A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Pre-Election Jobs Report Shows
Some Gain; Rate 7.9%
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Pre-Election Jobs Report Shows
Some Gain; Rate 7.9%

CNBC, by Jeff Cox

Original Article

Posted By:jackson, 11/2/2012 8:44:36 AM

American job creation improved in October with 171,000 new jobs but the unemployment rate moved higher to 7.9 percent, setting the stage for a final push to the finish line in the heated presidential campaign.Economists had been expecting the report to show a net of 125,000 new jobs and a steadying of the unemployment rate at 7.8 percent. Nomura Securities predicted the rate would fall to 7.7 percent, but most expected no change. Most of the job creation came in the services sector, with a gain of 150,000, while government employment rolls saw a collective decrease of 13,000.

Comments:
$6 Trillion gets us to 7.9 - in only four years!! Yea!! Happy days are here again! And let the spinning begin.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: grayjay, 11/2/2012 8:49:22 AM     (No. 8981732)

The headline says the jobs report shows some gain. 171,000 jobs will never catch up with population growth.

Another interesting item in the report, which should be the headline, is:
"Unemployment for blacks showed the highest increase in the survey, surging to 14.3 percent from 13.4 percent."
And yet 85% of the blacks will vote for him.


Reply 2 - Posted by: skedaddle, 11/2/2012 8:50:12 AM     (No. 8981733)

Absolute nonsense. But even if true, it hides the real problem which is all the really good jobs lost are being replaced with minimum wage jobs. If I lose a $25 an hour job with full benefits and replace it with a $8-$10 an hour job with no benefits, I'm not back where I started at all.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Pearson365, 11/2/2012 9:05:12 AM     (No. 8981764)

As CNBC's Rick Santelli pointed out in his graphic at 8:33 am, there are 61,000 fewer people employed in the US today than in February, 2009. Rick was immediately attacked by CNBC's spinners for Obama.


Reply 4 - Posted by: oh-heck, 11/2/2012 9:12:25 AM     (No. 8981780)

FTA: But unemployment for blacks showed the highest increase in the survey, surging to 14.3 percent from 13.4 percent.

Also, the average duration of unemployment climbed to a 2012 high of 40.2 weeks.

Taken comprehensively, the report was better than expected

Would CNBC be so genteel with a Republican President?


Reply 5 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 11/2/2012 9:13:00 AM     (No. 8981786)

Hmmm, did Cali forget to send in its numbers again?


Reply 6 - Posted by: fireman28, 11/2/2012 9:13:32 AM     (No. 8981789)

An expert on FOX mentioned that if you were part-time and worked just an hour or two then you are counted "in the workforce".

So, if a company lays off 1 full time employee and hires 5 part timers (no benefits) they are really, really helping the numbers for The Won.

PS - stupid Geraldo on FOX still pedling with his Obama kneepads that the Won did everything he could for Bengazi.


Reply 7 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 11/2/2012 9:24:05 AM     (No. 8981821)

I bet most new jobs are for the Christmas shopping season. Places like Amazon and other retailers hire lots of temp inventory and shipping jobs, which are terminated shortly after Christmastime.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 11/2/2012 9:36:51 AM     (No. 8981855)

Your quote is wrong, OP. It's "Happy days are rare again!"


Reply 9 - Posted by: MattO, 11/2/2012 9:37:23 AM     (No. 8981861)

Most if not all of the increase came from campaign related jobs. Paid internet, seminar posters. (4 hrs per wk) Vote registering jobs. (minimum wage + "bonuses". Voting machine hackers(full time in swing states unless voting software from Venezuela comes "pre-hacked"), driver to drive buses full of substitutes to vote in place of "folks" who can't make it due to unforeseen circumstances (may be attending their own funeral or busy voting in the state they moved to a few years back.


Reply 10 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 11/2/2012 10:23:39 AM     (No. 8981996)

Well, I can't fault CNBC for remaining in full Obama Cheerleader mode; after all it's who they are, and it's what they do.

The fault in this lies (pun fully intended) with the BLS. Big Liars' Statistics.


Reply 11 - Posted by: erv, 11/2/2012 10:37:43 AM     (No. 8982031)

#2 is correct. The average hourly wage fell by another cent last month. While one cent is not much, the continue falling of the hourly wage each month is adding up. Throw in the inflation rate and it is easy to see why many are having problems providing the basic necisities to their families, even whey they have a job. Obama has to go!



Post Reply   Close thread 710134




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "jackson"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "jackson"



Hard of hearings
New York Times, by Gail Collins    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/18/2013 8:09:16 AM     Post Reply
Before Congress is finished with the Internal Revenue Service, there’s a serious danger some of us are going to wind up feeling sorry for the auditors.And, honestly, that is not the way we were planning on spending the spring. Especially since it appears that there are people making decisions at the I.R.S. who have the intelligence of a wet Frisbee. But, so far, the Congressional hearings of outrage have been even less sympathetic. Perhaps you didn’t have time to spend much of your Friday watching the House Ways and Means Committee grill Steven Miller

On the Plus Side ...
New York Times, by Gail Collins    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/16/2013 8:34:41 AM     Post Reply
Let’s try to come up with some positive thoughts about the recent political fortunes of the Obama White House: • Economy’s getting a little better. Deficit’s dropping. • Bill Clinton had a really terrible second term and look how well things turned out for him. • Nobody in the administration has been caught driving to Canada with Bo the dog strapped to the car roof. It’s been quite a week, what with the I.R.S. scandal, the Benghazi controversy and revelations about the Justice Department’s sweep of The Associated Press’s phone records.

The Heretic at Heritage
Human Events, by Patrick J. Buchanan    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/15/2013 7:44:42 AM     Post Reply
Jason Richwine, the young conservative scholar who co-authored the Heritage Foundation report on the long-term costs of the amnesty bill backed by the “Gang of Eight,” is gone from Heritage. He was purged after The Washington Post unearthed his doctoral dissertation at the JFK School of Government. Richwine’s thesis: IQ tests fairly measure mental ability. The average IQ of immigrants is well below that of white Americans. This difference in IQ is likely to persist through several generations. And the potential consequences of this? “A lack of socioeconomic assimilation among low IQ immigrant groups

New Orleans Mother´s Day parade
shooting suspect possibly caught
on video
USA Today, by Doug Stanglin    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/13/2013 10:51:51 AM     Post Reply
New Orleans police have released a video that shows a possible suspect in the shooting that wounded 19 people at a Mother´s Day parade. The surveillance video shows the crowd dispersing and some falling to the ground before one person in a white T-shirt and dark pants flees. The image of the man isn´t clear but police say they hope someone will recognize him. The wounded included 10 adult men and seven women as well as a boy and a girl, both 10. Remi Braden, director of public affairs for the New Orleans Police

Leave Hillary Alone! Bill Kristol Says
Republicans Should Stop Running
‘Ridiculous’ Ads On Benghazi
Mediaite, by Tommy Christopher    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/13/2013 9:49:01 AM     Post Reply
On Fox News Sunday this morning, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol defended former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from partisan political attacks over the tragedy in Benghazi, while also urging non-partisan investigations into that incident and the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups during the 2012 election. Kristol denounced American Crossroads’ anti-Hillary ads, asking “What is the point of that?” and calling them “ridiculous.” “There’s no campaign going on,”Kristol continued, adding “Let’s pull the partisanship back. It’s genuine outrage. There should be bipartisan committees investigating both from Congress. So I wish the Republicans would just be quiet,

   

 

  


 
Daniel Snyder says Redskins
will never change name
USA Today, by Erik Brady    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/10/2013 9:15:48 AM     Post Reply
Daniel Snyder is owner of the Washington pro football team he grew up adoring. Would he ever consider changing the team name that many American Indians and others believe is a racial slur? "We will never change the name of the team," Snyder told USA TODAY Sports this week. "As a lifelong Redskins fan, and I think that the Redskins fans understand the great tradition and what it´s all about and what it means, so we feel pretty fortunate to be just working on next season." What if his football team loses an ongoing federal trademark lawsuit?

The Benghazi beat
New York Post, by Editors    Original Article
Posted By: jackson- 5/9/2013 8:24:43 AM     Post Reply
In the run-up to yesterday’s House hearings on Benghazi, we were struck by a column by The New York Times’ public editor. It was written in response to readers angry that the paper was not giving the Benghazi hearings the coverage they merited. After suggesting that such criticism was politically motivated and “fomented by Fox News,” the editor offered an interesting conclusion. “The Times,” she wrote, “has had a tendency to both play down the subject, which has significant news value, and to pursue it most aggressively as a story about political divisiveness rather than one about national security



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

57 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

   

 



 
Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

   

Post Reply   Close thread 710134





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~