, the fourth estate has turned out to be the fifth column in the nation.


Reply 14 - Posted by: KsGirl101, 11/8/2012 12:08:00 PM     (No. 8999684)

One thing I know positively. We're shutting down our small business. There goes four more people onto the unemployment lines. I hate it so much, but we're tired of beating our heads against 4 dollar diesel, taxes and regulations and fines and insurance and living on my salary alone and the fear of the government and what they're going to do next. We're selling out, buying guns and ammo and sticking whatever we have left in a sock and hunkering down.
Dear lord I hate this. But what I hate more are people who would sell their birthright for free stuff. People with ABSOLUTELY nothing in their lives to point to as personal worth but feel they're an invaluable asset to the world because of their mere existence. Thank you public education and your unnatural fixation on self esteem. Pigs in a feed lot have more worth than these people.
(Sorry. Got carried away there a bit.)


Reply 15 - Posted by: confused, 11/8/2012 12:20:47 PM     (No. 8999727)



Romney was a good candidate and this was a very good election effort. Various poling companies loudly proclaimed the democrat turnout would be different this season but the after the election results the TV land reality counts seemed wrong. The real problem was not the voters, counters or who was watching the counters. A firm owned by George Soros and operated in Spain took care of massaging the numbers. They did not have to follow the pundit’s theories because the rascals made up an alternate pro-Obama reality.
The counters inserted facetious gross number and manipulated the results. (GIGO –Garbage in, Garbage out) No wonder the Dems weren’t worried. The results were preordained.

The company is called SCYTL. Look it up on Google. It is owned by George Soros and does many number counting jobs for the USA and the separate states.

Of course some people will deny fraud (with the flimsiest of excuses) but they denied the 1919 World Series, Fast and Furious and are currently trying to tell us that what we all know about Benghazi is the haze of war. “Walk on by folks, nothing to see here”

There was a haze of war with the elections and unless we adamantly protest it now, today, this election cycle, there will be no prospect for fair future elections. The count and recounts will always be phony but look perfect. (Just like Russia and Venezuela).

SCYTL, member the name.

The problem is. Who will investigate? Not the in the tank investigative reporters, the broadcast media, the NYT, the Department of Justice or the Attorney general?
We have lost our voting voice and power; we are now subjects of the regimen.


Read Voter Fraud: fact of fiction
http://www.humanevents.com/2012/05/09/scytl-voter-fraud-facts-and-fiction/


Reply 16 - Posted by: Chief1942, 11/8/2012 2:55:04 PM     (No. 9000155)

If by "we lost" you mean America, you're dead on with that assessment. We now have 50+ percent of this nation's citizens who are progressive/socialists, hate America, want more and bigger government, more taxes (since most of them pay little or none), an impotent military, total acceptance of perverted chosen lifestyles, population control via infanticide, and taking the guns out of the hands of those that might defend freedom with them, an end to the Capitalist system that made this the wealthiest nation on earth, and of course continued contrition towards the fact that this nation once practiced slavery. That about sum it up?
The reality is that we can no longer use the law-abiding, legal system to turn this ship around. They have effectively stacked the deck to that approach in their favor. Nothing left to do but to use their very own tactics and fight fire with fire, while we still possess the fire.


Reply 17 - Posted by: franq, 11/8/2012 4:33:24 PM     (No. 9000415)

Well, #15, if what you say is true, we are pretty much on our own.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: judy, 11/8/2012 4:42:11 PM     (No. 9000438)

Repubs will never win when you have more than half the population (56 million) on food stamps . They voted for the freebies. They were afraid Romney would take away their free stuff. Dems love to tax & give away taxpayers $$$$. The makers lost to the takers. When is makers going to protest they are tired of paying for the ones who refuse to work. The won used taxpayers $$$$ to get the freebie votes. Also Romney should have included the tea party, he played it toooo safe.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Penney, 11/8/2012 6:51:30 PM     (No. 9000728)

One of the GOP leaders, (-might have been Gillespy, not sure), is toying with a bad idea for future campaigning & was on pbs this morning blaming the Romney loss on a lengthy & detailed list of his idea of GOP failures. Most of his, 'dirty laundry airing,' seemed to focus on supposed failures by the GOP to do like the dem pols by pandering, (my word for it!), to special interest groups, neatly compartmentalized, such as Latinos. He apparently thinks the GOP should be as divisive as the dems and copy their tactic of dividing Americans into special interest groups, ethnicities, genders, race, religion & etc., in order to court each one separately and apart from the rest, offering special policy favors for each in exchange for their votes. (...He didn't suggest adapting candidate's personal speech patterns to conform with each grouping like 0bama does, but that will probably come later! s/)

If political campaigning comes to THIS sort of twisted & divisive ploy by BOTH parties, the country is indeed in BIG trouble, for the authentic principles of equality & freedom, which are secured for us each in the Constitution, remain THE SAME EQUALLY for everyone. If that isn't the message of, ''America,'' what is?!! ...''E Pluribus Unim,'' Out of Many, One, lest some politicos forget!

The basic principles of freedom in the USA and EQUAL respect are the same for each human life as a valued individual American citizen. The GOP must convey Liberty's principles and Rights to each & every American citizen, ...absolutes which were secured by the Founders in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution and which have made America the beacon of Liberty on this planet since its founding.



Post Reply   Close thread 711235




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Colorado sheriffs seek to
block new gun restrictions,
file lawsuit against state
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM     Post Reply
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations

´We could lose everything´: Tea
Party groups prepare to sue IRS
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.

   

 



 
First Lady Expands Anti-
Obesity Campaign to Museums
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM     Post Reply
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community

Congressman: IRS asked pro-
life group about ´the content
of their prayers´
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM     Post Reply
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although

Treasury Knew of I.R.S.
Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,

HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t
Employees More Time for ´Planning
and Preparing Healthy Meals´
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM     Post Reply
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.

Will real villains in IRS
scandal ever be punished?
Fox News, by Juan Williams    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM     Post Reply
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

53 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

44 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

38 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 711235





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~