A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Data Points To A Powerful Romney
Campaign – And Yet…He Lost.
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Data Points To A Powerful Romney
Campaign – And Yet…He Lost.

Ulsterman Report, by Ulsterman

Original Article

Posted By:LOL Thomas, 11/7/2012 7:48:54 PM

Received this link from Insider this afternoon and told to look it over carefully.  They remain completely confounded as to how the reported #s and final results appear to directly conflict with data such as appears in this link. (Snip) Mitt Romney earned MORE votes among liberals, moderates, and conservatives than were cast for the Republican candidate in 2008 – in fact, this improvement was by a full 7% over 2008 – a very significant improvement.  Mitt Romney earned more votes from Protestants, Catholics, and Jews than the Republican nominee received in 2008, including a 9-point improvement among Jewish voters

Comments:
When you read the rest of the data, you’ll also see that a number of blacks shifted from Obama in 2008 to Romney in 2012. The enigma deepens . . .

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: jl80863, 11/7/2012 7:56:46 PM     (No. 8998115)

Golly folks, do you suppose there was some voter fraud the dems are so famous for?


Reply 2 - Posted by: Rubinski, 11/7/2012 8:00:49 PM     (No. 8998129)

I feel like they figured out how to steal votes, whether it was through manipulation of the machines, the EV, or however, that's my belief.

I truly despise what happened. I really don't believe what happened.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: curious1, 11/7/2012 8:03:55 PM     (No. 8998133)

Libtards spent the last 4 years generating voter registrations they could use for ballot box stuffing, When you have billions and there is no downside you can produce a lot of votes, without having to get the voters to come out and support you..
When such traitors start getting taken outside to the back of the courthouse by a sheriffs' deputy who then puts a round through their head (after a fair trial, of course) you'll see such behavior drop off.


Reply 4 - Posted by: kanphil, 11/7/2012 8:05:26 PM     (No. 8998139)

Good, sober people are losing confidence in the integrity of the voting process. This is extremely dangerous.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Scottish girl, 11/7/2012 8:07:42 PM     (No. 8998146)

Still so upset with the result. My friend and I were just saying how big Mitt won in the red states. When you saw his stops thousands of folk were there.


Reply 6 - Posted by: chance_232, 11/7/2012 8:08:52 PM     (No. 8998148)

No.....they just turned out more voters looking for their ObamaPhone.

These are exit POLLS, not real data. They have a margin of error and are impossible to validate. You will never win in a court of law with polls.


Reply 7 - Posted by: doodah, 11/7/2012 8:09:16 PM     (No. 8998151)

This is truly a cliche about elections, being crooked, but, I just could not believe that Romney all of a sudden was losing NC, Florida, Virginia (where he has been ahead all night). It seemed that Rasmuusen and Gallup, the two most respected pollsters, got it wrong and every other poll had it right. I still believe they knew how to puts votes in machines or something... the Dems created I believe.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: killerbee, 11/7/2012 8:10:43 PM     (No. 8998152)

I said it last night. There needs to be an independent investigation. It may not help after Romney's concession, but it will help to delegitimize the Won. There is no way he could have won this election without stealing it.

Keep praying hard for a miracle. If God doesn't intervene for us, we'll never recover from this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: wendybird, 11/7/2012 8:11:16 PM     (No. 8998153)

A physician friend who votes at the same place I do told me today that when he started the voting process yesterday, the ballot was marked for Obama. He couldn't erase or reverse it, and finally had to ask the guy in charge of the poling place to erase the obama vote. How many of us would make the effort? This is surreal.


Reply 10 - Posted by: peasantnumberthree, 11/7/2012 8:13:53 PM     (No. 8998165)

All this leaves me wondering if Venezuela's last election was less crooked than ours...


Reply 11 - Posted by: Emmajustin, 11/7/2012 8:18:00 PM     (No. 8998171)

We know the dems cheat. That is in their DNA.

But it is actually more frightening to think that there are really that many welfare takers and uninformed (or in favor of abortion, illegals, higher costs & taxes) folks that could vote for the idiot boy.


Reply 12 - Posted by: dolphin, 11/7/2012 8:24:30 PM     (No. 8998177)

Voter fraud.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: spengler, 11/7/2012 8:27:12 PM     (No. 8998181)

Machines in key states were rigged; the enemy started working on this 4 years ago.
Illegals voted. Others voted more than once. Mail-in ballots were falsified.

Our descent into Tyranny will soon accelerate. Evil will Rule.

America has been given over to Darkness.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Donna M, 11/7/2012 8:32:35 PM     (No. 8998187)

Back in my kid advertising account exec days, when I had to keep spreadsheets with pencil and green paper, my smart account supervisor told me to always eyeball the calculations, no matter how carefully made, for something called logic. The split nature of the results and the way they were reported don't meet the eyeball test. I do wish Romney had pressed for recounts, although I think their fatal error of the campaign was the loss of momentum experienced with Hurricane Sandy.

I keep thinking--what if Romney had bought national TV (net and cable) time late last week, to deliver a final message of change and recovery--and as part of it places where aid could be donated. What if the Romney people had forestalled Christie's big hug with Obama by flying Romney or Ryan into NJ--or making it very clear that if Christie invited Obama in that he may as well leave the Republican party. (Look for Christie to go 'independent' or Democrat in 2013, if he doesn't wind up in Washington.)

But what can you do when God gives you one final test, one more challenge and we fail it?


Reply 15 - Posted by: Subal, 11/7/2012 8:51:01 PM     (No. 8998226)

Christie goes to Att.General and Eric to Supreme Court!


Reply 16 - Posted by: god of irony, 11/7/2012 8:54:51 PM     (No. 8998234)

You can't look at the exit polls, they just tell you about the people that voted. 2 million McCain supporters didn't vote this time. Just like in 06, Evangelicals stayed home. Think back to all of the Mormon hatred that use to exist here at L.com those people didn't change their hearts, they just stayed home.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Fosterdad, 11/7/2012 9:03:11 PM     (No. 8998245)

#16 is right. Romney got 2.5 million fewer votes than McCain. Someone stayed home and I suspect it was Evangelicals who let anti-Mormon bigotry get the best of them. I hope I'm wrong, but I cannot for the life of me imagine anyone voting for McCain, yet staying home this time. If there's another explanation, I'd like to hear it.

Now 0bama got 9 million fewer votes than he did in '08. That I expected. But the GOP drop off totally defies all logic.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: cgood, 11/7/2012 9:05:44 PM     (No. 8998253)

I don't believe for a second that more people voted for McCain than Romney. Everyone I spoke to, eveything I read pointed to a very high turnout. Obama won like Chavez, Putin, and Saddam won.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Safari Man, 11/7/2012 9:14:14 PM     (No. 8998263)

The Muslims declared war on America decades ago and it took us until 9/11/01 to realize that we were at war. The progressives are at war with us and I still don't think we have realized it yet. When the republicans realize we're at war, maybe something will improve on our side. This is a cold war, a cold civil war.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Italiano, 11/7/2012 9:18:23 PM     (No. 8998267)

Evangelicals (I am one) did not stay home, especially after the Billy Graham ad hit. As for Romney getting fewer votes than McCain in 2008, get real. 2008 was when conservatives stayed home. It doesn't add up.


Reply 21 - Posted by: NY Betsy Rose, 11/7/2012 9:45:57 PM     (No. 8998316)

If this reaction to a stolen election keeps building to say.. Dec 21, 2012.. the Mayans may have been right. We will be released from whatever peril comes our way and ascend to higher spiritual beings. Would love to have my chin stick up higher than obambis..just once.


Reply 22 - Posted by: pickle1, 11/7/2012 9:55:20 PM     (No. 8998332)

It was rigged. They have been planning it for a long time. I believe the Republicans were involved. My first red flag was no campaigning. Just enough to keep the cover. I kept asking this over and over. Why not? You don't have to watch Fox or the others to know this. Republicans came on with Democrats to keep us distracted while possibly Sec of States were busy setting up the fraud. They keep knocking off conservatives one by one. Why wasn't Ted Cruz who swears he is a conservative knocked off? Simple, he isn't. Obama has never run anything but an illegal election. Obama is the perfect idiot just like Hitler to be the front for this. He intentionally has not let us know who he is to mainly keep us distracted. Yes, he should be investigated. The entire thing is a crock and no it's not the voters fault both sides. It is the fault of the government, bankers, businessmen and one world government. They can't take over unless they destroy America. I can now see why their was little campaigning. The fix was in.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Trenet, 11/7/2012 10:07:44 PM     (No. 8998367)

Remember also that a very large number of the Military
Did not get their ballots..I do not think that they would have voted for the man who let some Americans die in Benghazi!


Reply 24 - Posted by: snowcloud, 11/7/2012 10:19:28 PM     (No. 8998395)

I will N.E.V.E.R. donate again to any political candidate as long as I live. What a waste of my hard earned and stretched-to-the-limit-budgeted money. NEVER again.


Reply 25 - Posted by: ramona, 11/7/2012 10:33:06 PM     (No. 8998421)

I'm about as weary of hearing the Mormon card played as I am with the race card. Of course there were Conservatives who sat this one out - the anger after the McLame campaign led many (and we knew them here) to say that they would never be used again as pawns for the RNC. I agree that fraud could be a factor (perhaps even THE factor), but any loss of Conservative voters was a message to the RNC as much as it was a repudiation of a weakly conservative candidate.

I do hope some legal group investigates these results - especially the loss of military ballots in a suspicious plane crash.
Ramona (the Pest)


Reply 26 - Posted by: skedaddle, 11/7/2012 10:46:28 PM     (No. 8998441)

#22 is onto something. The Republican candidates in Missouri did absolutely no campaigning. Akin was the only Republican heard of and that was negative from both sides. Romney won the state but many of the other races went Democrat which doesn't make much sense either. The results just look really odd to me.


Reply 27 - Posted by: TigerLilly, 11/7/2012 11:36:18 PM     (No. 8998490)

I seem to have missed the election results for the hotly contested senate seats, house seats and governors races. Does anyone know the new count for Rep/Dem in senate and house?


Reply 28 - Posted by: Bla Bla, 11/7/2012 11:49:34 PM     (No. 8998509)

I think the DNC machine looked at all the missing names in the registers they could find (in the key states), then plugged in "all Dem party" ballots with those names that didn't show this time. They could still be filling in fake signatures right now as we type.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Bla Bla, 11/7/2012 11:58:28 PM     (No. 8998514)

re #17 -- I have another explanation. He is considered by the Righteous Right to be a flip-flopper, a RINO, &/or a moderate. They voted for McCain last time holding their nose, & were bitterly disappointed. They are mad at the GOP for continuing to give us candidates too close to a Dem, so this time they stayed home to teach them a lesson.

There may be a small percentage that wouldn't vote for a Mormon, but there is an even more complex reason for that. It has to do with having a "gut", and critical thinking abilities, which some believe is drummed-out of young Mormon men. I voted for him this time & in the last election, but I've heard discussions about that.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Crashnburn, 11/8/2012 12:46:07 AM     (No. 8998546)

Was it Karl Marx who said "It doesn't matter who votes, it only matters who counts the votes". As I understand, a lot of the voting machine companies are owned by George Soros. Would he have any interest in having Obama win?

I think there was massive voter fraud. I think there was at least some of each type of fraud mentioned in this topic.


Reply 31 - Posted by: janylou, 11/8/2012 1:16:07 AM     (No. 8998567)

I agree with #20. I am a Christian and didn't want Romney to get the nominee as I am not a fan of Mormons having lived among them all my life, but I didn't want Obama in again so I voted as did many of my friends. We are not responsible for his loss. I'd like to know why he was string in the first debate, semi-strong in the second and totally a rollover in the third? I would have thought too with all the Mormons in those swing states, he would have had a good ground game just from his church. And speaking of Mormons, how did Love lose in UT, a solidly Mormon state?


Reply 32 - Posted by: mws50, 11/8/2012 4:16:46 AM     (No. 8998638)

In Houston, a woman that used to live at one of our properties told us why she voted a straight democrat ticket, when she was a Romney supporter. The bus driver that picked up everyone at the nursing home to go vote, told them the Republicans planned on killing the Medicare they all received for their medical problems and they all would be kicked out on the street if the republicans won, so they needed to vote straight democrat to save the money they are all getting.

She was very upset when she was talking to our employees, especially after we told her the bus driver was lying to them.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Passion, 11/8/2012 4:36:11 AM     (No. 8998651)

I am, for the first time in my life, proudly trying on tin foil hats and buying into a kooky conspiracy theory - because the kooky theory that they managed to steal 5-10-15 million votes is ridiculous, but makes more sense than anything else I can think of.

Beam me up Scotty.....


Reply 34 - Posted by: danu, 11/8/2012 4:40:00 AM     (No. 8998655)

*In friendship false, implacable in hate:
Resolv'd to ruin or to rule the state.
To compass this, the triple bond he broke;
The pillars of the public safety shook:
And fitted Israel for a foreign yoke.*

~Absalom and Achitophel
by John Dryden(1631-1700)


Reply 35 - Posted by: bugger, 11/8/2012 4:43:07 AM     (No. 8998656)

There was massive voter fraud, no doubt. We have been sold out, no doubt. But it saddens me even more that people are starting to blame the Christians. I was thinking earlier this morning that the RINO's and others would do this.

Nothing happens on earth that God does not allow. I prayed hard that he would intervene and that the fraud would be rendered useless. That did not happen. I fear that God's judgement is finally being unleashed on America. For how many years can a nation slaughter innocent babies, to mention just one sinister aspect of decline, and not pay a price?


Reply 36 - Posted by: mws50, 11/8/2012 6:50:05 AM     (No. 8998729)

In 2008, O got over 69 million votes, McCain got almost 60 million votes. Romney received 58 million.

I cannot comprehend how over 2 million McCain voters stayed at home and how we did not receive at least 65 million votes for Romney with the economy as bad as it is.

Something is wrong.


Reply 37 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 11/8/2012 7:58:53 AM     (No. 8998860)

I'm having a tough time getting accurate reporting for the actual vote count.

69 million votes in 2008 and 9 million less this time for obama leaves 60 million for obama. McCain got 60 million in 2008 and Romney got the 58 million, then it's just a short hop to throw in a couple extra million to get obama across the line.

Voter machines by the hundreds we know of switched votes. Add a few trunks full of phony early ballots and the fix is in. It took only a million switches and ballots and you get the 2 million advantage. There have been more than that identified by my count in the last election. The demns sharpened their tools for this election.

I can see no way this election went the way it did.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 11/8/2012 8:07:30 AM     (No. 8998876)

Not a news site. Blogs are dime a dozen.


Reply 39 - Posted by: doodah, 11/8/2012 8:26:10 AM     (No. 8998933)

Don't blame the evangelicals, huge churches were on a 40 days of fasting and prayer and had huge rallies for Romney. What about Ron Paul supporters, would they make up the difference? Somehow, I can't believe they would be receptive to voting for Romney, when they were so bitter at the end. So, Ron Paulers out there, are you the ones that showed us who is boss?? If not, there was voter fraud, it does not feel right and the Chicago mafia was busy, busy in this election. When everyone is shaking their heads and are so shocked, common sense tells you something is wrong!


Reply 40 - Posted by: LadyVet, 11/8/2012 8:28:33 AM     (No. 8998940)

Where is #22 from? Why the suspicions about Ted Cruz? The answer is that he was elected from Texas and Texas is not Ohio, Michigan, or Wisconsin. We are not full of unionized thugs who run our elections. We do have some problems in our border counties and in Shiela Jackson Lee's district, but for the most of the state, it is still mostly sane.

We are expecting more "revenge" and "punish our enemies" coming from Washington, Obama, and Valerie Jarrett.


Reply 41 - Posted by: doodah, 11/8/2012 8:29:07 AM     (No. 8998941)

One more thing, if voter fraud is the answer, then it is a bridge too far to blame Repubs, this was straight from George Soros and the Chicago Mafia. With all the time and money, they figured out the game plan to steal the election like their socialist playbook reveals. How is it proved? That's the problem.



Post Reply   Close thread 711176




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "LOL Thomas"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "LOL Thomas"



‘The hunt is over’: Boston
bombing suspect taken alive
CNN, by Nick Dutton    Original Article
Posted By: LOL Thomas- 4/20/2013 4:50:41 AM     Post Reply
The second suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings was taken into custody Friday night, bringing to an end a massive manhunt in the tense Massachusetts capital worried by warnings the man was possibly armed with explosives. After announcing the arrest on Twitter, Boston police tweeted: “Captured!!! The hunt is over. The search is done. The terror is over. And justice has won. Suspect in custody.” (Snip) Police were alerted to his whereabouts by a man who went outside after authorities lifted an order for residents to stay inside during the manhunt. The man saw blood on a boat in the

First Spartanburg election requiring
photo IDs goes smoothly
Spartanburg Herald-Journal [SC], by Felicia Kitzmiller    Original Article
Posted By: LOL Thomas- 3/14/2013 3:02:49 AM     Post Reply
There were few complaints at the Woodruff polls as South Carolina´s new voter photo ID requirement was enforced for the first time in Spartanburg County. The re-do election for mayor in Woodruff is the first Spartanburg County election since the photo ID requirement went into effect Jan. 1. The law requires voters to show a S.C. driver´s license, Department of Motor Vehicles ID card, voter registration card with photo, federal military ID or a United States passport to cast a ballot. (Snip) The law was passed in 2012 as a measure to combat voter fraud, according to proponents.

Why the ‘threat’ on
Bob Woodward matters
Washington Post, by Kathleen Parker    Original Article
Posted By: LOL Thomas- 3/1/2013 9:41:36 PM     Post Reply
To the world beyond the Beltway, it might not mean much that Bob Woodward of the famed Watergate duo went public with his recent White House run-in. This would be an oversight. (Snip) Distrust of media, encouraged by alternative media seeking to enhance their own standing, has become a tool useful to the very powers the Fourth Estate was constitutionally endowed to monitor. When the president can bypass reporters to reach the public, it is not far-fetched to imagine a time — perhaps now? — when the state controls the message.

Woodward Right About Obama
Moving Sequester Goal Posts
Breitbart’s Big Government, by John Sexton    Original Article
Posted By: LOL Thomas- 3/1/2013 12:58:52 AM     Post Reply
There are two stories circulating around Bob Woodward this morning. (Snip) But the White House also wanted the issue to disappear until after the election, so in conjunction with Congress it proposed (and the President specifically endorsed) an enforcement mechanism called sequestration. In exchange for agreeing to a package of $1.2T in cuts with no revenues as a failsafe, Republicans agreed to raise the debt limit high enough that it would not be reached until after the election. The significant point is that the trigger for sequestration was not the same date as the implementation date.

BOOM! Leaked Email Shows
True Intent Of Obama’s Organizing
For Action (WHI RELATED)
Ulsterman Report, by Ulsterman    Original Article
Posted By: LOL Thomas- 2/28/2013 1:08:58 PM     Post Reply
This breaking story is now on Breitbart: Ofa Email: Attack Congressional Republicans on Sequester First, let us revisit the description of Organizing for Action given to us this week by White House Insider: “Well just look under the slimy rock of his Organizing for Action group.  The are all 501’nd up now and starting out with millions of donations and the single biggest voter database in the history of American politics. (Snip) It’s global.  It’s tied in with the U.N., climate change, gun control, healthcare, taxation, global taxation, currency, education, poverty, hunger, they got every big name item involved

White House Denied Senate Attempt
To Present Sequester Compromise
Ulsterman Report, by Ulsterman    Original Article
Posted By: LOL Thomas- 2/26/2013 7:56:19 AM     Post Reply
This just in from our Republican Insider, who has been very busy of late regarding the impending sequestration conflict that is being played out 24/7 by the Mainstream Media and the Obama White House. (Snip) Word of that compromise got out and reached the White House.  I am guessing it was someone working for Reid who relayed that information.  Regardless, it was the very next day that a staffer for one of the Senators working the compromise deal received word from Legislative Affairs to not under any circumstances continue to produce a compromise, or publicize any such deal.

Barack Obama Openly Hints
At Desire To Kill Citizens
With Drones Inside America…
Ulsterman Report, by Ulsterman    Original Article
Posted By: LOL Thomas- 2/17/2013 9:10:07 AM     Post Reply
In a very oddly worded public response to a question posed to him during an online interview, Barack Obama dances around the topic of using military drones to kill Americans inside of the United States. (Snip) First he begins his answer by stating, “There has never been a drone used on an American citizen on American soil.”  Barack Obama doesn’t say there never will be – or that he never intends to do so…he instead chooses – deliberatly, to say that such a thing has not happened…YET..  The president then gets into the meat of his prepared statement



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Benghazi and Obama´s
Ambition to Be U.N. SecGen

54 replie(s)
American Thinker, by James Lewis    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/25/2013 9:20:44 AM     Post Reply
Washington rumor has it that Obama wants to be U.N. Secretary General. There are several reasons that make that likely, and if it´s true, it throws new light on a lot of Obama´s oddities -- including his Royalty Bows, his Apology Tours, his Muslim Sellout, and the Benghazi Cover-Up. But first -- why would Obama be planning to become the chief of the U.N. before he has even finished his second term?

Bystanders in their own fate
53 replie(s)
Orange County Register (Ca), by Mark Steyn    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 5:32:34 PM     Post Reply
On Wednesday, Drummer Lee Rigby of the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, a man who had served Queen and country honorably in the hell of Helmand Province in Afghanistan, emerged from his barracks on Wellington Street, named after the Duke thereof, in southeast London. Minutes later, he was hacked to death in broad daylight and in full view of onlookers by two men with machetes who crowed "Allahu Akbar!" as they dumped his carcass in the middle of the street like so much roadkill. As grotesque as this act of savagery was, the aftermath was even more unsettling

Mark Levin: "RINO" Issa Didn´t
Investigate IRS Before Because
He "Despises The Tea Party"

45 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/24/2013 5:38:38 PM     Post Reply
MARK LEVIN: So why didn´t Chairman Issa hold an investigative hearing a year ago? Why didn´t Chairman Camp, all Republicans, hold an investigative hearing a year ago, and all the other tripping over themselves right now? I´ll tell you why. Because the establishment Republicans, the RINO Republicans, despise the Tea Party. They despise the conservative movement. We exist to be managed, to be shuttled to the polling place, to vote for their candidates. The Karl Roves of the world, and all the rest of them. They fight us in the primaries, they fight us at the grassroots.

Obama Asks Staff to
Start Cc’ing Him on Stuff

37 replie(s)
New Yorker, by Andy Borowitz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/24/2013 5:31:36 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON —In a dramatic departure from existing White House procedures, President Obama requested today that his staff start cc’ing him on stuff. “Look, I know a lot of you think I’m really busy and you don’t want to bother me,” the President reportedly told his staff in an Oval Office meeting. “But cc me anyway. It’s good for me to keep up on what’s going on around here.” “It’s not good when I turn on the news and they’re talking about something at the White House and I’m like, whoa, when did that happen?”

Boy Scouts Change Membership
Guidelines to Allow Homosexuals

30 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Penny Starr    Original Article
Posted By: Maryland_Patriot- 5/24/2013 10:01:34 AM     Post Reply
The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) have reversed their longstanding membership guidelines to allow homosexuals to join the organization. In an email to CNSNews.com, the BSA public affairs office said the vote on the resolution to “remove the restriction denying membership to youth on the basis of sexual orientation alone” was passed with 61.44 percent in favor and 38.56 percent opposed. “For 103 years, the Boy Scouts of America has been a part of the fabric of this nation, with a focus on working together to deliver the nation’s foremost youth program of character development and values-based leadership training,”

The Dots Already Lead To
Obama In The IRS Scandal

30 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 7:11:39 PM     Post Reply
Abuse Of Power: Any scandal investigation that expects a "Eureka!" moment, a White House e-mail, or Oval Office smoking gun will be misguided. In fact, the dots are already connected directly to the president. Barack Obama is not foolish enough to have a tape recording system hidden in his desk. And his administration staff are not careless enough to send one another incriminating e-mails. If the president was behind the IRS unlawfully harassing conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, we can be sure the communications were all sotto voce and in persona, like any good Chicago political operator.

Dem: Republicans throwing
infrastructure ´under the bus’

30 replie(s)
The Hill, by Keith Laing    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/25/2013 6:55:43 PM     Post Reply
A Washington state Democrat is accusing Republicans of “throwing American infrastructure … under the bus” after a bridge collapse there this week. The portion of Interstate 5 in Washington that runs over the Skagit River collapsed on Thursday after a truck hit an overhead support structure, but Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) cited the incident in an interview as proof Republicans were blocking infrastructure investment to hurt President Obama politically. “Well, they have clearly spent the whole last five years trying to tear the president down, but they have done it by throwing the American infrastructure and


Post Reply   Close thread 711176





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~