|
|
| |
Topic: Akin says he got a 'real skunking' |
Akin says he got a 'real skunking'
Politico, by MacKenzie Weinger
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 11/7/2012 3:21:07 PM
|
| Todd Akin on Wednesday called his defeat in the Missouri Senate race to Sen. Claire McCaskill a “real skunking.” Akin spoke about his failed bid with Mike Huckabee, the Republican’s highest-profile defender, on the former Arkansas governor’s radio show. Huckabee introduced Akin to his listeners by saying there was “maybe no greater disappointment personally” on Tuesday than Akin’s loss. Akin called Tuesday a “very, very hard, hard day and hard night.” “I always told people, ‘I don’t trust those polls,’ and the polls said it was supposedly very close or within a few points, and we finished
|
Comments: No, our country got a "real skunking." This is one race we should have won. He and Mourdock should have kept their mouths shut. They know how Democrats will destroy you over anything mispoken. Huckabee congratulated him on an 'honorable race??' Puhleeze.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
rarebear, 11/7/2012 3:28:15 PM (No. 8997293)
Hopefully, this embarassment will flee from public life altogether. The only way to embarass yourself, your family and your countrymen and achieve high political success is to join the Democratic Party. For an example, see Joe Biden. Adios, Akin - you dimwit.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
MissouriMan, 11/7/2012 3:31:02 PM (No. 8997299)
Akin should have done the honorable thing and dropped out of the race. His staying in gave the majority to Clair. I hope Akin rots in H E double hocky sticks.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
geoguy, 11/7/2012 3:32:49 PM (No. 8997302)
Akin is an engineer. That explains why he didn't drop out and let someone else represent the Republican party. My experience has been that engineers think they are the smartest person in the room.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jasmine, 11/7/2012 3:35:36 PM (No. 8997311)
What did he think was going to happen? He showed terrible judgment with his poorly chosen words, and insisted on confirming it by refusing to step aside.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
adguy47, 11/7/2012 3:38:10 PM (No. 8997322)
Here's a Bible verse that arrogant idiot can meditate on while waiting in line for his unemployment check: "Pride goeth before a fall."
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
sunsong, 11/7/2012 3:41:44 PM (No. 8997332)
Akin is the skunk - and he and Huckabee really stink!
There is no excusing what Akin said. The fact that he didn't immediately drop out and the fact that Huckabee supported him are truly disgraceful!
The GOP will simply fade away and die if they keep promoting men like Akin and Mourdock.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Garage Logician, 11/7/2012 3:42:02 PM (No. 8997335)
A real skunking would mean he got no votes. This guy can't express himself out of a wet paper bag. No wonder he put his foot in his mouth earlier. He's an imbecile.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
JediJerry, 11/7/2012 3:43:46 PM (No. 8997338)
What did he expect, a landslide victory? he got his rear end whipped but good over his idiotic remarks about abortion. His massive ego would not let him step aside knowing he had no chance after the fiasco. If he would have stepped aside and let another candidate take his place, it might have been different. In MHO Claire would have won no matter who the Republicans put up against her. Akin just made her win a cake walk. Now it's time to get over it and get a life.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
bighambone, 11/7/2012 3:52:27 PM (No. 8997364)
I agree with the last paragraph by #8. They are both boneheads, why should they even have answered such gotcha questions, as the US Senate has nothing to do with defining rape or abortion.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl, 11/7/2012 3:58:14 PM (No. 8997384)
Akin is proof-positive that politicians are dumber than dirt.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
civilservant, 11/7/2012 3:59:44 PM (No. 8997390)
The Republican Party pushed this honorable man as far away as possible. Chris Christie embraced and lauded BHO.
And somehow it's AKIN'S fault?
No, it is the tendency for R's to run away and the Left to fight and defend.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Stlouislaxbros dad, 11/7/2012 4:01:25 PM (No. 8997404)
Akin won the primary against two others. He got around 36% of the vote.
He then said the goofy "legitimate rape" comment.
Akin then said he would not step down from running as he was elected in the primary.
In reality...true. But realistically.. over 60% of Republicans wanted someone else.
So he listened to God who talks to his wife Lulubelle...and he stayed in.
And now we in Missouri have McCaskill as our United States Senator for six more years.
Thanks Todd.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Northcross, 11/7/2012 4:02:33 PM (No. 8997412)
Nice job Akin. You cost us a valuable seat in the Senate, not so much by your inarticulate remarks, but rather by your absolute refusal to step down. What an ego. What delusions of grandeur. Who was advising you?
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
St. Pitbull, 11/7/2012 4:02:53 PM (No. 8997415)
Well, awww shucks. This dipshot spins some good ol' boy colloquialism instead of tossing himself off a cliff. No shame, huh Akin? "I guess I'll jus' go gets me a ladle o' buttermilk and reconfiger what I shoulda done."
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
gagolfer, 11/7/2012 4:02:56 PM (No. 8997416)
He didn't use "poorly chosen words". He said what he believed. I wouldn't want anyone dumb enough to believe that a woman's body "shuts down" during a "legitimate" rape so she can't get pregnant to make any decision or vote in the Senate for anything that would affect me or any of us. His level of stupidity is mindboggling.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
hoopsfan, 11/7/2012 4:03:30 PM (No. 8997420)
Hey, Todd, in the words of Forest Gump:
Stupid is as stupid does
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
killerbee, 11/7/2012 4:05:37 PM (No. 8997429)
Should have dropped out. Whatever Dirty Claire does in her next term is Akin's responsibility as much as hers. He had a chance to do the right thing and he didn't do it. Shame on him.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Newtsche, 11/7/2012 4:06:26 PM (No. 8997435)
"Missouri, this is the best you got?!!!"
Missouri Rats crossed over in the primary and gave the most beatable Republican in the field the nomination. Even without his idiotic comments, Akin was a loser.
When he didn't step down later, he poisoned the whole GOP well. Attack ads in MO painted McCaskill as a moderate and used Romney's own words to destroy Akin. Akin was hugely outspent and his effective ads were few and far between.
What an ugly, ugly, ugly saga.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
TrueBlueWfan, 11/7/2012 4:14:59 PM (No. 8997462)
#2 said it for me. This was quite foreseeable, and he should have thought twice when the dems gave him money for the primary.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
altoona, 11/7/2012 4:25:03 PM (No. 8997494)
I will always be suspicious of Akin and Mourdock's "gaffes" having been scripted and paid for.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
WIBadger, 11/7/2012 4:25:34 PM (No. 8997497)
Whatever.
Now get out.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Susannah, 11/7/2012 4:28:13 PM (No. 8997503)
John Brunner would have walked all over McCaskill. He should have won the primary, but the Democrats bought and paid for Akin.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
lazlototh, 11/7/2012 4:32:18 PM (No. 8997521)
Mourdock and Akin are both embarrassments to the party. They didn't cost Romney the election but they didn't help, and they lost two easily winnable seats by their stupidity. Shame on them, and I hope never to hear from them again.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
billp, 11/7/2012 4:34:30 PM (No. 8997527)
So I suppose all you are going to hammer the rest of the Republicans who lost as well? Maybe Romney should have stepped aside for a better candidate huh?
Akin got what we all got - beaten by a people who've become ignorant and lazy - willing to be mothered by an all-powerful government. America wants socialism because we've let the socialists run our corporations, our schools, our media and yes, sometimes even our churches. I'm a Missourian and I don't know any Republicans who said they'd not vote for Akin. Lack of Republican and Republican Party support beat Akin. I no longer support the 'country club' Republican party - the go-along to get-along group that just wants to be in the 'club' so they can occasionally get a seat at the table. That's just not good enough.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
William1, 11/7/2012 4:37:02 PM (No. 8997537)
Looks like the circular firing squad is out in full force. Or is it the two minute hate? Not sure.
Sports fans, the problem is in the electorate. We Missourians got the prez vote right, but not the Senate vote.
If it makes you feel good to vilify Akin, go ahead. He**, why don't you get a lynch mob together? I only live about 10 miles from his HQ, so I can drive you there. But what good has it been to us to insist on purity in thought and deed?
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Blackeagle, 11/7/2012 4:38:46 PM (No. 8997547)
A primary runoff could have prevented this. Akin got 36% in a three way race. With a runoff, he would have then gotten 36% in a two-way race.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
rabbit, 11/7/2012 5:12:19 PM (No. 8997698)
I totally agree, #17. Akin's words were beyond "poorly chosen". They were offensive and wrong. He was a fool to think that he ever had a snowball's chance after that gaffe.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
dman, 11/7/2012 5:15:25 PM (No. 8997705)
That he was not made an "offer he can't refuse" to drop out exposes the lack of GOP party discipline.
As to engineers thinking they're the smartest people in the room, we don't. We know you are, #3. /s
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
suziannr, 11/7/2012 5:57:52 PM (No. 8997831)
No! the people responsible for the misery Macaskill will inflict on them is the VOTERS! and them alone. Same throughout this land.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
mominNoCA, 11/7/2012 6:00:02 PM (No. 8997836)
He should have dropped out after he made that ridiculous rape remark. Why play into the Democrats' "War on Women" BS?
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Penney, 11/7/2012 6:07:05 PM (No. 8997859)
McCaskill's offenses throughout her Senate term far outweigh Akin's inexplicable gaff.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
MDConservative, 11/7/2012 6:17:10 PM (No. 8997898)
For those who found Akin soooo offensive, you got yourself McCaskill. He's an idiot; she was. Akin lost, so quit whining, your celebratory beer is getting warm.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
octrojan, 11/7/2012 6:43:08 PM (No. 8997965)
The fact that he's even talking about rape shows what an idiot he is. The middle east is in flames, Iran's getting a nuke, we're trillions in debt, the fiscal cliff is coming...and this dope gets sucked into a conversation about rape/abortion. He can't manage to focus back on the issues?
An egomaniac who thinks he's bigger than the cause. What a loser.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 11/7/2012 7:53:52 PM (No. 8998106)
Akin, you became one of the top 10 distractions in the race. Your pride cost a crucial Senate seat. You could have dropped out gracefully after the huge unforced error, but didn't. You will be an example of pride leading to catastrophe.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
mmdemimonde, 11/7/2012 9:05:09 PM (No. 8998252)
and he was the biggest stinker. if he love america, he would have dropped out of the race. mc caskell was could been beaten and the narrative of the MSM would have stopped dead in its' tracks. this creep is a selfish, arrogant buffoon. he should be shunned.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
bighambone, 11/7/2012 11:34:38 PM (No. 8998488)
Republicans should know that the liberal media is out there just waiting for a Republican candidate to make a dumb comment about abortion or rape, so that it can be reconstructed out of context, and used against the candidate and the party in general. Since the Republicans apparently have not figured that out you can see why they are called the stupid party!
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 11/7/2012 11:39:52 PM (No. 8998497)
Akin. I do not blame you. You were obviously not ready for primetime. Sleep well, dear lad. dont wet the bed and Best wishes with that abstinence thing.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Sunhan65, 11/7/2012 11:51:20 PM (No. 8998511)
Todd, go strangle yourself.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
binthere_dunthat, 11/8/2012 1:35:46 AM (No. 8998581)
#22 You may well be on to something here.
Stranger circumstances can hardly be imagined.
What better way for the low life Dems to win can be arranged than to set up and fund a couple of extreme idiots for your opposition? Chicago political thugs must be chortling over these two "campaigns".
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
civilservant, 11/8/2012 11:08:17 AM (No. 8999473)
"Some doctors have told me that....."
#17, please explain how relating what others said is an expression of HIS beliefs???
This forum(mostly) threw Akin under the bus, and LAUDED the 'conservatism' of Chris Christie.
Who's the arrogant fools NOW??
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Remember when Fox News wasn’t ‘real news’?
|
|
Human Events, by David Harsanyi
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 10:21:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
We now know that the Justice Department kept exceptionally close tabs on Fox News reporter James Rosen in 2010, following his trips in and out of the State Department, hacking his personal emails and phone calls. Normal newsgathering activities are being treated as criminal activities by the White House. But consider what the same White House had to say about Fox News back in 2009. You might remember the concerted effort by White House officials to brand the right-leaning Fox News as a bogus news outlet, unworthy of attention.
|
|
More Secrets From Huma Abedin
|
|
FrontPage Magazine, by Arnold Ahlert
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 10:03:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Huma Abedin, former Secretary of State Hillary’s Clinton’s long time aide with extensive ties to Muslim Brotherhood groups, was granted an arrangement by the State Department to do outside consulting work, even as she remained a top advisor in the Department. Abedin did not disclose either the arrangement, or how much she earned from it, on her financial report, despite a requirement that public officials must disclose significant sources of income. Clinton advisor Philippe Reines contended she was under no obligation to do so. Abedin, who has served Clinton for 15 years, became a “special government employee”
|
Judge ruled feds need not notify Fox reporter of search
|
|
Politico, by Josh Gerstin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 6:45:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A federal judge in Washington ruled in 2010 that the Justice Department was not required by law to notify Fox reporter James Rosen that prosecutors had obtained his emails in connection with an investigation into a leak about North Korean plans to test a nuclear weapon. In September 2010, Chief U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth overruled the conclusion of federal magistrate John Facciola that Rosen—whose Gmail account was searched—was entitled by law to be informed. Prosecutors contended that under the statute used to get Rosen´s emails, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, they were not
|
DOJ Reacts to Rosen Report in Statement
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:45:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Department of Justice released a statement moments ago amid reports of the department obtaining a subpoena in order to access Fox News reporter James Rosen´s personal emails. "Leaks of classified information to the press can pose a serious risk of harm to our national security and it is important that we pursue these matters using appropriate law enforcement tools. Such investigations and prosecutions, including this particular case, follow all applicable laws, regulations, and longstanding Department of Justice policies intended to safeguard the First Amendment interests of the press in reporting the news and the public in receiving it."
|
Malkin To Kelly: IRS Not Just Scandal Because Of ‘Ideology,’ But Because Of Obama’s ‘Brass- Knuckled Intimidation’
|
|
Mediaite, by Matt Wilstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:34:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Malkin joined Megyn Kelly on Fox News Monday afternoon to discuss the latest developments in the investigation into the IRS targeting conservatives for audits. Malkin insisted it was not merely her “ideology” that has led to critique the Obama administration on their handling of the IRS issue and others, but rather the evidence she’s seen of their “bully brigade tactics” to “intimidate and criminalize their political opponents.” Malkin began by going after White House Press Secretary Jay Carney for his handling of the various Obama “scandals,” saying the “clown Carney press briefings have turned in
|
Fox News Will Defend Reporter Against ´Co-Conspirator´ Charge
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:05:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Justice Department, already under fire for seizing AP phone records, also viewed e-mails of Fox News chief Washington correspondent James Rosen, calling him a criminal ´co-conspirator´ for his reporting. Fox News´ executive vice president of news, Michael Clemente, released a statement defending Rosen. The statement issued Monday afternoon is below: "We are outraged to learn today that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter," Clemente said. "In fact, it is downright chilling. We will unequivocally
|
Former Counterterrorism Head: FBI Never Called Ft. Hood ´Workplace Violence´
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Kerry Picket
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 2:49:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Michael Steinbach, former head of the FBI’s counterterrorism division and now special agent in charge of Miami, told over 30 congressional staffers in March of 2012 that, contrary to the White House´s classification, the bureau does not refer to the Fort Hood shooting as "workplace violence." As head of the FBI counterterrorism division, Steinbach oversaw the investigation into the mass murder at Texas Army base. Steinbach made this claim during an unclassified counterterrorism briefing on Capitol Hill. “Do you guys teach your agents that Fort Hood was workplace violence?” one staffer asked.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|