If they really don't, then why did they vote for the media's boy.

That was my question, #1.

And why do they think that it's Bush's fault?

The only way to end the death grip they have is to after them personally. Call them out on their partisanship and hypocracy. Get them fired.

cancel your newspaper subscriptions! Now!

Post-election survey: Voters have no brains. There fixed that headline for you.

why were all four moderators democrats?

Pravda or state run media is what we have. The only vestige of truth is FoxNews. At least they try to give both sides. I am cancelling my local newspaper since they backed Obama. I do not watch any network news and totally boycott NBC on everything.

GOP voters have no trust in the media but Dem voters don't make a move until they are told who to vote for by the MSM, talk show hosts and pop stars.

Yet they bought the bull the media was selling hook, line and sinker.

The only thing I could offer to explain this connundrum, is that the Yutes are programmed already even before they leave whatever Gulag school they idled in. Perhaps microchiped (? Or maybe the cultural fascination with Zombies is rooted in fact?

#1, they didn't. The election was stolen by cheating libtards who have had four years and billions of dollars to manufacture the votes. In other words they did what they accused the pubbies of doing in 2000 and 2004 - payback for their insane projection, don't you know...

The MSM is totally responsible for what has come down to date, and what will happen coming down now. Don't BUY anything the media tries to sell, don't give them the time of day, and be sure, very sure you watch what you do, read, watch and consume from here on end. America is on a downward road. We all are in for whatever the ONE dishes out...revenge is his middle name.

Remember the 2nd debate when Obama told Crawley to 'get the transcript' which she then waved to the audience to prove BO's statement of calling it an act of terror. If that wasn't collusion I don't know what is.

We need good good recognizable names to call the alphabets. They have brought the Fauxnews label into common use. We need to push back on that. Fox is the only network who TRIES. The others just prostrate themselves before 0bambam's throne.

So, start a real network. Yes, it will cost a lot more than if someone had started an alternative to CNN when Ted Turner started his own propaganda outlet. Whoever would do it would make money, but it requires intelligence, street smarts and guts. I don't expect it to happen via Rush and others banding together, but maybe the O'Keefe kid with his camcorder will survive. Of course it may be way too late to stop this dive into a new Dark Ages.

Stop with this. Don't be down. Let it go. Take more care of your family. The press and the 47% face collapse. Let it happen.
I would, in the meantime, take an NRA class.

Thank God Almighty for the internet, talk radio and the Fox News Network to counteract the totally corrupt evil Drive-By Media of today.......Brings to mind the situation in Europe after World War II, when the enslaved masses behind "The Iron Curtain" in Eastern Europe had only communist dominated forms of mass media available to them. Therefore, the advent of Radio Free Europe (1949) and Radio Liberty (1953).

I believe that the MSM is a fifth column in this country bent on its undoing! Most of these people are anti-American and are communist/socialist in their ideology! Unless We, the People act to limit their influence, we will continue to reap the whirlwind!

MSM? Benghazi? What a despicable joke.

I have the same question as do #1 and #2.

FTA:"...voters were keenly aware of what the media was doing." But they went along with it, didn't they?

Romney was a good candidate and this was a very good election effort. Various poling companies loudly proclaimed the democrat turnout would be different this season but the after the election results the TV land reality counts seemed wrong. The real problem was not the voters, counters or who was watching the counters. A firm owned by George Soros and operated in Spain took care of massaging the numbers. They did not have to follow the pundit’s theories because the rascals made up an alternate pro-Obama reality.
The counters inserted facetious gross number and manipulated the results. (GIGO –Garbage in, Garbage out) No wonder the Dems weren’t worried. The results were preordained.

The company is called SCYTL. Look it up on Google. It is owned by George Soros and does many number counting jobs for the USA and the separate states.

Of course some people will deny fraud (with the flimsiest of excuses) but they denied the 1919 World Series, Fast and Furious and are currently trying to tell us that what we all know about Benghazi is the haze of war. “Walk on by folks, nothing to see here”

There was a haze of war with the elections and unless we adamantly protest it now, today, this election cycle, there will be no prospect for fair future elections. The count and recounts will always be phony but look perfect. (Just like Russia and Venezuela).

SCYTL, member the name.

The problem is. Who will investigate? Not the in the tank investigative reporters, the broadcast media, the NYT, the Department of Justice or the Attorney general?
We have lost our voting voice and power; we are now subjects of the regimen.


Read Voter Fraud: fact of fiction
http://www.humanevents.com/2012/05/09/scytl-voter-fraud-facts-and-fiction/

I harbor some resentment against Fox News. In the cases of the Obamacare vote and also the last presidential election, I believe they kept us hoping to get ratings. Saying the truth (that we were going to lose) right up front would not have kept us watching night after night.

And, of course, I also blame O'Reilly for declining to vet Obama during the 2008 election.